Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » New YouGov polling on party Brexit awareness highlights the ch

245

Comments

  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    ydoethur said:

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    We take Manhattan is Bailey credible as a strategy.
    Swapping Manhattan for Surinam has to be one of the greatest trades in history
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    Actually Manhattan is doable if we retake Canada and spring a surprise New England offensive. Berlin will be easy. Just like 45. Then we can think about having a proper crack at Moscow
    I prefer the Second British Empire to the first. Since the awfulness of British PMs has been so often compared to Eden recently, they may as well retake Suez as a prelude to liberating Hong Kong and bringing peace to the Indian subcontinent by uniting them under the yoke of British oppression our benevolent rule. We could take Réunion again for old times sake.
    Um, excuse me.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,082
    Charles said:

    ydoethur said:

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    We take Manhattan is Bailey credible as a strategy.
    Swapping Manhattan for Surinam has to be one of the greatest trades in history
    The Dutch still have Surinam don't they?
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,688
    I'll happily hear both of their views, There are no Titans.
  • Foxy said:

    Charles said:

    ydoethur said:

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    We take Manhattan is Bailey credible as a strategy.
    Swapping Manhattan for Surinam has to be one of the greatest trades in history
    The Dutch still have Surinam don't they?
    Independent since 1975
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,547
    justin124 said:

    A November 2019 election is trading at 5.8 on Betfair now.

    Crazy. I have topped up.
    Apols, being a non-betting type... You mean crazy long or crazy short?
    Seems crazy long to me. But what the hell do I know.
    I think it's crazy short. Assuming the election is on a Thursday the latest would be November 28th, and the latest that could be called is five weeks previously on October 24th.

    If that were to happen following a VONC, and a failure to agree on a replacement PM, then the VONC would have to be held no later than October 10th. But I see no reason why a VONC would be called before the Benn Act date of 19th October, unless the Opposition had agreed on a replacement PM.

    There isn't the time.
    No. The extension has to be secured and legislation giving effect to it has to be passed. And the election of the new speaker is set for 4th November. I think the opposition will want to wait for that. So the very earliest a motion for an election could pass is 5th November and the earliest Thursday on which an election could take place is December 12th.
    No - the election of a Speaker is irrelevant . It would not prevent a Dissolution - but be rescheduled for when Parliament reassembles.
    The election of the speaker would not prevent a dissolution but IMO the opposition parties will want to see that done before an election, just in case. It's a very important decision and they would not want to risk leaving it until after the election.
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    I hope you are selling LD seats on the spread betting markets. The current sell level is 47 seats so if you are right about 30 you'd make 17 times your stake level.
  • surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469
    SURVATION SEP 25
    Leave 45%
    Remain 51%
    Don't know 4%

    This is not the time to give up. Victory is almost there.
  • HYUFD said:
    What a complete waste of time that will be.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,778

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    I hope you are selling LD seats on the spread betting markets. The current sell level is 47 seats so if you are right about 30 you'd make 17 times your stake level.
    Just as a matter of interest, how much better than the spreads did the LDs do last time?
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,059

    Sky News
    @SkyNews
    · 21h
    .@LibDems leader @joswinson is vetoing a plan - backed by the other parties - to install @jeremycorbyn as a temporary prime minister if @borisjohnson is defeated in a vote of no confidence

    Sky News obsessed with Tory Swinson plan to allow a No Deal Brexit obsessed i tell you

    HYUFD said:

    nichomar said:

    Noo said:

    I don't think Labour's numbers are necessarily problematic. That 26% for "neither" could be a huge asset in an election campaign.
    Many of us on here are obsessed about Brexit -- I include myself in that -- but lots of folks out there aren't and have other policy concerns.

    Labour might be playing this just right even they can get the conversation onto other subjects during a campaign. Set-piece debates might help on that front, since there will be questions about various policy areas from the hosts and selected from the audience. My hunch is that the broadcasters will want to keep the debates as good-tempered as possible, meaning Brexit could be de-emphasised.

    Let's see whether there's even an election first though.

    Quite. The opposition are not going to allow an election to be called before 31 October and if Johnson has been forced to extend at that point then the Tories will not allow an election to be called in the immediate aftermath. Farage will be in full betrayal mode and the fallout of Johnson reneging on "do or die" will be all around us.
    That would be quite amusing, but it is out of their hands if VONC passed they can’t stop an election
    But a VONC can only pass with opposition support - they will not support one if they don't want an election. And only a VONC moved by the LOTO using the FTPA wording can bring down the government. The government cannot VONC itself.

