Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Rio’s over and so to Tokyo and beyond

SystemSystem Posts: 11,004
edited August 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Rio’s over and so to Tokyo and beyond

So, farewell then Rio – or perhaps, goodbye. It’s not been a vintage Games. Some problems, such as the Zika virus, couldn’t have been anticipated or prevented but others – the three-quarter empty stadia, the unsporting crowds, the polluted water, dangerous cycle courses and the impending shambles of the Paralympics – most certainly could.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    First like USA!
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,837
    Second like Team GB!
  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    Bronze
    Presume only non posh sports allowed in Tokyo
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited August 2016
    FPT:

    nunu said:

    the new games the Japanese mentioned baseball and surfing are ones Japan are good at but America should get gold medals. Also judo obs Japan are good at that but is popular in Framce also I don't think we are good at any of those but then again we did really well in the pj kicking and had no idea we were good at that even though my brother used to play it.

    Judo is already in the Olympics. You didn't see any coverage because the BBC don't show sports that don't have Britons in (though in fact we won a bronze in the Judo - Sally Conway, 70kg class).
    The BBC online coverage was excellent and covered a lot of sports that were not on telly. The fencing coverage for example.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419
    edited August 2016

    FPT:

    nunu said:

    the new games the Japanese mentioned baseball and surfing are ones Japan are good at but America should get gold medals. Also judo obs Japan are good at that but is popular in Framce also I don't think we are good at any of those but then again we did really well in the pj kicking and had no idea we were good at that even though my brother used to play it.

    Judo is already in the Olympics. You didn't see any coverage because the BBC don't show sports that don't have Britons in (though in fact we won a bronze in the Judo - Sally Conway, 70kg class).
    The BBC online coverage was excellent and covered a lot of sports that were not on telly. The fencing coverage for example.
    I can believe that. Anything without John Inverdale would be improved by the omission. But you had to search out that coverage.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,915
    FPT.
    Seem to remember Tokyo as well-organised. Of course there was little colour TV, and Tokyo is 8 hours ahead of us so there wasn’t a lot to watch live. Also think I recall a school acquaintance of mine winning a silver in the sailing.

    There was a lot else happening in my life in 1964!
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    FPT.
    Seem to remember Tokyo as well-organised. Of course there was little colour TV, and Tokyo is 8 hours ahead of us so there wasn’t a lot to watch live. Also think I recall a school acquaintance of mine winning a silver in the sailing.

    There was a lot else happening in my life in 1964!

    I suppose the time difference would make for the opening ceremony and finals to be on late morning GMT. Another Olympics for night owls and insomniacs. A Paris Olympics would be handy that way.

    Budapest and Rome too. Budapest would be fun, but very hot midsummer.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Los Angeles has hosted an Olympics relatively recently. I'm doubtful whether the IOC would now want to return to any city that had hosted the Olympics within the memories of many.

    I agree with David Herdson about Budapest, though it is worth noting that Hungary has overachieved in the Olympics for its size in the last two Olympics (it was 12th in this year's medal table, ahead of the hosts, and 9th in 2012). Quite apart from the smallness of the country, Hungary does not have a particularly good track record of delivering large infrastructure projects. This is a risk that I can't imagine the IOC wishing to run.

    To be honest, I find it hard to see past Paris. It would need to blot its copybook badly not to get it, I would have thought.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    The French have enough problems with terrorism in their own country. It might be enough for the IOC to go to the US.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited August 2016

    Los Angeles has hosted an Olympics relatively recently. I'm doubtful whether the IOC would now want to return to any city that had hosted the Olympics within the memories of many.

    I agree with David Herdson about Budapest, though it is worth noting that Hungary has overachieved in the Olympics for its size in the last two Olympics (it was 12th in this year's medal table, ahead of the hosts, and 9th in 2012). Quite apart from the smallness of the country, Hungary does not have a particularly good track record of delivering large infrastructure projects. This is a risk that I can't imagine the IOC wishing to run.

    To be honest, I find it hard to see past Paris. It would need to blot its copybook badly not to get it, I would have thought.

    The idea that Olympics should leave a legacy of infrastructure (and World Cups too) is part of the problem and why they get so expensive. Even rich countries and cities like London get landed with white elephants. West Ham got a free stadium (though one with no atmosphere, as did Man City from the Commonwealth). Most Olympic legacies are pretty poor.

    Each one does not have to be a bigger and more expensive show that breaks the bank somewhere. It is like extending your house for a party, then wondering what to do with the extra rooms afterwards.
  • Options
    bunncobunnco Posts: 169
    From the Archives:

    My grandfather ran in the 1932 Los Angeles Olympics in the 100m, 200m and 4x100m. All the European teams went across the Atlantic on the Olympic Ship [with Stanley Baldwin as it happens, who was attending the Ottowa Conference] and then via the Olympic Train to Los Angeles.

    Sadly he got crocked falling down a staircase onboard ship so didn't perform at his best. It didn't help that Lord Burghley dropped the baton in the 4x100 so nothing new there. We have a wonderful competitor's medallion at home - just not one of Bronze, Silver or Gold.

    LA 1932 is noteworthy in quite a few respects: The first Olympiad with an athletes village [men only - the women stayed at a hotel downtown], the first with photo-finish equipment. And an Olympic Art competition, where each country submitted artworks as part of a medal competition. And a purpose built stadium. Of course, many fewer people competed at that time and it was strictly amateurs only - he had to ask for time off work.

    But perhaps the biggest legacy was that the Xth Olympiad in 1932 marked the start of the end of the depression and the start of the economic recovery in the States following the 1920's Stock Crash. History might show that the 2012 Olympics in London marked the end of our recession and, who knows, the successes this time around, negate any remaining negativity about our role in a post Brexit world. The historical precedents are all there.

    Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot
  • Options
    bunncobunnco Posts: 169
    And, if you're interested, there's a fabulous official report on the 1932 Games here.
    http://library.la84.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1932/1932s.pdf
    It's a great read.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,258
    Wouldn't security concerns and potential political instability in Paris be a factor? It has had an awful couple of years and still appears to be in a state of siege.

    Answering my own question, given Rio just got the Games, possibly not.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,915
    bunnco said:

    From the Archives:

    My grandfather ran in the 1932 Los Angeles Olympics in the 100m, 200m and 4x100m. All the European teams went across the Atlantic on the Olympic Ship [with Stanley Baldwin as it happens, who was attending the Ottowa Conference] and then via the Olympic Train to Los Angeles.

    Sadly he got crocked falling down a staircase onboard ship so didn't perform at his best. It didn't help that Lord Burghley dropped the baton in the 4x100 so nothing new there. We have a wonderful competitor's medallion at home - just not one of Bronze, Silver or Gold.

    LA 1932 is noteworthy in quite a few respects: The first Olympiad with an athletes village [men only - the women stayed at a hotel downtown], the first with photo-finish equipment. And an Olympic Art competition, where each country submitted artworks as part of a medal competition. And a purpose built stadium. Of course, many fewer people competed at that time and it was strictly amateurs only - he had to ask for time off work.

    But perhaps the biggest legacy was that the Xth Olympiad in 1932 marked the start of the end of the depression and the start of the economic recovery in the States following the 1920's Stock Crash. History might show that the 2012 Olympics in London marked the end of our recession and, who knows, the successes this time around, negate any remaining negativity about our role in a post Brexit world. The historical precedents are all there.

    Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot

    Thanks for that.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133

    FPT.
    Seem to remember Tokyo as well-organised. Of course there was little colour TV, and Tokyo is 8 hours ahead of us so there wasn’t a lot to watch live. Also think I recall a school acquaintance of mine winning a silver in the sailing.

    There was a lot else happening in my life in 1964!

    I suppose the time difference would make for the opening ceremony and finals to be on late morning GMT. Another Olympics for night owls and insomniacs. A Paris Olympics would be handy that way.
    NBC will again make them switch timings to suit themselves. In Sydney they had to have the swimming finals in the morning sessions.

    But really, given the amount that they tape-delay anyway, the IOC and Tokyo OCOG should tell them to bugger off.
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,606

    Wouldn't security concerns and potential political instability in Paris be a factor? It has had an awful couple of years and still appears to be in a state of siege.

    Answering my own question, given Rio just got the Games, possibly not.

    After Rio, you have to figure this IPC won't go to a county with security issues. I think LA is a good bet and Hungary has an outside chance based on payments for votes.
  • Options
    dugarbandierdugarbandier Posts: 2,596
    "The IOC is not FIFA and has genuinely cleaned up its act."

    This might be considered a very optimistic view
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,915

    Wouldn't security concerns and potential political instability in Paris be a factor? It has had an awful couple of years and still appears to be in a state of siege.

    Answering my own question, given Rio just got the Games, possibly not.

    I wondered that a few days ago on here and was quite firmly that Paris could cope. I do think, though that the violence in Rio ...... street mugging and so on ..... is different in kind from that which we’ve seen in Paris.

    Berlin?
  • Options
    Manchester 2024
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935
    edited August 2016
    It will almost certainly be Paris, especially given the sentimental value of awarding the games to the City a century after they last hosted them. LA also last hosted it in 1984 i.e. my lifetime, Paris has not even hosted it in my parents' lifetime (indeed Rome also has hosted it more recently in 1960). A Tokyo followed by a Paris games, should also guarantee crowds and better organisation than Rio had and would offer a nice pattern of the Americas, then Asia, then Europe hosting.

    It should also be pointed out that although Eastern Europe has not hosted a games as such, Moscow did host the 1980 games
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,964
    Good morning, everyone.

    I was going to raise the terrorism/inexplicable lone wolf mental illness point, but I see everyone beat me to it.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935
    edited August 2016

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,810
    Another day another Tory at it
    Moneybags Tory MSP accused of exploiting parliamentary position to further his business interests
    ALEXANDER Burnett lodged five questions in Holyrood raising concerns about the planning process from a rival business for a housing development in his constituency.

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/moneybags-tory-msp-accused-exploiting-8679718
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,897
    It will be Paris I think, but not betting on it
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,932
    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935
    edited August 2016
    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    South Africa has a chance in 2028 if Durban put on a good Commonwealth games in 2022) LA or Chicago are better bets for 2032
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,351
    I see John Inverdale isn't flavour of the month. I suspect it goes back to his Marion Bartoli remarks, which I thought amusing. OK. if it was my daughter he was talking about, I'd be less phlegmatic, but it was his opinion which he was happy to share.

    Yes, he does suffer from verbal diarrhoea, but dissing an overpaid "celebrity" isn't the worst crime in the world.

    Rather that than the Richard Osman treacle you get on Pointless. He's a good comedian, but the sickening sycophancy to anyone vaguely in the celebrity category is nauseating.

    Even unknown Z-list celebrities are wonderful and marvellous, and each time one crops up in conversation, he begins to drool.

    He takes the piss occasionally out of the contestants, but it seems that the merest hint of fame sends his critical faculties into meltdown.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    I don't think we'll ever host a world cup. We are hated by the rest of the footballing world; our best bet is to get the Euros, but even that's a long way off given that we have the semi final and final of the "don't call it a tournament" tournament in 2020.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,964
    Mr. Eek, on Asia 2032: Tokyo has it in 2020, so that may not happen.

    Bit catch-22 on Paris. If they give it to the French, it's not hard to see multiple attacks happening. If they don't give it to the French, it may well be seen as terrorism scaring the IOC off.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935
    edited August 2016

    The French have enough problems with terrorism in their own country. It might be enough for the IOC to go to the US.

