Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Freedom for Tooting – the by-election to fill Sadiq’s seat

SystemSystem Posts: 11,007
edited May 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Freedom for Tooting – the by-election to fill Sadiq’s seat could be tight

Zac Goldsmith’s father once said that when a man married his mistress, that created a vacancy.  In the same way, his successful opponent for the Mayor of London contest can be expected shortly to be standing down as MP for Tooting, giving rise to a fascinating by-election.

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    1st like Sadiq Khan
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited May 2016
    FPT
    surbiton said:

    Indigo said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Indigo said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Indigo said:


    But the proportion of the cost of a new car that is attributable to the price of steel is pretty tiny.

    Nevertheless, the increase in steel costs comes directly out of the profits of the car company.

    Of course, we could impose tariffs on cars imported into the UK, to reflect the fact that foreign cars would benefit from cheaper steel.
    Bemoaning small profit cuts for rich multinationals, while true is unlikely to find much sympathy with voters. I would guess there is plenty of price elasticity in the new car market, its very much a luxury item, putting another five hundred quid on the tag of a new Honda is going to put off almost no buyers.
    Good luck with encouraging companies like Nissan to invest in the UK in future!
    I seem to remember the CEO of Nissan (UK) saying pretty much the same about the Euro, and yet here we are, if they can make money they will invest, even if that money is 5-10% less than they would ideally like.
    I don't think they would shut down. But why would they invest more ? For example, Nissan could invest in a new plant , say, near Drogheda, take skilled labour from Sunderland for a couple of years at a good pay. I am sure the Irish government would give a lot of the facilities as cheaply as possible under EU rules.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    I go to Tooting once a week. I find it difficult to believe that demographically it is moving towards the Tories. The boundaries are not the same as they were.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,294
    George Galloway is planning to stand in Tooting.

    He must love losing his deposits.

    Only way I could see the Tories gaining this seat is if Ken Livingstone was the Labour candidate.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    Merton and Wandsworth Assembly Seat (containing Tooting) was a Tory seat last time around and went to Labour on a 3.75% swing this time. If Tooting is trending Conservative then some nearby places must be heading Labour rapidly!
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    Is there a market on this seat yet?
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    It is common consensus that 2016 local elections were very close to 2012.

    Yet look at London. A 6.5% swing from Con to Lab. This is not just the Boris factor.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186
  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    edited May 2016
    Well I never... all the luvvies at the BAFTA complaining about their gravy train..paid for by the not so well paid...being told to stop being profligate...What a surprise..
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,131
    Is Sadiq really going to be in such a hurry to give up his London seat? Right now his victory has lifted him to the most significant and successful Labour politician in the country. If Crobyn went under the proverbial bus he would be a very strong candidate, if he still is in the Commons. He has played his cards quite well. He has distanced himself from Corbyn without going to war with him in the way most of the Blairites have.

    Corbyn looks safer after the series of elections but he is getting on and seems to find the intensity of leadership daunting. He is going on holiday again before the EU referendum. The ST yesterday listed his holidays since becoming leader. It was a surprisingly long list for a relatively short period.

    If I was advising Sadiq Khan I would be telling him that his local constituency needs a bit of time to catch up with the march Dan Watkins has got on them and that there is no particular rush.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,131
    FPT
    Tales from the count in Dundee. My daughter reported that several SNP supporters present were talking about voting Leave to try and precipitate a further referendum.

    This is of course beyond stupid because if Scotland votes Leave as well as rUK then there is no basis for a referendum. In any event the mood music from on high is very much that this is not the time.

    It does, however, reflect the impatience and frustration in SNP ranks amongst their more ardent supporters (and you have to be pretty ardent to hang around a count for hours doing very little wondering what is going on elsewhere). Managing that frustration is going to be a difficult and tricky task for Nicola. In the meantime Leave might gain some unexpected supporters. I saw Malcolm declare himself for Leave overnight
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    edited May 2016
    surbiton said:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    It is common consensus that 2016 local elections were very close to 2012.

    Yet look at London. A 6.5% swing from Con to Lab. This is not just the Boris factor.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    True Surbiton, but London is an irrelevance at national level because there are very few marginal seats in it. Likewise although Labour suffered further humiliation in Scotland and did well in Wales, they can't get worse in the former and can't do much better in the latter.

    Therefore what should really please Labour is that they still have a presence in the South and Midlands, and that people are still willing to vote for them there when Corbyn is not a factor. What should worry them is that polling suggests (caveats obviously apply) that he is a personal drag on the Labour ticket in those areas which makes them far more difficult to win at a general election.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited May 2016

    George Galloway is planning to stand in Tooting.

    He must love losing his deposits.

    Only way I could see the Tories gaining this seat is if Ken Livingstone was the Labour candidate.

    Livingstone is not hated in London as you might think. Maybe, parts of North and North-East London - not in Tooting.

    He is still a controversial figure and at 70, should think it is time for a younger person. So should Corbyn.
  • Options
    WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    edited May 2016

    Is there a market on this seat yet?

    Ladbrokes have one.

    Edit: and Betfair now
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    A shame if Wolfie Livingstone is not selected for Tooting – life mimicking art would be a hoot.
  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    There must be a lot of fools in Tooting....
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,847
    edited May 2016
    Morning all.

