Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Corbyn is more in touch on Europe with the voters Labour needs

SystemSystem Posts: 11,020
edited February 2017 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Corbyn is more in touch on Europe with the voters Labour needs to win back than his MPs or members

This has not been the best week for Jeremy Corbyn. He lost another Shadow Cabinet member and two other frontbench spokesmen, suffered a sizable rebellion on Europe (whereas, unlike one upon a time, the Tories presented an almost united front), prompting several thousand members to resign; yesterday’s YouGov poll confirmed that the Conservatives’ lead remains in the mid-teens, and Labour suffered a devastating local by-election loss in Rotherham, which the Lib Dems took on a 38% swing.

Read the full story here


«1345

Comments

  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited February 2017
    First...Lets Make America New Threads Great Again.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,967
    edited February 2017

    First...Lets Make America New Threads Great Again.

    Sad.

    :D
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited February 2017
    Morning all.

    Cheers Mr Herdson. – Corbyn appears to have a gift for alienating large chunks of his party, first the majority of the PLP, then the rump of party Remainers and now events threaten to upset his far left membership. - You’d have to have a heart of stone not to laugh….
  • Options
    Surely Corbyn's greatest (only?) strength is his authenticity - he's an un-reconstructed freedom fighter / terrorist loving seventies throwback with opinions which appall many people. And others, while reckoning he may be a bit of a tit, appreciate that he's an authentic tit and isn't trying to be something he isn't - unlike most contemporary politicians.

    It's not like any other neanderthal throwbacks with totally unacceptable views have done well recently is it?

    If he stood up in the HoC and said 'We should leave the EU - and I've never liked it' he'd be believed, unlike the vast majority of politicians who are clearly doing this through gritted teeth.

    Yes, it would cause a major pearl clutching in Islington (are you sure they have pearls? - ed) but in the country he would be believed.
  • Options

    Surely Corbyn's greatest (only?) strength is his authenticity - he's an un-reconstructed freedom fighter / terrorist loving seventies throwback with opinions which appall many people. And others, while reckoning he may be a bit of a tit, appreciate that he's an authentic tit and isn't trying to be something he isn't - unlike most contemporary politicians.

    It's not like any other neanderthal throwbacks with totally unacceptable views have done well recently is it?

    If he stood up in the HoC and said 'We should leave the EU - and I've never liked it' he'd be believed, unlike the vast majority of politicians who are clearly doing this through gritted teeth.

    Yes, it would cause a major pearl clutching in Islington (are you sure they have pearls? - ed) but in the country he would be believed.

    You raise an important issue Ms Carlotta, one would assume as pearls are derived from capitalist exploitation and the forced appropriation of the unpaid labour of marine molluscs, the good ladies of Islington would no doubt recoil from such decadent displays of repression. Only if they’re the real thing and inherited from granny can exceptions be made.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,586
    The Trump administration's commitment to transparency, a vignette...
    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/trump-administration-blacks-out-animal-welfare-information
    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today removed public access to tens of thousands of reports that document the numbers of animals kept by research labs, companies, zoos, circuses, and animal transporters—and whether those animals are being treated humanely under the Animal Welfare Act. Henceforth, those wanting access to the information will need to file a Freedom of Information Act request. The same goes for inspection reports under the Horse Protection Act, which prohibits injuring horses’ hooves or legs for show.

    The agency said in a statement that it revoked public access to the reports “based on our commitment to being transparent … and maintaining the privacy rights of individuals.”
  • Options

    Surely Corbyn's greatest (only?) strength is his authenticity - he's an un-reconstructed freedom fighter / terrorist loving seventies throwback with opinions which appall many people. And others, while reckoning he may be a bit of a tit, appreciate that he's an authentic tit and isn't trying to be something he isn't - unlike most contemporary politicians.

    It's not like any other neanderthal throwbacks with totally unacceptable views have done well recently is it?

    If he stood up in the HoC and said 'We should leave the EU - and I've never liked it' he'd be believed, unlike the vast majority of politicians who are clearly doing this through gritted teeth.

    Yes, it would cause a major pearl clutching in Islington (are you sure they have pearls? - ed) but in the country he would be believed.

    You raise an important issue Ms Carlotta, one would assume as pearls are derived from capitalist exploitation and the forced appropriation of the unpaid labour of marine molluscs, the good ladies of Islington would no doubt recoil from such decadent displays of repression. Only if they’re the real thing and inherited from granny can exceptions be made.
    People who had to buy their own pearls! eek!
  • Options
    JenSJenS Posts: 91
    Corbyn's main weakness is that he's incompetent.

    Popularity comes and goes, and long held views can come in and out of fashion.

    But an incompetent of limited intelligence is not going to become competent at the end of a long life of non achievement.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,115
    Nigelb said:

    The Trump administration's commitment to transparency, a vignette...
    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/trump-administration-blacks-out-animal-welfare-information
    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today removed public access to tens of thousands of reports that document the numbers of animals kept by research labs, companies, zoos, circuses, and animal transporters—and whether those animals are being treated humanely under the Animal Welfare Act. Henceforth, those wanting access to the information will need to file a Freedom of Information Act request. The same goes for inspection reports under the Horse Protection Act, which prohibits injuring horses’ hooves or legs for show.

    The agency said in a statement that it revoked public access to the reports “based on our commitment to being transparent … and maintaining the privacy rights of individuals.”

    So next step, the Hollywood luvvies co-ordinate a campaign for a million Freedom of Information requests a day on every animal they can think of.

    A month later, the Trump administration says it is having to suspend ALL Freedom of Information requests because the system is broken..... And those opposing his Govt. lose a key tool of scrutiny.

    On one level, you have to admire how these people are operating.

    Whilst on another, thinking WTF???
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.
  • Options
    Corbyn ought to be ideally placed to attract these voters back.
    The problem with this is that the Venn Diagram where Leave voters overlap with people who support being friendly with the IRA and supporting the economic model of Venezuela is something like four people, and three of them are writing in the SWP.
  • Options
    daodaodaodao Posts: 821
    JenS said:

    Corbyn's main weakness is that he's incompetent.

    Popularity comes and goes, and long held views can come in and out of fashion.

    But an incompetent of limited intelligence is not going to become competent at the end of a long life of non achievement.

    Well said.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I don't think Corbyn is chasing those with UKIP values, he represents an older tradition of Labour Leave. This opposition is not based on EU migration, but rather on workers control.

    There is a lot of scope for electoral popularity for an independent Red Brexit, with unlimited state intervention in industries, protective tarrifs and strong protection of workers from foreign competitio.

  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I don't think Corbyn is chasing those with UKIP values, he represents an older tradition of Labour Leave. This opposition is not based on EU migration, but rather on workers control.