    The US is not exactly immune from terrorism either, including 9/11, Orlando, San Bernardino etc more people have been killed by terrorists in the last 15 years on US soil than French soil
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,964
    Mr. CD13, Osman wasn't sycophantic to Clarkson on HIGNFY, filmed after Top Gear was curtailed. [To be honest, I thought Osman was something of a boor].
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    HYUFD said:

    The French have enough problems with terrorism in their own country. It might be enough for the IOC to go to the US.

    The US is not exactly immune from terrorism either, including 9/11, Orlando, San Bernardino etc more people have been killed by terrorists in the last 15 years on US soil than French soil
    ..but its perception that matters The French have a back history with Algeria that isn't going to go away.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935

    Los Angeles has hosted an Olympics relatively recently. I'm doubtful whether the IOC would now want to return to any city that had hosted the Olympics within the memories of many.

    I agree with David Herdson about Budapest, though it is worth noting that Hungary has overachieved in the Olympics for its size in the last two Olympics (it was 12th in this year's medal table, ahead of the hosts, and 9th in 2012). Quite apart from the smallness of the country, Hungary does not have a particularly good track record of delivering large infrastructure projects. This is a risk that I can't imagine the IOC wishing to run.

    To be honest, I find it hard to see past Paris. It would need to blot its copybook badly not to get it, I would have thought.

    The idea that Olympics should leave a legacy of infrastructure (and World Cups too) is part of the problem and why they get so expensive. Even rich countries and cities like London get landed with white elephants. West Ham got a free stadium (though one with no atmosphere, as did Man City from the Commonwealth). Most Olympic legacies are pretty poor.

    Each one does not have to be a bigger and more expensive show that breaks the bank somewhere. It is like extending your house for a party, then wondering what to do with the extra rooms afterwards.
    It is fair to say Rio did not put on a bigger, better and more expensive show than London to say the least
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    My friend worked on the 2010 bid, he says we're never getting the world cup, too many noses bent out of shape by The Sunday Times and BBC exposes.

    Ditto the USA wont be getting it again.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    South Carolina - Gravis

    Clinton 42 .. Trump 46

    http://gravismarketing.com/news/current-south-carolina-polling/

    Pennsylvania - CEPEX/CBS8

    Clinton 36.5 .. Trump 41.9

    http://www.projectexecution.consulting/cepexpoll/

    Note - First poll by this Canadian company .. :smile:
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935
    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    I don't think we'll ever host a world cup. We are hated by the rest of the footballing world; our best bet is to get the Euros, but even that's a long way off given that we have the semi final and final of the "don't call it a tournament" tournament in 2020.
    We have support from Africa and parts of Asia and Oceania and North America and perhaps the Dutch and Germans. The French, Germans, Italians and Brazilians and Argentines have now all hosted a more recent World Cup than we have and we hosted the Euros in 1996, thirty years after we last hosted a World Cup
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,964
    Mr. Eagles, if football associations had any balls they'd boycott Qatar, withdraw from FIFA and form an organisation that could, perhaps, be viewed with some trust.

    Mr. Root, also, 9/11 was a decade and a half ago. It'd be over two decades in the past by the next (bid for) Olympics. French terrorism was last week (Strasbourg stabbing, not that the media reported it much). There have been multiple major attacks over the last couple of years, unlike the US.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
  • Options
    Off topic, I see IDS is seemingly intent on destroying a third consecutive Tory PM.

    The man is the Tory Corbyn, a sleeper agent for the other side.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187

    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    My friend worked on the 2010 bid, he says we're never getting the world cup, too many noses bent out of shape by The Sunday Times and BBC exposes.

    Ditto the USA wont be getting it again.
    Not sure I agree with you about the USA. There's a lot of money to be made there.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935

    HYUFD said:

    The French have enough problems with terrorism in their own country. It might be enough for the IOC to go to the US.

    The US is not exactly immune from terrorism either, including 9/11, Orlando, San Bernardino etc more people have been killed by terrorists in the last 15 years on US soil than French soil
    ..but its perception that matters The French have a back history with Algeria that isn't going to go away.
    The U.S. has Iraq and Afghanistan so what the statistics don't lie!
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    The issue is not so much continents - it is time zones. Anyone wanting to watch the games live on TV in Africa and Europe has just had a fortnight of very, very late nights. In 2020 they will have to take a fortnight off work to watch them live. LA? Forget it. You have to become nocturnal.

    I hope the European and African members of the IOC can work together and get behind Paris. It is a world city worthy of the Olympics. Security concerns? Then make it the greatest gathering of Special Forces the world has ever seen.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    Moses_ said:

    Bronze
    Presume only non posh sports allowed in Tokyo

    Britain is quite an elitist country in the way public schools dominate so many top professions.

    I wonder if Japan is the same? Apparently they have a problem with getting women into the workplace.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,837
    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    I don't think we'll ever host a world cup. We are hated by the rest of the footballing world; our best bet is to get the Euros, but even that's a long way off given that we have the semi final and final of the "don't call it a tournament" tournament in 2020.
    Our best chance of holding the World Cup is if Russia or Qatar manage to Royally screw it up. We're never going to be awarded it by FIFA, but everyone knows we're a safe pair of hands that already has the entire infrastructure and stadia in place, and could hold the tournament next week if called upon to do so.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,258
    Pulpstar said:

    It will be Paris I think, but not betting on it

    That's just it. I don't trust the IOC (or other international bodies) to make a straight bet despite the reassurances we now hear.

    Interesting subject, but better value elsewhere.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,932
    HYUFD said:

    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    South Africa has a chance in 2028 if Durban put on a good Commonwealth games in 2022) LA or Chicago are better bets for 2032
    If the requirement is a completed Commonwealth games then South Africa would be a decent bet for 2032 as the 2028 Olympics will be awarded in 2021...
  • Options
    BTW - I see Ruth Davidson is channelling what Mike wrote on August 4th

    Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Tory leader, has become the most senior party figure to float the idea of an early election as she cited concerns about rebellious backbenchers.

