I guess everyone has their own reasons. Here's my own personal list: Windrush scandal Go Home vans Cuts to school spending Destroying local services by cutting council funding by half The treatment of the miners The poll tax Testing the poll tax out in Scotland Section 28 Young Conservatives with hang Mandela badges Margaret Thatcher Margaret Thatcher's voice Tory attitude towards Ireland Fox hunting Welfare reforms that have led directly to deaths Food banks Cutting taxes for people like me who already have plenty of money Boris Johnson and his garden bridge Privatised trains George Osborne's face
I'm sure I've missed loads and others will have their own greatest hits to add to the list.
Half of those are positive reasons to vote Conservative.
Perhaps, but which half? Like spending money on advertising. Half is wasted, but which half?
Where are the negative reasons?
Apart from Section 28 and Mandela, to be fair!
Good you're on board with deaths caused directly by welfare reforms, that'll give Esther McVey a warm, fuzzy feeling inside.
What about the behaviour of the miners towards the electricity users of the Uk and the police ?
Who was it who went into the strike with a big union and a small house and came out of it with a small union and a big house?
I'm from a mining family in a mining village and if Scargill and Thatcher turned up Scargill would get shot first.
But Thatcher would still get shot, right?
I suspect so. But the funny thing with Thatcher is that there's a (very) secret underlying support for her, even in the valleys. My mother-in-law, who was brought up in a crumbling farmhouse without running water, will quietly whisper in your ear that 'Thatcher was the best thing to happen to her'... mainly because she enabled her to buy her council house and borrow the money to get a lorry for her and my father-in-law's nascent scaffolding business. For every embittered lefty there'll be someone who is quietly happy that they were given a route out of generations of mining.
My grandfather was a surveyor for the NCB for 45 years. He hated both Thatcher and Scargill equally. No doubt it could've been handled better... but how could anyone have handled Scargill?!?!
Quite frankly, that's not a lot, even though costs are to be added. As the defendant didn't file a defence I wander whether he's a man of straw or rich enough to be 'not bothered'.
Always best to be careful what you say online. If you're going to insult someone, make sure you don't defame their character is my golden rule.
I wonder if the bestselling author who called me a paedophile on here had that post removed in his great vanilla purge of everything gamey? Got a couple of big bills coming up.
One drawback of anonymity is that you would struggle to show that you have been libelled, unless you can show that the impact on your online pseudonym was sufficiently severe. It would be an interesting question whether semi-anonymous people like "Rachael Swindon" could be libelled.
As far as I can tell, Fiona Onasanya can still vote in the House. Her vote may indeed may prove decisive in coming weeks.
If the government decided to introduce new laws relating to solicitors’ conduct, she could vote on those, which is pretty close to remarkable. In essence she could create laws for people that her conduct means that she’s unfit to being part of.
Even by the standards of laying, fraudulent, criminal MPs, that’s pretty remarkable..
She'd have to declare an interest though, wouldn't she? And how long does it take for Solicitors Regulatory Authority to stir itself into action? The General Pharmaceutical Council, with which I'm more familiar, seems to take about 6 months from a 'compliant' being made.
Mr. P, the use of language in that cartoon is the clunkiest I've seen since The Last Jedi.
That whooshing sound is the joke going over your head. It is based on Who Wants to be a Millionaire last night when a teacher settled for £500,000 because he could not answer the million pound question, Which of these Prime Ministers never served as Foreign Secretary? Winston Churchill, Anthony Eden, Harold Macmillan or Sir Alec Douglas-Home Compare that with the question in the cartoon.
I guess everyone has their own reasons. Here's my own personal list: Windrush scandal Go Home vans Cuts to school spending Destroying local services by cutting council funding by half The treatment of the miners The poll tax Testing the poll tax out in Scotland Section 28 Young Conservatives with hang Mandela badges Margaret Thatcher Margaret Thatcher's voice Tory attitude towards Ireland Fox hunting Welfare reforms that have led directly to deaths Food banks Cutting taxes for people like me who already have plenty of money Boris Johnson and his garden bridge Privatised trains George Osborne's face
I'm sure I've missed loads and others will have their own greatest hits to add to the list.