    If Johnson is forced to extend, which seems very likely, it is quite possible that he will remain in office for some time afterwards. You can easily see why it would be in the interests of the opposition to leave him marooned while Farage mops up Tory voters.
    Boris will resign as PM rather than agree an extension
    Do you have that phrase as a shortcut on your phone? Next to “Diehard Remainers”?
  • surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    I hope you are selling LD seats on the spread betting markets. The current sell level is 47 seats so if you are right about 30 you'd make 17 times your stake level.
    I do hope the LDs at least score 57 seats. Then they would be back at 2010 levels. Still well short of the Great Charlie Kennedy.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,038
    Andy_JS said:

    The fact that a December 2019 election is much more popular on Betfair Exchange than a November 2019 election is completely bonkers IMO.

    https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.154849135

    Why? A November election expires unless one is called in the next three weeks.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,059
    viewcode said:

    Some of you will have noted the reports earlier today about an unspecified number of European Union capitals, including Paris and Berlin, having discussed time-limiting the backstop. This presumably caused an uptick in GBP, gaining about 0.8 of a cent and reversing the loss of the day. The Bloomberg report is here:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-01/eu-ready-to-consider-time-limit-on-irish-backstop-in-brexit-deal?srnd=premium-europe

    Today, Macron was in Strasbourg and Merkel was in Berlin.

    https://www.elysee.fr/en/diary
    https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/terminkalender


    Maybe they spoke on the phone?
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503
    Omnium said:

    I'll happily hear both of their views, There are no Titans.
    Well lets not hope we get a mix of maths and geography. Diane asking about where funding for the needed 100 million new border officers is coming from, and Dominic confirming they will be deployed to the UK/Thai border.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,778
    DougSeal said:

    viewcode said:

    Some of you will have noted the reports earlier today about an unspecified number of European Union capitals, including Paris and Berlin, having discussed time-limiting the backstop. This presumably caused an uptick in GBP, gaining about 0.8 of a cent and reversing the loss of the day. The Bloomberg report is here:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-01/eu-ready-to-consider-time-limit-on-irish-backstop-in-brexit-deal?srnd=premium-europe

    Today, Macron was in Strasbourg and Merkel was in Berlin.

    https://www.elysee.fr/en/diary
    https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/terminkalender


    Maybe they spoke on the phone?
    I believe they use Google Meet.
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,623
    edited October 2019
    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    I prefer the 1% who think the Brexit Party is neither pro-Brexit nor anti-Brexit but were sure enough to not say "don't know".

    I want to understand their thought processes. Do they think the conversation goes something like this?

    "We're the Brexit Party"
    "What's your position on Brexit?"
    "We don't have one! We're just not that bothered about Brexit!!!!"
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,082
    edited October 2019

    TGOHF2 said:

    What did parliament achieve today ?

    As you can’t be bothered to look yourself.

    1. Scrutinised the Treasury.
    2. Scrutinised the Government’s plans for the Irish border.
    3. Scrutinised the Government’s policy on the homeless.
    4. Scrutinised the Government’s policy on the war in Yemen.
    5. Scrutinised the Government’s policy on agriculture after Brexit.

    Basically doing their job.
    If you consider obfuscating the will of the people doing their job then yes, if not, its appalling.
    I will repeat if you didn’t quite manage to read it:

    1. Scrutinised the Treasury.
    2. Scrutinised the Government’s plans for the Irish border.
    3. Scrutinised the Government’s policy on the homeless.
    4. Scrutinised the Government’s policy on the war in Yemen.
    5. Scrutinised the Government’s policy on agriculture after Brexit.

    Doing their job basically.

    Pretty much anything but dealing with Brexit then...
    Well Boris hasn’t brought back his wonderful deal yet so what do you expect them to do?
    Oh I am sure they are plotting behind the scenes, HOC right now is just a front. I don't agree with Brexit, but it must happen and v soon.
    You don’t think Parliament should be doing its constitutional role of scrutinising the Government?
    They should of course but it would be far more effective if Brexit was sorted, No one gives a flying fuck at the moment if the HOC is scrutinising the Treasury..they want the feckers to sort Brexit out. Period.
    Might it help if the PM and cabinet were either in Westminster or Brussels rather than staffing money against the wall in Manchester?
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Charles said:

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    Actually Manhattan is doable if we retake Canada and spring a surprise New England offensive. Berlin will be easy. Just like 45. Then we can think about having a proper crack at Moscow
    I prefer the Second British Empire to the first. Since the awfulness of British PMs has been so often compared to Eden recently, they may as well retake Suez as a prelude to liberating Hong Kong and bringing peace to the Indian subcontinent by uniting them under the yoke of British oppression our benevolent rule. We could take Réunion again for old times sake.
    Um, excuse me.
    Everyone should be silly a little of the time.
  • HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    What election? You're stuck with Johnson as in ineffectual PM until May 2022.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,289
    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Speculation at this stage about the outcome of the next GE is utterly pointless, if seductively fascinating; so much could happen before polling day, and indeed before a GE is even called.
  • surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469

    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    What election? You're stuck with Johnson as in ineffectual PM until May 2022.
    At least until May 2020 for sure. The extension will be until December 2020.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,603
    rcs1000 said:

    DougSeal said:

    viewcode said:

    Some of you will have noted the reports earlier today about an unspecified number of European Union capitals, including Paris and Berlin, having discussed time-limiting the backstop. This presumably caused an uptick in GBP, gaining about 0.8 of a cent and reversing the loss of the day. The Bloomberg report is here:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-01/eu-ready-to-consider-time-limit-on-irish-backstop-in-brexit-deal?srnd=premium-europe

    Today, Macron was in Strasbourg and Merkel was in Berlin.

    https://www.elysee.fr/en/diary
    https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/terminkalender


    Maybe they spoke on the phone?
    I believe they use Google Meet.
    I wonder if one of them got kicked out waiting in the lobby!
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,778
    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
    Well yes, of course. But that's because the LDs had more votes to lose in seats where they had 40-50%, than where they had 10 or 12%.

    Now, it's possible that if you add 17% to the LD vote total, then it goes on equally in Sunderland South and Hampstead.

    But I don't think it's very likely, do you?
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    A November 2019 election is trading at 5.8 on Betfair now.

    Crazy. I have topped up.
    Apols, being a non-betting type... You mean crazy long or crazy short?
    Seems crazy long to me. But what the hell do I know.
    I think it's crazy short. Assuming the election is on a Thursday the latest would be November 28th, and the latest that could be called is five weeks previously on October 24th.

    If that were to happen following a VONC, and a failure to agree on a replacement PM, then the VONC would have to be held no later than October 10th. But I see no reason why a VONC would be called before the Benn Act date of 19th October, unless the Opposition had agreed on a replacement PM.

    There isn't the time.
    No. The extension has to be secured and legislation giving effect to it has to be passed. And the election of the new speaker is set for 4th November. I think the opposition will want to wait for that. So the very earliest a motion for an election could pass is 5th November and the earliest Thursday on which an election could take place is December 12th.
    No - the election of a Speaker is irrelevant . It would not prevent a Dissolution - but be rescheduled for when Parliament reassembles.
    The election of the speaker would not prevent a dissolution but IMO the opposition parties will want to see that done before an election, just in case. It's a very important decision and they would not want to risk leaving it until after the election.
    It has often happened immediately following an election. Examples are Betty Boothroyd in 1992 and Bernard Weatherill in 1983.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    I hope you are selling LD seats on the spread betting markets. The current sell level is 47 seats so if you are right about 30 you'd make 17 times your stake level.
    I never bet!
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    To be fair the DUP have always been a bit like that 😉
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,620
    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    What did parliament achieve today ?

    What did you achieve today with your avatar featuring sectarian iconography?
    Seeing as you were triggered by a British monarch I’ve changed it to a British legend.
    A painting of your favourite sectarian icon behind Roger Moore.

    Well done.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,286
    edited October 2019

    Andy_JS said:

    The fact that a December 2019 election is much more popular on Betfair Exchange than a November 2019 election is completely bonkers IMO.

    https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.154849135

    Why? A November election expires unless one is called in the next three weeks.
    Because I think politicians on all sides will still do everything they can to avoid having a general election in either December or January. If it doesn't happen in November it'll be pushed back to February at the earliest IMO.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
    Well yes, of course. But that's because the LDs had more votes to lose in seats where they had 40-50%, than where they had 10 or 12%.

    Now, it's possible that if you add 17% to the LD vote total, then it goes on equally in Sunderland South and Hampstead.

