Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Vote LEAVE is naive if it thinks it can black-ball Farage f

SystemSystem Posts: 11,014
edited May 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Vote LEAVE is naive if it thinks it can black-ball Farage for the entire campaign

So far we haven’t seen any betting markets linked to the referendum TV debates but that’s likely to happen as this becomes a bigger issue following the Vote Leave reaction to the ITV event planned for June 9th. This is when Farage and Cameron are due to appear in the same programme although they won’t debate directly with each other.

Read the full story here


«1345678

Comments

  • Options
    First .... again!
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602
    SECOND.....like LEAVE!
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602
    It’s now being reported that it is planning to go to the courts to block the ITV programme

    Absolutely bonkers!

    On the bright side (sic) it will drive the 'Establishment Stab-in-the-Back/Stitch Up' narrative when LEAVE lose and will keep St Nigel and the UKIP Martyrs in gainful employment for decades to come.....
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602
    And since the Nats have been sitting on the sidelines, here's one from their favourite blogger:

    The problem for the SNP is that they’re a one-trick pony. Their electoral success shows that it’s been very good trick, but if you try to repeat any trick too often people eventually work out how it’s done and the magic is ruined. This particular trick only works if you have a credible economic case for independence, and that simply doesn’t exist.

    http://chokkablog.blogspot.co.id/2016/05/the-snp-running-to-stand-still.html
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672
    Hello Britain!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTMxfAkxfQ0

    There, now you feel better.
  • Options
    dugarbandierdugarbandier Posts: 2,596
    edited May 2016
  • Options
    adamandcatadamandcat Posts: 76
    edited May 2016
    Farage too high octane
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Morning all.

    “A young voters’ show from Glasgow – presented by Victoria Derbyshire.”

    And some say we should scrap the licence fee – for shame…!
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    Glorious eleventh! :)
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited May 2016
    Latest ARSE4EU Referendum Projection Countdown

    8888 seconds
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,326

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    You want Clegg up against Farage? Or worse still Fall, I mean Farron? For real?
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Top Hezbollah commander Badreddine killed
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-36283424

    Black armband time for Jahadi Jez.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Silencing Farage would be doing everyone a favour.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    With the government push for the BBC to provide more programmes for minority tastes...their eu show should be the one with Farage...with Galloway...up against jezza & cleggy.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    "Boris Johnson is good making rousing speeches but is weak when he has to face questions and ideas put to the test. Michael Gove can be effective but he is not the ideal front man."

    Cameron is also not a good debater, and struggles when not fighting from a prepared position.

    Dan Hannan is the answer IMHO. Good at speeches, and debating.

    He might only appeal to ABs, but ABs are what's needed.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    felix said:

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    You want Clegg up against Farage? Or worse still Fall, I mean Farron? For real?
    I would like to see LD representation in these shows (they do not appear to be debates in the proper sense). The LDs had a projected national vote share last week ahead of UKIP.

    My primary concern is that an EU debate which is mainly about squabbles within the Conservative party doesn't do the subject justice. Most Remainers are not Conservative voters.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    Your opening paragraph is what I've been telling you for weeks, Cameron has got himself into a dreadful mess.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,326
    More details of the tussles over who speaks when:

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/12/robert-peston-vote-leave-mad-slur-eu-referendum-debate

    Executive summary: it's a mess.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    My view is that Vote Leave have a genuine grievance, but have overreacted.

    And it's quite obvious precisely who within Vote Leave overreacted too.

    Nevertheless, ITV played a bit dirty on this and should reconsider.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,100

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    Well, yes, except the problem with that is Farage is only reliably on his own side. I have yet to be convinced he is on the side of Vote Remain, and will continue to harbour such doubts until at least early July...
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    ITV are rubbing their hands together, their biggest coup in years.

    Cameron v Farage is proper box office, they are a commercial tv station, they won't care a toss for Vote Leave.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    A 'minority taste' whose party came third in terms of votes at the GE.

