Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If current polling levels continue then UKIP must be in wit

SystemSystem Posts: 11,007
edited July 2013 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If current polling levels continue then UKIP must be in with a good chance of getting MPs

The significant feature of the weekend polling was that three of the 4 firms reporting had such large shares for UKIP – not much down on what we were seeing in the immediate aftermath of the party’s spectacular local elections performance in May

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    edited July 2013
    First!

    But is that really going to happen? Maybe – maybe not. Who knows?

    Anyone'd think this was a betting site with such insightful questions.
  • Options
    JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    Doubleplusnincompoopobulous mega-rubbish. The figures show that UKIP would start getting seats at 16% of the votes. That's like saying that Dennis Skinner would break the world record for 100 metres if he ran it in less than 9.58 seconds. Hashtag it's not going to happen.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    - "If current polling levels continue"

    They won't.

    Post the Euros next year the UKIP VI will decrease dramatically. It always does.

    (I say this as someone who hopes I am wrong.)
  • Options
    redcliffe62redcliffe62 Posts: 342
    You know your stuff on UKIP trends and the low satisfaction levels for Cameron and Miliband and Clegg suggest that the "anyone but them" box may get a tick at the euros, and then UKIP cannot be brushed off as a non force if they win most seats and have most votes.

    That threat will play long and hard at the Scottish referendum, where UKIP want to amend the Scottish parliament into a parish council (not just Tony Blair!) and simply brushing them off as not being a viable threat in a 2015 election so do not worry Scotland will be very hard to justify in light of the millions of people who will have voted for them in deepest Surrey, Hampshire and Lincolnshire and perhaps saw them WIN!

    Stay in Britain, get UKIP will be a powerful line at the referendum.
    No wonder UK Together are running away from Farage, he is toxic to their case.
    Bad enough being led by unelected Tories, what about an unelected UKIP coalition with whoever?
    Good grief!
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141
    edited July 2013
    I'd expect 5% to 10% with zero seats. But maybe there's not much room for them to be in the middle range (lower 10s etc). If they've got latent support in the mid-20s, maybe they can resist the squeeze with a bit of decent polling during the campaign, forcing the media to pay attention to them and producing a virtuous cycle.

    One thing I'm wondering about this: The LibDems have tended to poll very weakly in mid-term, then pick up support during the actual election. Why do people think that is, and why would or wouldn't it the same thing apply to UKIP?
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    edited July 2013
    I hadn't realised that the date of the 2014 European Parliament GE has been changed, from June to May, which makes it coincide with the English local elections (London boroughs; metropolitan boroughs; some unitary authorities; and some non-metropolitan districts):

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20130521IPR08702/html/Next-European-Parliament-elections-to-be-brought-forward-to-May-2014

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament_election,_2014_(United_Kingdom)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_local_elections,_2014

    Surely that is a nightmare scenario for Conservative councillors?

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Ukip to gain seats at the general election ?? .... The riddle will shortly be solved :

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE projection to be released at 9.00am ....

  • Options
    beastinblackbeastinblack Posts: 13
    edited July 2013
    Our democracy is a farce. A party that could get twice the vote but less than a tenth of the seats is not democracy.

    Stuart Dickson - 'Post the Euros next year the UKIP VI will decrease dramatically. It always does.' wishful thinking, it used to decrease because the Tories were in opposition who we used to think were actually Tories. Get my drift?

    Tim - 'We should be getting an ICM and a MORI this week, we'e not had a phone poll for ages, which will give a better idea.' Two other phone pollsters that do not prompt UKIP. Yes it will give us a better idea of the fact that these phone pollsters are out of date and cannot handle 4 party politics with their current methodology.
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141

    I hadn't realised that the date of the 2014 European Parliament GE has been changed, from June to May, which makes it coincide with the English local elections (London boroughs; metropolitan boroughs; some unitary authorities; and some non-metropolitan districts):

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20130521IPR08702/html/Next-European-Parliament-elections-to-be-brought-forward-to-May-2014

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament_election,_2014_(United_Kingdom)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_local_elections,_2014

    Surely that is a nightmare scenario for Conservative councillors?

    I think they were always going to coincide anyway, weren't they? I remember Daniel Hannan or someone wrote an article complaining about all kinds of EU things, one of them being that the British elections got moved to June to fit the EU schedule, and just as that came out the EU announced that they were going to move the EU elections back to May, just to mess with his head. (*)

    (*) Alternatively, to give the parliament time to pick the new Commission president to reflect the result of the elections.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    Best prices - 2014 European Parliament election in UK

    Most votes:
    UKIP 4/5 (Ladbrokes)
    Lab 7/4 (Hills)
    Con 7/1 (Hills)
    LD 125/1 (Hills)

    Most votes - match bet (Ladbrokes)
    UKIP 4/7
    Con 5/4
  • Options
    redcliffe62redcliffe62 Posts: 342

    I hadn't realised that the date of the 2014 European Parliament GE has been changed, from June to May, which makes it coincide with the English local elections (London boroughs; metropolitan boroughs; some unitary authorities; and some non-metropolitan districts):

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20130521IPR08702/html/Next-European-Parliament-elections-to-be-brought-forward-to-May-2014

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament_election,_2014_(United_Kingdom)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_local_elections,_2014

    Surely that is a nightmare scenario for Conservative councillors?

    I thought perception was UKIP may do better on a low turnout as more committed voters, but perhaps those that take it from 40% voting on Euros to 55% including councils may be mainly mainstream voters.

  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    JackW said:

    Ukip to gain seats at the general election ?? .... The riddle will shortly be solved :

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE projection to be released at 9.00am ....

    Remind us how accurate your ARSE projection was at the 2010 UK GE.

  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    Best prices - Next UK GE - total UKIP seats

    None 8/13 (Paddy Power)
    One to Five 2/1 (Hills)
    Over Five 5/1 (Hills)

    Therefore, according to current market prices, it is twice as likely that UKIP get their first MP (2/1) as it is than the Tories win an overall majority (4/1).


  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    Ukip to gain seats at the general election ?? .... The riddle will shortly be solved :

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE projection to be released at 9.00am ....

    Remind us how accurate your ARSE projection was at the 2010 UK GE.

    If you have to ask .....

    Titters ....



  • Options
    PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    UKIP with MPs? Maybe one or two, but I think zero is more than likely.

    Meanwhile the drains up on the NHS continues a pace - I'm very pleased about this development, there seems to be very many examples of system abuse here for convenience of the hospital staff.

    " Hospitals will today be told to review the treatment of every patient who has been on the controversial Liverpool Care Pathway after an independent review found examples of abuse across the NHS.

    The Department of Health will tell hospitals to refer doctors to the General Medical Council if they find the procedures have been abused.

    The pathway is used to "manage" the death of terminally ill NHS patients. However, the Neuberger inquiry, which will be published today, has heard allegations that patients have been unnecessarily sedated and denied food and water.

    The inquiry is expected to say that there were "numerous examples of poor implementation and worrying standards in care" and that in some cases patients have been put on the pathway without their families being informed.

    The pathway is now being phased out in a bid to restore public trust in the way the NHS treats terminally ill patients..." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10178763/Treatment-of-every-Liverpool-Pathway-patient-to-be-reviewed.html
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141

    I hadn't realised that the date of the 2014 European Parliament GE has been changed, from June to May, which makes it coincide with the English local elections (London boroughs; metropolitan boroughs; some unitary authorities; and some non-metropolitan districts):

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20130521IPR08702/html/Next-European-Parliament-elections-to-be-brought-forward-to-May-2014

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament_election,_2014_(United_Kingdom)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_local_elections,_2014

    Surely that is a nightmare scenario for Conservative councillors?