    The PM's EU hyperbole continues after a brief hiatus last week - WAR, really?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/08/cameron-brexit-will-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/

    He really doesn't seem to care if he kills his own party as long as he wins his beloved referendum. Is anyone still listening to him?
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    ydoethur said:

    surbiton said:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    It is common consensus that 2016 local elections were very close to 2012.

    Yet look at London. A 6.5% swing from Con to Lab. This is not just the Boris factor.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    True Surbiton, but London is an irrelevance at national level because there are very few marginal seats in it. Likewise although Labour suffered further humiliation in Scotland and did well in Wales, they can't get worse in the former and can't do much better in the latter.

    Therefore what should really please Labour is that they still have a presence in the South and Midlands, and that people are still willing to vote for them there when Corbyn is not a factor. What should worry them is that polling suggests (caveats obviously apply) that he is a personal drag on the Labour ticket in those areas which makes them far more difficult to win at a general election.
    You know many Tories moved out of London and that is why places like Basildon, Billericay, Thurrock became Tory. Now the new "emigrants", many of whom to the fringes are taking their Labour voting habit with them. Ilford North , for example, used to be won in very good years. In 2015 Labour won it. Some of the Redbridge seats are becoming tighter, The South West in London could also change after the Lib Dem wipe out.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    edited May 2016
    Sandpit said:

    Morning all.

    The PM's EU hyperbole continues - WAR, really?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/08/cameron-brexit-will-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/

    He really doesn't seem to care if he kills his own party as long as he wins his beloved referendum. Is anyone still listening to him?

    In fairness the idea of the ECSC was to provide a social and economic barrier to further wars, while NATO's command provided the military clout.

    The irony is that in the last few years the EU's economic policies towards the periphery have created the conditions that make wars far more likely.
  • Options
    WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Unless Labour screw up in selection I'm sceptical about the Conservatives' chances in Tooting. There is a reason why government gains in by-elections so rare!

    Certainly Shadsy's 2/1 doesn't tempt me.
  • Options
    Innocent_AbroadInnocent_Abroad Posts: 3,294
    Indigo said:

    Merton and Wandsworth Assembly Seat (containing Tooting) was a Tory seat last time around and went to Labour on a 3.75% swing this time. If Tooting is trending Conservative then some nearby places must be heading Labour rapidly!

    Quite.



  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited May 2016
    Greetings from the Philippines where the polls for Eleksyon 2016 opened about 8 hours ago, its going to be an interesting day, although we are unlikely to find out what the results are until late tomorrow or early the following day. There has been a country wide alcohol sales ban in place since midnight yesterday as politics is taken deadly seriously here, and that combined with drink has had unfortunately results before.

    An estimated 55 million voters are eligible to vote, turnout last time around was 74.34% and I would expect it to be higher this time as communications with more distant voters has improved, and modern communications has meant that even outlying areas are fully up to date on developments, there also has been enough controversy over the views and eligibility of the various candidates to capture the attention of even the most apathetic voter. There has been some polling but it is a relatively new development here on a national scale so it will be interesting to see how accurate it turns out to be.

    There has been some comment in the UK papers as new members of a famous dynasty continue to make their mark http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/09/a-younger-marcos-eyes-political-triumph-as-the-philippines-goes/. As an expat I will refrain from commenting on parties and policies as that is rarely welcomed by the locals, but will be an interested observer of the process.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    edited May 2016
    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:

    surbiton said:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    It is common consensus that 2016 local elections were very close to 2012.

    Yet look at London. A 6.5% swing from Con to Lab. This is not just the Boris factor.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    True Surbiton, but London is an irrelevance at national level because there are very few marginal seats in it. Likewise although Labour suffered further humiliation in Scotland and did well in Wales, they can't get worse in the former and can't do much better in the latter.

    Therefore what should really please Labour is that they still have a presence in the South and Midlands, and that people are still willing to vote for them there when Corbyn is not a factor. What should worry them is that polling suggests (caveats obviously apply) that he is a personal drag on the Labour ticket in those areas which makes them far more difficult to win at a general election.
    You know many Tories moved out of London and that is why places like Basildon, Billericay, Thurrock became Tory. Now the new "emigrants", many of whom to the fringes are taking their Labour voting habit with them. Ilford North , for example, used to be won in very good years. In 2015 Labour won it. Some of the Redbridge seats are becoming tighter, The South West in London could also change after the Lib Dem wipe out.
    You could say the same sort of thing about the cities and environs of Chester, or Cannock, or Cardiff. But I can't see that translating into the 100 seats Labour needs to win to form a government, or even 50 to coalesce with the SNP, while Corbyn is in charge.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    DavidL said:

    FPT
    Tales from the count in Dundee. My daughter reported that several SNP supporters present were talking about voting Leave to try and precipitate a further referendum.

    This is of course beyond stupid because if Scotland votes Leave as well as rUK then there is no basis for a referendum. In any event the mood music from on high is very much that this is not the time.

    It does, however, reflect the impatience and frustration in SNP ranks amongst their more ardent supporters (and you have to be pretty ardent to hang around a count for hours doing very little wondering what is going on elsewhere). Managing that frustration is going to be a difficult and tricky task for Nicola. In the meantime Leave might gain some unexpected supporters. I saw Malcolm declare himself for Leave overnight

    I wonder what happens to the SNP vote in 10 years time. The SNP has a raison d'être. If it cannot keep the Independence pot simmering, support will drain away. Also with the new financial powers they will have to make difficult decisions like all governments. Until now, it was a one-way bet.
  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    ydoethur said:

    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:

    surbiton said:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    It is common consensus that 2016 local elections were very close to 2012.