    There is a lot of scope for electoral popularity for an independent Red Brexit, with unlimited state intervention in industries, protective tarrifs and strong protection of workers from foreign competitio.

    Good morning all. The most impressive and yet most under-reported campaign group was Labour Leave.

    I completely agree with your points - though I'd probably temper that to more of a Blue Labour position. Delors persuaded UK Labour that the EU would protect workers from the Anglo-American economic model. Prior to that Labour were vehemently eurosceptic (this is from memory) - didn't they campaign to leave in '83?
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    John_M said:

    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I don't think Corbyn is chasing those with UKIP values, he represents an older tradition of Labour Leave. This opposition is not based on EU migration, but rather on workers control.

    There is a lot of scope for electoral popularity for an independent Red Brexit, with unlimited state intervention in industries, protective tarrifs and strong protection of workers from foreign competitio.

    Good morning all. The most impressive and yet most under-reported campaign group was Labour Leave.

    I completely agree with your points - though I'd probably temper that to more of a Blue Labour position. Delors persuaded UK Labour that the EU would protect workers from the Anglo-American economic model. Prior to that Labour were vehemently eurosceptic (this is from memory) - didn't they campaign to leave in '83?
    1983 manifesto was for leaving the EEC and also NATO, as well as unilateral nuclear disarmament.

    Famously described by Hattersley as the longest suicide note in history, but perhaps just 35 years early.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231

    John_M said:

    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I don't think Corbyn is chasing those with UKIP values, he represents an older tradition of Labour Leave. This opposition is not based on EU migration, but rather on workers control.

    There is a lot of scope for electoral popularity for an independent Red Brexit, with unlimited state intervention in industries, protective tarrifs and strong protection of workers from foreign competitio.

    Good morning all. The most impressive and yet most under-reported campaign group was Labour Leave.

    I completely agree with your points - though I'd probably temper that to more of a Blue Labour position. Delors persuaded UK Labour that the EU would protect workers from the Anglo-American economic model. Prior to that Labour were vehemently eurosceptic (this is from memory) - didn't they campaign to leave in '83?
    1983 manifesto was for leaving the EEC and also NATO, as well as unilateral nuclear disarmament.

    Famously described by Hattersley as the longest suicide note in history, but perhaps just 35 years early.
    Not Hattersley. Usually attributed to Kaufman, but sometimes also to Peter Shore.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Nigelb said:

    The Trump administration's commitment to transparency, a vignette...
    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/trump-administration-blacks-out-animal-welfare-information
    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today removed public access to tens of thousands of reports that document the numbers of animals kept by research labs, companies, zoos, circuses, and animal transporters—and whether those animals are being treated humanely under the Animal Welfare Act. Henceforth, those wanting access to the information will need to file a Freedom of Information Act request. The same goes for inspection reports under the Horse Protection Act, which prohibits injuring horses’ hooves or legs for show.

    The agency said in a statement that it revoked public access to the reports “based on our commitment to being transparent … and maintaining the privacy rights of individuals.”

    Animal rights terrorist groups have used those reports to attack facilities and harass owners. This is basically doing what the UK did 15 years ago after the SHAC campaigns*

    (* I feel somewhat personally about this because SHAC used to protest outside our office as a former subsidiary of the business - which we'd sold - had a big stake in HLS. And as a healthcare guy they assumed I was responsible...)
  • Options
    AlsoIndigoAlsoIndigo Posts: 1,852
    John_M said:

    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I don't think Corbyn is chasing those with UKIP values, he represents an older tradition of Labour Leave. This opposition is not based on EU migration, but rather on workers control.

    There is a lot of scope for electoral popularity for an independent Red Brexit, with unlimited state intervention in industries, protective tarrifs and strong protection of workers from foreign competitio.

    Good morning all. The most impressive and yet most under-reported campaign group was Labour Leave.

    I completely agree with your points - though I'd probably temper that to more of a Blue Labour position. Delors persuaded UK Labour that the EU would protect workers from the Anglo-American economic model. Prior to that Labour were vehemently eurosceptic (this is from memory) - didn't they campaign to leave in '83?
    GFC in 2008 followed by Greece demonstrated to those voters than the EU wasn't going to protect anyone from anything. Cameron's "negotiation" further demonstrated that they were not the slightest bit interested in fixing what was broken. Labour Leave was the natural consequence.
    Roger said:

    Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers

    As usual you completely miss the point. The number of Labour voters that vote leave is completely beside the point, in the same way as the number of people that voted for HRC in the USA. What matters is the number of continuencies that voted Leave, and more importantly the number of marginal consituencies that Labour are in danger of losing that voted Leave.

    image
    Proportion of constituencies held by each party according to likely referendum outcome

    (From: here)
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    edited February 2017

    John_M said:

    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I don't think Corbyn is chasing those with UKIP values, he represents an older tradition of Labour Leave. This opposition is not based on EU migration, but rather on workers control.

    There is a lot of scope for electoral popularity for an independent Red Brexit, with unlimited state intervention in industries, protective tarrifs and strong protection of workers from foreign competitio.

    Good morning all. The most impressive and yet most under-reported campaign group was Labour Leave.

    I completely agree with your points - though I'd probably temper that to more of a Blue Labour position. Delors persuaded UK Labour that the EU would protect workers from the Anglo-American economic model. Prior to that Labour were vehemently eurosceptic (this is from memory) - didn't they campaign to leave in '83?
    1983 manifesto was for leaving the EEC and also NATO, as well as unilateral nuclear disarmament.

    Famously described by Hattersley as the longest suicide note in history, but perhaps just 35 years early.
    Not so famous that you remembered it was Gerald Kaufman!
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,983
    Charles said:

    Nigelb said:

    The Trump administration's commitment to transparency, a vignette...
    http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/trump-administration-blacks-out-animal-welfare-information
    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today removed public access to tens of thousands of reports that document the numbers of animals kept by research labs, companies, zoos, circuses, and animal transporters—and whether those animals are being treated humanely under the Animal Welfare Act. Henceforth, those wanting access to the information will need to file a Freedom of Information Act request. The same goes for inspection reports under the Horse Protection Act, which prohibits injuring horses’ hooves or legs for show.

    The agency said in a statement that it revoked public access to the reports “based on our commitment to being transparent … and maintaining the privacy rights of individuals.”

    Animal rights terrorist groups have used those reports to attack facilities and harass owners. This is basically doing what the UK did 15 years ago after the SHAC campaigns*

    (* I feel somewhat personally about this because SHAC used to protest outside our office as a former subsidiary of the business - which we'd sold - had a big stake in HLS. And as a healthcare guy they assumed I was responsible...)
    Damned if you do and damned if you don’t comes to mind.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    edited February 2017
    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,983
    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    While I think you are generally right, Roger going quite so far OTT doesn’t help us.

