Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » We haven’t seen any post-Obama but punters are moving to IN

SystemSystem Posts: 11,017
edited April 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » We haven’t seen any post-Obama but punters are moving to IN

IN now a 71% chance on Betfair pic.twitter.com/yra2X48d9U

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • Options
    1st like Leave
  • Options
    dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,287
    2nd like Everton.
  • Options
    Hertsmere_PubgoerHertsmere_Pubgoer Posts: 3,476
    edited April 2016
    3rd
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    4th!
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,413
    What, no secretive millionaire supporting the Remain price in the wake of Obama's intervention? Surely some mistake?
  • Options
    dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,287
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    1st like Leave

    I don't think voters like being told what to do by foreign leaders.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962

    What, no secretive millionaire supporting the Remain price in the wake of Obama's intervention? Surely some mistake?

    The spike on the 21st is quite large relative to the volume on other days, but the timescale is short so perhaps such spikes are more common?
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    edited April 2016
    FPT

    AndyJS said:

    Was lucky enough to see Prince Charles, Judi Dench, David Mellor and George Alagiah outside the RSC theatre in Stratford today.

    I'm sorry that has to be the silliest post in the history of PB.

    No one who sees/meets David Mellor can be considered lucky.
    Dear gods please no one take this as an invitation to top the silliest post in the history of PB.

    Besides, the best ones are unintentional.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    Obama looks worried in that Observer picture, what has him so concerned?
  • Options
    MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    Can someone remind what the punters thought of the likelihood of a Conservative Majority, prior to the results of the GE last year?

  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962

    Hillary wot did it

    twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/723966827085336576

    Wait, isn't Trump supposed to be the next POTUS?.... ;)
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,881
    FPT, but more relevant to this one:
    Sandpit said:

    That's a big move towards Remain from the money in the last 48 hours.

    Some value in the 12/5 (3.4) now available for Leave, on the basis that it should get tighter at some point in the next two months?

    For anyone who wants better returns than a savings account, there's £2800 available with Betfair at 1.01 on there being a referendum during this Parliament!

    <55% turnout at 7.2 also some value? Does anyone so far think Labour are close to getting their vote out for Remain?</p>

  • Options
    kle4 said:

    FPT

    AndyJS said:

    Was lucky enough to see Prince Charles, Judi Dench, David Mellor and George Alagiah outside the RSC theatre in Stratford today.

    I'm sorry that has to be the silliest post in the history of PB.

    No one who sees/meets David Mellor can be considered lucky.
    Dear gods please no one take this as an invitation to top the silliest post in the history of PB.

    Besides, the best ones are unintentional.
    Yup. Like the ones where people say FPTP is better than AV
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 30,937
    RobD said:

    Hillary wot did it

    twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/723966827085336576

    Wait, isn't Trump supposed to be the next POTUS?.... ;)
    I hope not.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,413
    FPT
    viewcode said:

    Less camembert and wine before bedtime for you methinks.

    Stilton and claret, puh-leeze... :) As for bedtime, I have an paper to review and will not be in bed until 3.

    You're coming over as unhinged.

    It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)

    The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.

    True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
    But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,881
    edited April 2016


    Can someone remind what the punters thought of the likelihood of a Conservative Majority, prior to the results of the GE last year?

    Most of us, self included, were commenting on the value in the 1/8 available on NOM, during Election Day. It was around the Nuneaton declaration at 12:30am that it was realised that the majority might actually be on.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,269
    Yet another REMAIN propaganda thread :)
  • Options
    Interesting comments on the Guardian about Obama's c"back of the queue" words - most comments were pretty vehemently against him and a good chunk of those mentioned that it would of course be in the US's interests because of TTIP etc. Another good chunk said they hoped we would be in the back of the queue for any future US-led military actions.

    I do wonder if Cameron has made a major blunder here in getting Obama to speak out so bluntly - I think he views the left and centre-left as all sewn up for Remain and all that is needed is to persuade Tory voters to swing to Remain. But, as we are all know, there is a good chunk of the left that views anything backed by the US with suspicion. Add into that mix the view that TTIP is a plot to allow US private providers to take over the NHS and the left-wing vote for Remain may not look so certain.
  • Options
    Sorry, I meant on the readers comments, not those of the Guardian columnists!!
  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,775
    Obama and Clinton really shouldn't be commenting.

    No British politician advocates the way Americans should vote after all.