    She said the “usual suspects” on the backbenches could “cause problems” for Mrs May and added there was a clear “temptation” to call an election sooner than 2020.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/21/ruth-davidson-says-early-general-election-is-tempting-and-warns/
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    Sandpit said:

    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    I don't think we'll ever host a world cup. We are hated by the rest of the footballing world; our best bet is to get the Euros, but even that's a long way off given that we have the semi final and final of the "don't call it a tournament" tournament in 2020.
    Our best chance of holding the World Cup is if Russia or Qatar manage to Royally screw it up. We're never going to be awarded it by FIFA, but everyone knows we're a safe pair of hands that already has the entire infrastructure and stadia in place, and could hold the tournament next week if called upon to do so.
    Maybe, but I wouldn't be surprised to see Germany get it again in those circumstances.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    I'm going for Paris.

    The anniversary and infrastructure are a pull. It's culturally strong too.

    The USA seems to have had the Olympics quite enough to me. Los Angeles 1984 and Atlanta 1996. Plus Winter games in SLC in 2002.
  • Options
    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    My friend worked on the 2010 bid, he says we're never getting the world cup, too many noses bent out of shape by The Sunday Times and BBC exposes.

    Ditto the USA wont be getting it again.
    Not sure I agree with you about the USA. There's a lot of money to be made there.
    It is to do with where the prosecutions are happening, but the US Football Federation is still trying to clean up the legacy of Chuck Blazer.

    Lots of FIFA people are nervous about setting foot in the USA
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,837
    HYUFD said:

    Los Angeles has hosted an Olympics relatively recently. I'm doubtful whether the IOC would now want to return to any city that had hosted the Olympics within the memories of many.

    I agree with David Herdson about Budapest, though it is worth noting that Hungary has overachieved in the Olympics for its size in the last two Olympics (it was 12th in this year's medal table, ahead of the hosts, and 9th in 2012). Quite apart from the smallness of the country, Hungary does not have a particularly good track record of delivering large infrastructure projects. This is a risk that I can't imagine the IOC wishing to run.

    To be honest, I find it hard to see past Paris. It would need to blot its copybook badly not to get it, I would have thought.

    The idea that Olympics should leave a legacy of infrastructure (and World Cups too) is part of the problem and why they get so expensive. Even rich countries and cities like London get landed with white elephants. West Ham got a free stadium (though one with no atmosphere, as did Man City from the Commonwealth). Most Olympic legacies are pretty poor.

    Each one does not have to be a bigger and more expensive show that breaks the bank somewhere. It is like extending your house for a party, then wondering what to do with the extra rooms afterwards.
    It is fair to say Rio did not put on a bigger, better and more expensive show than London to say the least
    After all the problems in Rio, it's fair to say the IOC will be looking for a safe pair of hands and somewhere with local interest.

    Budapest is still under developed, probably not worth the risk. Rome would be fantastic, if there was any chance the Italians could actually pay for it. LA hosted already in my lifetime, don't see much enthusiasm for going back to the same city twice.

    That leaves Paris, which would put on a great show, and the 'century' sentimentality will help with the judges. Big question mark on security though, as others have mentioned. It will be the mother of all targets, how many people will want to turn up hours early to go through half a dozen police checkpoints on their way to watch?
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Nate Silver looks at the disparity between the tightening of national polls and Clinton's strong showing in most swing states :

    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-national-polls-show-the-race-tightening-but-state-polls-dont/
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Jim Waterson
    Theresa May undoing more George Osborne policies and abandoning regional mayors. https://t.co/QNPin9i3XO https://t.co/gnA2sI3gvm
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187

    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    My friend worked on the 2010 bid, he says we're never getting the world cup, too many noses bent out of shape by The Sunday Times and BBC exposes.

    Ditto the USA wont be getting it again.
    Not sure I agree with you about the USA. There's a lot of money to be made there.
    It is to do with where the prosecutions are happening, but the US Football Federation is still trying to clean up the legacy of Chuck Blazer.

    Lots of FIFA people are nervous about setting foot in the USA
    That's true. What about Canada? Women's World Cup was quite good (not that I watched any of it).
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,964
    Miss Plato, if she leaves it halfway done, that will be an issue.

    A Greater Manchester mayor, but not one for Yorkshire [excepting the odd southern bit that thinks it's in the Midlands...] could lead to people feeling one side of the Pennines is getting more devolution than the other (the continual cancellation of the tram system in Leeds has not endeared central government to the locals. In fact, I think it's the case that the money spent on preparing bids and plans for funding that was meant to come would have actually been enough to build a tram system).

    Anyway, I am off for a bit.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,837

    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    The issue is not so much continents - it is time zones. Anyone wanting to watch the games live on TV in Africa and Europe has just had a fortnight of very, very late nights. In 2020 they will have to take a fortnight off work to watch them live. LA? Forget it. You have to become nocturnal.

    I hope the European and African members of the IOC can work together and get behind Paris. It is a world city worthy of the Olympics. Security concerns? Then make it the greatest gathering of Special Forces the world has ever seen.
    Time zones is a big one, but unfortunately the largest and most influential TV audience is the USA.

    Fair to say that the last two weeks haven't been too productive in this household, with the track and field finishing at 6am local time (GMT+4). Tokyo will at least be on mainly during the hours of daylight! LA would run five hours later than Rio, so would be early mornings rather than late nights.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,837
    edited August 2016

    BTW - I see Ruth Davidson is channelling what Mike wrote on August 4th

    Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Tory leader, has become the most senior party figure to float the idea of an early election as she cited concerns about rebellious backbenchers.

    She said the “usual suspects” on the backbenches could “cause problems” for Mrs May and added there was a clear “temptation” to call an election sooner than 2020.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/21/ruth-davidson-says-early-general-election-is-tempting-and-warns/

    2019 looks possible. 4.2 on Betfair, against 1.7 for 2020. They'll want the EU negotiations pretty much done and dusted, and the new constituency boundaries in place before they call it though.