    But I don't think it's very likely, do you?
    UNS is far from perfect - but I would not expect it to be too far out. Remember that in February 1974 the Liberals polled over 19% - and ended up on 14 seats.
  • TGOHF2TGOHF2 Posts: 584

    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    What did parliament achieve today ?

    What did you achieve today with your avatar featuring sectarian iconography?
    Seeing as you were triggered by a British monarch I’ve changed it to a British legend.
    A painting of your favourite sectarian icon behind Roger Moore.

    Well done.
    Why don’t you like the Monarchy ?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,286
    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    I disagree, they should get to 30 seats easily.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
    Well yes, of course. But that's because the LDs had more votes to lose in seats where they had 40-50%, than where they had 10 or 12%.

    Now, it's possible that if you add 17% to the LD vote total, then it goes on equally in Sunderland South and Hampstead.

    But I don't think it's very likely, do you?
    More to the point, in places like Hampstead or Cambridge, the LibDems are confronted by Ultra-Remain Labour MPs.

    Like Justin, I just don't see many LibDem gains from Labour.

    They may get 15 or 20 from the Tories, possibly.
  • TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    What did parliament achieve today ?

    What did you achieve today with your avatar featuring sectarian iconography?
    Seeing as you were triggered by a British monarch I’ve changed it to a British legend.
    A painting of your favourite sectarian icon behind Roger Moore.

    Well done.
    "He's attempting re-entry!"
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 40,950
    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    With an overall majority Boris' government will deliver something you don't want.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    viewcode said:

    Some of you will have noted the reports earlier today about an unspecified number of European Union capitals, including Paris and Berlin, having discussed time-limiting the backstop. This presumably caused an uptick in GBP, gaining about 0.8 of a cent and reversing the loss of the day. The Bloomberg report is here:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-01/eu-ready-to-consider-time-limit-on-irish-backstop-in-brexit-deal?srnd=premium-europe

    Today, Macron was in Strasbourg and Merkel was in Berlin.

    https://www.elysee.fr/en/diary
    https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/terminkalender

    So both in Germany then...
  • Spurs 2 - 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Bayern Munich
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,286
    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    With an overall majority Boris' government will deliver something you don't want.
    What's that?
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503
    Charles said:

    viewcode said:

    Some of you will have noted the reports earlier today about an unspecified number of European Union capitals, including Paris and Berlin, having discussed time-limiting the backstop. This presumably caused an uptick in GBP, gaining about 0.8 of a cent and reversing the loss of the day. The Bloomberg report is here:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-01/eu-ready-to-consider-time-limit-on-irish-backstop-in-brexit-deal?srnd=premium-europe

    Today, Macron was in Strasbourg and Merkel was in Berlin.

    https://www.elysee.fr/en/diary
    https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/terminkalender

    So both in Germany then...
    Not quite
  • Sorry 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Andy_JS said:

    The fact that a December 2019 election is much more popular on Betfair Exchange than a November 2019 election is completely bonkers IMO.

    https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/politics/market/1.154849135

    A vote of no confidence needs to be called very sharpish for November to be in the frame. An agreed election on the two thirds route has more time but is much less likely.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,979

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    I hope you are selling LD seats on the spread betting markets. The current sell level is 47 seats so if you are right about 30 you'd make 17 times your stake level.
    47 is about fair value I think.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I doubt we’ll see @SouthamObserver for a little while. Someone confiscate the Leonard Cohen CDs.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 40,950
    Andy_JS said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    With an overall majority Boris' government will deliver something you don't want.
    What's that?
    Brexit.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,289

    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    What election? You're stuck with Johnson as in ineffectual PM until May 2022.
    At least until May 2020 for sure. The extension will be until December 2020.
    Very plausible imo.

    Thinking about potential GE election months we have:

    October - no longer possible at all.
    November - barely possible, would need a VoNC sharpish and no GNU.
    December - would be hated by the public due to Christmas and cold, dark days.
    January - a campaign over Christmas? I don't think so.
    February - often snowy, often cold, probably not a good choice.
    March onwards - beging to look more plausible to me.
  • timmotimmo Posts: 1,469
    She thinks she has 472 questions evidently
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,688

    Omnium said:

    I'll happily hear both of their views, There are no Titans.
    Well lets not hope we get a mix of maths and geography. Diane asking about where funding for the needed 100 million new border officers is coming from, and Dominic confirming they will be deployed to the UK/Thai border.
    I'd rather like to hear them on their better points rather than their worst.