    I thought perception was UKIP may do better on a low turnout as more committed voters, but perhaps those that take it from 40% voting on Euros to 55% including councils may be mainly mainstream voters.

    IIUC the local elections are where Labour are strong. To the extent that UKIP pull from Labour as well as the Tories, that implies a strong performance at the Euros for Labour, middling for UKIP and weak for Con.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,914
    It's hard to identify a seat where it could happen. Geographically you have to look towards eastern England. Which constituencies are possibilities?
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Ukip to gain seats at the general election ?? .... The riddle will shortly be solved :

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE projection to be released at 9.00am ....

    Remind us how accurate your ARSE projection was at the 2010 UK GE.

    If you have to ask .....

    Titters ....
    Yes, we know that you think you are the most glorious person on the planet Jack, but I have some news for you: you are not a celebrity.

    Has it never crossed your mind that there will be a lot of people reading this who were not reading PB back in 2008-10? Could you not assist those people by giving a brief summary of your previous ARSE projections so that they may assess their usefulness?

    For example, what was your ARSE projection in July 2008? ie. at the same point in the political cycle.
  • Options
    PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    The Sun's treatment of the pamplet ideas

    "TORY MPs will today launch a new drive to re-style themselves as the party of the workers, not the rich.

    The campaign will target working class and ethnic minority voters outside the South East in a desperate bid to boost support before the 2015 election.

    A group of MPs will urge PM David Cameron to show he is on the side of hard-up Brits by making the cost of living and jobs his top priorities.

    Ideas include increasing the minimum wage, currently £6.19 an hour, and slashing taxes for employers so they can pay for it.

    The group wants fuel duty to be frozen until at least 2015, and costly renewable energy targets axed to slash heating bills. It says councils should get new powers to reduce benefit sanctions for unemployed Brits, to take local job cuts into account.

    And to help more people get on the housing ladder, cities in the North would be allowed to build on green belt land if locals were in favour. MPs hope the ideas — set out in a pamphlet published today — will be included in the Conservatives’ election manifesto.

    Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/5013737/Tory-MPs-want-to-be-restyled-as-party-of-workers.html#ixzz2Z5nu6HDX
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    Best prices - Next UK GE - total UKIP seats

    None 8/13 (Paddy Power)
    One to Five 2/1 (Hills)
    Over Five 5/1 (Hills)

    Therefore, according to current market prices, it is twice as likely that UKIP get their first MP (2/1) as it is than the Tories win an overall majority (4/1).


    That’s not quite correct. The implied percentage probability of 2/1 = 33%
    The implied percentage probability of 4/1= 20%

    During the summer we need a thread on betting mathematics.


  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 23,754
    Stupid line-up from pre EU lobby to launch its manifesto. It's the roll your eyes and say well they would say that team. The pro lobby needs some new faces for a hearing not this crew.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jul/15/ken-clarke-danny-alexander-mandelson-eu
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,914
    In other news, keep an eye on events in Spain this week. Weekend revelations about an ongoing corruption scandal involving senior figures in PP, the ruling party, have dragged the PM directly into the firing line. It does not look good. It could get very messy.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    edited July 2013

    Best prices - Next UK GE - total UKIP seats

    None 8/13 (Paddy Power)
    One to Five 2/1 (Hills)
    Over Five 5/1 (Hills)

    Therefore, according to current market prices, it is twice as likely that UKIP get their first MP (2/1) as it is than the Tories win an overall majority (4/1).


    That’s not quite correct. The implied percentage probability of 2/1 = 33%
    The implied percentage probability of 4/1= 20%

    During the summer we need a thread on betting mathematics.
    Thanks. I realised that that was a bit wonky the moment I pressed the Post Comment button, but got distracted by Jack's ego.
  • Options
    Anyone noticed this Labour plan to make welfarism a human right? FFS!

    I'm not sure what our (unwritten) constitution says about enshrining socialism. Could Dave enshrine balanced budgets? This is precisely one of the key downfalls of the EU. They have tried to embed socialism within its constitution - and that is not compatible with democracy, where people may have a different political opinion.

    Labour's mantra: 'Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what you can squeeze out of it'. Losers.
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141
    edited July 2013

    It's hard to identify a seat where it could happen. Geographically you have to look towards eastern England. Which constituencies are possibilities?

    Survation did this after the local elections. This is limited to places that actually held elections, so there may be some other promising places elsewhere.

    http://survation.com/2013/05/ukip-won-in-8-westminster-constituencies-last-thursday/

    Constituency UKIP 'majority' in local election May 2013 Current MP Party Majority Party holding seat in 2001
    South Thanet 7.46% Laura Sandys Con 7617 Lab
    North Thanet 5.92% Sir Roger Gale Con 13528 Con
    Sittingbourne and Sheppey 5.70% Gordon Henderson Con 12383 Lab
    Forest of Dean 0.90% Mark Harper Con 11064 Lab
    Aylesbury 2.58% David Lidington Con 12618 Con
    Great Yarmouth* (over LAB) 2.25% Brandon Lewis Con 4276 Lab
    Boston & Skegness 11.18% Mark Simmonds Con 12426 Con
    East Worthing and Shoreham 1.72% Tim Loughton Con 11105 Con
    Castle Point 0.32% Rebecca Harris Con 7632 Con
    Bognor Regis and Littlehampton 7.35% Nick Gibb Con 13063 Con
  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 23,754
    Plato said:

    The Sun's treatment of the pamplet ideas

    "TORY MPs will today launch a new drive to re-style themselves as the party of the workers, not the rich.

    The campaign will target working class and ethnic minority voters outside the South East in a desperate bid to boost support before the 2015 election.

    A group of MPs will urge PM David Cameron to show he is on the side of hard-up Brits by making the cost of living and jobs his top priorities.

    Ideas include increasing the minimum wage, currently £6.19 an hour, and slashing taxes for employers so they can pay for it.

    The group wants fuel duty to be frozen until at least 2015, and costly renewable energy targets axed to slash heating bills. It says councils should get new powers to reduce benefit sanctions for unemployed Brits, to take local job cuts into account.

    And to help more people get on the housing ladder, cities in the North would be allowed to build on green belt land if locals were in favour. MPs hope the ideas — set out in a pamphlet published today — will be included in the Conservatives’ election manifesto.

    Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/5013737/Tory-MPs-want-to-be-restyled-as-party-of-workers.html#ixzz2Z5nu6HDX

    About 3 years too late. Those of us who have been saying this to the guffaws of the SE Blues can buy some popcorn as we watch the sudden change in spin and how our best ever chancellor has suddenly always been of this opinion.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557

    In other news, keep an eye on events in Spain this week. Weekend revelations about an ongoing corruption scandal involving senior figures in PP, the ruling party, have dragged the PM directly into the firing line. It does not look good. It could get very messy.

    Indeed.

    I am very nervous about Spain, and several other states. I am seriously considering significantly reducing my stock market exposure and putting some capital on money market. I just have a bad feeling that nearly every stock exchange on the planet seems to be overpriced at the moment.

    As I have stated previously, I consider gold to be underpriced and have been a buyer these last few months, but I am probably over-exposed to gold as well, so prefer money market.

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Ukip to gain seats at the general election ?? .... The riddle will shortly be solved :

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE projection to be released at 9.00am ....

    Remind us how accurate your ARSE projection was at the 2010 UK GE.

    If you have to ask .....