    Assuming other US political candidates stay clear then good for them, and bad for those that seem unable to do so.

  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    Interesting comments on the Guardian about Obama's c"back of the queue" words - most comments were pretty vehemently against him

    Well that's it. If Ciffers don't like it, the game is over.

    Or not
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,734

    FPT

    viewcode said:

    Less camembert and wine before bedtime for you methinks.

    Stilton and claret, puh-leeze... :) As for bedtime, I have an paper to review and will not be in bed until 3.

    You're coming over as unhinged.

    It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)

    The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.

    True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
    But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
    I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    viewcode said:

    I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO

    I am deeply insulted that your post appears before mine
  • Options
    MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642
    Ted Cruz's statement on Brexit:

    “Rather than scolding our closest allies for even considering exercising their rights as a sovereign nation, the President of the United States should look for ways to make Brexit, if it happens, an opportunity to enhance and strengthen the special relationship between our two countries.”
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/22/exclusive-sen-cruz-obama-brexit-comments-prez-make-opportunity-strengthen-special-relationship/
  • Options
    alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    edited April 2016
    Leave a rather begiinning to specialise in playing without a goalkeeper. First they say that we'll have no problem cutting shiny new trade deals outside of the EU only to be contradicted by Obama. Then they decide to combat that with their 'lame duck' President line leaving a gaping hole for Clinton to charge through. So they basically seem to be stuck with 'vote leave if you both want Trump to win and think he will win'!

    And that's without actually knowing what stance Trump is going to take now he's looking to switch to act "Presidential"
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @MSmithsonPB: After Obama’s referendum comments the woman who hopes to replace him says the same thing https://t.co/xSA0gqZSnT

    Wow, it's almost like they are both quoting the same US policy.

    But that can't be, Dominic Raab assured us he knows better...
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    MP_SE said:

    Ted Cruz's statement on Brexit:

    “Rather than scolding our closest allies for even considering exercising their rights as a sovereign nation, the President of the United States should look for ways to make Brexit, if it happens, an opportunity to enhance and strengthen the special relationship between our two countries.”
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/22/exclusive-sen-cruz-obama-brexit-comments-prez-make-opportunity-strengthen-special-relationship/

    Oh gods, I'm not sure I like, well, liking a Ted Cruz comment (though personally I'm not incandescent with rage about Obama and Hillary saying what they did, more disappointed how much Leavers have reacted to it)
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,881
    viewcode said:

    FPT

    viewcode said:

    Less camembert and wine before bedtime for you methinks.

    Stilton and claret, puh-leeze... :) As for bedtime, I have an paper to review and will not be in bed until 3.

    You're coming over as unhinged.

    It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)

    The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.

    True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
    But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
    I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO
    There are merits to LIFO?
  • Options
    MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    alex. said:

    Leave a rather begiinning to specialise in playing without a goalkeeper. First they say that we'll have no problem cutting shiny new trade deals outside of the EU only to be contradicted by Obama. Then they decide to combat that with their 'lame duck' President line leaving a gaping hole for Clinton to charge through. So they basically seem to be stuck with 'vote leave if you both want Trump to win and think he will win'!


    Obama said what his host (Cameron) asked him to say.

    It doesn't add much to the arguments.

    The US will do a deal if it's in their interests to do so. Which it will be. Speeches today notwithstanding.

  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Omnium said:

    Obama and Clinton really shouldn't be commenting.

    No British politician advocates the way Americans should vote after all.

    Assuming other US political candidates stay clear then good for them, and bad for those that seem unable to do so.

    Are we betting without Donald Trump? "'Divisive, stupid and wrong" -- D Cameron.
  • Options
    Scott_P said:

    Interesting comments on the Guardian about Obama's c"back of the queue" words - most comments were pretty vehemently against him

    Well that's it. If Ciffers don't like it, the game is over.

    Or not
    Not saying that - just saying his comments seems to have stirred up something of a hornet's nest and that many are attacking Obama's comments from a left-wing standpoint. Hillary's intervention will not help on that score either, as she is also viewed with suspicion.