    Incidentally, what is going happen to those British students who have enrolled at Maastricht Uni? Presumably those there will be able to finish, but what about anyone thinkimng of applying now?
  • Options
    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    Cheer up! They'll still be able to after we leave the EU:

    Permanent Residence
    Permanent Residence is open to everyone, no matter what your country of origin is. If you’re not from the EU then this is what you need to apply for. You can also apply for this scheme if you are from the EU


    https://www.gov.mt/en/life events/moving-to-malta/pages/moving-to-malta.aspx
  • Options
    Good morning, everyone.

    Mr. Herdson, 'tis ironic that a rare area where Corbyn's more in touch with the people than the PLP are is one that's causing him so much dissent.

    Mr. Roger, if only some sort of travel had been possible before the EU existed.

    I am not sure that calling those with whom you disagree 'selfish ignorant' is necessarily persuasive. Perhaps better than 'basket of deplorables', though.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231
    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    My daughter is about to leave for a job and new life in Canada. I didn't realise it must be in the EU for this to happen.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Maltese women are the only European nationality with higher BMI than UK, but apart from that I agree. Brexit Britons will have narrower horizons.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    edited February 2017
    Corbyn had many weaknesses.

    Amongst those is that he appears far too political. And therefore a bit odd. Not someone to talk about the weather with. Believe it or not relatively few of us are animated by the Palestinian situation or Marxism.

    He, despite his best efforts, is condrmnef to be one of them, not one of us.

    Ed had the same problem.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Maltese women are the only European nationality with higher BMI than UK, but apart from that I agree. Brexit Britons will have narrower horizons.
    That will happen if you live on a type of chocolate. FACT. The martians are literally huge.
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,351
    Charles,

    Don't be defensive. I visited Huntingdon Research Centre about twenty years or so ago and had a tour. It was well laid out, the animal facilities were superb and the staff were animal lovers.

    Having come in through a line of protesters (as was the norm then), I asked why they didn't offer a tour to the protestors.

    "We tried it once," they said. "95% of the visitors were impressed and complimentary. The other 5% refused to even look, they came in to complain and then went off to inform the media that they'd visited the Animal Dachau and it was even worse than they'd described."

    Fake News isn't a new thing.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    While I think you are generally right, Roger going quite so far OTT doesn’t help us.

    Incidentally, what is going happen to those British students who have enrolled at Maastricht Uni? Presumably those there will be able to finish, but what about anyone thinkimng of applying now?
    Funnily enough when I wrote that post I was thinking of the Oceanographic institute in Villefranche near Nice. Boys and girls of all nationalities drinking coffee swimming and kissing I can't imagine anything more fun than being enrolled as an eighteen year old and you'd learn french
  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 23,754
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    While I think you are generally right, Roger going quite so far OTT doesn’t help us.

    Incidentally, what is going happen to those British students who have enrolled at Maastricht Uni? Presumably those there will be able to finish, but what about anyone thinkimng of applying now?
    Funnily enough when I wrote that post I was thinking of the Oceanographic institute in Villefranche near Nice. Boys and girls of all nationalities drinking coffee swimming and kissing I can't imagine anything more fun than being enrolled as an eighteen year old and you'd learn french
    Hmmmm

    so basically Roger youre a seventies voyeur

    :-)
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    CD13 said:

    Charles,

    Don't be defensive. I visited Huntingdon Research Centre about twenty years or so ago and had a tour. It was well laid out, the animal facilities were superb and the staff were animal lovers.

    Having come in through a line of protesters (as was the norm then), I asked why they didn't offer a tour to the protestors.

    "We tried it once," they said. "95% of the visitors were impressed and complimentary. The other 5% refused to even look, they came in to complain and then went off to inform the media that they'd visited the Animal Dachau and it was even worse than they'd described."

    Fake News isn't a new thing.

    I'm not being defensive, but when my boss (at the time) was physically assaulted as he tried to get in a taxi it tends to colour your opinion. We ended up having to remove home addresses, etc from our contact cards and, Thursday lunchtimes (for some reason they were on a weekly schedule) leave via the garage rather than the main door.

    We got off lightly - there were other people who were bombed

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/oct/25/animal-research-animal-welfare
  • Options
    Mr. Charles, unsure if it's related to Huntingdon itself, but I do remember reading about a chap who was branded by an animal terrorist group (Liberation Front or suchlike), and that they dug up someone else's grandmother's remains.

    Fortunately, that seems to have died down.
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,351
    edited February 2017
    Charles,

    There seems to be a hard core of activists who can never be convinced. Facts will be what they want them to be.

    Trump may be barmy, but whatever he does now will always be a cause for protest. That 5% have bought a season ticket for the outrage bus and intend to get their money's worth.

    I suspect that will only make him more stubborn. "What's the point of listening to these people?" he'll say, and he'll have a point.

    Edit: And it's that 5% who will receive all the publicity and set the agenda.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205
    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

  • Options
    YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I just don't see how this is consistent with the data in Wales.

    Every Labour seat in Wales (except Cardiff) voted Leave.

    The Remain supporting areas are the seats held by the LibDems (Ceredigion), PC (Arfon & Meirionnydd) and the Tories (Vale of Glamorgan & Monmouthshire).
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    edited February 2017

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Maltese women are the only European nationality with higher BMI than UK, but apart from that I agree. Brexit Britons will have narrower horizons.
    I haven't been to Malta for years but returning from France the differnce in obeisity is extraordinary. If you see a very large person in the environs of Nice the chances are they're English. Considering most Britons are slaves to fitbit it's surprising
  • Options
    EssexitEssexit Posts: 1,956
    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
  • Options



    Fortunately, that seems to have died down.

    Prison may have helped:

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/oct/25/animal-research-animal-welfare
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891

    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I just don't see how this is consistent with the data in Wales.

    Every Labour seat in Wales (except Cardiff) voted Leave.

    The Remain supporting areas are the seats held by the LibDems (Ceredigion), PC (Arfon & Meirionnydd) and the Tories (Vale of Glamorgan & Monmouthshire).
    I don't either but the figures for Labour Remainers are well over 70% yet the Labour constituencies are apparently well over 70% Leave
  • Options
    Labour embracing Leave risks losing a completely different (and more numerous) set of supporters, many of whom feel extremely passionately about the subject of EU membership. Those defying the three line whip weren't doing so solely from principle.

    What should Labour do? A competent leader would by now have laid out his objectives for Britain's future relationship with the EU, drawing on Labour's internationalist tradition and stressing the need for continuing to work closely together both at a state level and at a human level. He would be stressing the need to protect existing workers (both in Britain and abroad) and seeking a settlement for the workers not the bankers, challenging the EU to approach negotiations on the same way - a Brexit for the people, not a card game behind closed doors between politicians.

    The problem, as usual, for Labour is right at the top.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231

    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I just don't see how this is consistent with the data in Wales.