    Titters ....
    Yes, we know that you think you are the most glorious person on the planet Jack, but I have some news for you: you are not a celebrity.

    Has it never crossed your mind that there will be a lot of people reading this who were not reading PB back in 2008-10? Could you not assist those people by giving a brief summary of your previous ARSE projections so that they may assess their usefulness?

    For example, what was your ARSE projection in July 2008? ie. at the same point in the political cycle.
    Oh you are a dull fellow and on such a wonderful early Monday morning. One might have hoped that your recent absence from PB hadn't dulled your wits too much, but hey ho ....

    Neither am I much concerned by the ignorance of those foolish enough not to have been cognisant of Mike's fine publication in 2008 or even earlier.

    As for not being "the most glorious person on the planet" I'll have to agree with you - That prerogative is held by Mrs Jack W - I can pick em !!

    Any more dull questions Stuart ??

  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    JackW said:

    Ukip to gain seats at the general election ?? .... The riddle will shortly be solved :

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE projection to be released at 9.00am ....

    Remind us how accurate your ARSE projection was at the 2010 UK GE.

    If you have to ask .....

    Titters ....
    Yes, we know that you think you are the most glorious person on the planet Jack, but I have some news for you: you are not a celebrity.

    Has it never crossed your mind that there will be a lot of people reading this who were not reading PB back in 2008-10? Could you not assist those people by giving a brief summary of your previous ARSE projections so that they may assess their usefulness?

    For example, what was your ARSE projection in July 2008? ie. at the same point in the political cycle.
    Oh you are a dull fellow and on such a wonderful early Monday morning. One might have hoped that your recent absence from PB hadn't dulled your wits too much, but hey ho ....

    Neither am I much concerned by the ignorance of those foolish enough not to have been cognisant of Mike's fine publication in 2008 or even earlier.

    As for not being "the most glorious person on the planet" I'll have to agree with you - That prerogative is held by Mrs Jack W - I can pick em !!

    Any more dull questions Stuart ??
    No, just the same one: what was your ARSE projection in July 2008?

  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 23,754
    tim said:

    Plato said:

    The Sun's treatment of the pamplet ideas

    "TORY MPs will today launch a new drive to re-style themselves as the party of the workers, not the rich.

    The campaign will target working class and ethnic minority voters outside the South East in a desperate bid to boost support before the 2015 election.

    A group of MPs will urge PM David Cameron to show he is on the side of hard-up Brits by making the cost of living and jobs his top priorities.

    Ideas include increasing the minimum wage, currently £6.19 an hour, and slashing taxes for employers so they can pay for it.

    The group wants fuel duty to be frozen until at least 2015, and costly renewable energy targets axed to slash heating bills. It says councils should get new powers to reduce benefit sanctions for unemployed Brits, to take local job cuts into account.

    And to help more people get on the housing ladder, cities in the North would be allowed to build on green belt land if locals were in favour. MPs hope the ideas — set out in a pamphlet published today — will be included in the Conservatives’ election manifesto.

    Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/5013737/Tory-MPs-want-to-be-restyled-as-party-of-workers.html#ixzz2Z5nu6HDX

    About 3 years too late. Those of us who have been saying this to the guffaws of the SE Blues can buy some popcorn as we watch the sudden change in spin and how our best ever chancellor has suddenly always been of this opinion.

    Osbornes policies are deliberately designed to make it worse

    A third of Britain is effectively off-limits to lower-income working families because private rents are unaffordable, a new report claims.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23273448

    Stoking up houseprices outweighs any fiddling around at the edges.
    Yeah tim , but as we know that's also Labour's policy.

  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141
    OT, I'm quite liking Predictious, the Intrade clone using Bitcoin, a peer-to-peer digital currency created by a pseudonymous hacker to help people lay bets on Ron and Rand Paul. There's hardly any liquidity, but the flip side of that is that you can throw up ridiculously bad-value offers and occasionally some over-optimistic person will take them.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    Best prices - First to leave the Euro

    Cyprus 6/4 (PP)
    Greece 2/1 (Lad)
    Slovenia 7/1 (Lad)
    Italy 12/1 (PP)
    Spain 12/1 (PP)
    Portugal 18/1 (SJ)
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,576
    edited July 2013
    On topic - I've been impressed by the robustness of UKIP support as they have dropped out of the headlines - so those confidently predicting "UKIP triumph in the Euros (and simultaneously held locals?) followed by slump" may need to think again.

    Rather alarming headline in the Sun, which I thought referred to the Liverpool Pathway, but instead to sorting out NHS management at failing trusts:

    "Deaths Squads"

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/5013633/Deaths-squads-deployed-at-14-NHS-hospitals-over-13000-lost-lives.html

    Trevor Kavenagh not sympathetic to Andy Burnham:

    "The political blame game is already under way with former Health Secretary Andy Burnham predictably fingering Tory “cuts”.

    ...It was on his watch that the Mid-Staffs catastrophe exploded, destroying the public’s implicit faith in Labour’s proudest creation, the cradle-to-grave National Health Service.

    The Mid-Staffs deaths of 1,200 men and women who should have lived shocked the nation — but Whitehall civil servants did everything possible to block an inquiry.

    “We do not feel a full public inquiry would be in the interests of patients and the public,” wrote one self-serving official.

    Mr Burnham took the advice. The Francis Inquiry was carried out in private.


  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    Unibet have actually got the best price if you want to bet on UKIP winning at least one MP: 11/5.

  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141

    Best prices - First to leave the Euro

    Cyprus 6/4 (PP)
    Greece 2/1 (Lad)
    Slovenia 7/1 (Lad)
    Italy 12/1 (PP)
    Spain 12/1 (PP)
    Portugal 18/1 (SJ)

    I don't think any of them will but if they were going to you might want to look at the strong end (Finland?) rather than the weak end. Also you have to watch the definitions because the Eurozone might find it easier to split rather than crumble, and if it did it might not be clear which of the pieces was the original Euro...
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    edited July 2013
    Next UK GE - UKIP vote percentage (Ladbrokes)

    0-5% 5/2
    5-10% 6/4
    10-15% 4/1
    15-20% 7/1
    20-25% 14/1
    25+% 16/1
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557

    Best prices - First to leave the Euro

    Cyprus 6/4 (PP)
    Greece 2/1 (Lad)
    Slovenia 7/1 (Lad)
    Italy 12/1 (PP)
    Spain 12/1 (PP)
    Portugal 18/1 (SJ)

    I don't think any of them will but if they were going to you might want to look at the strong end (Finland?) rather than the weak end. Also you have to watch the definitions because the Eurozone might find it easier to split rather than crumble, and if it did it might not be clear which of the pieces was the original Euro...
    Finland are 33/1 with PP.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    UKIP to win a by-election before the next UK GE: 7/2 (William Hill)

  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141

    Best prices - First to leave the Euro

    Cyprus 6/4 (PP)
    Greece 2/1 (Lad)
    Slovenia 7/1 (Lad)
    Italy 12/1 (PP)
    Spain 12/1 (PP)
    Portugal 18/1 (SJ)

    I don't think any of them will but if they were going to you might want to look at the strong end (Finland?) rather than the weak end. Also you have to watch the definitions because the Eurozone might find it easier to split rather than crumble, and if it did it might not be clear which of the pieces was the original Euro...
    Finland are 33/1 with PP.
    Still not value IMHO, but a whole lot better than the other ones.
  • Options
    PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Janet Daley wrote on Saturday about the tack the Tories could take - its has similarities with the pamphlet proposals.