    As I said, the general consensus has been that the left-wing vote is in the bag for Remain - Obama may have upset that equation with what he said.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,189
    edited April 2016
    MP_SE said:

    Ted Cruz's statement on Brexit:

    “Rather than scolding our closest allies for even considering exercising their rights as a sovereign nation, the President of the United States should look for ways to make Brexit, if it happens, an opportunity to enhance and strengthen the special relationship between our two countries.”
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/22/exclusive-sen-cruz-obama-brexit-comments-prez-make-opportunity-strengthen-special-relationship/

    Notice how Cruz doesn't say what Britain should or shouldn't do. Just as it should be.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,881
    edited April 2016
    MP_SE said:

    Ted Cruz's statement on Brexit:

    “Rather than scolding our closest allies for even considering exercising their rights as a sovereign nation, the President of the United States should look for ways to make Brexit, if it happens, an opportunity to enhance and strengthen the special relationship between our two countries.”
    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/04/22/exclusive-sen-cruz-obama-brexit-comments-prez-make-opportunity-strengthen-special-relationship/

    That's a model answer on how to respond to questions of another country's politics. Well done Ted Cruz, which is not something I think I've ever said before!!
  • Options
    DixieDixie Posts: 1,221
    Sorry to bang on about the London elections, but I was very grateful to Nick Palmer for giving his view on what is happening in the Labour party, stating that there is lots going on.

    According to me red sources, apparently, Labour do have as many events as any London campaign but less activists are turning out. Also, they claim their vote is down, but I can't work out if that is versus the last Mayoral, 4 years ago or at the GE in 2015.

    Clearly, if the latter, turnout will be about half, so of course their vote is down. If it is down versus 2012, then we Tories will be happy.

    Re; Mayoralty, Labour have gone from quiet confidence to arrogance, Sadiq has won, absolute 100% certainty they say. So, they may be a smidgeon of value on the day if Zac drifts to a silly figure like 10 to 1. Zac still has a chance if Tories turn out and the quiet voters turn out too. Remember the GE. There's a chance.

    For Assembly Member elections, we are in the dark. One senior Labour man told me that they might lose Brent & Harrow. F*ck me, if true, that is amazing. Therefore there might be a bet there, a fiver or so. Labour also claim they are struggling in Barnet & Camden and Ealing & Hillingdon. But they feel strong in North-east. The trouble with all this chat, is that the data is small in figures and lots of hearsay. On the other hand, the polls were great for Labour, but they didn't change their confidence/arrogance monitor. They (& Tories) are only reading their own data, the polls are too volatile.
  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,775
    According to BF GO is less likely to be next PM than Corbyn.

    Interesting...

    I'm positioned against that nonsense anyway, but as I don't really believe GO will be next PM, and that I've no great wish to tie up funds waiting on Corbyn to self-identify with the tit-he-is I'm not piling in.

    My money, as I think I've said before, is on Rees-Mogg! (Fun market in the odd fiver)
  • Options
    The front page of the Mail on Sunday has leavers privately admitting they are headed for defeat
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,734
    Scott_P said:

    viewcode said:

    I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO

    I am deeply insulted that your post appears before mine
    Don't worry. It'll be read after yours... :)
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    The front page of the Mail on Sunday has leavers privately admitting they are headed for defeat

    How long ago it seems now that the Brexiteers were cheering Boris joining the team...
  • Options
    William_HWilliam_H Posts: 346
    Omnium said:

    Obama and Clinton really shouldn't be commenting.

    No British politician advocates the way Americans should vote after all.

    Assuming other US political candidates stay clear then good for them, and bad for those that seem unable to do so.

    Well, UK politicians have called Donald Trump a buffoon, a demagogue and a wazzock quite recently.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    I think it'll be hilarious if Gove or IDS and the other Tory Leavers come out again and say they still think Cameron is the bestest guy evar and should lead the negotiations for Leave.
  • Options
    TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    Scott_P said:

    The front page of the Mail on Sunday has leavers privately admitting they are headed for defeat

    How long ago it seems now that the Brexiteers were cheering Boris joining the team...
    You mean this -

    https://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/723973515251212288
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    Don't worry, Cameron will probably be gone within a few weeks whatever the result of the EU vote.
  • Options
    viewcodeviewcode Posts: 18,734
    Sandpit said:

    viewcode said:

    FPT

    viewcode said:

    Less camembert and wine before bedtime for you methinks.

    Stilton and claret, puh-leeze... :) As for bedtime, I have an paper to review and will not be in bed until 3.

    You're coming over as unhinged.

    It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)

    The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.

    True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
    But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
    I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO
    There are merits to LIFO?
    Weirdly i just answered a query posted later than yours.

    Which makes this response a) an answer to your query, b) an example of the phenomenon, and c) recursive to boot.