Half of those are positive reasons to vote Conservative.
Perhaps, but which half? Like spending money on advertising. Half is wasted, but which half?
Where are the negative reasons?
Apart from Section 28 and Mandela, to be fair!
Good you're on board with deaths caused directly by welfare reforms, that'll give Esther McVey a warm, fuzzy feeling inside.
Quite frankly, that's not a lot, even though costs are to be added. As the defendant didn't file a defence I wander whether he's a man of straw or rich enough to be 'not bothered'.
Always best to be careful what you say online. If you're going to insult someone, make sure you don't defame their character is my golden rule.
I wonder if the bestselling author who called me a paedophile on here had that post removed in his great vanilla purge of everything gamey? Got a couple of big bills coming up.
One drawback of anonymity is that you would struggle to show that you have been libelled, unless you can show that the impact on your online pseudonym was sufficiently severe. It would be an interesting question whether semi-anonymous people like "Rachael Swindon" could be libelled.
Yeah, my tongue was very firmly lodged in cheek. I suspect even if my real name was my tag, it would be difficult to prove reputational damage of an obscure person by a slightly well known person on an obscure forum. If only I'd learned to dive and emigrated to Thailand..
I guess everyone has their own reasons. Here's my own personal list: Windrush scandal Go Home vans Cuts to school spending Destroying local services by cutting council funding by half The treatment of the miners The poll tax Testing the poll tax out in Scotland Section 28 Young Conservatives with hang Mandela badges Margaret Thatcher Margaret Thatcher's voice Tory attitude towards Ireland Fox hunting Welfare reforms that have led directly to deaths Food banks Cutting taxes for people like me who already have plenty of money Boris Johnson and his garden bridge Privatised trains George Osborne's face
I'm sure I've missed loads and others will have their own greatest hits to add to the list.
Half of those are positive reasons to vote Conservative.
Perhaps, but which half? Like spending money on advertising. Half is wasted, but which half?
Where are the negative reasons?
Apart from Section 28 and Mandela, to be fair!
Good you're on board with deaths caused directly by welfare reforms, that'll give Esther McVey a warm, fuzzy feeling inside.
"The unregulated nature of cryptocurrency exchanges, plus the fact that so many use them to hold their coins rather than just exchange them, invites fraud," said security expert Dr Alan Woodward from the University of Surrey"
Extraordinary to see the Prime Minister's comments about the reduction in Police numbers not being related to rising knife crime not being more widely discussed. I suspect if you asked most people how they would combat crime the answer might be more Police on the streets (and more stop and search powers arguably).
I thought Stop and Search is racist!
This is a big question interviewers should ask Labour MPs (rightly) complaining about the knife crime figures. If you want more police, how will they stop the crimes without targeted stop-and-search ?
It's fine. We're all going to be employed to pick turnips in East Anglia replacing tracksuited Latvians of haphazard dentition. Or, if Corbo sweeps to power, there will be jobs aplenty rounding up jews in his Einsatzkommandos.
Extraordinary to see the Prime Minister's comments about the reduction in Police numbers not being related to rising knife crime not being more widely discussed. I suspect if you asked most people how they would combat crime the answer might be more Police on the streets (and more stop and search powers arguably).
I thought Stop and Search is racist!
This is a big question interviewers should ask Labour MPs (rightly) complaining about the knife crime figures. If you want more police, how will they stop the crimes without targeted stop-and-search ?
I guess everyone has their own reasons. Here's my own personal list: Windrush scandal Go Home vans Cuts to school spending Destroying local services by cutting council funding by half The treatment of the miners The poll tax Testing the poll tax out in Scotland Section 28 Young Conservatives with hang Mandela badges Margaret Thatcher Margaret Thatcher's voice Tory attitude towards Ireland Fox hunting Welfare reforms that have led directly to deaths Food banks Cutting taxes for people like me who already have plenty of money Boris Johnson and his garden bridge Privatised trains George Osborne's face
I'm sure I've missed loads and others will have their own greatest hits to add to the list.