    Few politicians know anything about maths. It's numeracy that matters.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,778
    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
    Well yes, of course. But that's because the LDs had more votes to lose in seats where they had 40-50%, than where they had 10 or 12%.

    Now, it's possible that if you add 17% to the LD vote total, then it goes on equally in Sunderland South and Hampstead.

    But I don't think it's very likely, do you?
    UNS is far from perfect - but I would not expect it to be too far out. Remember that in February 1974 the Liberals polled over 19% - and ended up on 14 seats.
    My personal guess (and this is backed up the European election results) is that the LDs are seeing a major resurgence in what we might call Remainia. That is, cities, leafy suburbs and the the market towns of South East England.

    If you look at the spread in LD votes at the Euros in 2019, and compare it to the 2009 spread, you see the LD is more concentrated, not less, with much higher highs (London and the South East), and similar lows (the Midlands, the East and Wales). There was only 7% between the best and worst regions in 2009; there was almost 14% in 2009.

    Now, you can choose to ignore this if you like, but I think the evidence that the LD vote is going to lose all its concentration is scant.
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    What election? You're stuck with Johnson as in ineffectual PM until May 2022.
    At least until May 2020 for sure. The extension will be until December 2020.
    14 months of disagreements and indecision and uncertainty.

    That will be good for us.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,237
    @MarqueeMark , I note your remark on the previous thread about apologies from those who mocked you for saying that the EU would make further concessions. I am not aware of mocking you on that specific point (as opposed to generally, or on other points), but if I did and the concession eventuates and it gets passed by all parties before Oct 31st, then let me apologise in advance.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,620
    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    What did parliament achieve today ?

    What did you achieve today with your avatar featuring sectarian iconography?
    Seeing as you were triggered by a British monarch I’ve changed it to a British legend.
    A painting of your favourite sectarian icon behind Roger Moore.

    Well done.
    Why don’t you like the Monarchy ?
    Why don’t you like catholics?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,289
    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
    Well yes, of course. But that's because the LDs had more votes to lose in seats where they had 40-50%, than where they had 10 or 12%.

    Now, it's possible that if you add 17% to the LD vote total, then it goes on equally in Sunderland South and Hampstead.

    But I don't think it's very likely, do you?
    UNS is far from perfect - but I would not expect it to be too far out. Remember that in February 1974 the Liberals polled over 19% - and ended up on 14 seats.
    My personal guess (and this is backed up the European election results) is that the LDs are seeing a major resurgence in what we might call Remainia. That is, cities, leafy suburbs and the the market towns of South East England.

    If you look at the spread in LD votes at the Euros in 2019, and compare it to the 2009 spread, you see the LD is more concentrated, not less, with much higher highs (London and the South East), and similar lows (the Midlands, the East and Wales). There was only 7% between the best and worst regions in 2009; there was almost 14% in 2009.

    Now, you can choose to ignore this if you like, but I think the evidence that the LD vote is going to lose all its concentration is scant.
    Suspect the LDs will do well in the South West too - a traditional strong area for them.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Foxy said:

    Charles said:

    ydoethur said:

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    We take Manhattan is Bailey credible as a strategy.
    Swapping Manhattan for Surinam has to be one of the greatest trades in history
    The Dutch still have Surinam don't they?
    Not since 1975

    Whereas the wider Anglo-Saxon family still controls Manhattan
  • Scott_P said:
    Sounds entirely reasonable and I don't see how anyone can disagree with this, but what if there is no way to get Stormont to decide anything?
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    SURVATION SEP 25
    Leave 45%
    Remain 51%
    Don't know 4%

    This is not the time to give up. Victory is almost there.

    Thank you for your encouragement
  • TGOHF2TGOHF2 Posts: 584

    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    What did parliament achieve today ?

    What did you achieve today with your avatar featuring sectarian iconography?
    Seeing as you were triggered by a British monarch I’ve changed it to a British legend.
    A painting of your favourite sectarian icon behind Roger Moore.

    Well done.
    Why don’t you like the Monarchy ?
    Why don’t you like catholics?
    When did you stop beating your wife ?
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    edited October 2019

    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    What election? You're stuck with Johnson as in ineffectual PM until May 2022.
    At least until May 2020 for sure. The extension will be until December 2020.
    Very plausible imo.