    And now if you'll forgive me, I have to go do some work
  • Options
    PeterCPeterC Posts: 1,274
    edited April 2016
    Am I imagining it or has Cameron been resorting to comfort eating to assuage the stress of the referendum? He seems decidedly podgy in recent photos.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    Dixie said:

    Sorry to bang on about the London elections

    Better than on the EU.

    I'm struggling to see the Tories still being in with a chance though. Ed M clearly didn't inspire people to vote for him in droves nationally, but Khan seems to have the Corbynite crowd on site, without any first preference being syphoned off by Galloway, without putting off the rest of Labour voters who might otherwise stay at home as well, so will presumably maximise the Labour support, particularly since the Tories are internally divided at the moment, the LDs nowhere, and Zac being no Boris.

    I'll happily admit I know little of London, but from the outside it's looking like Labour arrogance is well founded on this one.
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    Scott_P said:

    The front page of the Mail on Sunday has leavers privately admitting they are headed for defeat

    How long ago it seems now that the Brexiteers were cheering Boris joining the team...
    You mean this -

    https://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/723973515251212288
    How lucky for Cameron that the main OUT figurehead is Boris who has clearly lost it.

  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,775

    Omnium said:

    Obama and Clinton really shouldn't be commenting.

    No British politician advocates the way Americans should vote after all.

    Assuming other US political candidates stay clear then good for them, and bad for those that seem unable to do so.

    Are we betting without Donald Trump? "'Divisive, stupid and wrong" -- D Cameron.
    Well.. a good point (I don't know the context of that quote. When was it?). Cameron shouldn't have commented if Trump was in any way at the time running for office.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,881

    The front page of the Mail on Sunday has leavers privately admitting they are headed for defeat

    Oh dear.

    Someone needs to give the Leave campaign a massive kick in the arse. They need to stick to the Goves, Hannans, Hoeys and a couple of kippers, letting the Boris's and Nigels loose to shout their mouths off on the front pages really aren't helping the cause one little bit.
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    I am not that surprised. Cameron always remind me of this:

    http://viz.co.uk/raffles-the-gentleman-thug/
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,881
    viewcode said:

    Sandpit said:

    viewcode said:

    FPT

    viewcode said:

    Less camembert and wine before bedtime for you methinks.

    Stilton and claret, puh-leeze... :) As for bedtime, I have an paper to review and will not be in bed until 3.

    You're coming over as unhinged.

    It isn't me who's screaming at the President of the United States or calling the PM a traitor (OK, it isn't you, either. But a lot of Brexiters are doing exactly that.)

    The US will prioritise a trade deal with us if they think there's money in it for them. They'd prioritise a trade deal with Orpington if they thought there was money in it for them.

    True...but that's just rephrasing what I said. ("Respect and attention come with power...what can you do to me and what can you do for me?") You can get whatever deal you like...provided you pay for it. And the shape of that deal will be shaped (ouch!) by the power and wealth of both parties.
    But you're not getting the basic point. If there's money in it for them, there's minus money in it for us. That's basic arithmetic. The more keen they are to do it, the less keen we should be. I'd love to be at the back of the queue. Not in the queue at all would suit me.
    I never anticipated that a PB tread would mutate into the merits of FIFO versus LIFO
    There are merits to LIFO?
    Weirdly i just answered a query posted later than yours.

    Which makes this response a) an answer to your query, b) an example of the phenomenon, and c) recursive to boot.

    And now if you'll forgive me, I have to go do some work
    LOL, very good Mr @viewcode :)
  • Options
    Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention
  • Options
    TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.

    My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
  • Options
    TomsToms Posts: 2,478

    Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention

    Maybe we ought to be grateful that they care.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725
    edited April 2016
    PeterC said:

    Am I imagining it or has Cameron been resorting to comfort eating to assuage the stress of the referendum? He seems decidedly podgy in recent photos.

    Maybe a little, but I don't think it's very noticeable - I think he tends to fluctuate quite a bit on the weight side in any case, so might just be at the plump end of his personal spectrum right now.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,725

    Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention

    Plenty of time left for the narrative to change. The big cards have surely been played, and now it's for the long long grind to the end for Leave to chip away at.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,814
    edited April 2016
    SeanT said:



    I can only conclude that he is passionately europhile, on a scale that makes Ken Clarke look like Nige Farage. Which also means he is a fraud and a liar.

    That penny dropped for me with the non-negotiation, negotiation fiasco.