    Every Labour seat in Wales (except Cardiff) voted Leave.

    The Remain supporting areas are the seats held by the LibDems (Ceredigion), PC (Arfon & Meirionnydd) and the Tories (Vale of Glamorgan & Monmouthshire).
    I would have thought there are more Labour voters in London than there are voters in the whole of Wales.

    The real issue is that if Labour try and concentrate on Remain voter support only they effectively kiss goodbye to every seat outside London, Manchester, West Yorkshire and Newcastle - although that is indeed where most of their voters live if we just judge by raw numbers.
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    Labour embracing Leave risks losing a completely different (and more numerous) set of supporters, many of whom feel extremely passionately about the subject of EU membership. Those defying the three line whip weren't doing so solely from principle.

    What should Labour do? A competent leader would by now have laid out his objectives for Britain's future relationship with the EU, drawing on Labour's internationalist tradition and stressing the need for continuing to work closely together both at a state level and at a human level. He would be stressing the need to protect existing workers (both in Britain and abroad) and seeking a settlement for the workers not the bankers, challenging the EU to approach negotiations on the same way - a Brexit for the people, not a card game behind closed doors between politicians.

    The problem, as usual, for Labour is right at the top.

    Isn't that rather close to the vision laid out by Mrs. T. May?
  • Options
    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Theoretically yes, but in practice the language barrier is too great for most British people. Across Europe (and not just the EU) everyone learns English as the obvious second language, normally starting in primary school. How many even on PB would be able to move to a country where English wasn't an official language and be able to operate as effectively as they can here? I visit France most years, often on school trips (we do an exchange with a school near Toulouse which I normally go on), but my French is strictly O-level standard. I doubt that I could easily apply for a job in a normal French school either.
  • Options
    Miss Vance, cheers for that.
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited February 2017
    Hooray! Witty, amusing Roger is gone, pompous Roger is back. Thank God for that, my whole world view was shattered yesterday, normality is restored.

    Let's look at the data from the ONS. Sadly it's based on 2011 Eurostat data so hardly finger-on-the-pulse stuff.

    There were 83k British kids (i.e. <15 years) living in the EU27. About 90k 15-29 year olds. Let's be generous and assume they're all students. There are roughly 500k 29-64 year olds. Let's assume they're all workers. There are 190k pensioners (if we assume everyone still retires @ 65). Of those, the bulk* (101k) are in Spain.

    For the Brits, permanent emigration is a minority sport. Or rather, emigration to Europe is a minority sport. The British diaspora is still out into the Anglosphere.

    Dig a little deeper, and we (as you might expect) live mostly in Spain, France, Ireland and Germany. A steep drop below that.

    The UK passport is the #3 in the world for visa free travel. I don't expect that to change. I also expect us to remain part of Erasmus. British wanderlust is not going to be put back in the bottle until Ryanair et al go bust. Clacton, my arse.

    As for the rest, wot @Cyclefree said.

    * Oops. Pedants, have mercy. Let's call it 'just over half' ;)
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    Cyclefree said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

    A patronising post but nothing wrong with that!

    There's a difference between visiting various cities in the world and being able to work in them as easily as you can your local Tesco. A friend of mine has recently been fined £15,000 by the Home Office for employing an Algerian to wash the dishes in his cafe for a few hours on a Saturday night.

    Perhaps when you were working and travelling we were either in the EU or the rules were more lax then?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231
    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
  • Options
    philiph said:

    Labour embracing Leave risks losing a completely different (and more numerous) set of supporters, many of whom feel extremely passionately about the subject of EU membership. Those defying the three line whip weren't doing so solely from principle.

    What should Labour do? A competent leader would by now have laid out his objectives for Britain's future relationship with the EU, drawing on Labour's internationalist tradition and stressing the need for continuing to work closely together both at a state level and at a human level. He would be stressing the need to protect existing workers (both in Britain and abroad) and seeking a settlement for the workers not the bankers, challenging the EU to approach negotiations on the same way - a Brexit for the people, not a card game behind closed doors between politicians.

    The problem, as usual, for Labour is right at the top.

    Isn't that rather close to the vision laid out by Mrs. T. May?
    No. Theresa May has given a few platitudes about Global Britain but prioritised clamping down on immigration, mocked citizens of the world and her style couldn't have been more card player if she tried.
  • Options
    Cyclefree said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

    That was then, this is now. With much greater mass mobility now, Britain can't expect to return to the border regimes of the 1960s.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231
    edited February 2017
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    It doesn't really matter that a majority of Corbyn's lost voters were for Leave or even that so many Labour seats are in Leave areas. Labour voters are by a large majority Remainers and by chasing the right wing straight banana vote he's just alienating his core supporters

    Nothing is more anathema to Labour values than watching their leader chase those with UKIP values and he shouldn't be surprised when he's treated like an unprincipled pariah.

    I just don't see how this is consistent with the data in Wales.

    Every Labour seat in Wales (except Cardiff) voted Leave.

    The Remain supporting areas are the seats held by the LibDems (Ceredigion), PC (Arfon & Meirionnydd) and the Tories (Vale of Glamorgan & Monmouthshire).
    I don't either but the figures for Labour Remainers are well over 70% yet the Labour constituencies are apparently well over 70% Leave
    Because Labour's vote distribution of remainders, like its vote share generally, is grossly inefficient and piled up big in a few constituencies?

    I'm guessing Scotland may also skew it somewhat - I would have thought almost all leavers in Scotland were Conservative with a minority (like our own MalcolmG) from the SNP.

    However, I have just made the bold assumption that there are still Labour voters in Scotland!
  • Options
    mattmatt Posts: 3,789
    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    How often do the majority of people travel outside the UK. One, perhaps twice, a year and then to a beach resort.

    You and I live in a world where people travel across borders and work internationally all the time. I've taken, and this is not a boast, just an observation, 18 international flights so far this year. I don't think I have much in common with the voters of Hartlepool, Grimsby, Clayton et al. To be honest, I'm pleased that I don't, but equally their vote in a national referendum is worth as much as mine.
  • Options
    YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
  • Options
    Corbyn is not credible. There is no policy he could formulate that would (1) unite the PLP; and (2) get attention from voters generally. The obvious solution to Labour's Article 50 problem was to recognise that it was a trigger vote and that within weeks it would be forgotten as the important stuff around the Brexit negotiations got underway. There was no need for a three line whip. But Corbyn chose to alienate MPs and his own base instead. When you see Derek Hatton, George Monbiot, Owen Jones and every other erstwhile Corbyn media cheerleader proclaiming their loss of faith, you know Corbyn is in serious trouble. Those who voted for him in 2015 and 2016 feel he has betrayed them (except Nick Palmer, of course!). It's hard to see how he wins them back. Meanwhile, Momentum is breaking up into a dozen different splinter groups - as was always going to happen. Everyone else is just watching and waiting. Tick tock.
  • Options
    "To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime. "
    The utter contempt Roger has for the working classes of this country is breathtaking. His unconfined and self-serving elitism, arrogance and snobbery belong in the 18th century.
  • Options
    Roger said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

    A patronising post but nothing wrong with that!