    "In other words, what was wrong with the Mitt Romney incarnation of Republicanism was not that it did not make itself explicitly inclusive of Hispanic voters, but that it failed to address the concerns of any working-class groups – whether they were white or from racial minorities. His campaign presented itself as almost entirely the voice of entrepreneurial capitalism rather than speaking for working people (like the Reagan Democrats who once voted Republican in huge numbers).

    So, on the Kristol analysis, what is needed is not a racially based recasting of the party philosophy but a clear statement of the basic economic message that should resonate with all hard-working voters who want to improve their lives, whether they are white or Latino. (In fact, the second George Bush to win the presidency was very successful in capturing the Hispanic vote, perhaps because he did not present himself as a successful businessman who championed wealth, but as someone who believed in individual achievement.)

    Now, this problem – and the proposed solution – has a clear resonance in Britain. Many of our ethnic minority populations are also aspirational and hard-working. The Asian community is renowned for its belief in strong families and the value of education. Such people should be natural Tory voters.

    Indeed, the traditional party message could very well have more personal relevance for them than it does for many white working-class Britons: as in the US, which now also has a welfare-dependency problem among the settled population, new migrants here are even more likely to want to be independent and self-determining. The answer is not to scrap the old values but to restate them with conviction and courage to a fresh audience who have every reason to adopt them..." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/georgeosborne/10177373/Modern-voters-are-very-receptive-to-the-Rights-old-economic-values.html

  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,922

    Best prices - First to leave the Euro

    Cyprus 6/4 (PP)
    Greece 2/1 (Lad)
    Slovenia 7/1 (Lad)
    Italy 12/1 (PP)
    Spain 12/1 (PP)
    Portugal 18/1 (SJ)

    What are the rules on 'dead heats'. I would guess that we wouldn't see just one going. BTW, Slovenia is very poor odds. Italy might be the stand out value.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,922
    BTW: great British economy news. From the FT:

    The number of companies close to insolvency dropped sharply in the second quarter, underpinning hopes of a sustainable recovery in the UK’s economy.
    This is the third quarter in a row that the number of companies on the verge of insolvency has fallen, according to Begbies Traynor, the restructuring specialists whose red flag alert monitors early signs of distress in small and medium-sized companies across the UK.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    @Stuart_Dickson wrote :

    "No, just the same one: what was your ARSE projection in July 2008? "

    ......................................................................

    There was no July 2008 ARSE projection.

    However for the sake of peace and quiet here is the final projection for the last national outing of the ARSE and the actual results - 2012 US Presidential election including "The JackW Swing State Nine", Electoral College and Vote Share :

    State .. ARSE .. Actual ..

    New Hampshire - O+4 .. O+5.5
    Virginia - O+3 .. O+3.9
    North Carolina - R+2 .. R+2
    Florida - R+1 .. O+0.8
    Iowa - O+4 .. O+5.4
    Ohio - O+4 .. O+3
    Wisconsin - O+6 .. O+7
    Colorado - O+2 .. O+5.4
    Nevada - O+6 .. O+7

    EC - ARSE 303/235 .. Actual 332/206 .. ARSE narrowly incorrect on Florida 29 EC votes.

    Vote Share - ARSE - 51/48 .. Actual 51.1/47.2

    Not unduly shabby one might say ?!?
  • Options
    MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    Good morning. Another sunny and hot one I see.

    @Michael_Heaver UKIP
    Everyone who wants to look at real results of Green utopian dream should look at Brighton where rubbish fills the streets.
  • Options
    PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Some GE2010 demographics I wasn't aware of. Does anyone know the Tory stats?

    "On policies ranging from Europe to welfare and immigration, Labour and its traditional support base have drifted apart. Miliband and Balls are far less interested in the views of the grandchildren of the Durham miners than Attlee and Morrison were. The Labour Party now represents the lawyers of Islington more than the ordinary working people in Durham.

    That new reality is reflected in the voting figures. Only 57 per cent of skilled working-class voters voted at the last election, compared with 76 per cent of middle-class voters. The level of detachment from today’s Labour Party is illustrated by the fact that only 29 per cent of the skilled working class voted Labour – it was well over 50 per cent for Tony Blair’s first two victories..." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10179042/Heres-how-the-Conservatives-can-win-back-the-working-class.html
  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    MK..Vote Green..Get Rubbish
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,576

    In other news, keep an eye on events in Spain this week. Weekend revelations about an ongoing corruption scandal involving senior figures in PP, the ruling party, have dragged the PM directly into the firing line. It does not look good. It could get very messy.

    Not happy times on the Peninsula:

    "Spain's Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy is facing renewed calls to resign after a newspaper published text messages allegedly linking him to the man at the centre of a secret payments scandal.

    The El Mundo report said Mr Rajoy sent words of support to Luis Barcenas, former treasurer of the governing Popular Party (PP).

    Mr Barcenas is in custody facing trial for corruption and tax fraud. He denies the allegations.

    Mr Rajoy, too, denies any wrongdoing."

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23310930

    "Portugal's borrowing costs jump as political tensions rise

    Yields on 10-year bonds hit an intraday high of 7.9% before easing back, while the Lisbon stock market closed down by 1.6%.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23289622

    Latest Bond Rate 7.52... C
  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    Good cartoon on Guido's site.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Good morning, everyone.

    I was just scanning a BBC news article (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23308050) on women offenders and rehabilitation when I came across a link to the loathsome Corston Report.

    It's a bit old but if memory serves it recommended that almost no women (barring murderers/rapists) should go to prison and that women offenders should otherwise live in groups of 20-30 in the community and spend their time shopping/cooking, because prisons are evil and masculine institutions designed for evil men.

    Funny how when it comes to men having the huge majority of boardroom positions some want quotas for women, but the huge disparity in prisoners (regarding gender) leads some to think women should almost never go to prison.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Andy Burnham on Sky this morning - looked well shifty.
  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    TGOHF..Was he selling used cars?..Guido's cartoonist got him just right today
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Latest 2015 GE ARSE projection :

    Countdown - 18 minutes .....
  • Options
    I was at a lunch on Sunday, outside my demograph. I said that I was hoping to be a UKIP PPC in the 2015 GE. An aged guest said, to murmurs of general agreement, 'I agree with UKIP on the EU, but I think you other policies are too extreme for me to vote for you'.

    I asked him if he knew any UKIP policies, apart from BOO. 'None; its just a general feeling', he said.

    Can UKIP turn around this problem? Because there is no logical basis for this anti feeling, it must be possible. How? Endorsements from respected people would help, and that must be a runner.

    Mike Smithson making money out of UKIP doing well is a straw in the wind.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Mr. Kendrick, I've no special insight but would suggest emphasising policies that have common ground with most people. (Cutting fuel duty would go down well, likewise overseas aid and a lower limit on benefits).
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    I was at a lunch on Sunday, outside my demograph. I said that I was hoping to be a UKIP PPC in the 2015 GE. An aged guest said, to murmurs of general agreement, 'I agree with UKIP on the EU, but I think you other policies are too extreme for me to vote for you'.

    I asked him if he knew any UKIP policies, apart from BOO. 'None; its just a general feeling', he said.

    Can UKIP turn around this problem? Because there is no logical basis for this anti feeling, it must be possible. How? Endorsements from respected people would help, and that must be a runner.

    Mike Smithson making money out of UKIP doing well is a straw in the wind.