    He's a fake, a liar, a fraud. a bully and a complete and utter waste of space!
  • Options
    Toms said:

    Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention

    Maybe we ought to be grateful that they care.
    It really has been a 'nuclear' option by the US so you have to assume they really believe in the UK in the EU. Wonder how leave will accuse Cameron of writing Clinton's speech
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,287
    edited April 2016
    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.
  • Options
    Hillary Clinton urges Britain to remain in the European Union

    US presidential hopeful weighs in on forthcoming vote as No 10 welcomes latest backing ahead of 23 June referendum

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/23/hillary-clinton-britain-should-stay-in-eu?CMP=twt_a-politics_b-gdnukpolitics
  • Options
    Looks like Hillary's comments not going down too well amongst the CiFers:

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/23/hillary-clinton-britain-should-stay-in-eu#comments
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    Wonder how leave will accuse Cameron of writing Clinton's speech

    I had no idea he was so powerful.

    I thought Leave were claiming he had no influence whatsoever...
  • Options
    Tim Montgomerie ‎@MontieUSA

    Exclusive @YouGov poll for @CapX: 59% of Americans say UK should "never" be at back of queue http://capx.co/59-of-americans-say-no-obama-britain-should-never-be-at-back-of-line/
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention

    Plenty of time left for the narrative to change. The big cards have surely been played, and now it's for the long long grind to the end for Leave to chip away at.
    The narrative has been set by remain very early in the campaign and I believe it has taken leave completely by surprise
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,056
    SeanT said:

    I can only conclude that he is passionately europhile, on a scale that makes Ken Clarke look like Nige Farage.

    He just passionately detests the Eurosceptic wing of his own party and sees this as a one-off opportunity to bury them. Unfortunately he's only feeding the resentment.

    I only hope the referendum result is so decisive that the losing side has to accept the result with good grace, whatever opinion they have of the way the campaign was fought.
  • Options
    MikeL said:

    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.

    I reckon Boris thought if Leave lost, it would be close, but if it is crushing victory for Remain, then he loses his lustre as a 'winner'
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,814
    edited April 2016
    MikeL said:

    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.

    Perhaps Boris is playing the "long game"?

    Let Osborne become leader. Osborne proves to be even more toxic and useless than El Gord. Tories defeated heavily in 2020 with Osborne humiliated (hey a guy can dream) Boris comes in and saves the day.
  • Options

    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.

    My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
    Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
  • Options
    GIN1138 said:

    MikeL said:

    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.

    Perhaps Boris is playing the "long game"?

    Let Osborne become leader. Osborne proves to be even more toxic and useless than El Gord. Tories defeated heavily in 2020 with Osborne humiliated (hey a guy can dream) Boris comes in and saves the day.
    Osborne nor Boris will even make it to the final two.
  • Options
    MikeL said:

    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.

    To be honest I never rated him for PM and I also think recent errors by Osborne has had the same result for him
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 30,937
    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    The front page of the Mail on Sunday has leavers privately admitting they are headed for defeat

    How long ago it seems now that the Brexiteers were cheering Boris joining the team...
    You mean this -

    https://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/723973515251212288
    How lucky for Cameron that the main OUT figurehead is Boris who has clearly lost it.

    Boris has lost it, but so has Cameron (see their relative poll ratings, both falling). I am utterly mystified by the "back of the queue" bollocks (and I don't believe for a minute Obama would have said this without Cameron urging it, or even writing it).

    It's unnecessary. It's very risky. It looks terrible. REMAIN are very likely to win anyway. Why make yourself look like a snivelling treacherous c*nt, as Cameron has done? Bizarre.
    "snivelling treacherous c*nt"

    Can we use that as the standard description for Cameron from now on? Happy to credit it where necessary.
  • Options
    weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820

    Yet another REMAIN propaganda thread :)

    Why not - websites are going to reflect the views of the people running it. It's not going to sway many votes.
  • Options
    MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    edited April 2016

    kle4 said:

    Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention

    Plenty of time left for the narrative to change. The big cards have surely been played, and now it's for the long long grind to the end for Leave to chip away at.
    The narrative has been set by remain very early in the campaign and I believe it has taken leave completely by surprise

    Indeed, Remain had all the resources initially in their favour.

    Lots to play for yet, though.

  • Options
    weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820

    RobD said:

    Hillary wot did it

    twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/723966827085336576

    Wait, isn't Trump supposed to be the next POTUS?.... ;)
    I hope not.
    Well with the apparently large swings to him in California, I wouldn't bet against it.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    They feel badly let down.