    VoteLeave appear to want a veto over who appears and their hysterical reaction to the Robert Peston who campaigned for the Euro and now runs ITV decision which 'will have consequences' as the current occupants of Downing Street 'won't be there much longer' raises questions over senior VoteLeave judgement - AFAIK, neither Gove nor Boris have repeated these claims, nor do I think they would endorse them......
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,859
    Morning. Was there not a market mentioned on here a few months back on the identity of the lead speaker for the Leave side in the first debate? I'm sure I remember discussion on here about it but can't find record of it.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285

    More details of the tussles over who speaks when:

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/12/robert-peston-vote-leave-mad-slur-eu-referendum-debate

    Executive summary: it's a mess.

    BBC debate sounds like it could be "hello Wembley Wembley Wembley Wembley Wembley " as the echo rings out around an empty hall. No Cameron no jezza.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    ITV are rubbing their hands together, their biggest coup in years.

    Cameron v Farage is proper box office, they are a commercial tv station, they won't care a toss for Vote Leave.
    Probably much smaller audiences than the Euro 16 matches, but certainly the pick of the shows.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602
    edited May 2016

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    ITV are rubbing their hands together, their biggest coup in years.

    Cameron v Farage is proper box office, they are a commercial tv station, they won't care a toss for Vote Leave.
    Quite. Their job is to make TV programs which attract audiences - and they've got the two biggest 'stars' they could get to appear opposite each other
  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 23,754
    Annual village meeting with the parish council last night.

    The Council chairman and a guy from BT blamed the lack of high speed broadband in our village on the need to get EU approval to put in subsidised broadband lines.

  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,921
    edited May 2016

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    This looks and feels like a right wing argument that has little to do with Labour voters. That's no surprise given that the referendum is only happening because of internal Tory dynamics and the fear of vote-leak to UKIP.

    Cameron is reaping what he sowed:
    * EU immigrant bashing and misleading stats on benefit claims were deemed helpful for short-term electoral gain, but now that genie is out of the bottle and cannot be put back.
    * Voter registration rules were rewritten to favour the Tories; it turns out potential Remain voters are most likely to be disenfranchised.
    * The referendum was designed to quieten down the Tory right; that's alienated the Labour people Cameron needs to turnout in order to win.

    It's a masterpiece of bad planning in which short-term gain has taken precedence over long-term strategic thought. If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.

  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    ITV are rubbing their hands together, their biggest coup in years.

    Cameron v Farage is proper box office, they are a commercial tv station, they won't care a toss for Vote Leave.
    Probably much smaller audiences than the Euro 16 matches, but certainly the pick of the shows.
    You see, you've come round to my way of thinking. The 20 somethings in pubs watching football are mostly Remain, you think they're going to the Polling Booths singing 3 Lions and voting IN?

    Not a chance, Cameron has fucked up badly.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    ITV are rubbing their hands together, their biggest coup in years.

    Cameron v Farage is proper box office, they are a commercial tv station, they won't care a toss for Vote Leave.
    But it isn't Cameron vs Farage - it's Cameron being asked, then Farage being asked as far as I can see.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    ITV are rubbing their hands together, their biggest coup in years.

    Cameron v Farage is proper box office, they are a commercial tv station, they won't care a toss for Vote Leave.
    But it isn't Cameron vs Farage - it's Cameron being asked, then Farage being asked as far as I can see.
    Yep, no head to head which is a shame. Im sure Dave knows inside his renegotiation has fallen flat on its face.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    RobD said:

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    ITV are rubbing their hands together, their biggest coup in years.

    Cameron v Farage is proper box office, they are a commercial tv station, they won't care a toss for Vote Leave.
    But it isn't Cameron vs Farage - it's Cameron being asked, then Farage being asked as far as I can see.
    Yep, no head to head which is a shame. Im sure Dave knows inside his renegotiation has fallen flat on its face.
    and say what you want about Clegg.. at least he had the balls to debate Farage.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?
    Because he will be seen as campaigning against the will of the people
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    The Leave campaign is s bit meta. It loves talking about itself.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,921
    edited May 2016

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?

    He is already alienating large numbers of Tories. If you believe the warnings about Brexit he'll also be scorned for failing to prevent it, having precipitated it only to buy some time with internal party critics.