    Yet look at London. A 6.5% swing from Con to Lab. This is not just the Boris factor.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    True Surbiton, but London is an irrelevance at national level because there are very few marginal seats in it. Likewise although Labour suffered further humiliation in Scotland and did well in Wales, they can't get worse in the former and can't do much better in the latter.

    Therefore what should really please Labour is that they still have a presence in the South and Midlands, and that people are still willing to vote for them there when Corbyn is not a factor. What should worry them is that polling suggests (caveats obviously apply) that he is a personal drag on the Labour ticket in those areas which makes them far more difficult to win at a general election.
    You know many Tories moved out of London and that is why places like Basildon, Billericay, Thurrock became Tory. Now the new "emigrants", many of whom to the fringes are taking their Labour voting habit with them. Ilford North , for example, used to be won in very good years. In 2015 Labour won it. Some of the Redbridge seats are becoming tighter, The South West in London could also change after the Lib Dem wipe out.
    You could say the same sort of thing about the cities and environs of Chester, or Cannock, or Cardiff. But I can't see that translating into the 100 seats Labour needs to win to form a government, or even 50 to coalesce with the SNP, while Corbyn is in charge.
    Actually only 10 plus a little help from the Liberals.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    surbiton said:

    I wonder what happens to the SNP vote in 10 years time.

    It's not going to take 10 years...

    There is going to be some very unpopular stuff this year. :)
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    Sandpit said:

    Morning all.

    The PM's EU hyperbole continues after a brief hiatus last week - WAR, really?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/08/cameron-brexit-will-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/

    He really doesn't seem to care if he kills his own party as long as he wins his beloved referendum. Is anyone still listening to him?

    By Cheshu, he is an ass, as in the world: I will
    verify as much in his beard: he has no more
    directions in the true disciplines of the wars, look
    you, of the Roman disciplines, than is a puppy-dog.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    A couple of potential Labour candidates:

    http://www.jasfortooting.org.uk/

    Sent me by a well known Labour activist, albeit in the north.

    And also Jayne Lim who came second in the selection for Sheffield. She is a Corbynite, Londoner and Junior Doctor. She is profiled here.

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/03/three-women-labour-candidate-sheffield-byelection
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    Well I never... all the luvvies at the BAFTA complaining about their gravy train..paid for by the not so well paid...being told to stop being profligate...What a surprise..

    Almost as shocking as newspapers connected to rival broadcasters wanting to weaken but not commercialise the BBC.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    Sandpit said:

    Morning all.

    The PM's EU hyperbole continues after a brief hiatus last week - WAR, really?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/08/cameron-brexit-will-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/

    He really doesn't seem to care if he kills his own party as long as he wins his beloved referendum. Is anyone still listening to him?

    Well that one unravelled before he closed his mouth.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12103724/Historians-for-Britain-warn-against-pro-EU-scare-tactics.html
    In a letter to the Telegraph, 14 academics and authors including Andrew Roberts say Nato, not the EU, has guaranteed peace in Europe
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Indigo said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all.

    The PM's EU hyperbole continues after a brief hiatus last week - WAR, really?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/08/cameron-brexit-will-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/

    He really doesn't seem to care if he kills his own party as long as he wins his beloved referendum. Is anyone still listening to him?

    Well that one unravelled before he closed his mouth.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12103724/Historians-for-Britain-warn-against-pro-EU-scare-tactics.html
    In a letter to the Telegraph, 14 academics and authors including Andrew Roberts say Nato, not the EU, has guaranteed peace in Europe
    I'd have more confidence in their prognostications if they were called Historians for Accuracy. Though I suppose at least they wear their biases upfront.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:

    surbiton said:

    ydoethur said:

    surbiton said:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    It is common consensus that 2016 local elections were very close to 2012.

    Yet look at London. A 6.5% swing from Con to Lab. This is not just the Boris factor.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2016-36215186

    True Surbiton, but London is an irrelevance at national level because there are very few marginal seats in it. Likewise although Labour suffered further humiliation in Scotland and did well in Wales, they can't get worse in the former and can't do much better in the latter.

    Therefore what should really please Labour is that they still have a presence in the South and Midlands, and that people are still willing to vote for them there when Corbyn is not a factor. What should worry them is that polling suggests (caveats obviously apply) that he is a personal drag on the Labour ticket in those areas which makes them far more difficult to win at a general election.
    You know many Tories moved out of London and that is why places like Basildon, Billericay, Thurrock became Tory. Now the new "emigrants", many of whom to the fringes are taking their Labour voting habit with them. Ilford North , for example, used to be won in very good years. In 2015 Labour won it. Some of the Redbridge seats are becoming tighter, The South West in London could also change after the Lib Dem wipe out.
    You could say the same sort of thing about the cities and environs of Chester, or Cannock, or Cardiff. But I can't see that translating into the 100 seats Labour needs to win to form a government, or even 50 to coalesce with the SNP, while Corbyn is in charge.
    Actually only 10 plus a little help from the Liberals.
    You are extremely optimistic in assuming the devoutly religious Farron will prop up the openly anti-clerical Corbyn, and forgetting the DUP. 323 minus the SNP's figure is the target.
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 4,968
    Depends on the candidate. A Corbynite candidate pictured with the man himself will certainly create an opportunity for the Tories.
  • Options
    another_richardanother_richard Posts: 25,046
    ' Tooting has long been a Labour stronghold. It has been held by the party ever since its creation in 1974. The closest that the Conservatives have got to Labour was in 1987, when they got to within 3% of the Labour MP. So it should be a safe Labour hold. '

    The Conservatives actually won the equivalent of Tooting constituency in 1955 and 1959 although it had the name of Wandsworth Central then.

