Categories
Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If leader ratings are indeed a good guide to electoral outcome
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If leader ratings are indeed a good guide to electoral outcomes then Clinton should do it on Tuesday
Gallup
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Oh my, Mrs May's majority is getting even smaller
https://twitter.com/BelTel/status/794562158692564993
After all, we can name a few congressmen and senators who do, and will.
If Sinn Fein swear the oath to Liz, then I reckon the Orange Order will have a parade
the OO are a very progressive organisation, they may ask Marty to join
Here's hoping you're right Mike, for my sake as much as yours!
but of course there always is, you just lack imagination and ambition
Walking away from the crap he's left all over the floor.
This is my view, for the moment.
Vive La Difference
Where SF really could make a difference is in stopping the boundary changes. If they show up for that, then I think the boundary changes are almost certainly defeated.
Clinton leading in all of WI, PA, NH, NC and NV.
Enough to push her 538 win % up by over 1%.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/updates/
Clinton 44 .. Trump 39
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/page/president_poll_daily_tracker.html#incart_std
I do wonder just what the print media will do or say if they block A50 again. Today's headlines were so over the top but judging from twitter and the broadcast media they hit a very large amount of agreement
That much said, if it comes down to a choice between the UK as either a state within a federal EU or one of its protectorates, or England (or an Anglo-Welsh Britain) outside of it, then I vote for the latter. Every time.
It's a question of priorities.
Who's in charge of staffing up the Whitehouse if Trump wins?
(((Subodh Chandra)))
44m
(((Subodh Chandra))) @SubodhChandra
BREAKING: US Judge Gwin is granting a temporary-restraining order against @realDonaldTrump campaign to forbid voter-intimidation! @OHDems
Lining up to oppose Article 50 we have the likes of Blair, Clegg, the SNP and Sinn Fein. Not a good look.
Both Labour and the LDs are chasing the same metropolitan lefty voters
Labour are ignoring their traditional WWC constituency and the LDs are making sure they remain seatless in the SW
Could be one of those times of change coming up
He was in Round Table, Rotary, Freemasons and a lay preacher as well as a Chief Superintendent of Police.
It is just awful to realise he was performing these disgusting acts while socialising with us and has upset us greatly
I await my 1-70 on Maryland and California to arrive with enough profit for about 4 pints of beer too.
And the 1-50 on DC
Having met his father, and knowing a fair bit about the family, I could believe it.
His father was a JP.
I saw some time ago that a school friend of mine had been convicted of multiple sexual assaults/rape. That was a rather odd feeling.
http://www.paddypower.com/bet/politics/other-politics/us-politics?ev_oc_grp_ids=2718290
Murray will be world number 1 if he reaches the final in Paris
He's only playing follow the leader. The Lib Dems really are morphing into the anti-Ukip, a one-trick pony protest movement dedicated to stopping Brexit (or, failing that, applying to rejoin the EU as swiftly as possible.)
If you're waiting for the revival of the yellows as a significant force in the Commons, I think you may well be waiting for a very long time.
http://order-order.com/2016/11/04/sadiqs-night-czars-foul-mouthed-tory-scum-tweets/
And Jack W....Murray looks to get a good run as Numero Uno too once he gets there. He's not protecting many points in the front half of next year.....
If I understand this summary correctly, it puts the government in a worse position than it would have been if it had put Article 50 in front of parliament in the first place. That's because it merges the end result with the initial procedural step, rather than keeping them separate as the government was hoping,. It focuses the debate on what happens afterwards. That's probably why the government is hoping for a reprieve from the Supreme Court.
My other half was utterly convinced the Gov't was going to lose (She knows her constitutional law) - I'll suggest she starts charging the Gov't for her advice.
I know someone who was in the same class at school as a certain Harold Shipman, who he described as totally unremarkable in every way.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-37872501
And as for other events this week, well, 2016 continues to be a funny old year.
https://www.headoflegal.com/2016/11/04/why-the-high-court-got-the-law-wrong-about-brexit/
Ooooh... CETA: still not a done deal?
http://www.jill2016.com/ballot_access
Not even on the ballot everywhere (And where she is write in, you can forget her getting more than about a thousand votes)
'He recognises that confronting Russian President Vladimir Putin may not be that bright and says he will talk to anyone. Indeed, he went to Mexico and met the premier there. Oh, and I nearly forgot, he actually likes the United Kingdom, not a charge that could be levelled at Obama or Clinton. '
http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/nigel-farage-donald-trump-is-not-perfect-but-he-is-the-agent-of-change-that-we-need-a3387151.html
https://lockerdome.com/6301731373984833/9232912470165780
Meet the Law. The law of unintended consequences...
http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/exaustralian-prime-minister-john-howard-on-why-we-should-make-the-most-of-brexit-a3387201.html
I would contend that militancy about the EU vote, one way or the other, is not a characteristic of the majority of the electorate - and that, insofar as it is, there are many more people who loathe the EU than love it. If Ukip bumps around the low to mid teens in the polls, then a position of 8% for the Lib Dems doesn't look so very far from what one might expect if they really are going to major as the anti-Ukip going forward.
Calm down everybody, the EU exists.
On this Phillips business, I've never heard of the man, but given there seem to be plenty of MPs and party members so at odds with their parties and their direction that it seems silly how tribally supportive they remain (even if only refusing to back anyone else even if objectively they seem to suit them more), it's almost refreshign to see someone just be clear, the label they were elected under no longer fits them.