  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?
    Because he will be seen as campaigning against the will of the people
    Cameron was the only person who could deliver a referendum.

    He has.

    Scorn would be if he scurried back to Brussels seeking 'an improved deal' a la Boris.....
  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    SO If Cameron took us out of the EU because the majority voted for that then why would he be scorned...he would be carrying out the will of the people. ..but lefties hate that..
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    I think with the BBC circle jerk & other news plus the way it was spun I would think project fear will have been quite satisfied with how they managed to bury the bad news.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    edited May 2016
    The frontpages are horrible from the Sun, Telegraph and Mail...and the Express.

    Those immigration stats are awful and manna for VoteLeave. A MILLION+ more than HMG claimed?!?! And 800k more from the EU alone :open_mouth:

    Cameron's tens of thousands manifesto commitment is looking more and more like a giant lie.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?
    Because he will be seen as campaigning against the will of the people
    Cameron was the only person who could deliver a referendum.

    He has.

    Scorn would be if he scurried back to Brussels seeking 'an improved deal' a la Boris.....
    Look, I'm going to come over all Sean T but if, and its still a big if, Leave wins effectively what has happened is Cameron has said to us:

    This is what you should do.

    And we've said:

    Fuck off.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,921

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........

    The papers that support Leave have gone with immigration; those that don't haven't. It's not a mood change, it's entirely predictable. That said, immigration is clearly what will win it for Leave. Cameron reaping what he sowed.

  • Options
    dugarbandierdugarbandier Posts: 2,596

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    bastards redux :)
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........

    The papers that support Leave have gone with immigration; those that don't haven't. It's not a mood change, it's entirely predictable. That said, immigration is clearly what will win it for Leave. Cameron reaping what he sowed.

    And to your credit you have always predicted Leave wins based on immigration.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,921

    SO If Cameron took us out of the EU because the majority voted for that then why would he be scorned...he would be carrying out the will of the people. ..but lefties hate that..

    He'll be scorned for his failure to lead his party and guide his country. He'll be scorned because he failed. As far as I can tell the scorn on the right for him is growing already.

  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,709

    Silencing Farage would be doing everyone a favour.

    It'll take a while for UKIP's falling support to register. In the meantime let Farage have his say in the referendum that he had a hand in bringing about. After that let them fade away like these guys:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Empire_Loyalists
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    I know Remain are hoping no one would really notice the immigration numbers under the Mark Carney and now Major being rude - I can't see that working myself. Carney is Yet Another Suit forecasting doom, Lagard Another Foreigner, and Major is planning to be rude about Tory voters being divisive over immigration. We all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.

    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?
    Because he will be seen as campaigning against the will of the people
    Cameron was the only person who could deliver a referendum.

    He has.

    Scorn would be if he scurried back to Brussels seeking 'an improved deal' a la Boris.....
    Look, I'm going to come over all Sean T but if, and its still a big if, Leave wins effectively what has happened is Cameron has said to us:

    This is what you should do.

    And we've said:

    Fuck off.
    And without Cameron, we wouldn't have been asked in the first place.....

    Since, as LEAVErs promise us, a gloriously prosperous future and freedom awaits us if we do LEAVE, Cameron should be feted as a hero?

    No? Thought not. Much of LEAVE is consumed by hatred of Cameron.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,597
    Remain are in a bit of a bind when it comes to these TV shows. Put forward Cameron and fail to motivate the Labour Remainers who they have to persuade to turn out. Put forward Corbyn and push more Tories into Leave as he advocates a more social Europe.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    Off topic, but is it just me who sees these BBC "reforms" as a total non event?

    Ofcom regulating rather than the BBC itself seems like common sense and, try as I might, i can't get excited about a board replacing a trust.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?

    He is already alienating large numbers of Tories. If you believe the warnings about Brexit he'll also be scorned for failing to prevent it, having precipitated it only to buy some time with internal party critics.


    Yes, but why is seeking, then respecting, the will of the people something worthy of scorn?
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    What's the point of having an officially-designated campaign if it can't choose who represents it in the debates?
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited May 2016

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    ITV are rubbing their hands together, their biggest coup in years.