    ' The area has undergone substantial demographic change. While most of London is trending to Labour, Tooting is an exception. '

    The areas of Tooting constituency adjacent to Battersea and Putney constituencies have demographically trended Conservative while the areas adjacent to Streatham and Mitcham constituencies have demographically trended Labour.

    These changes rather counter the common idea that Tooting is trending Conservative demographically:

    White
    2001 73%
    2011 66%

    Muslim
    2001 7%
    2011 11%

    Home ownership
    2001 55%
    2011 48%

  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    edited May 2016

    Indigo said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all.

    The PM's EU hyperbole continues after a brief hiatus last week - WAR, really?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/08/cameron-brexit-will-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/

    He really doesn't seem to care if he kills his own party as long as he wins his beloved referendum. Is anyone still listening to him?

    Well that one unravelled before he closed his mouth.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12103724/Historians-for-Britain-warn-against-pro-EU-scare-tactics.html
    In a letter to the Telegraph, 14 academics and authors including Andrew Roberts say Nato, not the EU, has guaranteed peace in Europe
    I'd have more confidence in their prognostications if they were called Historians for Accuracy. Though I suppose at least they wear their biases upfront.
    Be fair Alistair, the plural of 'historian' is 'argument'. Look at TSE and Morris Dancer.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @Labourpaul: Why? WHY? WHYYYY? RT @callummay: Ken Livingstone is going on @VanessaOnAir's BBC Radio London programme again this morning, politics fans.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited May 2016

    I'd have more confidence in their prognostications if they were called Historians for Accuracy. Though I suppose at least they wear their biases upfront.

    Biased informants can still be right, remember the BNP informer for Rotherham ?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    Scott_P said:

    @Labourpaul: Why? WHY? WHYYYY? RT @callummay: Ken Livingstone is going on @VanessaOnAir's BBC Radio London programme again this morning, politics fans.

    I would love to see the contract Cameron and Osborne signed with Satan. I still think they're somehow swindling him.
  • Options
    runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536

    ' Tooting has long been a Labour stronghold. It has been held by the party ever since its creation in 1974. The closest that the Conservatives have got to Labour was in 1987, when they got to within 3% of the Labour MP. So it should be a safe Labour hold. '

    The Conservatives actually won the equivalent of Tooting constituency in 1955 and 1959 although it had the name of Wandsworth Central then.

    ' The area has undergone substantial demographic change. While most of London is trending to Labour, Tooting is an exception. '

    The areas of Tooting constituency adjacent to Battersea and Putney constituencies have demographically trended Conservative while the areas adjacent to Streatham and Mitcham constituencies have demographically trended Labour.

    These changes rather counter the common idea that Tooting is trending Conservative demographically:

    White
    2001 73%
    2011 66%

    Muslim
    2001 7%
    2011 11%

    Home ownership
    2001 55%
    2011 48%

    Hard to see the Conservatives getting close here unless there is very differential turnout on the day between the two parts of the seat. And hard to see why Tory voters would be especially enthused just now.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    ydoethur said:

    Indigo said:

    Sandpit said:

    Morning all.

    The PM's EU hyperbole continues after a brief hiatus last week - WAR, really?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/08/cameron-brexit-will-increase-risk-of-europe-descending-into-war/

    He really doesn't seem to care if he kills his own party as long as he wins his beloved referendum. Is anyone still listening to him?

    Well that one unravelled before he closed his mouth.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12103724/Historians-for-Britain-warn-against-pro-EU-scare-tactics.html
    In a letter to the Telegraph, 14 academics and authors including Andrew Roberts say Nato, not the EU, has guaranteed peace in Europe
    I'd have more confidence in their prognostications if they were called Historians for Accuracy. Though I suppose at least they wear their biases upfront.
    Be fair Alistair, the plural of 'historian' is 'argument'. Look at TSE and Morris Dancer.
    Well since Alistair is in MetropolitanLawyersStrongerInEurope perhaps we shouldn't listen to him either :D
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    ' Tooting has long been a Labour stronghold. It has been held by the party ever since its creation in 1974. The closest that the Conservatives have got to Labour was in 1987, when they got to within 3% of the Labour MP. So it should be a safe Labour hold. '

    The Conservatives actually won the equivalent of Tooting constituency in 1955 and 1959 although it had the name of Wandsworth Central then.

    In 1955 Eden was Prime Minister: in 1959 Macmillan. Both were Eton and Oxford men. The portents are clear.
  • Options
    Innocent_AbroadInnocent_Abroad Posts: 3,294

    ' Tooting has long been a Labour stronghold. It has been held by the party ever since its creation in 1974. The closest that the Conservatives have got to Labour was in 1987, when they got to within 3% of the Labour MP. So it should be a safe Labour hold. '

    The Conservatives actually won the equivalent of Tooting constituency in 1955 and 1959 although it had the name of Wandsworth Central then.