    There's a difference between visiting various cities in the world and being able to work in them as easily as you can your local Tesco. A friend of mine has recently been fined £15,000 by the Home Office for employing an Algerian to wash the dishes in his cafe for a few hours on a Saturday night.

    Perhaps when you were working and travelling we were either in the EU or the rules were more lax then?

    I needed a visa to work in Spain in the 1980s. Before we joined the EEC it was generally the wealthy who travelled widely and worked in Europe; and, of course, the numbers were far lower than they are now.

  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Brexit.

    Population still ageing
    Globalisation still accelerating.
    Internet and technology still disrupting traditional jobs
    Trump still turning the world upside down.

    And Britain paralyzed by bloody Brexit.
  • Options
    theakestheakes Posts: 842
    David:
    1. Labour gained Dinnington from UKIP because the Lib Dems did no work at all in the ward concentrating on Brinsworth. If they had it would almost certainly have been different, probably a 30% turnout against 19%.. Where they work they seem to win, ie Sunderland and others.
    2. Brinsworth is not in isolation and follows the same familiar pattern of Labour to Lib Dem since the Autumn. The scale has been building steadily. The omens are for the same at Stoke Central. (Why the media hug UKIP is a mystery, their vote is just tumbling week by week and I suspect the same again at Stoke)
    3. Whether a seat voted Remain or Leave does not affect local or I suspect parliamentary outcomes. The Referendum is history to most folk and many are bored stiff hearing politicians, political betting and the media on both sides going on about it. The world is moving on in people minds, they feel they have much more to worry about, rising prices, inflation, high personal debt levels and interest rates rising soon. All this is playing into the protest vote which is or has switched from UKIP to the Lib Dems. The arrival of Trump has yet to play out, that could send some Leave votes to think again, it might not.
  • Options
    John_M said:

    Hooray! Witty, amusing Roger is gone, pompous Roger is back. Thank God for that, my whole world view was shattered yesterday, normality is restored.

    Let's look at the data from the ONS. Sadly it's based on 2011 Eurostat data so hardly finger-on-the-pulse stuff.

    There were 83k British kids (i.e.

    Ongoing cheap air travel will also depend on a deal with the EU and an agreement to abide by EU laws. Ditto with data roaming charges and the other countless ways in which being a part of the single market makes life easier for the millions of Brits who travel to the continent each year.

  • Options
    EssexitEssexit Posts: 1,956

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    I don't have any figures on this either, but by the 23rd of June wouldn't most students have gone home for the summer?
  • Options
    Jonathan said:

    Brexit.

    Population still ageing
    Globalisation still accelerating.
    Internet and technology still disrupting traditional jobs
    Trump still turning the world upside down.

    And Britain paralyzed by bloody Brexit.

    Part of me thinks that by having the politicians completely absorbed by Brexit, they don't have the opportunity to come up with wholly misconceived ideas to address other problems that would otherwise be seen as pressing.
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,710

    Cyclefree said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

    That was then, this is now. With much greater mass mobility now, Britain can't expect to return to the border regimes of the 1960s.
    That's a very good point. In my experience 9/11 was a turning point as governments responded to a threat in the only way they know: by increasing red tape. My wife who was a non-EU permanent resident in the UK got fed up with getting a letter from her employer, three months of original bank statements as well as a confirmed itinerary every time she wanted to go to Paris or Amsterdam for the weekend. AFAIK they couldn't even turn her away, as long she provided the paperwork.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    Sadly that doesn't surprise me after ten years working in further and higher education.
  • Options
    mattmatt Posts: 3,789

    John_M said:

    Hooray! Witty, amusing Roger is gone, pompous Roger is back. Thank God for that, my whole world view was shattered yesterday, normality is restored.

    Let's look at the data from the ONS. Sadly it's based on 2011 Eurostat data so hardly finger-on-the-pulse stuff.

    There were 83k British kids (i.e.

    Ongoing cheap air travel will also depend on a deal with the EU and an agreement to abide by EU laws. Ditto with data roaming charges and the other countless ways in which being a part of the single market makes life easier for the millions of Brits who travel to the continent each year.

    Could you explain some more about airspace, flight rights and the interaction with European law. You're clearly an expert.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205
    Roger said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Roger said:

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

    A patronising post but nothing wrong with that!

    There's a difference between visiting various cities in the world and being able to work in them as easily as you can your local Tesco. A friend of mine has recently been fined £15,000 by the Home Office for employing an Algerian to wash the dishes in his cafe for a few hours on a Saturday night.

    Perhaps when you were working and travelling we were either in the EU or the rules were more lax then?
    When I was a child we weren't in the EU. And yet I grew up in Italy and moved between it, the UK and Ireland as easily as now. My father travelled all round Europe in the fifties in a similar way. So did others in his family and in my mothers.

    I look back through all the generations on all sides of my family and see travel and work abroad in every generation. I simply don't accept your absurd characterisation that not being in the EU will mean no travel to or from Europe and no cultural exchange. Overstating your case does not help.

    You can have completely open borders and there will be advantages. But there are also disadvantages. Somewhat more restricted borders will also have advantages and disadvantages.

    The advocates of free borders are very quick to point to the many advantages of open borders but less willing to understand that there are also costs and that people may feel that the balance between the pros and cons has shifted the wrong way. We are arguing about what rules should apply, who bears the costs and how the rules should be applied. This is not the apocalypse. It is the fery boring everyday stuff of politics and good administration.

    Your friend was fined because he employed someone who had no right to live and work in the UK and EU FoM rules have nothing to do with Algerians.
  • Options
    matt said:

    John_M said:

    Hooray! Witty, amusing Roger is gone, pompous Roger is back. Thank God for that, my whole world view was shattered yesterday, normality is restored.

    Let's look at the data from the ONS. Sadly it's based on 2011 Eurostat data so hardly finger-on-the-pulse stuff.

    There were 83k British kids (i.e.

    Ongoing cheap air travel will also depend on a deal with the EU and an agreement to abide by EU laws. Ditto with data roaming charges and the other countless ways in which being a part of the single market makes life easier for the millions of Brits who travel to the continent each year.

    Could you explain some more about airspace, flight rights and the interaction with European law. You're clearly an expert.

    When we leave the EU we will be outside the Single Aviation Market, unless we do a deal to remain within it.