    Cameron v Farage is proper box office, they are a commercial tv station, they won't care a toss for Vote Leave.
    Probably much smaller audiences than the Euro 16 matches, but certainly the pick of the shows.
    You see, you've come round to my way of thinking. The 20 somethings in pubs watching football are mostly Remain, you think they're going to the Polling Booths singing 3 Lions and voting IN?

    Not a chance, Cameron has fucked up badly.
    There are no matches on the 23rd June. The group stages finish on the 22nd.

    The football audience will perhaps be a distraction for some, but probably more the C2DE than ABC1 demographic, and male rather than female. It could well weight the young vote even more to Remain.

    There is also the possibility of the conviviality of the Euro 2016, like Eurovision, showing how much like other Europeans we are, reducing fear of "the other".

    I don't expect it to have a big effect, though will dominate TV, with football pointy heads arguing with made up statistics rather than political ones!

  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    I know Remain are hoping no one would really notice the immigration numbers under the Mark Carney and now Major being rude - I can't see that working myself. Carney is Yet Another Suit forecasting doom, Lagard Another Foreigner, and Major is planning to be rude about Tory voters being divisive over immigration. We all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.

    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    I'm genuinely puzzled, look at the nonsense where 61% of us are looking to Carney for guidance, its the biggest load of tripe I've ever heard. Desperate people do desperate things, I can only imagine Cameron is seeing his career in tatters a year after winning a majority, anybody predicting this would have been ridiculed.

    Its astonishing, unprecedented.
  • Options

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    .........all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.
    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    Major is usually wrong on these matters. Far too willing to go along with whatever the mindset of the establishment is.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    Off topic, but is it just me who sees these BBC "reforms" as a total non event?

    Ofcom regulating rather than the BBC itself seems like common sense and, try as I might, i can't get excited about a board replacing a trust.

    Peston argues the reforms are more far-reaching than appears at first sight:

    https://www.facebook.com/pestonitv/posts/1620711631586909
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    What's the point of having an officially-designated campaign if it can't choose who represents it in the debates?

    They probably are - for most of them - just they don't have a veto over all of them......something called 'editorial freedom'.....
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?
    Because he will be seen as campaigning against the will of the people
    Cameron was the only person who could deliver a referendum.

    He has.

    Scorn would be if he scurried back to Brussels seeking 'an improved deal' a la Boris.....
    Look, I'm going to come over all Sean T but if, and its still a big if, Leave wins effectively what has happened is Cameron has said to us:

    This is what you should do.

    And we've said:

    Fuck off.
    And without Cameron, we wouldn't have been asked in the first place.....

    Since, as LEAVErs promise us, a gloriously prosperous future and freedom awaits us if we do LEAVE, Cameron should be feted as a hero?

    No? Thought not. Much of LEAVE is consumed by hatred of Cameron.
    You know as well as I do that Cameron was pushed into this as a way to keep Tories in the fold, and lure enough Kippers back for the GE. The immigration numbers were another one.

    Let's not pretend he had noble motives or that covering his arse was anything other than covering his arse.
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976

    What's the point of having an officially-designated campaign if it can't choose who represents it in the debates?

    Well quite - ITV and an egotistical tit have done their best to undermine the official campaign.
  • Options
    Innocent_AbroadInnocent_Abroad Posts: 3,294

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?
    Because popular sovereignty includes the right to scorn whoever does to-day what the people wanted yesterday but have since changed their minds about. Political junkies can whinge all they like (as in "but you voted for this") but popular sovereignty includes the right to say "and we wish we hadn't so we're going to take it out on you". Voters have hearts and stomachs: they are not logical calculating machines.

  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    The EU Referendum was massively overdue..someone had to have the gonads to offer one..according to some on PB there would never be a good time..but there had to be a time..so stop whinging..go and vote and live with the decision of the majority of voters
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    I am not convinced that Farage is this great debater.

    Sure he beat Clegg in 2014 but a tub of lard could have beaten 2014 Clegg.
    Let's not forget that he was also on the 2015 debates, one of them with Cameron.