    In 1955 Eden was Prime Minister: in 1959 Macmillan. Both were Eton and Oxford men. The portents are clear.
    It's straw-clutching time for Tory Peebies :o

  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Cameron speech on Sky now
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,645
    Not a chance. Khan is riding high and will campaign for his successor, labour are increasing in popularity in London, the Tories are woundec and as you point have gotten close before, so the momentum is not inevitable.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943
    Good Morning Britain EU Referendum poll - Remain 42% Leave 40%
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Good morning, everyone.

    Mr. kle4, I'm inclined to agree. Plus, the vote won't be about determining the government but just a single seat, so those wary of Corbyn may well not bother to turn out.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,645
    Indigo said:

    Greetings from the Philippines where the polls for Eleksyon 2016 opened about 8 hours ago, its going to be an interesting day, although we are unlikely to find out what the results are until late tomorrow or early the following day. There has been a country wide alcohol sales ban in place since midnight yesterday as politics is taken deadly seriously here, and that combined with drink has had unfortunately results before.

    An estimated 55 million voters are eligible to vote, turnout last time around was 74.34% and I would expect it to be higher this time as communications with more distant voters has improved, and modern communications has meant that even outlying areas are fully up to date on developments, there also has been enough controversy over the views and eligibility of the various candidates to capture the attention of even the most apathetic voter. There has been some polling but it is a relatively new development here on a national scale so it will be interesting to see how accurate it turns out to be.

    There has been some comment in the UK papers as new members of a famous dynasty continue to make their mark http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/09/a-younger-marcos-eyes-political-triumph-as-the-philippines-goes/. As an expat I will refrain from commenting on parties and policies as that is rarely welcomed by the locals, but will be an interested observer of the process.

    The BBC report on the election said one of the presidential candidates talks about killing people a lot. Sounds exciting.

    Banning alcohol before the vote? I'm guessing no betting on the outcomes either then.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    runnymede said:

    ' Tooting has long been a Labour stronghold. It has been held by the party ever since its creation in 1974. The closest that the Conservatives have got to Labour was in 1987, when they got to within 3% of the Labour MP. So it should be a safe Labour hold. '

    The Conservatives actually won the equivalent of Tooting constituency in 1955 and 1959 although it had the name of Wandsworth Central then.

    ' The area has undergone substantial demographic change. While most of London is trending to Labour, Tooting is an exception. '

    The areas of Tooting constituency adjacent to Battersea and Putney constituencies have demographically trended Conservative while the areas adjacent to Streatham and Mitcham constituencies have demographically trended Labour.

    These changes rather counter the common idea that Tooting is trending Conservative demographically:

    White
    2001 73%
    2011 66%

    Muslim
    2001 7%
    2011 11%

    Home ownership
    2001 55%
    2011 48%

    Hard to see the Conservatives getting close here unless there is very differential turnout on the day between the two parts of the seat. And hard to see why Tory voters would be especially enthused just now.
    I cannot see the yuppies and yummy mummies of Earlham and Balham being hardcore Leavers, I suspect very happy with Cameron. Wandsworth has been a flagship council for the Tories for years so should have lots of ground troops handy too.

    Nonetheless should be a Labour hold, particularly with some basking in the glory of Khan's victory.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,645
    Honestly, I like Cameton as a PM, generally at least, but his latest claim just don't be believed by anyone, even if it were true, it's too much.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Chis Cillizza of the "Washington Post" on the huge electoral map disadvantage that the GOP has in POTUS elections - It's demographics stupid :

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-gops-electoral-map-problem-is-not-about-trump-its-about-demographics/2016/05/08/14cdf1fc-1523-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Mr. kle4, without the EU we'd have global war.

    Fortunately, if we vote to leave, global warming will destroy all human life, so the war won't be very long.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,936
    Tooting has never had the combined force of TSE and I campaigning in it before....

    Just saying.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,294
    Mortimer said:

    Tooting has never had the combined force of TSE and I campaigning in it before....

    Just saying.

    Indeed. Also shows that the Tories will unite post referendum to win elections.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,645
    I see Greek crisis is back in the news. I don't know, I'm not averse to remakes and reboots of classic franchises, but I think we've had too many of them in too short a period, the formula is getting stale and the actors hearts don't seem in to the material, they're just going through the motions.

    Mr. kle4, without the EU we'd have global war.

    Fortunately, if we vote to leave, global warming will destroy all human life, so the war won't be very long.

    Well that's a relief.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    I'm getting the distinct impression from this speech that Remain's internal polling is telling them that floaters think their campaign has been talking Britain down - a lot.

    All of sudden Britain is marvellous and not too poor, wee and stupid today. I'm not convinced that after a diet of back-of-the-line rhetoric over the last few weeks can be washed away with a speech. The comments in the Times are a hoot. c100 so far and 98 are WTF/taking the piss.
  • Options
    runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536

    Mr. kle4, without the EU we'd have global war.

    Fortunately, if we vote to leave, global warming will destroy all human life, so the war won't be very long.

    I wish people would stop downplaying the risks. Brexit will lead to the end of all life in the universe, not just on earth. The Treasury's gravity model of trade proves it.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,645
    runnymede said:

    Mr. kle4, without the EU we'd have global war.