    Thinking about potential GE election months we have:

    October - no longer possible at all.
    November - barely possible, would need a VoNC sharpish and no GNU.
    December - would be hated by the public due to Christmas and cold, dark days.
    January - a campaign over Christmas? I don't think so.
    February - often snowy, often cold, probably not a good choice.
    March onwards - beging to look more plausible to me.
    In the 20th century we had December elections in 1910, 1918 & 1923. There were also January elections in 1906 and 1910 , with February elections in 1950 and 1974.
  • Charles said:

    Foxy said:

    Charles said:

    ydoethur said:

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    We take Manhattan is Bailey credible as a strategy.
    Swapping Manhattan for Surinam has to be one of the greatest trades in history
    The Dutch still have Surinam don't they?
    Not since 1975

    Whereas the wider Anglo-Saxon family still controls Manhattan
    Dutch is still official in Surinam
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    Actually Manhattan is doable if we retake Canada and spring a surprise New England offensive. Berlin will be easy. Just like 45. Then we can think about having a proper crack at Moscow
    I prefer the Second British Empire to the first. Since the awfulness of British PMs has been so often compared to Eden recently, they may as well retake Suez as a prelude to liberating Hong Kong and bringing peace to the Indian subcontinent by uniting them under the yoke of British oppression our benevolent rule. We could take Réunion again for old times sake.
    Um, excuse me.
    Everyone should be silly a little of the time.
    It was my great-great-great-grandfather who was Chairman of the East India Company...
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,620
    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    TGOHF2 said:

    What did parliament achieve today ?

    What did you achieve today with your avatar featuring sectarian iconography?
    Seeing as you were triggered by a British monarch I’ve changed it to a British legend.
    A painting of your favourite sectarian icon behind Roger Moore.

    Well done.
    Why don’t you like the Monarchy ?
    Why don’t you like catholics?
    When did you stop beating your wife ?
    I asked why you thought it was a good idea to use sectarian iconography on your avatar. You know full well it’s a deeply unpleasant, bigoted, sectarian symbol, and you still haven’t answered my question.
  • Surely the LibDem position is straight forward:
    1. Hauling in voters and members from both Tory and Labour Parties sick of extremism.
    2. A further stack of Labour and Tory MPs turnable as time goes on
    3. Whatever Swinson chooses to do, a confidence vote in a Corbyn minority fails because adding
    4. So why risk breaking your supoorter base to vote for something that will fail anyway?
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,688

    I doubt we’ll see @SouthamObserver for a little while. Someone confiscate the Leonard Cohen CDs.

    I have you down as a Tom Lehrer fan Mr Meeks. God, if only I wasn't!


  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,289
    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    What election? You're stuck with Johnson as in ineffectual PM until May 2022.
    At least until May 2020 for sure. The extension will be until December 2020.
    Very plausible imo.

    Thinking about potential GE election months we have:

    October - no longer possible at all.
    November - barely possible, would need a VoNC sharpish and no GNU.
    December - would be hated by the public due to Christmas and cold, dark days.
    January - a campaign over Christmas? I don't think so.
    February - often snowy, often cold, probably not a good choice.
    March onwards - beging to look more plausible to me.
    In the 20th century we had December elections in 1910, 1918 & 1923. There were also January elections in 1906 and 1910 , with February elections in 1950 and 1974.
    Yes I know all that but I'd humbly suggest the Christmas season is a bit more of a 'thing' now than it was 100 years ago.

    Of course anything is possible but whoever gets to set the election date will not want to piss off large sections of the population.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    viewcode said:

    Some of you will have noted the reports earlier today about an unspecified number of European Union capitals, including Paris and Berlin, having discussed time-limiting the backstop. This presumably caused an uptick in GBP, gaining about 0.8 of a cent and reversing the loss of the day. The Bloomberg report is here:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-01/eu-ready-to-consider-time-limit-on-irish-backstop-in-brexit-deal?srnd=premium-europe

    Today, Macron was in Strasbourg and Merkel was in Berlin.

    https://www.elysee.fr/en/diary
    https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/terminkalender

    So both in Germany then...
    Not quite
    Hence the “...”

    (I was in Germany last week and someone described Strasbourg as “really part of Germany” 😆)
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Why wouldn’t he? It’s diplomacy 101
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503
    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    viewcode said:

    Some of you will have noted the reports earlier today about an unspecified number of European Union capitals, including Paris and Berlin, having discussed time-limiting the backstop. This presumably caused an uptick in GBP, gaining about 0.8 of a cent and reversing the loss of the day. The Bloomberg report is here:

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-01/eu-ready-to-consider-time-limit-on-irish-backstop-in-brexit-deal?srnd=premium-europe

    Today, Macron was in Strasbourg and Merkel was in Berlin.

    https://www.elysee.fr/en/diary
    https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/angela-merkel/terminkalender

    So both in Germany then...
    Not quite
    Hence the “...”