    2015 Farage with his Aids comments etc did not beat Cameron in the debates nor did he in my view remotely appeal to over 51% of the voters as Vote Leave need to.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    .........all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.
    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    Major is usually wrong on these matters. Far too willing to go along with whatever the mindset of the establishment is.
    Apparently Major is claiming we're doing long term damage - and it's *dangerous*, he'll blame senior Tories in the Leave camp.

    Eff Me - I've seen the quotes on Sky - no bridges left unburned.
  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Cameron has offered a Referendum..which is a long time overdue..He wants us to stay in..The Debates are taking place..the people will decide...It is called Democracy ..Cameron,like me and everyone else has one vote.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,280
    edited May 2016

    I can see why Vote Leave are hacked off. Nigel Farage is a minority taste and ITV should have consulted them over the debate representative.

    But if he's going to be visible, a debate is the best use of him.

    Going to court to silence someone on their own side would look ridiculous.

    My view is that Vote Leave have a genuine grievance, but have overreacted.

    And it's quite obvious precisely who within Vote Leave overreacted too.

    Nevertheless, ITV played a bit dirty on this and should reconsider.
    Except...future of our country/avoiding global apocalypse notwithstanding...ITV is in the entertainment game.

    And Nige is box office.
  • Options
    runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    .........all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.
    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    Major is usually wrong on these matters. Far too willing to go along with whatever the mindset of the establishment is.
    Apparently Major is claiming we're doing long term damage - and it's *dangerous*, he'll blame senior Tories in the Leave camp.

    Eff Me - I've seen the quotes on Sky - no bridges left unburned.
    If ever there was a hapless puppet/mouthpiece for others, it is John Major.

    Just have a look back at some of the pathetic speeches he made from 1992-1997, often channelling Heseltine or the European Movement. His suggestion that the UK would get hyperinflation if it left the ERM being a classic example.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    The frontpages are horrible from the Sun, Telegraph and Mail...and the Express.

    Those immigration stats are awful and manna for VoteLeave. A MILLION+ more than HMG claimed?!?! And 800k more from the EU alone :open_mouth:

    Cameron's tens of thousands manifesto commitment is looking more and more like a giant lie.

    The extra people were short term working visitors rather than migrants, over here for a brief period of work. The ONS specifically says that the passenger survey is the accurate figure. Personally, I would bring back exit checks at ports and airports, it is the only way to detect the real numbers and overstayers.

    My hospital often recruits from Europe for short term vacancies, for example.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    .........all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.
    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    Major is usually wrong on these matters. Far too willing to go along with whatever the mindset of the establishment is.
    He's very tainted over Maastricht. And the ERM. And destroying the Tories with Back To Basics. BTB was just terribly badly done and ended up as the slogan for sex scandals - but that's what voters remember.

    I presume Major is saying this in an attempt to corral swing Tories - I can't see it making much difference, yet it will alienate a huge swathe of members. He isn't saying this without Number Ten's encouragement.

    I seriously can't believe what Remain are doing - it's so incredibly damaging to their own Party.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602
    edited May 2016

    The schedule to me looks too much like the David Cameron show. The majority of support for Remain comes from outside the Conservative party.

    I am not convinced that much of it will be worth watching.

    I expect it'll be reasonably entertaining TV, but yes, the schedule raises more questions than it answers. The Tories are pretty polarised on this; Labour is on the whole not, but Labour voters aren't sure whether to get involved at all, so Remain needs to make sure that both Corbyn and Alan Johnson OR Sadiq Khan get into the schedule - each of them appeals to a different segment of the Labour electorate so they're both needed in there.

    If Remain does lose, Cameron will have no-one to blame but himself. He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.
    Alternatively, he had the courage to ask the British people what they thought, and acted on the answer.....

    Why would he be scorned for respecting the will of the people?
    Because he will be seen as campaigning against the will of the people
    Cameron was the only person who could deliver a referendum.

    He has.

    Scorn would be if he scurried back to Brussels seeking 'an improved deal' a la Boris.....
    Look, I'm going to come over all Sean T but if, and its still a big if, Leave wins effectively what has happened is Cameron has said to us:

    This is what you should do.