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/atyourservice/en/displayFtu.html?ftuId=FTU_5.6.7.html
  • Options
    YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    I don't have any figures on this either, but by the 23rd of June wouldn't most students have gone home for the summer?
    Ah yes, that is a fair point. Cambridge term ended on 17 June. That would explain the depressed turnout in the student wards.

    YDoethur's Hypothesis remains unsupported by data (so far).
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231
    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    I don't have any figures on this either, but by the 23rd of June wouldn't most students have gone home for the summer?
    That is of course another possibility to account for Cambridge's figures, although it shouldn't affect postgraduates.

    However, most of the ones who had left will probably have been on holiday rather than voting at home.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    I don't have any figures on this either, but by the 23rd of June wouldn't most students have gone home for the summer?
    Ah yes, that is a fair point. Cambridge term ended on 17 June. That would explain the depressed turnout in the student wards.

    YDoethur's Hypothesis remains unsupported by data (so far).
    Another question though - under the new system would students have bothered to register anyway?
  • Options
    mattmatt Posts: 3,789

    matt said:

    John_M said:

    Hooray! Witty, amusing Roger is gone, pompous Roger is back. Thank God for that, my whole world view was shattered yesterday, normality is restored.

    Let's look at the data from the ONS. Sadly it's based on 2011 Eurostat data so hardly finger-on-the-pulse stuff.

    There were 83k British kids (i.e.

    Ongoing cheap air travel will also depend on a deal with the EU and an agreement to abide by EU laws. Ditto with data roaming charges and the other countless ways in which being a part of the single market makes life easier for the millions of Brits who travel to the continent each year.

    Could you explain some more about airspace, flight rights and the interaction with European law. You're clearly an expert.

    When we leave the EU we will be outside the Single Aviation Market, unless we do a deal to remain within it.

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/atyourservice/en/displayFtu.html?ftuId=FTU_5.6.7.html
    Yet open skies with a large number of countries existed before the SEM existed before and will,be, as a matter of law, the reversionary approach.
  • Options
    matt said:

    matt said:

    John_M said:

    Hooray! Witty, amusing Roger is gone, pompous Roger is back. Thank God for that, my whole world view was shattered yesterday, normality is restored.

    Let's look at the data from the ONS. Sadly it's based on 2011 Eurostat data so hardly finger-on-the-pulse stuff.

    There were 83k British kids (i.e.

    Ongoing cheap air travel will also depend on a deal with the EU and an agreement to abide by EU laws. Ditto with data roaming charges and the other countless ways in which being a part of the single market makes life easier for the millions of Brits who travel to the continent each year.

    Could you explain some more about airspace, flight rights and the interaction with European law. You're clearly an expert.

    When we leave the EU we will be outside the Single Aviation Market, unless we do a deal to remain within it.

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/atyourservice/en/displayFtu.html?ftuId=FTU_5.6.7.html
    Yet open skies with a large number of countries existed before the SEM existed before and will,be, as a matter of law, the reversionary approach.

    Nope, for EU member states a deal will have to be done at the EU level. They can't negotiate separately.

  • Options
    AlsoIndigoAlsoIndigo Posts: 1,852
    Roger said:

    There's a difference between visiting various cities in the world and being able to work in them as easily as you can your local Tesco. A friend of mine has recently been fined £15,000 by the Home Office for employing an Algerian to wash the dishes in his cafe for a few hours on a Saturday night.

    Did I miss Algeria joining the EU ?
  • Options
    EssexitEssexit Posts: 1,956

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    I don't have any figures on this either, but by the 23rd of June wouldn't most students have gone home for the summer?
    Ah yes, that is a fair point. Cambridge term ended on 17 June. That would explain the depressed turnout in the student wards.

    YDoethur's Hypothesis remains unsupported by data (so far).
    To be fair so does Essexit's!
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,205

    Cyclefree said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

    That was then, this is now. With much greater mass mobility now, Britain can't expect to return to the border regimes of the 1960s.
    Agreed. There will be new rules to take account of the consequences of the mass mobility which the previous rules facilitated. In short, politics reacts to changes of facts and circumstances. Every action has a reaction.

    And people find this surprising because......?

    My point is that cultural exchange and travel were possible when there were very different rules going back over the last century and will continue to be possible when new rules are brought in. It is quite absurd to pretend that we will become a cultural wasteland simply because someone has to fill in a form. It is not form-filling which prevents culture but a closed mind. And closed inflexible minds come in all shapes and sizes.

  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,987
    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.
    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    I don't have any figures on this either, but by the 23rd of June wouldn't most students have gone home for the summer?
    Absolutely right: most people will have left by the 10th
  • Options
    YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    ydoethur said:



    Another question though - under the new system would students have bothered to register anyway?

    True, it requires more initiative for the student to register.
  • Options
    The arrival of Trump on the scene means Brexit will be far softer than a lot of us may have feared a while back. His unpredictability and alliegance to America First mean that the UK and EU need each other. We are a big economy that the Europeans are going to want open access to, while everyone knows there is no game-changing trade deal the UK can do with the US. The wriggle room in the White Paper is immense and will be fully utilised. We'll end up semi-detached, rather than detached. Everyone will be fine with that, apart from the swivel-eyed right; though many will end up wondering what the point of it all was.
  • Options
    BromptonautBromptonaut Posts: 1,113

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Maltese women are the only European nationality with higher BMI than UK, but apart from that I agree. Brexit Britons will have narrower horizons.
    Malta has the lowest level of cycling in the EU. Correlation not causation I'm sure.
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,995



    Mr. Roger, if only some sort of travel had been possible before the EU existed.

    It's not about travel; it's about the Brexitards turning their backs on a broader European identity and the lifelong mobility and freedom that went with it.

    I have a nephew who wanted to go to university in Spain. Will he still be able to? Probably, but it might be more expensive and complicated so he might not bother and he'll just have his horizons broadened in Hull instead of Seville.

    I have a friend who wanted to retire in France and bought a house for that purpose. Will he still be able to do it? Probably not, the health insurance costs for non-EU residents in France have put that beyond him and his wife.

    But it's all worth it because something, something, something sovreignty.
  • Options
    EssexitEssexit Posts: 1,956
    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:



    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.

    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    I don't have any figures on this either, but by the 23rd of June wouldn't most students have gone home for the summer?
    That is of course another possibility to account for Cambridge's figures, although it shouldn't affect postgraduates.

    However, most of the ones who had left will probably have been on holiday rather than voting at home.
    Judging - anecdotally and unscientifically - from my Facebook feed around that time, the twentysomething graduates I know were bothering to vote, overwhelmingly for Remain, and getting postal/proxy votes if they were going to be away.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,744
    Sometimes I feel if only cyclefree were a politician perhaps many of our problems In This country could be sorted out, because there'd finally be someone to cut through all the nonsense in a calm, erudite fashion to enable some worthwhile discussion and compromise to go on. But then I think if it happened more likely the culture of our politics would win out and diminish the advantages, as the system grinds down the keen and able.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231
    Essexit said:



    To be fair so does Essexit's!