    Letting rEd Miliband in as PM seems extreme to me.
  • Options
    david_kendrick1david_kendrick1 Posts: 325
    edited July 2013

    Mr. Kendrick, I've no special insight but would suggest emphasising policies that have common ground with most people. (Cutting fuel duty would go down well, likewise overseas aid and a lower limit on benefits).

    I don't think it is anything to do with policies. The problem is feelings, not policies.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,245

    Mr. Kendrick, I've no special insight but would suggest emphasising policies that have common ground with most people. (Cutting fuel duty would go down well, likewise overseas aid and a lower limit on benefits).

    I don't think it is anything to do with policies. The problem is feelings, not policies.
    So huge surprise, you need a comprehensive fully costed set of policies (let's call it a manifesto) rather than fixating on one of several things that floats peoples' boats at the moment and going for the "feeling" vote.

    Thing is, then instead of a protest party, with plenty of votes, at least in mid-term, UKIP ends up one more A in NOTA.
  • Options
    NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,321
    Plato said:

    Some GE2010 demographics I wasn't aware of. Does anyone know the Tory stats?

    "...That new reality is reflected in the voting figures. Only 57 per cent of skilled working-class voters voted at the last election, compared with 76 per cent of middle-class voters. The level of detachment from today’s Labour Party is illustrated by the fact that only 29 per cent of the skilled working class voted Labour – it was well over 50 per cent for Tony Blair’s first two victories..." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10179042/Heres-how-the-Conservatives-can-win-back-the-working-class.html

    The class division in British politics faded steadily up to 2010 except among DEs who were still strongly Labour, though less than they used to be. Otherwise, class was no longer much of a predictor. That's become less true since the election - the current YG has Labour ahead 46-24 in C2DE, 37-35 in ABC1. I think what's happening is mainly that C2 voters tend to vote against the party in power, since they've got some qualifications but aren't doing well. Conversely AB voters have become steadily more Labour over the years.

    I'd expect 5% to 10% with zero seats. But maybe there's not much room for them to be in the middle range (lower 10s etc). If they've got latent support in the mid-20s, maybe they can resist the squeeze with a bit of decent polling during the campaign, forcing the media to pay attention to them and producing a virtuous cycle.

    One thing I'm wondering about this: The LibDems have tended to poll very weakly in mid-term, then pick up support during the actual election. Why do people think that is, and why would or wouldn't it the same thing apply to UKIP?

    Interesting question. Probably that broadcasting rules require more coverage to be given to the LibDems in the final month, so they start to look like a major alternative. Doesn't look as though that will happen for UKIP this time.

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE ****

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE Projection :

    Con 290 .. Lab 280 .. LibDem 40 .. SNP 13 .. PC 3 .. NI 18 .. Ukip 2 .. Respect 1 .. Green 1 .. Ind 1 .. Speaker 1

    Hung Parliament - Conservatives Short By 36.
  • Options
    NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    I think, like before, UKIP will fall back before the next GE (I have a bet with isam that they will get <10%). But I think they'll do a lot better than 2010 and this will cost the Tories and in a tight race that could end up being crucial. I also think they can easily win a seat on <10% if they properly target an area of strength, no idea if they are actually doing that though.
  • Options
    PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    The ultimate sexism IMO. Frankly, I can't think that living a la Greenham Common would be much better. Women in packs aren't my cup of tea at all.

    Good morning, everyone.

    I was just scanning a BBC news article (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23308050) on women offenders and rehabilitation when I came across a link to the loathsome Corston Report.

    It's a bit old but if memory serves it recommended that almost no women (barring murderers/rapists) should go to prison and that women offenders should otherwise live in groups of 20-30 in the community and spend their time shopping/cooking, because prisons are evil and masculine institutions designed for evil men.

    Funny how when it comes to men having the huge majority of boardroom positions some want quotas for women, but the huge disparity in prisoners (regarding gender) leads some to think women should almost never go to prison.

  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Tim -.when is you prediction out ?
  • Options
    NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    tim said:


    Tories on 290 and UKIP gaining seats is as implausible as it was when you first floated it with 5 UKIP MP's.

    No it's not, it's perfectly possible if they prioritise winning seats over total voteshare.
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141
    edited July 2013

    I was at a lunch on Sunday, outside my demograph. I said that I was hoping to be a UKIP PPC in the 2015 GE. An aged guest said, to murmurs of general agreement, 'I agree with UKIP on the EU, but I think you other policies are too extreme for me to vote for you'.

    I asked him if he knew any UKIP policies, apart from BOO. 'None; its just a general feeling', he said.

    Can UKIP turn around this problem? Because there is no logical basis for this anti feeling, it must be possible. How? Endorsements from respected people would help, and that must be a runner.

    The traditional solution is to pick a high-profile fight that puts the leadership on the other side of the divide. Ideally if the opportunity comes up you'd do Farage against the extreme-right (BNP/EDL etc), but it may be that there any credible enemies there to fight with, in which case you're going to have to pick an issue on which you can come at Cameron and Miliband from the left.

    I can't think of an obvious one right now, but it might become easier when Labour finalize all the cuts they're not going to reverse. Maybe there's an issue like benefits for disabled people you can campaign on. Or how about animal rights? There's a plausibly UK vs Foreign angle there (remember the protests at East Coast ports against British calves being taken to cruel conditions on Dutch farms?) but it would challenge the conventional swivel-eyed stereotypes.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Men who think we should've joined the euro also think we should stay in the EU: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jul/15/ken-clarke-danny-alexander-mandelson-eu
  • Options
    NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    tim said:

    There seems to be a competition this morning on who can come up with the most stupid policy ideas

    Here's a couple of brave attempts.

    I am *shocked* you didnt cite this humdinger:

    "So they suggest "all benefits to teenage mothers should be made on the condition of them living with their parents or in supervised hostel accommodation"."

    Now where on earth could they have picked this idea up from?!
  • Options
    PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Whilst I don't normally agree with celeb endorsements - some reassuring faces like say Michael Parkinson wouldn't do any harm. Kippers could get a free Parker pen with every membership ;^ )

    The coverage UKIP attracts on the BBC is probably the biggest issue - the Tories who were against the EU were rubbished for over a decade and still get a very hard time/painted as loons. Until the BBC changes it's ways [which is extremely unlikely], it'll be an uphill struggle.

    Only issues like the injustice over fostering cut through the bollox.

    Kippers have many potentially popular policies - such as allowing a smoking room in a pub etc, but they get almost no coverage.

    I was at a lunch on Sunday, outside my demograph. I said that I was hoping to be a UKIP PPC in the 2015 GE. An aged guest said, to murmurs of general agreement, 'I agree with UKIP on the EU, but I think you other policies are too extreme for me to vote for you'.

    I asked him if he knew any UKIP policies, apart from BOO. 'None; its just a general feeling', he said.

    Can UKIP turn around this problem? Because there is no logical basis for this anti feeling, it must be possible. How? Endorsements from respected people would help, and that must be a runner.

    Mike Smithson making money out of UKIP doing well is a straw in the wind.

  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Interesting that the BBC refers to a £500 benefit cap:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23306092

    Sounds much harsher than £26,000.
  • Options
    NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    @tim

    So you're offering worse than evens on UKIP winning a seat at the GE? What can I say except, no thanks.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    tim said:

    JackW said:

    PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE ****

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE Projection :

    Con 290 .. Lab 280 .. LibDem 40 .. SNP 13 .. PC 3 .. NI 18 .. Ukip 2 .. Respect 1 .. Green 1 .. Ind 1 .. Speaker 1

    Hung Parliament - Conservatives Short By 36.