    And we've said:

    Fuck off.
    And without Cameron, we wouldn't have been asked in the first place.....

    Since, as LEAVErs promise us, a gloriously prosperous future and freedom awaits us if we do LEAVE, Cameron should be feted as a hero?

    No? Thought not. Much of LEAVE is consumed by hatred of Cameron.
    You know as well as I do that Cameron was pushed into this as a way to keep Tories in the fold, and lure enough Kippers back for the GE. The immigration numbers were another one.

    Let's not pretend he had noble motives or that covering his arse was anything other than covering his arse.
    Cameron can't win.

    REMAINers hate him because the people might get the answer wrong so shouldn't have been asked in the first place.

    LEAVErs hate him (despite giving them the first vote in 40 years), well, because
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,280

    SO If Cameron took us out of the EU because the majority voted for that then why would he be scorned...he would be carrying out the will of the people. ..but lefties hate that..

    He'll be scorned for his failure to lead his party and guide his country. He'll be scorned because he failed. As far as I can tell the scorn on the right for him is growing already.

    He'll be scorned for adhering to the classical Conservative "trust the people" mantra?

    Doubt it.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,280

    What's the point of having an officially-designated campaign if it can't choose who represents it in the debates?

    What's the point of having a private entertainment company if they can't pick and choose their own content?
  • Options
    PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited May 2016
    "Serena Williams eats dog food but reaches Italian Open quarters"

    www.thedailymash.co.uk
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/36274989
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    What's the point of having an officially-designated campaign if it can't choose who represents it in the debates?

    Well quite - ITV and an egotistical tit have done their best to undermine the official campaign.
    The best thing about Peston on ITV is that I never see him. He's such a berk, and his ongoing mid-life crisis makeover... :astonished: Has he bought himself a penis car or motorcycle yet? I keep seeing lifestyle pieces about him/his latest squeeze in the Mail.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302

    Off topic, but is it just me who sees these BBC "reforms" as a total non event?

    Ofcom regulating rather than the BBC itself seems like common sense and, try as I might, i can't get excited about a board replacing a trust.

    Peston argues the reforms are more far-reaching than appears at first sight:

    https://www.facebook.com/pestonitv/posts/1620711631586909
    Interesting. Thanks.

    I'm not stirred. Peston seems to be arguing that having it audited for value for money, compelling it to tender much of its programming to the private sector, and having it regulated by an external regulator will lead to a stifling of creative output.

    The complaint strategy of poorly accountable organisations in receipt of public largesse for decades. And I love the idea that the BBC being subject to competition will mean it is unable to make popular new programmes.

    Colour me unmoved.
  • Options
    Innocent_AbroadInnocent_Abroad Posts: 3,294
    edited May 2016

    What's the point of having an officially-designated campaign if it can't choose who represents it in the debates?

    Well quite - ITV and an egotistical tit have done their best to undermine the official campaign.
    The best thing about Peston on ITV is that I never see him. He's such a berk, and his ongoing mid-life crisis makeover... :astonished: Has he bought himself a penis car or motorcycle yet? I keep seeing lifestyle pieces about him/his latest squeeze in the Mail.
    Stop reading the Mail, then. Simple.

  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133

    What's the point of having an officially-designated campaign if it can't choose who represents it in the debates?

    They probably are - for most of them - just they don't have a veto over all of them......something called 'editorial freedom'.....
    The TV companies shouldn't choose who represents the campaigns at all - they are reporting not participating.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.

    Unless it's a raging success, of course...
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    .........all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.
    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    Major is usually wrong on these matters. Far too willing to go along with whatever the mindset of the establishment is.
    He's very tainted over Maastricht. And the ERM.
    I suspect you're over-analysing this.

    As we saw with the photo of Cameron with Ashdown & Kinnock, the reaction in the Ashcroft focus groups was one of nostalgic affection - not 'THAT B*STARD WHO HAS EARNED MILLIONS FROM THE EU - CAMERON IS FINISHED NOW (again) - as confidently predicted on here.