    I've been trying to find some, but so far only click bait from the Telegraph. I would guess there will be an academic tome on the EU referendum a la the British General Elections series, which hopefully will have something on this. No sign of it yet though as far as I can see.

    TBF it wasn't anyone's fault that the weather in London was so bad that day - I don't think that could have beeen foreseen. But for the rest...
  • Options
    Dura_Ace said:



    Mr. Roger, if only some sort of travel had been possible before the EU existed.

    It's not about travel; it's about the Brexitards turning their backs on a broader European identity and the lifelong mobility and freedom that went with it.

    I have a nephew who wanted to go to university in Spain. Will he still be able to? Probably, but it might be more expensive and complicated so he might not bother and he'll just have his horizons broadened in Hull instead of Seville.

    I have a friend who wanted to retire in France and bought a house for that purpose. Will he still be able to do it? Probably not, the health insurance costs for non-EU residents in France have put that beyond him and his wife.

    But it's all worth it because something, something, something sovreignty.

    Both will be fine. A deal will be done. We'll trade access for sovereignty; free movement will essentially remain in place. Thank-you President Trump.

  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231
    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:

    Essexit said:

    ydoethur said:



    One of my students made this very point yesterday.

    I responded that if turnout had been as high among the young as among the old, Remain would almost certainly have won.

    With luck, that has impressed the importance of voting when given the chance on the whole class.

    We don't know that Remain would have won. There's probably something different about the type of young people who did and didn't bother to vote, and therefore how those non-voters would have decided.

    For instance if university students and graduates were more likely to vote than those in manual occupations.
    This is true, which is why I used 'almost'.

    Anecdotally however I would have said university students were less likely to vote than manual workers, simply because university students can be quite mind-blowingly childish, thoughtless and irresponsible in a way that it simply isn't possible to be if you are working for a living. Happy to be proven wrong if anyone has any data to the contrary.

    I also made the point that a lower turnout in Scotland probably had a bearing, but in mitigation the Scots must be utterly sick of referendums.
    An interesting question. I was sceptical, but there is some evidence that you're right. Here are the Cambridge wards

    https://tinyurl.com/z6fqxxm

    The student dominated wards are Newnham, Castle & Market, which do have the lowest percentage turnouts.
    I don't have any figures on this either, but by the 23rd of June wouldn't most students have gone home for the summer?
    That is of course another possibility to account for Cambridge's figures, although it shouldn't affect postgraduates.

    However, most of the ones who had left will probably have been on holiday rather than voting at home.
    Judging - anecdotally and unscientifically - from my Facebook feed around that time, the twentysomething graduates I know were bothering to vote, overwhelmingly for Remain, and getting postal/proxy votes if they were going to be away.
    Both of us are being anecdotal and unscientific!

    Seriously though, it's an interesting point.
  • Options
    AlsoIndigoAlsoIndigo Posts: 1,852
    .
    Cyclefree said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

    That was then, this is now. With much greater mass mobility now, Britain can't expect to return to the border regimes of the 1960s.
    Agreed. There will be new rules to take account of the consequences of the mass mobility which the previous rules facilitated. In short, politics reacts to changes of facts and circumstances. Every action has a reaction.

    And people find this surprising because......?

    My point is that cultural exchange and travel were possible when there were very different rules going back over the last century and will continue to be possible when new rules are brought in. It is quite absurd to pretend that we will become a cultural wasteland simply because someone has to fill in a form. It is not form-filling which prevents culture but a closed mind. And closed inflexible minds come in all shapes and sizes.

    I am still at a loss as to how the other 160+ countries of the world manage to trade together and visit each other without being in the single market.

    I have been working, traveling and living in South East Asia for over a decade, my total visa hassle usual amounts to a small fee and a 30 minute visit to the immigration office once a year, however do people survive.
  • Options
    MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    John_M said:

    Hooray! Witty, amusing Roger is gone, pompous Roger is back. Thank God for that, my whole world view was shattered yesterday, normality is restored.

    Let's look at the data from the ONS. Sadly it's based on 2011 Eurostat data so hardly finger-on-the-pulse stuff.

    There were 83k British kids (i.e.

    Ongoing cheap air travel will also depend on a deal with the EU and an agreement to abide by EU laws. Ditto with data roaming charges and the other countless ways in which being a part of the single market makes life easier for the millions of Brits who travel to the continent each year.


    Data roaming charges that are only finally being abolished in 2017?

    How on earth did people manage before then?

  • Options
    FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195
    Dura_Ace said:



    Mr. Roger, if only some sort of travel had been possible before the EU existed.

    It's not about travel; it's about the Brexitards turning their backs on a broader European identity and the lifelong mobility and freedom that went with it.

    I have a nephew who wanted to go to university in Spain. Will he still be able to? Probably, but it might be more expensive and complicated so he might not bother and he'll just have his horizons broadened in Hull instead of Seville.

    I have a friend who wanted to retire in France and bought a house for that purpose. Will he still be able to do it? Probably not, the health insurance costs for non-EU residents in France have put that beyond him and his wife.

    But it's all worth it because something, something, something sovreignty.
    Err when I was moving to France I had to purchase their health insurance whether we were in EU or not.

  • Options
    Spain has taken back control of its lettuces. The Sun is furious :-)
    https://twitter.com/sturdyalex/status/827802791083126784
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,231

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Maltese women are the only European nationality with higher BMI than UK, but apart from that I agree. Brexit Britons will have narrower horizons.
    Malta has the lowest level of cycling in the EU. Correlation not causation I'm sure.
    Never been to Malta. Is it very hilly or do they just not like cycling?

    Their roads do have something of a reputation for crazy drivers though - who was it said 'on Malta they drive in the shade'?
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,744

    Roger said:

    There's a difference between visiting various cities in the world and being able to work in them as easily as you can your local Tesco. A friend of mine has recently been fined £15,000 by the Home Office for employing an Algerian to wash the dishes in his cafe for a few hours on a Saturday night.

    Did I miss Algeria joining the EU ?
    Rogers just a bit upset for his friend who, iirc, unwittingly hired someone with no right work in the U.K And got punished for it. But the law demands you check these things apparently, so sucks for him but it's not actually unfair what the home office did on the face of it, and I don't know that any party would have dropped the rules that led to that punishment, though I'm happy to be corrected if there is one. Maybe the greens.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Roger said:

    Cyclefree said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Funnily enough Roger, long before the UK joined the EU I was travelling between and living in the cities of Italy and France with no problems whatsoever, as did my parents and their generation. And, come to think of it, so did their parents and grand-parents.

    You seem to think that there was nothing good before the EU and nothing good outside it. It's a view. But not a very intelligent or cultured one.