    2019 might also be right in the middle of Corbyn's deselection purge of the moderates, having her opponents' shambles in the news running up to an election might help Mrs May with her decision.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    PlatoSaid said:

    I'm going for Paris.

    The anniversary and infrastructure are a pull. It's culturally strong too.

    The USA seems to have had the Olympics quite enough to me. Los Angeles 1984 and Atlanta 1996. Plus Winter games in SLC in 2002.

    Paris would be a good choice.

    If not then perhaps the IOC might like to look outside the box for a European choice - Lisbon, Copenhagen or wait for it .... Dublin .. :smile:

    Cost of course ?!?!

    Or to cheer Remainers .... Brussels .. :smiley:
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,570
    The grievance mongers alight on Great British Bake off:

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14694454.BBC_criticised_as_new_Great_British_Bake_Off_series_contains_no_Scots/

    Lets see -

    Scotland has one twelfth of the UK's population.

    There are twelve contestants

    Last year two came from Scotland.

    So, all things being equal, roughly how many should Scotland have this year.....?
  • Options

    BTW - I see Ruth Davidson is channelling what Mike wrote on August 4th

    Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Tory leader, has become the most senior party figure to float the idea of an early election as she cited concerns about rebellious backbenchers.

    She said the “usual suspects” on the backbenches could “cause problems” for Mrs May and added there was a clear “temptation” to call an election sooner than 2020.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/21/ruth-davidson-says-early-general-election-is-tempting-and-warns/

    That's the Ruth Davidson who isn't even in parliament.

    So what does she know about rebellious backbenchers ?

    And the backbenchers who could cause May problems include Soubry, Perry, Morgan and other Osborne arselickers.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Anyway, I am off for a bit.

    Sauce pot !! .. :sunglasses:

  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,955
    PlatoSaid said:

    Jim Waterson
    Theresa May undoing more George Osborne policies and abandoning regional mayors. https://t.co/QNPin9i3XO https://t.co/gnA2sI3gvm

    Perhaps she is more keen on regional governors? ;)
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,915
    edited August 2016
    JackW said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    I'm going for Paris.

    The anniversary and infrastructure are a pull. It's culturally strong too.

    The USA seems to have had the Olympics quite enough to me. Los Angeles 1984 and Atlanta 1996. Plus Winter games in SLC in 2002.

    Paris would be a good choice.

    If not then perhaps the IOC might like to look outside the box for a European choice - Lisbon, Copenhagen or wait for it .... Dublin .. :smile:

    Cost of course ?!?!

    Or to cheer Remainers .... Brussels .. :smiley:
    Stockholm again? Or, if the US is being thought about, Chicago. Didn’t they put in a few years ago?
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,122
    I think that the impending disaster in Rio about the para Olympics will be a major factor. In London the para Olympics played to packed stadia and huge enthusiasm (not least because the Brits do even better at them than the original Olympics). We have already seen fairly empty stadia for the main games in Rio but that is nothing to what we are likely to see in the next month. After Rio a strong local demand for tickets for both events is going to be high on the agenda.

    Like every other criteria that points to either Paris or LA with Paris correctly the very strong favourite.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935
    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    South Africa has a chance in 2028 if Durban put on a good Commonwealth games in 2022) LA or Chicago are better bets for 2032
    If the requirement is a completed Commonwealth games then South Africa would be a decent bet for 2032 as the 2028 Olympics will be awarded in 2021...
    The Commonwealth Games certainly give South Africa a dress rehearsal Brazil did not have
  • Options
    gnorngnorn Posts: 14
    The last Paris games included competitions in ballooning, croquet, and a swimming obstacle race. I could definitely get behind a repeat of that!
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,570
    PlatoSaid said:

    Jim Waterson
    Theresa May undoing more George Osborne policies and abandoning regional mayors. https://t.co/QNPin9i3XO https://t.co/gnA2sI3gvm

    Great job by the photo-editor on that one!
  • Options
    Following the Neil Kinnock YouTube link from the last thread brings this:

    Dennis Skinner on Labour's 1992 defeat:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogt6njXU9Cg

    quite prophetic on what Labour's problems would be re the EU and losing touch with working class voters.

    Skinner really didn't like the LibDems - "Dr Death, Shirley Poppins, Woy of the Wadicles, Paddy Backdown".
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935

    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    My friend worked on the 2010 bid, he says we're never getting the world cup, too many noses bent out of shape by The Sunday Times and BBC exposes.

    Ditto the USA wont be getting it again.
    It would probably need a shakeup of FIFA which is clearly overdue
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    edited August 2016

    The grievance mongers alight on Great British Bake off:

    http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14694454.BBC_criticised_as_new_Great_British_Bake_Off_series_contains_no_Scots/

    Lets see -

    Scotland has one twelfth of the UK's population.

    There are twelve contestants

    Last year two came from Scotland.

    So, all things being equal, roughly how many should Scotland have this year.....?

    Not sure if you've ever noticed, but the X Factor has a distinct lack of Scottish contestants in the live finals. There was a Scottish lad who made the final a few years ago but I reckon that's the only Scot in recent years. Apparently it has something to do with Simon Cowell not trusting them since he had trouble with Jai McDowell who won Britain's Got Talent.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Interesting nugget on China - 26 golds, marked the lowest number since Atlanta in 1996.

    They sent 416 athletes.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,935
    edited August 2016

    JackW said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    I'm going for Paris.

    The anniversary and infrastructure are a pull. It's culturally strong too.

    The USA seems to have had the Olympics quite enough to me. Los Angeles 1984 and Atlanta 1996. Plus Winter games in SLC in 2002.

    Paris would be a good choice.

    If not then perhaps the IOC might like to look outside the box for a European choice - Lisbon, Copenhagen or wait for it .... Dublin .. :smile:

    Cost of course ?!?!