    Fortunately, if we vote to leave, global warming will destroy all human life, so the war won't be very long.

    I wish people would stop downplaying the risks. Brexit will lead to the end of all life in the universe, not just on earth. The Treasury's gravity model of trade proves it.
    I just wish the andromeda galaxy had stayed out of the argument, it just got all our backs up.
  • Options
    RazedabodeRazedabode Posts: 2,976
    This Cameron speech plunges new depths. I'm still undecided, but stuff like ' we'll go to war' seems a tad over the top.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Mr. Runnymede, that's why the inhabitants of the Pegasus Galaxy also deserve a vote. All 73 trillion firmly believe universal peace can only continue* if we stay in the EU.

    *Peace, of course, including genocide in Bosnia and a war currently on hiatus in Ukraine.

    Miss Plato, weeks to go, so time for Remain to turn the apocalyptic oil tanker around. That said, it's harder to claim positivity whilst claiming a vote for Leave is a vote for World War Three.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    A shame if Wolfie Livingstone is not selected for Tooting – life mimicking art would be a hoot.

    I'd bung a few quid to fund his deposit - a lookalike would be hilarious.
  • Options
    runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536

    Mr. Runnymede, that's why the inhabitants of the Pegasus Galaxy also deserve a vote. All 73 trillion firmly believe universal peace can only continue* if we stay in the EU.

    *Peace, of course, including genocide in Bosnia and a war currently on hiatus in Ukraine.

    Miss Plato, weeks to go, so time for Remain to turn the apocalyptic oil tanker around. That said, it's harder to claim positivity whilst claiming a vote for Leave is a vote for World War Three.

    Yes it's very serious. I'd really like to hear Stephen Hawking's views on whether, in fact, Brexit would also have a severe negative effect on parallel universes as well as our own. I've been up at night worrying about this issue.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,321
    Labour is selecting this Saturday, so also not messing about.

    On another subject, I see from RedBox that Osborne has confirmed that he is a leadership candidate and says he'll be the "principled" one (paywall). Can't read the article itself as I don't want to give money to the Times...
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,294
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Mr. Meeks, I'm not the PM, but if I were, and I thought global war might be a consequence of a Leave vote, I probably would've mentioned it sooner.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    There doesn't seem to be much correlation between this test and ultimate success. Margaret Thatcher did fourth worst, Michael Foot did second best.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,936

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    It seems that AlastairMeeks is really quite worried at the very suggestion that Britain might leave the undemocratic, unresponsive, frequently obstructionist and mostly protectionist EU. Bluntly, he has to accept that the benefits of leaving might outweigh those of staying - especially for those who might be in different circumstances to him and be attracted to different prospects. Higher wages, better access to public services and stronger ties with the rest of the world are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for PB Leavers to point that out.

  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,645

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    Some leavers think there will be no negative consequences to leaving. I am not one of them. I think there will be a lot of uncertainty and we may suffer in many ways, however I have come to dislike the other path enough I think we need to take the risk. I can accept international cooperation may take a hit. But the trailed point was about taking that all the way to war, and as I said even if that were true it is an implausible sounding claim.

    I trust this meets your 'grow up' request?
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    There are risks with leaving, and risks with remaining. But I don't believe that EU membership is all that important in the grand scheme of things, I'm sure the 21st century will provide many larger headaches for us.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    Yeah, but Dave good turn down the apocalyptic rhetoric before he starts to look silly.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,936
    I've been convinced for 2 weeks that Remain have some dreadful private polling. Like Plato I just cannot see any other reason for scaring the horses, which is certainly what is happening now.

    Basically, the British people do not like to be lectured to. DC might do well to remember that.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Averages out with EdM. I am no Corbyn fan, but (outside Scotland) it was not that bad a result.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,294
    Regarding the PM's speech today, all I can think about this morning is this.

    https://vimeo.com/85914510
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited May 2016

    Mr. Meeks, I'm not the PM, but if I were, and I thought global war might be a consequence of a Leave vote, I probably would've mentioned it sooner.

    I also probably wouldn't have been threatening it a couple of months ago if I didn't get that last bit of meaningless tinsel.

    I also probably wouldn't have said:
    Some people seem to say that really Britain couldn’t survive, couldn’t do okay outside the European Union. I don’t think that is true,” said David Cameron heckled by anti-EU protesters during business speech “Let’s be frank, Britain is an amazing country. We’ve got the fifth biggest economy in the world. We’re a top ten manufacturer. We’ve got incredibly strong financial services. The world wants to come and do business here.

    “Look at the record of inward investment. Look at the leaders beating the path to our door to come and see what’s happening with this great country’s economy. The argument isn’t whether Britain could survive outside the EU. Of course it could.”
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/britain-would-do-okay-outside-the-european-union-david-cameron-says-a6727031.html

    Where he seemed to feel it was about the nuances of where we would do best, not that one option mean war and one didn't.

    Pathetic.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    If Cameron thinks war with Europe is a possibility, why are we not ramping up defence spending?
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,847
    Well now that you put it like that...
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Mortimer said:

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    It seems that AlastairMeeks is really quite worried at the very suggestion that Britain might leave the undemocratic, unresponsive, frequently obstructionist and mostly protectionist EU. Bluntly, he has to accept that the benefits of leaving might outweigh those of staying - especially for those who might be in different circumstances to him and be attracted to different prospects. Higher wages, better access to public services and stronger ties with the rest of the world are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for PB Leavers to point that out.