    But they've got BoJo.

    And Peter Bone.

    What more could they possibly want?
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,287
    Boris would have had a better chance supporting Remain, backing Cameron 100% and then becoming Foreign Secretary. With Osborne fatally damaged, Boris could then have won by default - his "personality" overcoming any downside with the members who supported Brexit.

    A mainstream Boris, especially after 3 years as Foreign Secretary, would be certain to win with the members, even having supported Remain.

    Whereas now he's shot himself in the foot - putting the person who lay low and bided their time into pole position - Theresa May.

    It's hers to lose now.
  • Options
    DixieDixie Posts: 1,221
    kle4 said:

    Dixie said:

    Sorry to bang on about the London elections

    Better than on the EU.

    I'm struggling to see the Tories still being in with a chance though. Ed M clearly didn't inspire people to vote for him in droves nationally, but Khan seems to have the Corbynite crowd on site, without any first preference being syphoned off by Galloway, without putting off the rest of Labour voters who might otherwise stay at home as well, so will presumably maximise the Labour support, particularly since the Tories are internally divided at the moment, the LDs nowhere, and Zac being no Boris.

    I'll happily admit I know little of London, but from the outside it's looking like Labour arrogance is well founded on this one.
    I think I'm trying to be optimistic. There is value in a bet though. Mayoral and Assembly Member elections wildly different, mind.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,881

    Hillary Clinton urges Britain to remain in the European Union

    US presidential hopeful weighs in on forthcoming vote as No 10 welcomes latest backing ahead of 23 June referendum

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/23/hillary-clinton-britain-should-stay-in-eu?CMP=twt_a-politics_b-gdnukpolitics

    There's a certain demographic of Guardian reading Corbyn supporters who are usually deeply suspicious of anything the US supports. I wonder how many left of centre voters also see the whole thing as an internal Tory party struggle and won't bother to turn out on the day.

    The already soft Remain vote could be being made softer by the PMs use of American politicians to try and help his cause.
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    Toms said:

    Now Hilary Clinton fully endorses Obama. Leave seem to be falling out with each other. The narrative is now fixed with the £4,300 figure and 'going to the back of the queue' and now Sky headlining Hilary Clinton's intervention

    Maybe we ought to be grateful that they care.
    It really has been a 'nuclear' option by the US so you have to assume they really believe in the UK in the EU. Wonder how leave will accuse Cameron of writing Clinton's speech
    Clinton hasn't said "get to the back of the queue, you smelly British twats" while standing at a lectern IN BRITAIN.
    I didn't hear Obama say that either
  • Options
    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.

    I reckon Boris thought if Leave lost, it would be close, but if it is crushing victory for Remain, then he loses his lustre as a 'winner'
    Any Briton who votes REMAIN after Obama's comments is a self-hating traitor.

    I genuinely do not understand how you could possibly vote REMAIN, now.
    Because even ardent Leavers think the plan Gove and Leave announced the other day is crap, it is in fact act of economic self harm.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,814

    SeanT said:

    I can only conclude that he is passionately europhile, on a scale that makes Ken Clarke look like Nige Farage.

    He just passionately detests the Eurosceptic wing of his own party and sees this as a one-off opportunity to bury them. Unfortunately he's only feeding the resentment.

    I only hope the referendum result is so decisive that the losing side has to accept the result with good grace, whatever opinion they have of the way the campaign was fought.

    He wouldn't be in power with the "eurosceptic wing" of his party given that he and his europhile opinions are in the minority within the party...

    As for "accepting the defeat with grace".. Well, the British people's view will have to be respected but there will be plenty of people waiting to rip Cameron and Osborne to pieces in the coming months and years. Myself included.

  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 30,937

    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.

    My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
    Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
    It is interesting how many posters on here who were, until recently, well disposed to Cameron now want him crucified. In spite of what TSE and the few remaining loyalists might wish it really doesn't bode well for him after the referendum.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    SeanT said:

    Any Briton who votes REMAIN after Obama's comments is a self-hating traitor.

    Queueing is the very essence of the British Psyche

    NOT queueing would make you a traitor. Queueing like a true Brrit is the most patriotic of acts.
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    If REMAIN wins by margin Cameron will be totally ruthless with those who were on the other side. He's going to be hard to shift.
  • Options
    PeterCPeterC Posts: 1,274

    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.