    Tories on 290 and UKIP gaining seats is as implausible as it was when you first floated it with 5 UKIP MP's.
    Now we all know you're going to go UKIP 0 soon, why not stop fannying about, you've gone from 5 to 2 due to embarrassment, just do it.

    Dull fellow X 2 this morning.

    The ability of small parties (sorry Ukippers) to gain seats whilst the big two (sorry yellow peril) slug it out is a historical fact.

    Get a grip "tim" .... go milk a few cows or take a gander at "Farmers Weekly" but kindly desist from commenting on political projections that you don't have the brains to deal with !!

    Moo, moo .....

  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    edited July 2013
    @Dodd

    "Good cartoon on Guido's site."

    If you're not a right wing nutter with the IQ of a gnat there's NOTHING interesting on Guido's site
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901

    It's hard to identify a seat where it could happen. Geographically you have to look towards eastern England. Which constituencies are possibilities?

    Thurrock has to be a big runner, along with S Basildon & E Thurrock, and Dagenham & Rainham
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    tim said:

    Neil said:

    tim said:


    Tories on 290 and UKIP gaining seats is as implausible as it was when you first floated it with 5 UKIP MP's.

    No it's not, it's perfectly possible if they prioritise winning seats over total voteshare.
    I'll bet you £50 that if the Tories win >280 seats UKIP don't win more than one seat.

    Absolutely hilarious .... "tim says Tories on 290 and Ukip gaining seats is "implausible" and then offers a wager with Tories on 280 and Ukip gaining a seat !!

    So bloody funny I think "tim" should abandon farming and do stand up comedy !!

  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141
    Neil said:

    tim said:


    Tories on 290 and UKIP gaining seats is as implausible as it was when you first floated it with 5 UKIP MP's.

    No it's not, it's perfectly possible if they prioritise winning seats over total voteshare.
    Can you game this out with some actual numbers? Say they need latent support of about 18%, but they throw everything at just their target seats to the maximum extent that it's actually practical. There has to be a limit to how much they can actually concentrate on those targets, because their candidates in the non-targets aren't just going to stand down, especially after winning upset victories in local elections, and potentially in the Euros. What proportion of the vote are we expecting them to get in the seats where they don't try?
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    tim said:

    JackW said:

    tim said:

    JackW said:

    PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE ****

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE Projection :

    Con 290 .. Lab 280 .. LibDem 40 .. SNP 13 .. PC 3 .. NI 18 .. Ukip 2 .. Respect 1 .. Green 1 .. Ind 1 .. Speaker 1

    Hung Parliament - Conservatives Short By 36.

    Tories on 290 and UKIP gaining seats is as implausible as it was when you first floated it with 5 UKIP MP's.
    Now we all know you're going to go UKIP 0 soon, why not stop fannying about, you've gone from 5 to 2 due to embarrassment, just do it.

    Dull fellow X 2 this morning.

    The ability of small parties (sorry Ukippers) to gain seats whilst the big two (sorry yellow peril) slug it out is a historical fact.

    Get a grip "tim" .... go milk a few cows or take a gander at "Farmers Weekly" but kindly desist from commenting on political projections that you don't have the brains to deal with !!

    Moo, moo .....


    Explain why the UKIP projection has gone from 5 to 2 over the last few weeks if it's not just embarrassment at the first figure plucked out of the air.
    Incorrect dullard.

    The previous ARSE projection published on 1st July has Ukip on 3 seats. They've dropped one .... a bit like you.

    Facts aren't your strong point. Stick to smears, half truths and getting MODERATED on a continuous basis. You do those very well.

  • Options
    dugarbandierdugarbandier Posts: 2,596


    The traditional solution is to pick a high-profile fight that puts the leadership on the other side of the divide. Ideally if the opportunity comes up you'd do Farage against the extreme-right (BNP/EDL etc), but it may be that there any credible enemies there to fight with, in which case you're going to have to pick an issue on which you can come at Cameron and Miliband from the left.

    I can't think of an obvious one right now, but it might become easier when Labour finalize all the cuts they're not going to reverse. Maybe there's an issue like benefits for disabled people you can campaign on. Or how about animal rights? There's a plausibly UK vs Foreign angle there (remember the protests at East Coast ports against British calves being taken to cruel conditions on Dutch farms?) but it would challenge the conventional swivel-eyed stereotypes.

    how many former BNP voters are now saying they'll vote UKIP tho? maybe the problem is that UKIP leadeship are afraid of losing the EDL votes (much as they might privately be ashamed of them)

    getting (for example) basingstoke ukip to mention immigrants less than 50 times on their homepage might also make them look less swivelly

  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901
    tim said:

    JackW said:

    tim said:

    Neil said:

    tim said:


    Tories on 290 and UKIP gaining seats is as implausible as it was when you first floated it with 5 UKIP MP's.

    No it's not, it's perfectly possible if they prioritise winning seats over total voteshare.
    I'll bet you £50 that if the Tories win >280 seats UKIP don't win more than one seat.

    Absolutely hilarious .... "tim says Tories on 290 and Ukip gaining seats is "implausible" and then offers a wager with Tories on 280 and Ukip gaining a seat !!

    So bloody funny I think "tim" should abandon farming and do stand up comedy !!

    I was being generous.

    You can have 290 if you want.
    280 is a worse bet for me as most people would've worked out.


    Why would someone who thought Ukip would get a seat take your bet when they can get 11/5 they win a seat with no caveats?


  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901


    The traditional solution is to pick a high-profile fight that puts the leadership on the other side of the divide. Ideally if the opportunity comes up you'd do Farage against the extreme-right (BNP/EDL etc), but it may be that there any credible enemies there to fight with, in which case you're going to have to pick an issue on which you can come at Cameron and Miliband from the left.

    I can't think of an obvious one right now, but it might become easier when Labour finalize all the cuts they're not going to reverse. Maybe there's an issue like benefits for disabled people you can campaign on. Or how about animal rights? There's a plausibly UK vs Foreign angle there (remember the protests at East Coast ports against British calves being taken to cruel conditions on Dutch farms?) but it would challenge the conventional swivel-eyed stereotypes.

    how many former BNP voters are now saying they'll vote UKIP tho? maybe the problem is that UKIP leadeship are afraid of losing the EDL votes (much as they might privately be ashamed of them)

    getting (for example) basingstoke ukip to mention immigrants less than 50 times on their homepage might also make them look less swivelly

    They should make sure everyone sees this. sums up the divide between the establishment and UKIP. If people think Mary Beard looks a bit wacky that can only help


    http://youtu.be/7QYCTDXq56w
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141


    how many former BNP voters are now saying they'll vote UKIP tho? maybe the problem is that UKIP leadeship are afraid of losing the EDL votes (much as they might privately be ashamed of them)

    Well, he wouldn't necessarily lose them, especially if he was going after violent extremists rather than regular honest, patriotic racists.

    EDL protesting outside a mosque, Farage shows up nearby, gives a speech about how the British value freedom of conscience and everybody is free to practice their own religion, walks to the mosque with the imam past the EDL nutjobs, something like that.

    But yeah, it's a bit of a delicate balancing act.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    tim said:

    JackW said:

    tim said:

    JackW said:

    tim said:

    JackW said:

    PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE ****

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE Projection :

    Con 290 .. Lab 280 .. LibDem 40 .. SNP 13 .. PC 3 .. NI 18 .. Ukip 2 .. Respect 1 .. Green 1 .. Ind 1 .. Speaker 1

    Hung Parliament - Conservatives Short By 36.