    I have always been open to that second "might". I discount it because in order for those benefits to outweigh the disadvantages it would require maturity in assessing the competing risks. The screaming infantilism of so many Leavers leads me to conclude that the necessary maturity in the Leave camp is entirely absent.
  • Options
    weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820
    surbiton said:

    FPT

    surbiton said:

    Indigo said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Indigo said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Indigo said:


    But the proportion of the cost of a new car that is attributable to the price of steel is pretty tiny.

    Nevertheless, the increase in steel costs comes directly out of the profits of the car company.

    Of course, we could impose tariffs on cars imported into the UK, to reflect the fact that foreign cars would benefit from cheaper steel.
    Bemoaning small profit cuts for rich multinationals, while true is unlikely to find much sympathy with voters. I would guess there is plenty of price elasticity in the new car market, its very much a luxury item, putting another five hundred quid on the tag of a new Honda is going to put off almost no buyers.
    Good luck with encouraging companies like Nissan to invest in the UK in future!
    I seem to remember the CEO of Nissan (UK) saying pretty much the same about the Euro, and yet here we are, if they can make money they will invest, even if that money is 5-10% less than they would ideally like.
    I don't think they would shut down. But why would they invest more ? For example, Nissan could invest in a new plant , say, near Drogheda, take skilled labour from Sunderland for a couple of years at a good pay. I am sure the Irish government would give a lot of the facilities as cheaply as possible under EU rules.
    The UK could give a lot of facilities under UK rules - which the Government can change as necessary.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,161
    JackW said:

    Chis Cillizza of the "Washington Post" on the huge electoral map disadvantage that the GOP has in POTUS elections - It's demographics stupid :

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-gops-electoral-map-problem-is-not-about-trump-its-about-demographics/2016/05/08/14cdf1fc-1523-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html

    thx. excellent article. i remain betting on HRC.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,847
    Scott_P said:

    @Labourpaul: Why? WHY? WHYYYY? RT @callummay: Ken Livingstone is going on @VanessaOnAir's BBC Radio London programme again this morning, politics fans.

    He's clearly decided that Labour are going to kick him out any, so why should he bother to shut up?
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Mortimer said:

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    It seems that AlastairMeeks is really quite worried at the very suggestion that Britain might leave the undemocratic, unresponsive, frequently obstructionist and mostly protectionist EU. Bluntly, he has to accept that the benefits of leaving might outweigh those of staying - especially for those who might be in different circumstances to him and be attracted to different prospects. Higher wages, better access to public services and stronger ties with the rest of the world are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for PB Leavers to point that out.

    I have always been open to that second "might". I discount it because in order for those benefits to outweigh the disadvantages it would require maturity in assessing the competing risks. The screaming infantilism of so many Leavers leads me to conclude that the necessary maturity in the Leave camp is entirely absent.
    Any yet you continue to imply that the "leave camp" will be the government of the UK after the referendum, which is.... what's that word again.. oh yes.... false.
  • Options
    runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    kle4 said:

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    Some leavers think there will be no negative consequences to leaving. I am not one of them. I think there will be a lot of uncertainty and we may suffer in many ways, however I have come to dislike the other path enough I think we need to take the risk. I can accept international cooperation may take a hit. But the trailed point was about taking that all the way to war, and as I said even if that were true it is an implausible sounding claim.

    I trust this meets your 'grow up' request?
    I doubt it.

    'Growing up' means listening to what 'intelligent' and 'cultured' London dwellers tell you is good for you, and not provoking them into hissy fits by questioning it.

  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419
    On topic, I'd predict a comfortable and relatively anticlimactic Labour hold. Local factors may help the Conservatives but these will be swamped by national ones.

    Governments always struggle to gain by-elections because the cost/benefit balance between supporting the government for floating voters is substantially different at a by-election compared with a general election. Corbyn can't enter Number 10 if Labour wins. That it's been 34 years since any government gained a seat says all that's needed about the dynamic - and that gain was against a split opposition, with the sitting MP defecting to the SDP. On top of which, the election was held at a time when there was an incentive to back the government, with the Falklands War ongoing (and being won by early June).

    Excluding Bristol SE in 1961 (which Tony Benn 'won' but was disqualified from), and parties winning back constituencies after the retirement of Speakers, the previous instance of any government gaining a seat was 1960. It is very rare.

    And it's not going to happen this time because on top of the fewer incentives for floating voters to go Blue, the Conservatives will be in the middle of a civil war over the EU: never a great attraction to most of the electorate.

    It may be that at some point this parliament, the Conservatives will gain a seat. If it happens, I'd expect it to be in a non-London super-marginal at a time of significant internal strife within Labour; possibly, as in 1982, off the back of an MP resigning in protest or defection. But not in Tooting.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Cameron is clearly dog whistling again, this time about the risks of a Boris-Trump "special" special relationship.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,645

    Mortimer said:

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    It seems that AlastairMeeks is really quite worried at the very suggestion that Britain might leave the undemocratic, unresponsive, frequently obstructionist and mostly protectionist EU. Bluntly, he has to accept that the benefits of leaving might outweigh those of staying - especially for those who might be in different circumstances to him and be attracted to different prospects. Higher wages, better access to public services and stronger ties with the rest of the world are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for PB Leavers to point that out.