    My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
    Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
    It is interesting how many posters on here who were, until recently, well disposed to Cameron now want him crucified. In spite of what TSE and the few remaining loyalists might wish it really doesn't bode well for him after the referendum.
    Does Cameron get knifed in a VoC straight after the referendum?
  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,775
    Dixie said:

    Sorry to bang on about the London elections, but I was very grateful to Nick Palmer for giving his view on what is happening in the Labour party, stating that there is lots going on.

    According to me red sources, apparently, Labour do have as many events as any London campaign but less activists are turning out. Also, they claim their vote is down, but I can't work out if that is versus the last Mayoral, 4 years ago or at the GE in 2015.

    Clearly, if the latter, turnout will be about half, so of course their vote is down. If it is down versus 2012, then we Tories will be happy.

    Re; Mayoralty, Labour have gone from quiet confidence to arrogance, Sadiq has won, absolute 100% certainty they say. So, they may be a smidgeon of value on the day if Zac drifts to a silly figure like 10 to 1. Zac still has a chance if Tories turn out and the quiet voters turn out too. Remember the GE. There's a chance.

    For Assembly Member elections, we are in the dark. One senior Labour man told me that they might lose Brent & Harrow. F*ck me, if true, that is amazing. Therefore there might be a bet there, a fiver or so. Labour also claim they are struggling in Barnet & Camden and Ealing & Hillingdon. But they feel strong in North-east. The trouble with all this chat, is that the data is small in figures and lots of hearsay. On the other hand, the polls were great for Labour, but they didn't change their confidence/arrogance monitor. They (& Tories) are only reading their own data, the polls are too volatile.

    Labour hold the seat of Westminster North - Karen Buck. Happily the council is controlled by the Tories. We have nice clean streets (well ish), and a low count of daft beards. Ms Buck is spectacularly ineffective in bringing socialism in her wake. No doubt she has some good stickers that she can deploy. She is a terrible MP.

    Harrow should be safe Tory, but somehow it's not. There has been some awful local government there.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    A host of new polls today from Germany. Merkel's party struggling to reach 33% in most of them:

    http://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/
  • Options
    dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,287

    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    The front page of the Mail on Sunday has leavers privately admitting they are headed for defeat

    How long ago it seems now that the Brexiteers were cheering Boris joining the team...
    You mean this -

    https://twitter.com/suttonnick/status/723973515251212288
    How lucky for Cameron that the main OUT figurehead is Boris who has clearly lost it.

    Boris has lost it, but so has Cameron (see their relative poll ratings, both falling). I am utterly mystified by the "back of the queue" bollocks (and I don't believe for a minute Obama would have said this without Cameron urging it, or even writing it).

    It's unnecessary. It's very risky. It looks terrible. REMAIN are very likely to win anyway. Why make yourself look like a snivelling treacherous c*nt, as Cameron has done? Bizarre.
    "snivelling treacherous c*nt"

    Can we use that as the standard description for Cameron from now on? Happy to credit it where necessary.
    STC will do.
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,287

    MikeL said:

    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.

    I reckon Boris thought if Leave lost, it would be close, but if it is crushing victory for Remain, then he loses his lustre as a 'winner'
    Yes - I imagine he's hoping to limit Remain to no more than 55% - if he can do that then at least it looks just about respectable.

    If it's anywhere up near 60% then it's a very bad defeat and makes Boris look bad in two ways:

    1) being integral to a very unsuccessful campaign - not being able to make an impact
    2) picking the wrong side in the first place - poor judgement
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.

    I reckon Boris thought if Leave lost, it would be close, but if it is crushing victory for Remain, then he loses his lustre as a 'winner'
    Any Briton who votes REMAIN after Obama's comments is a self-hating traitor.

    I genuinely do not understand how you could possibly vote REMAIN, now.
    Because even ardent Leavers think the plan Gove and Leave announced the other day is crap, it is in fact act of economic self harm.
    No. After Obama, if you vote REMAIN, you are a traitor. And there's an end to it.
    Have another drink

  • Options
    SeanT said:

    MikeL said:

    Is the danger here for Boris that he is destroying his leadership chances?

    Looking out of control - not the measured behaviour of a PM.

    Starting to look as if he jumped the gun - thinking that declaring for Out and then an Out win would guarantee him becoming PM.

    If Out now loses by a wide margin combined with his "performance" during the campaign it could well end his chances.