    Tories on 290 and UKIP gaining seats is as implausible as it was when you first floated it with 5 UKIP MP's.
    Now we all know you're going to go UKIP 0 soon, why not stop fannying about, you've gone from 5 to 2 due to embarrassment, just do it.

    Dull fellow X 2 this morning.

    The ability of small parties (sorry Ukippers) to gain seats whilst the big two (sorry yellow peril) slug it out is a historical fact.

    Get a grip "tim" .... go milk a few cows or take a gander at "Farmers Weekly" but kindly desist from commenting on political projections that you don't have the brains to deal with !!

    Moo, moo .....


    Explain why the UKIP projection has gone from 5 to 2 over the last few weeks if it's not just embarrassment at the first figure plucked out of the air.
    Incorrect dullard.

    The previous ARSE projection published on 1st July has Ukip on 3 seats. They've dropped one .... a bit like you.

    Facts aren't your strong point. Stick to smears, half truths and getting MODERATED on a continuous basis. You do those very well.


    And a previous one had 5.
    So you were wrong then .... We are shocked .... Not.

    Your inability to grasp some simple historical electoral facts is surely no surprise as you seem to see all elections through the prism of your anti Conservative bile.

    If you can prize yourself away from this months issue of the Cheshire Gentleman Farmer & Pig Breeders Gazette you will note that since the Feb 1974 election that small parties have gained seats outwith the main battle.

    Dust your grey matter down and do the research.

  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901


    how many former BNP voters are now saying they'll vote UKIP tho? maybe the problem is that UKIP leadeship are afraid of losing the EDL votes (much as they might privately be ashamed of them)

    Well, he wouldn't necessarily lose them, especially if he was going after violent extremists rather than regular honest, patriotic racists.

    EDL protesting outside a mosque, Farage shows up nearby, gives a speech about how the British value freedom of conscience and everybody is free to practice their own religion, walks to the mosque with the imam past the EDL nutjobs, something like that.

    But yeah, it's a bit of a delicate balancing act.
    Here's Farage with the usual fawning golf club members and old biddys

    http://www.economicvoice.com/nigel-farage-ukip-condemns-defacing-of-muslim-gravestones/50038143#axzz2Z6MS2IX5

    http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/109396/nigel-farage-west-wrong-iran-sanctions
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    edited July 2013
    @Sam

    "They should make sure everyone sees this. sums up the divide between the establishment and UKIP."

    When I see that clip of the girl saying her Grandparents were Polish but that now the Poles are flooding her neighbourhood they should be kicked out (Presumably not her Grandparents?) I just get depressed.

    My Great grandparents were immigrants which makes me very aware that if everyone was as selfish as that lady I wouldn't be here.
  • Options
    NeilNeil Posts: 7,983

    Neil said:

    tim said:


    Tories on 290 and UKIP gaining seats is as implausible as it was when you first floated it with 5 UKIP MP's.

    No it's not, it's perfectly possible if they prioritise winning seats over total voteshare.
    Can you game this out with some actual numbers? Say they need latent support of about 18%, but they throw everything at just their target seats to the maximum extent that it's actually practical. There has to be a limit to how much they can actually concentrate on those targets, because their candidates in the non-targets aren't just going to stand down, especially after winning upset victories in local elections, and potentially in the Euros. What proportion of the vote are we expecting them to get in the seats where they don't try?
    It's actually quite difficult. At what level of support do they start dragging down the Tory seat numbers in a serious way? Obviously at <4% not more than a handful of seats. I'm not entirely clear when they start doing serious damage to the Tories. However I think it's perfectly possible for UKIP to win a seat even at 5% (were they to fall that low). If they choose to target ruthlessly. That's fptp for you. But overall I dont think JackW's prediction is necessarily internally inconsistent as tim seems to.
  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    AEP seems in a good mood this morning, must be the weather.


    "Lloyd’s TSB bi-annual survey of companies shows firms expect to boost spending on machinery and take on more staff over the next six moths, with the East Midlands the most exuberant region and small firms enjoying the biggest jump.

    Animal spirits are highest in the manufacturing sector, a sign that coalition policies aimed at rebalancing the economy towards industry are starting to bear fruit.

    The report says the UK confidence index has jumped 11 points to 30pc over the past six months. It is now well above its historic average of 21pc.

    Some 50pc of firms expect sales to grow in the second half of 2013, with just 14pc bracing for a fall. “Businesses are clearly beginning to regain confidence about future trading prospects, after years of hesitation and concern,” said David Oldfield from Lloyds Banking Group."


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10178991/Britain-shakes-off-global-gloom-as-business-confidence-surges.html
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    We're only in a "very new political environment" if some of the more extremist mid-term projections are accurate. An assumption that should not be stated as a fact.

    It is entirely possible that 13% for a protest party during mid-term when the traditional protest party is part of coalition government is an overestimate of how UKIP will poll when the question of who governs the nation comes up again next time. There's very little actual evidence that there's been some major transformation: Even in the Council Elections UKIP+BNP polled the same as UKIP+BNP polled in 2009 European Elections a year before the last general election. And we know what a success that was for high-flying Farage.
  • Options
    Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    edited July 2013
    JackW said:

    PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE ****

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE Projection :

    Con 290 .. Lab 280 .. LibDem 40 .. SNP 13 .. PC 3 .. NI 18 .. Ukip 2 .. Respect 1 .. Green 1 .. Ind 1 .. Speaker 1

    Hung Parliament - Conservatives Short By 36.

    SNP 13 ?

    Which 13?

    In order to get to 13 Westminster seats the SNP would have to start winning places like Edinburgh West, from 4th place! (Admittedly we hold the Holyrood seat, but still...)

    Either that or else JackW is predicting a partial collapse of the SLAB vote under Ed Miliband. Sub 34%, from 42% under Gordon Brown.
  • Options
    RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    @JackW - At the risk of bringing back painful memories, any views on Watford at the GE?

    Ladbrokes go:

    Labour 4/7
    Con 2/1
    LibDem 6/1
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901
    edited July 2013
    Roger said:

    @Sam

    "They should make sure everyone sees this. sums up the divide between the establishment and UKIP."

    When I see that clip of the girl saying her Grandparents were Polish who came to live here during the war but that now the Poles should be kicked out (Presumably not her Grandparents?) I just get depressed.

    My Great grandparents were immigrants which makes me very aware that if everyone was as selfish as that lady I wouldn't be here.

    Big difference between assimilation of refugees and those who were part of mass immigration
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    Watford was the seat JackW and I had a big argument over @ GE2010

    He said LD - I said CON

    The LD candidate, Sal Brinton, did make it to Parliament but as a life peer.

    @JackW - At the risk of bringing back painful memories, any views on Watford at the GE?

    Ladbrokes go:

    Labour 4/7
    Con 2/1
    LibDem 6/1

  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901
    edited July 2013
    tim said:

    isam said:

    @Sam

    "They should make sure everyone sees this. sums up the divide between the establishment and UKIP."

    When I see that clip of the girl saying her Grandparents were Polish who came to live here during the war but that now the Poles should be kicked out (Presumably not her Grandparents?) I just get depressed.

    My Great grandparents were immigrants which makes me very aware that if everyone was as selfish as that lady I wouldn't be here.
    Big difference between assimilation of refugees and those who were part of mass immigration

    Is there any evidence that Poles who moved here recently aren't assimilating?
    The same charges were made against Jews at the time.