    (I was in Germany last week and someone described Strasbourg as “really part of Germany” 😆)
    Germans do have a historical habit of being territorial about such things 😉
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    Foxy said:

    Charles said:

    ydoethur said:

    nichomar said:

    DougSeal said:

    Who the hell are the 3% who think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit?

    The retake Calais, war boosters
    No we first take Manhattan and then Berlin
    We take Manhattan is Bailey credible as a strategy.
    Swapping Manhattan for Surinam has to be one of the greatest trades in history
    The Dutch still have Surinam don't they?
    Not since 1975

    Whereas the wider Anglo-Saxon family still controls Manhattan
    Dutch is still official in Surinam
    And English is mangled in the States
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,979

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
    Well yes, of course. But that's because the LDs had more votes to lose in seats where they had 40-50%, than where they had 10 or 12%.

    Now, it's possible that if you add 17% to the LD vote total, then it goes on equally in Sunderland South and Hampstead.

    But I don't think it's very likely, do you?
    More to the point, in places like Hampstead or Cambridge, the LibDems are confronted by Ultra-Remain Labour MPs.

    Like Justin, I just don't see many LibDem gains from Labour.

    They may get 15 or 20 from the Tories, possibly.
    I think LibDems will get six at the most off Labour.
    Bermondsey, Cambridge, Leeds NW, Portsmouth S, Sheffield Hallam, Vauxhall.
    Perhaps three of them. But dozens off the Tories - and that's what matters.
  • Charles said:
    Like Dev sending condolences on Hitler's suicide?
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    .
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
    Well yes, of course. But that's because the LDs had more votes to lose in seats where they had 40-50%, than where they had 10 or 12%.

    Now, it's possible that if you add 17% to the LD vote total, then it goes on equally in Sunderland South and Hampstead.

    But I don't think it's very likely, do you?
    UNS is far from perfect - but I would not expect it to be too far out. Remember that in February 1974 the Liberals polled over 19% - and ended up on 14 seats.
    My personal guess (and this is backed up the European election results) is that the LDs are seeing a major resurgence in what we might call Remainia. That is, cities, leafy suburbs and the the market towns of South East England.

    If you look at the spread in LD votes at the Euros in 2019, and compare it to the 2009 spread, you see the LD is more concentrated, not less, with much higher highs (London and the South East), and similar lows (the Midlands, the East and Wales). There was only 7% between the best and worst regions in 2009; there was almost 14% in 2009.

    Now, you can choose to ignore this if you like, but I think the evidence that the LD vote is going to lose all its concentration is scant.
    I have never attached much weight to EU elections - and this year both major parties largely abstained from them.Nor do I share the widespread assumption that the the next election will be dominated by Brexit. Many expected that in 2017 and were proved wrong. I also recall that at that election we held different views as to the likely outcome in Remain strongholds such as Cambridge.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Omnium said:

    I doubt we’ll see @SouthamObserver for a little while. Someone confiscate the Leonard Cohen CDs.

    I have you down as a Tom Lehrer fan Mr Meeks. God, if only I wasn't!


    I like both!

    Tom Lehrer is in that select category, alongside Clarissa Eden and Olivia de Havilland, of people still alive that you don’t expect to be (but are pleased that they are).
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,547

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    And I will raise a glass of champagne to them on election night when Boris crosses the threshold for a Tory majority
    What election? You're stuck with Johnson as in ineffectual PM until May 2022.
    At least until May 2020 for sure. The extension will be until December 2020.
    Very plausible imo.

    Thinking about potential GE election months we have:

    October - no longer possible at all.
    November - barely possible, would need a VoNC sharpish and no GNU.
    December - would be hated by the public due to Christmas and cold, dark days.
    January - a campaign over Christmas? I don't think so.
    February - often snowy, often cold, probably not a good choice.
    March onwards - beging to look more plausible to me.
    In the 20th century we had December elections in 1910, 1918 & 1923. There were also January elections in 1906 and 1910 , with February elections in 1950 and 1974.
    Yes I know all that but I'd humbly suggest the Christmas season is a bit more of a 'thing' now than it was 100 years ago.