    I suspect a similar reaction to Major - 'Is he still around - oh yes, didn't he do the naughty with that dreadful Currie woman - imagine eh?'
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    .........all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.
    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    Major is usually wrong on these matters. Far too willing to go along with whatever the mindset of the establishment is.
    He's very tainted over Maastricht. And the ERM. And destroying the Tories with Back To Basics. BTB was just terribly badly done and ended up as the slogan for sex scandals - but that's what voters remember.

    I presume Major is saying this in an attempt to corral swing Tories - I can't see it making much difference, yet it will alienate a huge swathe of members. He isn't saying this without Number Ten's encouragement.

    I seriously can't believe what Remain are doing - it's so incredibly damaging to their own Party.
    As a Remainer LD, I am quite happy for the Tories to be made unelectable!

    John Major has grown on me over the years. I voted Labour in 92 and 97 (as I recall you did too) appalled by the zombie Tory party ripping its own entrails out over Europe. However he has behaved with far more dignity than any other ex PM since Callaghan.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,202
    Leave need to get people like Gisela Stuart much more prominent. At the moment this still looks like an internal Tory party row and the objections to UKIP making a contribution hardly help this.

    If Leave are to win they need to win a significant share of Labour supporters. Apart from IDS pointing out that uncontrolled immigration damages the less well off in society they seem to me to be largely ignored and IDS is just never going to appeal to that electorate even if he is right.

    Leave simply cannot win this with the more right wing half of the Tories +UKIP. It is nowhere near enough and they should be paying a lot more attention to that in the selection of spokespeople than they seem to be at the moment.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Charles said:

    He'll be remembered as the PM who took the UK out of Europe: scorned on all sides at home and abroad. What a legacy.

    Unless it's a raging success, of course...
    And if we do vote Leave, and referenda are held in other EU countries - well that's democracy.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,805
    I think Farage v Cameron would be well worth watching. It would be like Cicero v Cataline.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,602

    What's the point of having an officially-designated campaign if it can't choose who represents it in the debates?

    They probably are - for most of them - just they don't have a veto over all of them......something called 'editorial freedom'.....
    The TV companies shouldn't choose who represents the campaigns at all - they are reporting not participating.
    They are trying to get an audience.

    Who do you think would get a bigger audience than Cameron vs Farage?
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    I can remember how I voted at every General and Holyrood election except for 2001. It is frustrating the hell out of me.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    edited May 2016

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    I know Remain are hoping no one would really notice the immigration numbers under the Mark Carney and now Major being rude - I can't see that working myself. Carney is Yet Another Suit forecasting doom, Lagard Another Foreigner, and Major is planning to be rude about Tory voters being divisive over immigration. We all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.

    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    I'm very surprised about the Carney poll findings. If most people really do choose to believe him then there's not much Leave can do.

    But he is an Osborne appointment who personally sought him out, and negotiated his salary and package, and is clearly not independent. He called Osborne's voodoo Treasury paper a 'sound analytic process'.

    The former Governer of the BoE has said the threat is exaggerated and refused to rule out voting for Brexit: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/20/economic-threat-of-brexit-is-being-exaggerated-says-former-bank/
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,280

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    .........all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.
    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    Major is usually wrong on these matters. Far too willing to go along with whatever the mindset of the establishment is.
    He's very tainted over Maastricht. And the ERM.
    I suspect you're over-analysing this.

    As we saw with the photo of Cameron with Ashdown & Kinnock, the reaction in the Ashcroft focus groups was one of nostalgic affection - not 'THAT B*STARD WHO HAS EARNED MILLIONS FROM THE EU - CAMERON IS FINISHED NOW (again) - as confidently predicted on here.

    I suspect a similar reaction to Major - 'Is he still around - oh yes, didn't he do the naughty with that dreadful Currie woman - imagine eh?'
    Plus he is, proverbially, the guy from Brixton who ran away from the circus to join the ratrace and become a politician, grammar school educated, and will appeal to those voters who are currently turned off by the Brasenose vs Balliol vs Oriel nature of the debate.
  • Options
    RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 27,190

    Remain are in a bit of a bind when it comes to these TV shows. Put forward Cameron and fail to motivate the Labour Remainers who they have to persuade to turn out. Put forward Corbyn and push more Tories into Leave as he advocates a more social Europe.