Decent list. I'd add the creepy claims to progressiveness in an effort to convince the gullible that they're not the same old Tories. Of course the last two and a half years have been a great cleansing corrective to that auld bollocks.
Possibly similar to creepy claims from Nationalists that they are inclusive, with their efforts to convince the gullible that they are not really the nasty, hate filled bigots that we all know they are!
Extraordinary to see the Prime Minister's comments about the reduction in Police numbers not being related to rising knife crime not being more widely discussed. I suspect if you asked most people how they would combat crime the answer might be more Police on the streets (and more stop and search powers arguably).
I thought Stop and Search is racist!
This is a big question interviewers should ask Labour MPs (rightly) complaining about the knife crime figures. If you want more police, how will they stop the crimes without targeted stop-and-search ?
I guess everyone has their own reasons. Here's my own personal list: Windrush scandal Go Home vans Cuts to school spending Destroying local services by cutting council funding by half The treatment of the miners The poll tax Testing the poll tax out in Scotland Section 28 Young Conservatives with hang Mandela badges Margaret Thatcher Margaret Thatcher's voice Tory attitude towards Ireland Fox hunting Welfare reforms that have led directly to deaths Food banks Cutting taxes for people like me who already have plenty of money Boris Johnson and his garden bridge Privatised trains George Osborne's face
I'm sure I've missed loads and others will have their own greatest hits to add to the list.
Decent list. I'd add the creepy claims to progressiveness in an effort to convince the gullible that they're not the same old Tories. Of course the last two and a half years have been a great cleansing corrective to that auld bollocks.
Possibly similar to creepy claims from Nationalists that they are inclusive, with their efforts to convince the gullible that they are not really the nasty, hate filled bigots that we all know they are!
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Mr. P, the use of language in that cartoon is the clunkiest I've seen since The Last Jedi.
That whooshing sound is the joke going over your head. It is based on Who Wants to be a Millionaire last night when a teacher settled for £500,000 because he could not answer the million pound question, Which of these Prime Ministers never served as Foreign Secretary? Winston Churchill, Anthony Eden, Harold Macmillan or Sir Alec Douglas-Home Compare that with the question in the cartoon.
I knew it but even with my 90% certainty I wouldn't have been willing to risk losing that amount of money. It's one of those things you have read in life and know with certainty otherwise you take the money despite having a strong inkling.
I guess everyone has their own reasons. Here's my own personal list: Windrush scandal Go Home vans Cuts to school spending Destroying local services by cutting council funding by half The treatment of the miners The poll tax Testing the poll tax out in Scotland Section 28 Young Conservatives with hang Mandela badges Margaret Thatcher Margaret Thatcher's voice Tory attitude towards Ireland Fox hunting Welfare reforms that have led directly to deaths Food banks Cutting taxes for people like me who already have plenty of money Boris Johnson and his garden bridge Privatised trains George Osborne's face
I'm sure I've missed loads and others will have their own greatest hits to add to the list.
Yep, a lot of irrational prejudice and confirmation bias.
I've found this gem in the latest accounts of Caversham Finance (Trades as Brighthouse)...
"Considering all the above, the directors believe that the continuation of the funding facility and the conclusion of the High Cost Credit review representes material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern."
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Yawn!! It is Project Realism now. The Fear piece is left to you guys; the Fear of the Foreigner, a sick exploitation which has been amply used by Farage, and continues to be used by thickos like Mark Francois. It is a very old and sinister tactic and it will do no one any good longer term, except exploitative politicians and journalists who will continue to stir up the gullible.
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Yawn!! It is Project Realism now. The Fear piece is left to you guys; the Fear of the Foreigner, a sick exploitation which has been amply used by Farage, and continues to be used by thickos like Mark Francois. It is a very old and sinister tactic and it will do no one any good longer term, except exploitative politicians and journalists who will continue to stir up the gullible.