    Or to cheer Remainers .... Brussels .. :smiley:
    Stockholm again? Or, if the US is being thought about, Chicago. Didn’t they put in a few years ago?
    Stockholm had the 1912 Games, Chicago has not held it before
  • Options

    BTW - I see Ruth Davidson is channelling what Mike wrote on August 4th

    Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Tory leader, has become the most senior party figure to float the idea of an early election as she cited concerns about rebellious backbenchers.

    She said the “usual suspects” on the backbenches could “cause problems” for Mrs May and added there was a clear “temptation” to call an election sooner than 2020.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/21/ruth-davidson-says-early-general-election-is-tempting-and-warns/

    That's the Ruth Davidson who isn't even in parliament.

    So what does she know about rebellious backbenchers ?

    And the backbenchers who could cause May problems include Soubry, Perry, Morgan and other Osborne arselickers.
    That comes over rather aggressive towards TSE - not my intention.

    I'm just annoyed at this continual plotting and jockeying for position the likes of Ruth Davidson engage in.

    If May wants to call a general election she will do so but that will be her decision and not influenced by Davidson's opinions.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,837

    JackW said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    I'm going for Paris.

    The anniversary and infrastructure are a pull. It's culturally strong too.

    The USA seems to have had the Olympics quite enough to me. Los Angeles 1984 and Atlanta 1996. Plus Winter games in SLC in 2002.

    Paris would be a good choice.

    If not then perhaps the IOC might like to look outside the box for a European choice - Lisbon, Copenhagen or wait for it .... Dublin .. :smile:

    Cost of course ?!?!

    Or to cheer Remainers .... Brussels .. :smiley:
    Stockholm again? Or, if the US is being thought about, Chicago. Didn’t they put in a few years ago?
    One huge problem with the Olympics, unlike say the World Cup, is the sheer variety of sports and number of people that have to be accommodated, therefore the number of venues required.

    It's the cost of building all this for a month's use that puts off many potential bidders. Is there anywhere, other than London and Beijing, which could host an Olympics without major development required in the city?
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419

    "The IOC is not FIFA and has genuinely cleaned up its act."

    This might be considered a very optimistic view

    I didn't say it was entirely clean but the gift culture certainly isn't what it was twenty years ago, never mind anything like FIFA.

    I stick with what I said in the intro. There will be all sorts of considerations beyond sporting and technical ones - but I think these will still tend towards the comfort of delegates, sentiment and prestige rather than more corrupt factors.

    I agree that security is an issue but France can rightly point out that it's just staged the Euro 2016 championships without too much trouble. Whether the security forces were overly distracted by the football to miss the preparations for the Nice truce attack is an open question but that happened the week after Euro2016 ended and low-tech lone-wolf attacks are in any case the hardest to prevent in advance (though in that case, it might have been stopped indirectly had the perpetrator been arrested on other grounds).
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    JackW said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    I'm going for Paris.

    The anniversary and infrastructure are a pull. It's culturally strong too.

    The USA seems to have had the Olympics quite enough to me. Los Angeles 1984 and Atlanta 1996. Plus Winter games in SLC in 2002.

    Paris would be a good choice.

    If not then perhaps the IOC might like to look outside the box for a European choice - Lisbon, Copenhagen or wait for it .... Dublin .. :smile:

    Cost of course ?!?!

    Or to cheer Remainers .... Brussels .. :smiley:
    Stockholm again? Or, if the US is being thought about, Chicago. Didn’t they put in a few years ago?
    Chicago? Well, if you want to get shot...
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,606
    DavidL said:

    I think that the impending disaster in Rio about the para Olympics will be a major factor. In London the para Olympics played to packed stadia and huge enthusiasm (not least because the Brits do even better at them than the original Olympics). We have already seen fairly empty stadia for the main games in Rio but that is nothing to what we are likely to see in the next month. After Rio a strong local demand for tickets for both events is going to be high on the agenda.

    Like every other criteria that points to either Paris or LA with Paris correctly the very strong favourite.

    Yes, I think that's going to be a major factor as well in not picking a developing nation ever again. Even Eastern European nations might struggle in that regard. Still I think Hungary has a chance through means of corruption which the organisers of Paris, LA and Rome might not get involved in. The story about the IOC member voting for London by accident in the first round instead of Madrid riling up the Spanish contingent because of promises and payments made probably hasn't changed very much. The IOC may not be as bad as FIFA, but I'm certain that votes are up for sale and a nation like Hungary could exploit that system to their advantage.
  • Options
    bunnco said:

    From the Archives:

    My grandfather ran in the 1932 Los Angeles Olympics in the 100m, 200m and 4x100m. All the European teams went across the Atlantic on the Olympic Ship [with Stanley Baldwin as it happens, who was attending the Ottowa Conference] and then via the Olympic Train to Los Angeles.

    Sadly he got crocked falling down a staircase onboard ship so didn't perform at his best. It didn't help that Lord Burghley dropped the baton in the 4x100 so nothing new there. We have a wonderful competitor's medallion at home - just not one of Bronze, Silver or Gold.

    LA 1932 is noteworthy in quite a few respects: The first Olympiad with an athletes village [men only - the women stayed at a hotel downtown], the first with photo-finish equipment. And an Olympic Art competition, where each country submitted artworks as part of a medal competition. And a purpose built stadium. Of course, many fewer people competed at that time and it was strictly amateurs only - he had to ask for time off work.

    But perhaps the biggest legacy was that the Xth Olympiad in 1932 marked the start of the end of the depression and the start of the economic recovery in the States following the 1920's Stock Crash. History might show that the 2012 Olympics in London marked the end of our recession and, who knows, the successes this time around, negate any remaining negativity about our role in a post Brexit world. The historical precedents are all there.

    Bunnco - Your Man on the Spot

    Thank you for that. Unfortunately, I think the bit about the 4x100 has been embellished in the telling. Burghley ran in the 4x400, not the 4x100. The GB team (Finlay, Fuller, Engelhart and Page) qualified for the 4x100 final by finishing third in heat 1 in a time of 42.0s. They finished last in the final with a time of 41.4s, just 0.2s behind the bronze medal team (Italy) which doesn't sound like the baton was dropped. Burghley won silver in the 4x400.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,122
    PlatoSaid said:

    Interesting nugget on China - 26 golds, marked the lowest number since Atlanta in 1996.