    The story of the lady in the QT clip followed by the results in the Lincolnshire locals?
  • Options
    RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    @MikeSmithson - Do you think the 6/1 on the LibDems might be value?
  • Options
    PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    IDS on R4 this morning - he doesn't give Humphrys much rope.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b036tsn9/live
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE **** PB EXCLUSIVE ****

    Latest 2015 GE ARSE Projection :

    Con 290 .. Lab 280 .. LibDem 40 .. SNP 13 .. PC 3 .. NI 18 .. Ukip 2 .. Respect 1 .. Green 1 .. Ind 1 .. Speaker 1

    Hung Parliament - Conservatives Short By 36.

    SNP 13 ?

    Which 13?

    In order to get to 13 Westminster seats the SNP would have to start winning places like Edinburgh West, from 4th place! (Admittedly we hold the Holyrood seat, but still...)

    Either that or else JackW is predicting a partial collapse of the SLAB vote under Ed Miliband. Sub 35%, from 42% under Gordon Brown.
    Well roger me with an "Arc of Prosperity" the PB High Priest of SNP - Stuart Dickson is now moaning that I've projected them to win too many seats !!

    Too many Ukip for "tim" .... too many SNP for "Stuart Dickson" .... What next ??? .... "Neil" says 1 Green one too many !!

    Signed :

    Exasperated of Auchentennach

  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    Interesting that the BBC refers to a £500 benefit cap:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23306092

    Sounds much harsher than £26,000.

    Does it? It might depend on whether you are used to thinking in terms of weekly wages or annual salaries. Your own prejudices are showing. The lower figure of £350 for single people could have been used if this really were some bizarre Al-Beeb plot to discredit IDS.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited July 2013

    Watford was the seat JackW and I had a big argument over @ GE2010

    He said LD - I said CON

    The LD candidate, Sal Brinton, did make it to Parliament but as a life peer.


    @JackW - At the risk of bringing back painful memories, any views on Watford at the GE?

    Ladbrokes go:

    Labour 4/7
    Con 2/1
    LibDem 6/1

    This is true oh wise one.

    I'm still flummoxed by that result. The ARSE computers still regales at that one - The computer it says "no"

    6/1 on the second placed LibDems looks inviting notwithstanding their present polling position. Having said that the 4/7 on Labour is awful.

    Will the punters stick with nanny and keep the Tory. They might do a 1992 on us all ??

    Lib Dem the value .... but open me up and you'll find Watford and Margaret Beckett carved on my heart !!

  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    We're only in a "very new political environment" if some of the more extremist mid-term projections are accurate. An assumption that should not be stated as a fact.

    It is entirely possible that 13% for a protest party during mid-term when the traditional protest party is part of coalition government is an overestimate of how UKIP will poll when the question of who governs the nation comes up again next time. There's very little actual evidence that there's been some major transformation: Even in the Council Elections UKIP+BNP polled the same as UKIP+BNP polled in 2009 European Elections a year before the last general election. And we know what a success that was for high-flying Farage.

    As noted downthread, the Lib Dems have historically polled worse in mid-term opinion polls than at the following general election. If UKIP follow that pattern we're on the cusp of a political earthquake.

    The idea of comparing the vote share from a set of council elections with European elections is ridiculous. UKIP have previously done very well at EU elections, for obvious reasons, but have previously been criticised for not translating those votes into votes in other elections, such as those for the councils, which would enable them to build up local strength for a challenge for MP seats. Matching their previous EU election performance at the locals is a vast step forward for UKIP.
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    edited July 2013
    It is not a bet I would make without further information.

    On the face of it Watford should be good for the LDs. They have the elected mayor who has gone on to get re-elected but I think 3-way marginals are going to be challenging for the yellows. It was LAB up to 2010 when they finished 3rd

    @MikeSmithson - Do you think the 6/1 on the LibDems might be value?

  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901
    edited July 2013
    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    Roger said:

    @Sam

    "They should make sure everyone sees this. sums up the divide between the establishment and UKIP."

    When I see that clip of the girl saying her Grandparents were Polish who came to live here during the war but that now the Poles should be kicked out (Presumably not her Grandparents?) I just get depressed.

    My Great grandparents were immigrants which makes me very aware that if everyone was as selfish as that lady I wouldn't be here.

    Big difference between assimilation of refugees and those who were part of mass immigration

    Is there any evidence that Poles who moved here recently aren't assimilating?
    The same charges were made against Jews at the time.
    They tory of the lady in the QT clip followed by the results in the Lincolnshire locals?
    I said evidence.


    Her claims are bollocks "there are hardly any locals in Boston anymore" "everyone is moving away"

    Bollocks

    Number of English born People in Boston 2001 = 52,878
    Number of English born People in Boston 2011 = 53,799

    http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=6275026&c=boston&d=13&e=13&g=6445706&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=1&s=1373879019255&enc=1&dsFamilyId=85

    http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=6275026&c=boston&d=13&e=13&g=6445706&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=1&s=1373879019255&enc=1&dsFamilyId=2478



    The maternity hospital is at bursting point?

    No it isn't I posted the stats for you which showed women are diverted from Lincoln to Boston when Lincoln closes due to being busy.

    I thought you asked abòut Polish people assimilating?

    How would you suggest measuring that? I'm assuming people who lived there before saying how it has affected their lives doesn't count, along with a big vote for a party that wants to end mass immigration?

    But it's a reasonable question to ask I think. ow would you suggest measuring assimilation?
  • Options
    Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,059
    EY: UK economy 'on the mend' and set for rapid growth

    The Ernst & Young Item Club says the UK economy is “on the mend” and will see strong growth in the next three years on the back of rising consumer spending, house prices and business investment.

    The EY Item Club summer forecast shows gross domestic product growth of 1.1 per cent this year, 2.2 per cent next year and 2.6 per cent in 2015 far outstripping the forecasts of the Office for Budget Responsibility. The OBR predicts growth of 0.6 per cent this year, just 1.3 per cent next year and 2.3 per cent in 2015.

    It means the Government’s budget deficit could be far smaller than the £120bn predicted at the end of 2013 and could reduce more quickly.

    The economy grew by 0.3 per cent in Q1 2013 after a drop of 0.1 per cent in 2012, despite a 0.7 per cent boost in Q3 2012 on the back of the London Olympics.

    EY predicts consumer spending will grow by 1.6 per cent this year but the percentage of salaries put into savings will drop to 5.6 per cent compared to 6.3 per cent last year.

    The report forecasts one million people moving home this year with rapid growth in house prices of 2.3 per cent, 5.5 per cent next year and a massive 6.3 per cent in 2015. It credits the funding for lending scheme and Government’s Help to Buy scheme for a growing housing recovery.

    Business investment has dropped 34 per cent since 2008 but is set to bounce back with expected expected growth of 8.1 per cent next year, 9.4 per cent in 2015 and 7.5 per cent in 2016.

    The report also expects UK exports to increase by 1.2 per cent this year and 4.6 per cent in 2014, signalling a rebalancing of the UK economy.

    EY Item chief economic adviser Peter Spencer says: “It is looking much more positive and we are unlikely to see a repeat of 2011 when a recovery in confidence was crushed by the Euro crisis.

    “Spending on the high street is holding up nicely, housing market transactions are beginning to gather pace and, perhaps most significantly, the global economy also appears to be on the mend. In fact, it is the first time in many months where we can see balanced growth in the economy.”

  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    edited July 2013
    Re Watford.

    I should imagine that all the LD effort will be going into neighbouring St. Albans where a superb candidate put on 11% in 2010 and got very close.

    See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/constituency/e35.stm

    All of this depends which seats are on the target list and it could be that neither make that.
This discussion has been closed.