Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » With the Alabama polls showing the Farage-backed Moore 3.8% ah

124»

Comments

  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,839

    Keith chegwin is dead.

    Cheggers Played Pop, in the days when on the other side there was Jimmy Savile...
  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400

    Well, I've been abroad for several days (Cornwall) and have just caught up with the Brexit fun and games. It seems that we're heading for EU membership without the voting rights. While this is infinitely preferable to cliff-fall Brexit, it does bring into focus what a pointless exercise the whole Brexit thing has turned out to be. Also, what a pair of miserable, gutless little creeps Boris and Gove are. I loathe Farage, but at least he has the strength of his convictions. That pair should resign. Instead they're pretending they've played a blinder when in fact all they've stood for has gone up in smoke. Pathetic!

    The UK chemical industry saying they want to stay under EU regulation REACH regulation is quite amusing too, since this was one of Hannan et al's bête noire's, the removal of which was going to turbocharge British business. Oh well.
  • Options
    JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548


    Does the soviet key still work?

  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,839

    Saudi Arabia to allow cinemas to reopen from early 2018

    Bringing 19th century social norms to the 21st century Saudi Arabia.

    The new young guy in SA is doing an awesome job. They’ve got cinemas and theme parks under construction, although it will probably be a while before you can get a beer in the hotels of Riyadh.
  • Options
    From the photos online of the would be attacker he is going to be in a shit load of pain...oh well.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    Scott_P said:
    Putting it in to concede an oversight committee doesn’t seem all that far fetched.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,899
    edited December 2017

    From the photos online of the would be attacker he is going to be in a shit load of pain...oh well.

    He'll be wishing he had blown himself up. Supermax till he drops dead, his punishment will be worse than the death penalty itself.
  • Options
    rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787
    Pulpstar said:

    From the photos online of the would be attacker he is going to be in a shit load of pain...oh well.

    He'll be wishing he had blown himself up. Supermax followed by THE CHAIR :D
    New York doesn't have capital punishment.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,899
    rpjs said:

    Pulpstar said:

    From the photos online of the would be attacker he is going to be in a shit load of pain...oh well.

    He'll be wishing he had blown himself up. Supermax followed by THE CHAIR :D
    New York doesn't have capital punishment.
    Yes just noted that. But there'll be no escape from the local supermax for him. Ever.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    rpjs said:

    Pulpstar said:

    From the photos online of the would be attacker he is going to be in a shit load of pain...oh well.

    He'll be wishing he had blown himself up. Supermax followed by THE CHAIR :D
    New York doesn't have capital punishment.
    Depends if he's tried under federal law.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,920
    Sandpit said:

    No deal, no money....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/11/britain-will-not-pay-penny-leave-european-union-no-deal-theresa/

    Britain will not pay its agreed £39 billion bill to leave the European Union if a trade deal cannot be agreed, Theresa May has told her MPs.

    The Prime Minister said in a letter to her parliamentary party: “The Government has said that we are a country that honours its obligations, and that is what we will do.

    “We have agreed a fair settlement of commitments we have made while a member of the EU, in the spirit of our future partnership.

    “It depends upon a broader agreement being reached – as I have said, nothing is agreed until everything is agreed – so if there is no agreement then our offer also falls away.”

    I'm sorry, archer101au says different. I don't see why I should listen to evidence or facts, when I can listen to him.
  • Options
    Has somebody taken trumps twitter machine away?
  • Options
    Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    surbiton said:

    Elliot said:

    Scott_P said:
    That discrete audit found the CAP worked for the UK, which is obviously bonkers. It discredited the whole exercise. It made clear the whole thing was done by pro-EU civil servants seeking the conclusions they wanted to. Reminds me of the Yes, Minister line about independent inquiries being trains following the tracks you set before them.
    I am not surprised. Bloody moaning farmers, forever guzzling subsidies. Then they vote Brexit because, guess what, the subsidy forms are "too complicated".

    After the vote, they want UK government to guarantee that they will not lose out. Oh, yeah !
    If you have a full time job your income is almost certainly higher than that of the median UK farmer. James Dyson probably skews the mean a bit - not that that will mean anything to someone who thinks that evens is longer odds than 9/4 against, though.
  • Options
    rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787
    tlg86 said:

    rpjs said:

    Pulpstar said:

    From the photos online of the would be attacker he is going to be in a shit load of pain...oh well.