    Exactly. The EU that Cameron supports and the EU Corbyn supports are the same. The right have succeeded in turning the EU into a bank-run mandatory privatisation flexible labour thing, the left want to bring it back to a social justice solidarity workers rights thing. Too much of Cameron banging on and the greater the risk of people thinking "I'm not voting for THAT".

    But regarding Cameron refusing to debate Gove or Boris, does he think he isn't already indirectly? That his party isn't tearing itself apart already? That people are stupid enough to realise this referendum is a giant mistake born of his personal desperation? He's going around saying a vote to leave would bring a out economic collapse and war. What kid of irresponsible idiot would risk that for the sake of trying to win an election? So he's either dragged the country to the edge of this abyss to serve his own narrow ends, or he's telling ever stupider lies.

    Or both.

    Tell you what. Let's have him on telly all the time. It's great.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822

    Oh my word - more fun today.

    Major is making a speech that apparently accuses the Leave campaign of turning Tories into Kippers... and Lagard is doing a You're Doomed turn to.

    The front pages has the Times and FT on Carney, every other one (except the Mirror which doesn't know the referendum is on) is about immigration.

    I spoke about mood yesterday, its changing........
    .........all know *divisive* is code for WAAYYYCIST.
    I'm not impressed by the latter at all. I like John Major - but he's going about this all wrong if his speech turns out as trailed.
    Major is usually wrong on these matters. Far too willing to go along with whatever the mindset of the establishment is.
    He's very tainted over Maastricht. And the ERM.
    I suspect you're over-analysing this.

    As we saw with the photo of Cameron with Ashdown & Kinnock, the reaction in the Ashcroft focus groups was one of nostalgic affection - not 'THAT B*STARD WHO HAS EARNED MILLIONS FROM THE EU - CAMERON IS FINISHED NOW (again) - as confidently predicted on here.

    I suspect a similar reaction to Major - 'Is he still around - oh yes, didn't he do the naughty with that dreadful Currie woman - imagine eh?'
    Well, we'll have to disagree here. And Kinnock's pensions still remain in nerd territory - Major's HMG are widely known.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,280
    Sean_F said:

    I think Farage v Cameron would be well worth watching. It would be like Cicero v Cataline.

    They wish.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Alistair said:

    I can remember how I voted at every General and Holyrood election except for 2001. It is frustrating the hell out of me.

    I gave New Labour the benefit of the doubt, and I was developing a few doubts by then. Given the choice of Blair pre Iraq and Hague it wasn't a difficult decision.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    DavidL said:

    Leave need to get people like Gisela Stuart much more prominent. At the moment this still looks like an internal Tory party row and the objections to UKIP making a contribution hardly help this.

    If Leave are to win they need to win a significant share of Labour supporters. Apart from IDS pointing out that uncontrolled immigration damages the less well off in society they seem to me to be largely ignored and IDS is just never going to appeal to that electorate even if he is right.

    Leave simply cannot win this with the more right wing half of the Tories +UKIP. It is nowhere near enough and they should be paying a lot more attention to that in the selection of spokespeople than they seem to be at the moment.

    Agree re Gisela - and more Frank Field. IDS despite being very sincere is totally wrong as a frontman. Labour look at him and come over all Bedroom Tax!!!! Playing Scrooge for 6yrs has typecast him.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133

    Cameron can't win.

    REMAINers hate him because the people might get the answer wrong so shouldn't have been asked in the first place.

    LEAVErs hate him (despite giving them the first vote in 40 years), well, because

    ...he said he was prepared to recommend leaving and only wanted to stay in a reformed EU, and then having failed to get any meaningful reform is campaigning to Remain on pain of apocalypse whilst doing everything in his power to rig the referendum for Remain.

    If he hadn't done any one of those, he wouldn't be hated anywhere near as much. Saying he can't win, whilst accurate, doesn't really reflect that it's his own fault. Nobody but him has painted him into this corner.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,805
    O/T I can't link but Lewis Baston has an excellent article about Scottish politics on Con Home.
This discussion has been closed.