    Of course anything is possible but whoever gets to set the election date will not want to piss off large sections of the population.
    The opposition does not want an election before Johnson has agreed an extension. And the government will not want an election afterwards.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,082

    Omnium said:

    I doubt we’ll see @SouthamObserver for a little while. Someone confiscate the Leonard Cohen CDs.

    I have you down as a Tom Lehrer fan Mr Meeks. God, if only I wasn't!


    I like both!

    Tom Lehrer is in that select category, alongside Clarissa Eden and Olivia de Havilland, of people still alive that you don’t expect to be (but are pleased that they are).
    Satire died when they gave Henry Kissinger the Peace prize.

    Even Brexit struggles to match that.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    Scott_P said:
    Not his best, and in danger of creating a meme even more mind blowing boring than bloody Schrodinger's sodding fucking cat.

    And it has just occurred to me that that is French for "this is not a blowjob". Do we think naughty old Magritte intended that?
  • ozymandiasozymandias Posts: 1,503

    Omnium said:

    I doubt we’ll see @SouthamObserver for a little while. Someone confiscate the Leonard Cohen CDs.

    I have you down as a Tom Lehrer fan Mr Meeks. God, if only I wasn't!


    I like both!

    Tom Lehrer is in that select category, alongside Clarissa Eden and Olivia de Havilland, of people still alive that you don’t expect to be (but are pleased that they are).
    Bernard Cribbins always in this grouping.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    Barnesian said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    justin124 said:

    For those liberal minded Remainers celebrating more people recognize LDs as more pro-Remain may get what they do not wish for: the Remain vote totally split. All you will be doing is hand victory to HYUFD and his party.
    I am not sure the LDs can even get back to 2010 strength let alone Charlie Kennedy's heyday.

    I agree - they will do well to reach 30 seats.
    The LibDem seat number correlates pretty well in the post 1992 world with the Con-LD spread. If the number is 13-14 percentage points, as now, then that suggests they will end up with around 40-42 seats.

    Now, it may be that that spread blows out to 18-20 points, but you are taking a lot for granted in assuming it.
    Not entirely so. On the basis of UNS, even current polls would only produce fewer than 15 gains from the Tories and a mere handful from Labour - indeed only Sheffield Hallam looks a likely gain at Labour expense. Add a single gain from SNP - Fife NE - and that would take them to circa 30 seats. Personally, I expect them to fall back from current poll levels.
    Well yes, of course. But that's because the LDs had more votes to lose in seats where they had 40-50%, than where they had 10 or 12%.

    Now, it's possible that if you add 17% to the LD vote total, then it goes on equally in Sunderland South and Hampstead.

    But I don't think it's very likely, do you?
    More to the point, in places like Hampstead or Cambridge, the LibDems are confronted by Ultra-Remain Labour MPs.

    Like Justin, I just don't see many LibDem gains from Labour.

    They may get 15 or 20 from the Tories, possibly.
    I think LibDems will get six at the most off Labour.
    Bermondsey, Cambridge, Leeds NW, Portsmouth S, Sheffield Hallam, Vauxhall.
    Perhaps three of them. But dozens off the Tories - and that's what matters.
    Bermondsey and Leeds NW are now much less likely due to former LD MPs not standing. In Portsmouth South the electoral dynamics have changed following Labour's surprise win in 2017 from third place. The new Labour MP will have first term incumbency - and likely to be seen as the strongest anti-Tory option.
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    TGOHF2 said:
    And when Parliament/the courts say no to both options....?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,044
    Scott_P said:
    So, looks like we are not leaving. Plus ca change.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 49,963
    viewcode said:

    @MarqueeMark , I note your remark on the previous thread about apologies from those who mocked you for saying that the EU would make further concessions. I am not aware of mocking you on that specific point (as opposed to generally, or on other points), but if I did and the concession eventuates and it gets passed by all parties before Oct 31st, then let me apologise in advance.

    That is very genereous, considering I was indulging in some mild trolling!
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 61,590
    Not really - he’s just a fan of dictatorship.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,274
    edited October 2019
    TGOHF2 said:

    twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1179140682231025664?s=21

    Has Boris booked the removal van yet? It doesn't matter what the new deal is, the EU will say no and even if they don't, of course parliament will.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Given that this "new deal" seems designed to be shot down, by everybody, are we win the last week of BoZo's premiership?
This discussion has been closed.