    They sent 416 athletes.

    Quite an interesting chart amongst the BBC gloating showing the trends in the medals table: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/37132833

    China put in a huge effort for Beijing but not so much this time or the last. I suspect that they will want to do much better in Tokyo given local rivalries.

    For the UK the number of fourths is encouraging but further progress is going to require a generation of Adam Peaty's because we are pretty close to topped out in our strengths. Oh and a replacement for Mo.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,570

    BTW - I see Ruth Davidson is channelling what Mike wrote on August 4th

    Ruth Davidson, the Scottish Tory leader, has become the most senior party figure to float the idea of an early election as she cited concerns about rebellious backbenchers.

    She said the “usual suspects” on the backbenches could “cause problems” for Mrs May and added there was a clear “temptation” to call an election sooner than 2020.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/21/ruth-davidson-says-early-general-election-is-tempting-and-warns/

    That's the Ruth Davidson who isn't even in parliament.

    So what does she know about rebellious backbenchers ?

    And the backbenchers who could cause May problems include Soubry, Perry, Morgan and other Osborne arselickers.
    I'm just annoyed at this continual plotting and jockeying for position the likes of Ruth Davidson engage in.
    I think Ruth is generally quite well behaved - its worth reading her comments in full - much more balanced than the précis suggests - and not at all like IDS writing in the Sun on Sunday demanding BREXIT NOW!

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1646498/iain-duncan-smith-says-the-referendum-was-not-a-suggestion-we-have-to-leave-eu-now-and-respect-brexit/
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419
    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    Enough members of the IOC were quite clear after the 2000 bid that they were only interested in London bidding that it's highly unlikely that Manchester will ever stage the Games while there are so many premier league cities putting up for them.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    I'd go for Moscow given how corrupt it has become.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419
    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    Unlike FIFA, there's no IOC rule about rotation but it does seem to form part of the unofficial criteria on which decisions are based. Not since 1948/52 has one continent staged two Games in succession but Madrid bid for the 2016 Games, to follow on from London, which itself formed a two-in-three in Europe with Athens, which would be the same as Rio-Tokyo-LA, if you count the Americas as one (which is itself more of a stretch).
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419
    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Manchester 2024

    Manchester has hosted the Commonwealth games and could be an outside bet as a future candidate but given the UK only hosted the games 4 years ago it will be decades before we get a chance of hosting them again. We are likely to get the World Cup first, in which case Manchester would clearly play its part
    I don't think we'll ever host a world cup. We are hated by the rest of the footballing world; our best bet is to get the Euros, but even that's a long way off given that we have the semi final and final of the "don't call it a tournament" tournament in 2020.
    We'll get a world cup when FIFA has sorted out its corruption. Which might be never but then again might not. The best bet though is to continue to play the anti-corruption game, which goes down well with fans and might play dividends in the long run. No point bidding though until there are any fruits there.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    .
    DavidL said:

    PlatoSaid said:

    Interesting nugget on China - 26 golds, marked the lowest number since Atlanta in 1996.

    They sent 416 athletes.

    Quite an interesting chart amongst the BBC gloating showing the trends in the medals table: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/olympics/37132833

    China put in a huge effort for Beijing but not so much this time or the last. I suspect that they will want to do much better in Tokyo given local rivalries.

    For the UK the number of fourths is encouraging but further progress is going to require a generation of Adam Peaty's because we are pretty close to topped out in our strengths. Oh and a replacement for Mo.
    That's a great selection of graphics and nerd stats.
  • Options
    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    South Africa has a chance in 2028 if Durban put on a good Commonwealth games in 2022) LA or Chicago are better bets for 2032
    If the requirement is a completed Commonwealth games then South Africa would be a decent bet for 2032 as the 2028 Olympics will be awarded in 2021...
    The USA is virtually a continent in its own right and is comparable to how often the EU gets it (especially since Canada prefers to host the winter olympics which it is more suited to). Since the 90s the USA has hosted the Olympics only once in Atlanta.

    Europe has had:
    Barcelona 1992
    Athens 2004
    London 2012

    The USA is surely due it before the EU is again?
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    nunu said:

    I'd go for Moscow given how corrupt it has become.

    My parents won a competition and went to the Moscow games. What a strange experience it seemed to be.

    The very tough treatment of their athletes really made an impression.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419

    Mr. Eagles, if football associations had any balls they'd boycott Qatar, withdraw from FIFA and form an organisation that could, perhaps, be viewed with some trust.

    Mr. Root, also, 9/11 was a decade and a half ago. It'd be over two decades in the past by the next (bid for) Olympics. French terrorism was last week (Strasbourg stabbing, not that the media reported it much). There have been multiple major attacks over the last couple of years, unlike the US.

    There was, however, a bomb last time, in Atlanta.

    Re the World Cup, precisely. The problem is money but so is the solution. Were the English, French, Italian, German and Spanish Associations to withdraw and ban any player who played in it from being registered with an affiliated club, the financial losses would cripple FIFA. Working round the employment law might be tricky but there ought to be some possible solution along those lines.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,918

    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    South Africa has a chance in 2028 if Durban put on a good Commonwealth games in 2022) LA or Chicago are better bets for 2032
    If the requirement is a completed Commonwealth games then South Africa would be a decent bet for 2032 as the 2028 Olympics will be awarded in 2021...
    The USA is virtually a continent in its own right and is comparable to how often the EU gets it (especially since Canada prefers to host the winter olympics which it is more suited to). Since the 90s the USA has hosted the Olympics only once in Atlanta.

    Europe has had:
    Barcelona 1992
    Athens 2004
    London 2012

    The USA is surely due it before the EU is again?
    I'd agree, but there are two other factors to consider:

    1. How committed is the City of Los Angeles to the bid? Really, really wanting it matters.

    2. The IOC has a tendency to give the games to countries which 'keep trying'. The UK (between Manchester and London) bid on a lot of Olympics before they got London 2012. That works in Paris' favour.