    A patronising post but nothing wrong with that!

    There's a difference between visiting various cities in the world and being able to work in them as easily as you can your local Tesco. A friend of mine has recently been fined £15,000 by the Home Office for employing an Algerian to wash the dishes in his cafe for a few hours on a Saturday night.

    Perhaps when you were working and travelling we were either in the EU or the rules were more lax then?
    If I remember, he broke the law. Perhaps he should have employed a legal worker.

    You and I might agree that he was treated more harshly than, say, Baroness Scotland but those sort of decisions are made above our pay grade
  • Options

    John_M said:

    Hooray! Witty, amusing Roger is gone, pompous Roger is back. Thank God for that, my whole world view was shattered yesterday, normality is restored.

    Let's look at the data from the ONS. Sadly it's based on 2011 Eurostat data so hardly finger-on-the-pulse stuff.

    There were 83k British kids (i.e.

    Ongoing cheap air travel will also depend on a deal with the EU and an agreement to abide by EU laws. Ditto with data roaming charges and the other countless ways in which being a part of the single market makes life easier for the millions of Brits who travel to the continent each year.


    Data roaming charges that are only finally being abolished in 2017?

    How on earth did people manage before then?

    They paid a lot more money to use their mobiles abroad.

  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891

    Roger said:

    There's a difference between visiting various cities in the world and being able to work in them as easily as you can your local Tesco. A friend of mine has recently been fined £15,000 by the Home Office for employing an Algerian to wash the dishes in his cafe for a few hours on a Saturday night.

    Did I miss Algeria joining the EU ?
    No but you missed the point
  • Options
    Mr. Ace, 'Brexitards'?

    *sighs*

    Also, I never felt European, as an identity. Perhaps you feel a deep and abiding kinship with Slovenians and Greeks and Spaniards. But that's not the only perspective; others are available.

    You scoff at sovereignty as if it's a matter of no import. Perhaps it isn't, to you. Perhaps the UK slowly being dissolved into the EU as nation-states are whittled away and their powers replaced by Brussels is something you'd welcome. But the country has taken a different view.

    As for your friend: he can sell the house, can he not? Changing his plans will be a shame for him, and likewise for your nephew (if that happens). But I don't think tacitly accepting the continual erosion of our capacity for self-governance in exchange for being able to retire in another country is a good bargain.

    There is increasing talk of the United States of Europe, of the need for more Europe (the EU*), of an EU Army. At what point would you say stop?

    We're already experiencing the difficulties of leaving because the bureaucratic empire-building means the EU has taken what should have been independent bodies (such as EURatom) and the extent of our legislative integration. How much harder would it be to leave later?

    If you're a federalist, that's not a problem, of course. But a federalist I am not. I rather like the idea of electing a government that implement a manifesto, rather than laws conjured by foreign bureaucrats being imposed upon the UK.
  • Options
    JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548

    the swivel-eyed

    the swivel-eyed

    the swivel-eyed

    the swivel-eyed

    the swivel-eyed

    Putting that in every post about your political opponents makes you sound, well, a bit swivel-eyed..
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,744
    edited February 2017

    Dura_Ace said:



    Mr. Roger, if only some sort of travel had been possible before the EU existed.

    It's not about travel; it's about the Brexitards turning their backs on a broader European identity and the lifelong mobility and freedom that went with it.

    I have a nephew who wanted to go to university in Spain. Will he still be able to? Probably, but it might be more expensive and complicated so he might not bother and he'll just have his horizons broadened in Hull instead of Seville.

    I have a friend who wanted to retire in France and bought a house for that purpose. Will he still be able to do it? Probably not, the health insurance costs for non-EU residents in France have put that beyond him and his wife.

    But it's all worth it because something, something, something sovreignty.

    Both will be fine. A deal will be done. We'll trade access for sovereignty; free movement will essentially remain in place. Thank-you President Trump.

    Very optimistic of you. Devil is in the details, but there's still hope for a deal that works for most of Britain and most the eu. Tough task of course, and starting negotiating position seems to maintain we won't try for anything like that.
  • Options
    BromptonautBromptonaut Posts: 1,113
    ydoethur said:

    Roger said:

    Watching the 28 European leaders sailing through the port of Valletta was such a depressing sight. The EU meant that every citizen of the UK could not only visit but go to school in work in live in go to university in bring up a family in this beautiful city in Malta as easily as they could any town in Britain.

    To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime.

    Im surprised the young people of this country didn't rise up in rebellion against their selfish ignorant parents and grandparents.

    Perhaps as they watch their children follow them into a life of obeisity in their cultural wasteland they might just pause for thought.

    Maltese women are the only European nationality with higher BMI than UK, but apart from that I agree. Brexit Britons will have narrower horizons.
    Malta has the lowest level of cycling in the EU. Correlation not causation I'm sure.
    Never been to Malta. Is it very hilly or do they just not like cycling?

    Their roads do have something of a reputation for crazy drivers though - who was it said 'on Malta they drive in the shade'?
    Biggest deterrent to taking up cycling for most people is fear of traffic - you answered your own question!

    It's why Birmingham (flattish) has a cycle to work level of 1.6% while in Bristol (hillier) it's over 7%.
  • Options

    philiph said:

    Labour embracing Leave risks losing a completely different (and more numerous) set of supporters, many of whom feel extremely passionately about the subject of EU membership. Those defying the three line whip weren't doing so solely from principle.

    What should Labour do? A competent leader would by now have laid out his objectives for Britain's future relationship with the EU, drawing on Labour's internationalist tradition and stressing the need for continuing to work closely together both at a state level and at a human level. He would be stressing the need to protect existing workers (both in Britain and abroad) and seeking a settlement for the workers not the bankers, challenging the EU to approach negotiations on the same way - a Brexit for the people, not a card game behind closed doors between politicians.

    The problem, as usual, for Labour is right at the top.

    Isn't that rather close to the vision laid out by Mrs. T. May?
    No. Theresa May has given a few platitudes about Global Britain but prioritised clamping down on immigration, mocked citizens of the world and her style couldn't have been more card player if she tried.
    Which is why the white paper mentions:

    banker: 24 times
    worker: zero times

    Or is it the other way round?
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549

    "To have had a future where Rome Venice Florence Paris Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen and Vienna were as accessible as Hartlipool Bradford Grimsby Rotherham and Clacton and to have had it taken away was a crime. "
    The utter contempt Roger has for the working classes of this country is breathtaking. His unconfined and self-serving elitism, arrogance and snobbery belong in the 18th century.

    Totally agree about Roger, he thinks he's some great intellect and liberal, but his posts are full of snobbery, ignorance, rudeness, and misogyny. His "bitch in heat" comment would have been a permanent ban if this was my site.
This discussion has been closed.