I think a fair observer would conclude that while the Leave side promised lots of things that have not materialised, the Remain side threatened a lot of things that have not materialised.
I guess everyone has their own reasons. Here's my own personal list: Windrush scandal Go Home vans Cuts to school spending Destroying local services by cutting council funding by half The treatment of the miners The poll tax Testing the poll tax out in Scotland Section 28 Young Conservatives with hang Mandela badges Margaret Thatcher Margaret Thatcher's voice Tory attitude towards Ireland Fox hunting Welfare reforms that have led directly to deaths Food banks Cutting taxes for people like me who already have plenty of money Boris Johnson and his garden bridge Privatised trains George Osborne's face
I'm sure I've missed loads and others will have their own greatest hits to add to the list.
Decent list. I'd add the creepy claims to progressiveness in an effort to convince the gullible that they're not the same old Tories. Of course the last two and a half years have been a great cleansing corrective to that auld bollocks.
Possibly similar to creepy claims from Nationalists that they are inclusive, with their efforts to convince the gullible that they are not really the nasty, hate filled bigots that we all know they are!
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Yawn!! It is Project Realism now. The Fear piece is left to you guys; the Fear of the Foreigner, a sick exploitation which has been amply used by Farage, and continues to be used by thickos like Mark Francois. It is a very old and sinister tactic and it will do no one any good longer term, except exploitative politicians and journalists who will continue to stir up the gullible.
It's not though is it and you know it. Even when the arch Europhiles were jerking off about Nissan cutting jobs they soon had to backtrack when Nissan publicly said Brexit was not involved. Almost all Project Fear and Sky News/Guardian's scare stories revolve around 'might' or 'could' rather than being based upon actual events. It's all a bit desperate, and I say that as someone who completely understands many prominent leave supporters also have failed to deliver on their promises.
I'm sure I've missed loads and others will have their own greatest hits to add to the list.
Do you still hate the Germans for the Blitz??
I'd be careful about pursuing that course. @Paul_Bedfordshire , formerly of this parish, actively wanted to shell Dieppe
Dieppe is a bit grotty - well it was when I was there in the early 80s...!
It didn't look great when I passed through last year, though like millions of others I just drove through it off the ferry.
The areas around commercial ports and railway stations are almost always utter dives. Arriving anywhere by train means that when you actually get to the town centre, you're always surprised at how nice it is, after the miserable view afforded from the tracks.
Mr. Royale, yeah, but police numbers do comfort the public, and attacking cuts is convenient for the Opposition and police (we'd be doing so much better if only the politicians would give us more money etc).
I guess the solution is to do what the US do with funding speculative science and technology research: In their case military expenditure is politically bombproof, so they fund stuff as part of the military.
In Britain everyone wants more police, but actually stopping crime needs social workers and probation officers, so give the social workers and probation officers little helmets and make them part of the police.
Good stuff from the staggers. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/economy/2019/01/why-uk-cannot-see-brexit-utterly-utterly-stupid "what was once described as Project Fear transforms in time into “the people knew they were voting for that”. Claims there will be no short-term hit to living standards made before the referendum have now become “people knew there would be a short-term cost” ... There is only one way to make sense of the “people’s vote = undemocratic” equation, or the “will of the people”, and that is that the first referendum effectively disenfranchised Remain voters.
Oh before I forget @shadsy asked last night for betting odds from 1992. I came up with something but it was a hell of a trudge. Is there an online database or downloadable file of historical political betting odds ? I know about betdata archive but I want something that goes back to the 60s. Happy to pay money for the file.
Mr. Royale, yeah, but police numbers do comfort the public, and attacking cuts is convenient for the Opposition and police (we'd be doing so much better if only the politicians would give us more money etc).
I guess the solution is to do what the US do with funding speculative science and technology research: In their case military expenditure is politically bombproof, so they fund stuff as part of the military.
In Britain everyone wants more police, but actually stopping crime needs social workers and probation officers, so give the social workers and probation officers little helmets and make them part of the police.
And give them armoured cars ...
In Britain the voters want them "on the beat" so they're mostly going to be walking to whoever they're visiting.