    But I'm more with you than against; I'd reckon LA should be the narrow favourite. 45:40:12;3 would be my probabilities. (And maybe the 3 for Budapest is generous...)
  • Options
    weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820
    JackW said:

    Nate Silver looks at the disparity between the tightening of national polls and Clinton's strong showing in most swing states :

    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-national-polls-show-the-race-tightening-but-state-polls-dont/

    Which is interesting as the list of polls on the site http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/updates/#plus

    Shows very few swing-state polls in recent days - the last ones showing Trump ahead in BOTH Carolinas.
  • Options
    Wondering how the UK might up its medal gold count I had a quick peak at Wiki to see how many medals there are for each sport. There are some very medal-rich sports where we are nowhere to be seen:
    Weightlifting 15
    Wrestling 18
    Shooting 15
    Judo 14
    Rhythmic Gym 18 (phwoar!)
    Fencing 10
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    Morning all. In the interests of preserving my sleep patterns, I'm praying it will be Paris.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,897
    edited August 2016
    Patrick said:

    Wondering how the UK might up its medal gold count I had a quick peak at Wiki to see how many medals there are for each sport. There are some very medal-rich sports where we are nowhere to be seen:
    Weightlifting 15
    Wrestling 18
    Shooting 15
    Judo 14
    Rhythmic Gym 18 (phwoar!)
    Fencing 10

    Where do you get 18 from in the rhythmic gymnastics ?

    I count two competitions, all around women individual; and all around women team.

    We got two bronze in the shooting, whilst not as great as some other nations it was on the map !

    Weightlifiting and wrestling are a couple of seams we could tap.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,955
    weejonnie said:

    JackW said:

    Nate Silver looks at the disparity between the tightening of national polls and Clinton's strong showing in most swing states :

    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-national-polls-show-the-race-tightening-but-state-polls-dont/

    Which is interesting as the list of polls on the site http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/updates/#plus

    Shows very few swing-state polls in recent days - the last ones showing Trump ahead in BOTH Carolinas.
    Good summary of all the various forecasts:

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
  • Options
    Pulpstar said:

    Patrick said:

    Wondering how the UK might up its medal gold count I had a quick peak at Wiki to see how many medals there are for each sport. There are some very medal-rich sports where we are nowhere to be seen:
    Weightlifting 15
    Wrestling 18
    Shooting 15
    Judo 14
    Rhythmic Gym 18 (phwoar!)
    Fencing 10

    Where do you get 18 from in the rhythmic gymnastics ?

    I count two competitions, all around women individual; and all around women team.
    Whoops! 18 is all gymnastics not just rhythmic. My bad. (But wiki page not well presented). Still phwoar!
  • Options
    scotslassscotslass Posts: 912
    ANOTHER RICHARD

    Brilliant clip from Dennis Skinner in 1992 - a reminder of when Labour had personalities as well as leaders. Watched it after listening to the robotic and incompetent Kezzia Dugdale on the Scottish radio.

    It may be that Scots Labour would be better served by keeping Corbyn and ditching this tragically sub standard politician who has never even won a constituency seat.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419

    eek said:

    HYUFD said:

    eek said:

    I think the question is to those people with votes does the IOC care more about spreading the games between continents and then is America one continent or 2...

    If they regard America as one continent I would expect 2024 to go to Paris, if not its a coin toss between Paris and LA... Personally I reckon its Paris in 24, LA in 28 then somewhere in Asia in 32....

    South Africa has a chance in 2028 if Durban put on a good Commonwealth games in 2022) LA or Chicago are better bets for 2032
    If the requirement is a completed Commonwealth games then South Africa would be a decent bet for 2032 as the 2028 Olympics will be awarded in 2021...
    The USA is virtually a continent in its own right and is comparable to how often the EU gets it (especially since Canada prefers to host the winter olympics which it is more suited to). Since the 90s the USA has hosted the Olympics only once in Atlanta.

    Europe has had:
    Barcelona 1992
    Athens 2004
    London 2012

    The USA is surely due it before the EU is again?
    Yes, and if the USOC could find a city where politicians and people were united behind the bid they'd be pretty much first on the list, particularly if it's a prestige city like New York. LA is only bidding this time because Boston withdrew.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,897
    edited August 2016
    Patrick said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Patrick said:

    Wondering how the UK might up its medal gold count I had a quick peak at Wiki to see how many medals there are for each sport. There are some very medal-rich sports where we are nowhere to be seen:
    Weightlifting 15
    Wrestling 18
    Shooting 15
    Judo 14
    Rhythmic Gym 18 (phwoar!)
    Fencing 10

    Where do you get 18 from in the rhythmic gymnastics ?

    I count two competitions, all around women individual; and all around women team.
    Whoops! 18 is all gymnastics not just rhythmic. My bad. (But wiki page not well presented). Still phwoar!
    Rhythmic gymnastics will be a tough one to try and get a medal in given there are only a couple (And the strength of 'greater russia' in the event). Mind you Spain got the silver in the team so it is not impossible to defeat the slavs.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    edited August 2016
    Patrick said:

    Wondering how the UK might up its medal gold count I had a quick peak at Wiki to see how many medals there are for each sport. There are some very medal-rich sports where we are nowhere to be seen:
    Weightlifting 15
    Wrestling 18
    Shooting 15
    Judo 14
    Rhythmic Gym 18 (phwoar!)
    Fencing 10

    Simon Timson - an UK sport admin bigwig said Shooting was a target sport for Tokyo - and looking at other high medal number events to exploit. Very sensible stuff.

    EDIT I wish there was a Strong Man event in the Olympics - a version of MPent for epic feats of strength. It'd make brilliant TV for those who don't watch the World's Strongest Man competition.
This discussion has been closed.