    I reckon Boris thought if Leave lost, it would be close, but if it is crushing victory for Remain, then he loses his lustre as a 'winner'
    Any Briton who votes REMAIN after Obama's comments is a self-hating traitor.

    I genuinely do not understand how you could possibly vote REMAIN, now.
    That is just so wrong in tone and thought. I am as pro UK as you or anyone else, it's just we differ on how best we can win promote the UK.
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670

    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.

    My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
    Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
    It is interesting how many posters on here who were, until recently, well disposed to Cameron now want him crucified. In spite of what TSE and the few remaining loyalists might wish it really doesn't bode well for him after the referendum.
    Despite being plainly a Europhile it is quite clear a large number of Eurosceptic Conservatives thought Cameron was "one of us".

    Which as an outsider is completely unfathomable.
  • Options
    timetrompettetimetrompette Posts: 111
    edited April 2016
    MikeL said:

    Boris would have had a better chance supporting Remain, backing Cameron 100% and then becoming Foreign Secretary. With Osborne fatally damaged, Boris could then have won by default - his "personality" overcoming any downside with the members who supported Brexit.

    A mainstream Boris, especially after 3 years as Foreign Secretary, would be certain to win with the members, even having supported Remain.

    Whereas now he's shot himself in the foot - putting the person who lay low and bided their time into pole position - Theresa May.

    It's hers to lose now.

    Johnson's no more likely to become leader than Osborne. And he's got loser written all over his pasty face.

    Cameron's salted the earth for any posho public schoolboy types with hopes of being in charge of the Tories, so whatever remains of the sub 100K member Conservative party will have to look elsewhere for a saviour. And they'll need to be capable of building bridges with big donors such as the MIC.
  • Options
    Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 30,937

    If REMAIN wins by margin Cameron will be totally ruthless with those who were on the other side. He's going to be hard to shift.

    10 MPS. That's all it takes to block every single measure he wants to pursue in Parliament.

    And he is earning the abiding hatred of many of the people - the activists on the ground - who the Tory party will rely upon to get re-elected.

    He may not be able to be moved until he chooses to go but his legacy is toast. He will forever more be viewed in the same light as Heath. Burnt in effigy every November the 5th.
  • Options

    SeanT said:

    My contempt for Cameron is now entirely boundless. I hate him. I want him gone, ruined, humiliated. Forever.

    If I am feeling this, as a mild eurosceptic non Tory, I wonder what some committed Tory sceptics are thinking.

    I'm not a tory but I respected cameron,not any more,the man is a lying cnut.

    My revenge will be after the referendum (looks like leave will lose ) his leave backbenchers who must have some bad taste from cameron tactics and the tory leadership where I pray that other cnut osborne loses.
    Cameron supporters that are for LEAVE that I know are utterly bewildered by him. They feel badly let down.
    It is interesting how many posters on here who were, until recently, well disposed to Cameron now want him crucified. In spite of what TSE and the few remaining loyalists might wish it really doesn't bode well for him after the referendum.
    As a party member of twenty years, I contacted quite a few fellow members in recent days, even the leavers aren't that het up. Gay marriage was more of an issue than this has been.

    Some of them remember the 90s and don't want to make the same mistake of the 90s, this includes people that have never been that favourable to Cameron from the start.

    Obviously I might be wrong, and you could be right, the local election results will be a good indicator.

    I'm spending most of the next fortnight helping a Tory hold a council seat in West Yorkshire, I'll let you know what the other activists say.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,814
    edited April 2016
    MikeL said:

    Boris would have had a better chance supporting Remain, backing Cameron 100% and then becoming Foreign Secretary. With Osborne fatally damaged, Boris could then have won by default - his "personality" overcoming any downside with the members who supported Brexit.

    A mainstream Boris, especially after 3 years as Foreign Secretary, would be certain to win with the members, even having supported Remain.

    Whereas now he's shot himself in the foot - putting the person who lay low and bided their time into pole position - Theresa May.

    It's hers to lose now.

    Maybe Boris will come back into frame if/when all Cameron and Osborne's lies about how everything is gonna be amazing by shackling ourselves ever tighter to the EU comes back to bite them and the Tories?

    Do you really trust losers like Juncker not to send the whole thing tits up in the years ahead? The euro is probably one more recession away from complete impolosion,etc...

    Course we might finish up with a new Jerusalem through the EU but my guess is that a complete economic and political meltdown is more likely. If/when that happens maybe they'll send for Boris.

    Who knows...
This discussion has been closed.