Mr. Royale, yeah, but police numbers do comfort the public, and attacking cuts is convenient for the Opposition and police (we'd be doing so much better if only the politicians would give us more money etc).
I guess the solution is to do what the US do with funding speculative science and technology research: In their case military expenditure is politically bombproof, so they fund stuff as part of the military.
In Britain everyone wants more police, but actually stopping crime needs social workers and probation officers, so give the social workers and probation officers little helmets and make them part of the police.
And give them armoured cars ...
In Britain the voters want them "on the beat" so they're mostly going to be walking to whoever they're visiting.
Urban policing should be in the fashion of Dixon of Dock Green, and rural like Heartbeat.
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Yawn!! It is Project Realism now. The Fear piece is left to you guys; the Fear of the Foreigner, a sick exploitation which has been amply used by Farage, and continues to be used by thickos like Mark Francois. It is a very old and sinister tactic and it will do no one any good longer term, except exploitative politicians and journalists who will continue to stir up the gullible.
I think a fair observer would conclude that while the Leave side promised lots of things that have not materialised, the Remain side threatened a lot of things that have not materialised.
So if both sides cocked up perhaps we should have a rerun?
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Yawn!! It is Project Realism now. The Fear piece is left to you guys; the Fear of the Foreigner, a sick exploitation which has been amply used by Farage, and continues to be used by thickos like Mark Francois. It is a very old and sinister tactic and it will do no one any good longer term, except exploitative politicians and journalists who will continue to stir up the gullible.
It's not though is it and you know it. Even when the arch Europhiles were jerking off about Nissan cutting jobs they soon had to backtrack when Nissan publicly said Brexit was not involved. Almost all Project Fear and Sky News/Guardian's scare stories revolve around 'might' or 'could' rather than being based upon actual events. It's all a bit desperate, and I say that as someone who completely understands many prominent leave supporters also have failed to deliver on their promises.
WE'VE GOT HIM. CONGRATULATIONS!!!
We've found the person who takes the statement of company management over an extremely sensitive political issue in their host country...AT FACE VALUE.
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Yawn!! It is Project Realism now. The Fear piece is left to you guys; the Fear of the Foreigner, a sick exploitation which has been amply used by Farage, and continues to be used by thickos like Mark Francois. It is a very old and sinister tactic and it will do no one any good longer term, except exploitative politicians and journalists who will continue to stir up the gullible.
I think a fair observer would conclude that while the Leave side promised lots of things that have not materialised, the Remain side threatened a lot of things that have not materialised.
So if both sides cocked up perhaps we should have a rerun?
So everyone can double down on their cock-ups?
In the meantime, as we wait many more months, more jobs bleed away through "uncertainty". Great plan....
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Yawn!! It is Project Realism now. The Fear piece is left to you guys; the Fear of the Foreigner, a sick exploitation which has been amply used by Farage, and continues to be used by thickos like Mark Francois. It is a very old and sinister tactic and it will do no one any good longer term, except exploitative politicians and journalists who will continue to stir up the gullible.
It's not though is it and you know it. Even when the arch Europhiles were jerking off about Nissan cutting jobs they soon had to backtrack when Nissan publicly said Brexit was not involved. Almost all Project Fear and Sky News/Guardian's scare stories revolve around 'might' or 'could' rather than being based upon actual events. It's all a bit desperate, and I say that as someone who completely understands many prominent leave supporters also have failed to deliver on their promises.
WE'VE GOT HIM. CONGRATULATIONS!!!
We've found the person who takes the statement of company management over an extremely sensitive political issue in their host country...AT FACE VALUE.
Well, yes, but this does work both ways. Firms going bust because of bad management or other economic conditions and blaming Brexit also can't be taken at face value.
A no deal Brexit will simply mean they do it quickly. With a deal-Brexit they will have longer to achieve the transition.
Love it, Sky News and The Guardian with something MAY happen IF something unlikely happens. Project Fear doesn't even deal in facts, it just hopes for the worst.