    I have always been open to that second "might". I discount it because in order for those benefits to outweigh the disadvantages it would require maturity in assessing the competing risks. The screaming infantilism of so many Leavers leads me to conclude that the necessary maturity in the Leave camp is entirely absent.
    I assume there are enough mature ones even In The official campaigns to manage such, once they are out if campaign mode. If 50% of the country votes out there must be some number of sensible people in the right places who take that view and can assess such things.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    edited May 2016
    Sky's got bored with Cameron's speech and cut away - he's still talking 40 mins on... Review in the studio - too long, plodding and unconvincing/phoned-in. One reviewer "I think someone rewrote this after seeing the headlines".
  • Options
    Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,059
    edited May 2016
    Labour hold/hang (McDonnell/Flint)

    Spurs less certain to be 2nd.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,645
    Sandpit said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Labourpaul: Why? WHY? WHYYYY? RT @callummay: Ken Livingstone is going on @VanessaOnAir's BBC Radio London programme again this morning, politics fans.

    He's clearly decided that Labour are going to kick him out any, so why should he bother to shut up?
    It's getting to the point well be disappointed that he doesn't bring up hitler.

  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    And if Cameron thinks war with Europe is possible, why the hell are we not bailing out the steel industry?
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Mr. Jonathan, sounds more foghorn than dog whistle.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,294
    Jonathan said:

    Cameron is clearly dog whistling again, this time about the risks of a Boris-Trump "special" special relationship.

    The best observation on the Boris/Dave relationship.

    Neither can understand the other one's success.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,161
    tlg86 said:

    And if Cameron thinks war with Europe is possible, why the hell are we not bailing out the steel industry?

    excellent point.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,161
    kle4 said:

    Sandpit said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Labourpaul: Why? WHY? WHYYYY? RT @callummay: Ken Livingstone is going on @VanessaOnAir's BBC Radio London programme again this morning, politics fans.

    He's clearly decided that Labour are going to kick him out any, so why should he bother to shut up?
    It's getting to the point well be disappointed that he doesn't bring up hitler.

    my popcorn is ready.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited May 2016
    runnymede said:


    'Growing up' means listening to what 'intelligent' and 'cultured' London dwellers tell you is good for you, and not provoking them into hissy fits by questioning it.

    Well quite, the whole tone is sneering enough to embarrass George Osborne, and long may it continue, it firms up Leave voters on here wonderfully. Infact I recommend massed sneering at the uncultured and "thick" masses on a national scale, and healthy tone of condescension and a metaphorical patronising pat on the head would be an added bonus for Vote Leave ;)
  • Options
    Gosh, many of us didn't realise that Brexit could be such a threat to Life on Planet Earth. Thank goodness that Cameron's "renegotiation" has clinched the deal for so many of us.
  • Options
    geoffwgeoffw Posts: 8,135
    Project Fear will turn us all into pommes frites.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    I wonder if Livingstone will call for party unity. One party, one leader, that sort of thing.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    I wonder if Livingstone will call for party unity. One party, one leader, that sort of thing.

    Naughty ;)
  • Options
    runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    Indigo said:

    Mortimer said:

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    It seems that AlastairMeeks is really quite worried at the very suggestion that Britain might leave the undemocratic, unresponsive, frequently obstructionist and mostly protectionist EU. Bluntly, he has to accept that the benefits of leaving might outweigh those of staying - especially for those who might be in different circumstances to him and be attracted to different prospects. Higher wages, better access to public services and stronger ties with the rest of the world are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for PB Leavers to point that out.

    I have always been open to that second "might". I discount it because in order for those benefits to outweigh the disadvantages it would require maturity in assessing the competing risks. The screaming infantilism of so many Leavers leads me to conclude that the necessary maturity in the Leave camp is entirely absent.
    Any yet you continue to imply that the "leave camp" will be the government of the UK after the referendum, which is.... what's that word again.. oh yes.... false.
    Well you have to chuckle at these terribly 'clever' people calling for a 'mature' debate on the issues while at the same time applauding a REMAIN campaign that consists almost entirely of ridiculous scare stories.

    If such a 'mature' and thoughtful debate was ever possible, their own side's antics have made it impossible.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Mortimer said:

    I realise that Leavers are apoplectic at the very suggestion that Leaving might have a few consequences that would be unwelcome. Bluntly, they have to grow up and accept that there would be some different risks that Leaving would bring over Remaining. Weakened international cooperation and destabilising international relations are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for the Prime Minister to point that out.

    It seems that AlastairMeeks is really quite worried at the very suggestion that Britain might leave the undemocratic, unresponsive, frequently obstructionist and mostly protectionist EU. Bluntly, he has to accept that the benefits of leaving might outweigh those of staying - especially for those who might be in different circumstances to him and be attracted to different prospects. Higher wages, better access to public services and stronger ties with the rest of the world are among them.

    It is entirely reasonable for PB Leavers to point that out.

    I think @MP_SE's comparison with It's Grim Up North London is spot on.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133

    Mr. Meeks, I'm not the PM, but if I were, and I thought global war might be a consequence of a Leave vote, I probably would've mentioned it sooner.

    I wouldn't have permitted a referendum.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,966
    edited May 2016
    An electoral metric that has Michael Foot at second highest may not necessarily be the most authoritative.
This discussion has been closed.