Yawn!! It is Project Realism now. The Fear piece is left to you guys; the Fear of the Foreigner, a sick exploitation which has been amply used by Farage, and continues to be used by thickos like Mark Francois. It is a very old and sinister tactic and it will do no one any good longer term, except exploitative politicians and journalists who will continue to stir up the gullible.
It's not though is it and you know it. Even when the arch Europhiles were jerking off about Nissan cutting jobs they soon had to backtrack when Nissan publicly said Brexit was not involved. Almost all Project Fear and Sky News/Guardian's scare stories revolve around 'might' or 'could' rather than being based upon actual events. It's all a bit desperate, and I say that as someone who completely understands many prominent leave supporters also have failed to deliver on their promises.
WE'VE GOT HIM. CONGRATULATIONS!!!
We've found the person who takes the statement of company management over an extremely sensitive political issue in their host country...AT FACE VALUE.
Well, yes, but this does work both ways. Firms going bust because of bad management or other economic conditions and blaming Brexit also can't be taken at face value.
I wonder if one day we MIGHT see a Brexit Bad story where MIGHT doesn't do an almighty large amount of heavy lifting?
Honda closing? They were not going to say it is because the UK has chosen this path because they still want to sell cars in the future to UK customers.
The reason why "might" is still used is because we have not left the EU yet. Once all these jobs and industries have closed for good in a hard Brexit it will be a bit late to start thinking they were not joking.
Comments
My grandfather was a surveyor for the NCB for 45 years. He hated both Thatcher and Scargill equally. No doubt it could've been handled better... but how could anyone have handled Scargill?!?!
BOOM
Winston Churchill, Anthony Eden, Harold Macmillan or Sir Alec Douglas-Home Compare that with the question in the cartoon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFa0xE6Jll0
"Mystery as Quadriga crypto-cash goes missing"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47454528
I suspect even if my real name was my tag, it would be difficult to prove reputational damage of an obscure person by a slightly well known person on an obscure forum. If only I'd learned to dive and emigrated to Thailand..
All utterly dodgy on many levels of course...
Dr Woodward is head of No Shit Sherlock Studies.
He won't lose any more support. The hardcore who fall at his feet will love him even more for it.
Jew-hatred is much less ambiguous.
More stores for Mike Ashley in a years time ?
I've found this gem in the latest accounts of Caversham Finance (Trades as Brighthouse)...
"Considering all the above, the directors believe that the continuation of the funding facility and the conclusion of the High Cost Credit review representes material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern."
https://twitter.com/HouseofCommons/status/1102917686986711042
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-47451761
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/us/politics/hillary-clinton-not-running.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&fbclid=IwAR3yNOkbW9sk2p2KV-GmtBcqYlCVzEGuxj0N6ANSwd36Yp-F-5AYP1_Sdr4
Also not planning to stfu and retire to a shed but you can't have everything.
Also [oops Titans spolier]
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/economy/2019/01/why-uk-cannot-see-brexit-utterly-utterly-stupid
"what was once described as Project Fear transforms in time into “the people knew they were voting for that”. Claims there will be no short-term hit to living standards made before the referendum have now become “people knew there would be a short-term cost”
...
There is only one way to make sense of the “people’s vote = undemocratic” equation, or the “will of the people”, and that is that the first referendum effectively disenfranchised Remain voters.
One of my (many) guilty pleasures is Combat Dealers, I believe they're aiming to restore or reconstruct a Jagdpanther, of which I wholly approve.
https://twitter.com/PeterStefanovi2/status/1102825644323454976
We've found the person who takes the statement of company management over an extremely sensitive political issue in their host country...AT FACE VALUE.
In the meantime, as we wait many more months, more jobs bleed away through "uncertainty". Great plan....
Days,Hours, Minutes since the last Labour anti-semitism scandal.The reason why "might" is still used is because we have not left the EU yet. Once all these jobs and industries have closed for good in a hard Brexit it will be a bit late to start thinking they were not joking.
Expect his lawyers to go for an injucntion in 5, 4, 3.....