    He'll be wishing he had blown himself up. Supermax followed by THE CHAIR :D
    New York doesn't have capital punishment.
    Depends if he's tried under federal law.
    I don't think there's any federal offence he could be tried for, and as no-one was killed, he wouldn't be eligible for the federal death penalty anyway.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,011
    rcs1000 said:

    Sandpit said:

    No deal, no money....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/11/britain-will-not-pay-penny-leave-european-union-no-deal-theresa/

    Britain will not pay its agreed £39 billion bill to leave the European Union if a trade deal cannot be agreed, Theresa May has told her MPs.

    The Prime Minister said in a letter to her parliamentary party: “The Government has said that we are a country that honours its obligations, and that is what we will do.

    “We have agreed a fair settlement of commitments we have made while a member of the EU, in the spirit of our future partnership.

    “It depends upon a broader agreement being reached – as I have said, nothing is agreed until everything is agreed – so if there is no agreement then our offer also falls away.”

    I'm sorry, archer101au says different. I don't see why I should listen to evidence or facts, when I can listen to him.
    Do you believe the financial settlement is contingent on negotiating a Canada-style FTA?
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,011

    Has somebody taken trumps twitter machine away?

    He's tweeted since the explosion:
    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/940223974985871360
  • Options
    PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138

    Jonathan said:

    The Tories have played a blinder in the South on boundaries. Take a town, any town and wrap enough countryside around it to make it Tory. Doesn't matter how odd the boundary is.
    That's how they get almost 100% of the seats with lest than 50% of the vote.

    Great idea - except the Tories no more set the boundaries than Labour do. In fact the last time the boundaries were changed was when Labour were in power.
    So I would suggest you are talking rubbish.
    Except that the Tories fixed the number of seats, which determined the size of constituencies, which determined how much rural area should be in each constituency. A bit broad brush, but nevertheless....

    Tories guilty as charged,
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,274
    edited December 2017

    Has somebody taken trumps twitter machine away?

    He's tweeted since the explosion:
    https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/940223974985871360
    On the important issues then....

    I do have this vision of the secret service trying to rush him to a secure location and him going no hold on a minute, I must finish this tweet.

    BTW, I watched the CH4, 4 part documentary on him over the weekend, it was actually really interesting.
  • Options
    RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    HYUFD said:

    Roger said:

    any chance of a UK byelection in early 2018?

    I'd say probably no. TMay looks more secure than she has been since GE17 though maybe DGreen could be in trouble. If he has to quit as TMay's deputy then hard to see him staying in the Commons.
    Unlikely his wife would let him. All those nubile journalists......
    Ashord lowest Tory majority in recent times was the 5000+ ion 1997. The fight there is for second place. Lab, LD and UKIP all been there in recent years, so can’t really see it as ‘interesting'.
    You are quite right looking at the numbers. But that is a part of the south east where Labour is stronger than it looks. It isn't that far from Hastings which was very nearly an upset in June and Canterbury that actually was one.
    Lab have some pockets of strength in Ashford town but the constituency has a lot more rural territory than Hastings. It is massively oversized and so will look better for Lab after the next boundary review (whenever that is), although still fairly safe Con.
    There are a number of Tory safe seats in Kent and Sussex that would be marginals if it was not for the villages, Folkestone, Maidstone and Tonbridge and Worthing for example. It was the villages which ensured they stayed Tory in 1997 even as several other Kent and Sussex seats went Labour or LD
    The Tories have played a blinder in the South on boundaries. Take a town, any town and wrap enough countryside around it to make it Tory. Doesn't matter how odd the boundary is.

    That's how they get almost 100% of the seats with lest than 50% of the vote.
    Great idea - except the Tories no more set the boundaries than Labour do. In fact the last time the boundaries were changed was when Labour were in power.

    So I would suggest you are talking rubbish.
    You are wrong. Boundaries can be influenced by lobbying at a local level, building as they do on wards. Tories very organised in past.
    Yes the boundaries are certainly influenced by political considerations. But to be fair to the Tories the typical geography in the south east is medium sized town surrounded by a lot of villages. That's good territory for them, and it means you can have a lot of Labour votes with little representation. But it also means that there are quite few potential Canterburys out there if Labour is doing well and the Conservatives badly.
  • Options
    Scott_P said:
    It's a statement of intent, both parties have already said that!
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    It's a statement of intent, both parties have already said that!

    https://twitter.com/albertonardelli/status/940142336352366593
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    rkrkrk said:

    Fantastic news from phase 1 trial on drug to slow Huntington’s disease - potentially with implications for Alzheimer’s also...

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/dec/11/excitement-as-huntingtons-drug-shown-to-slow-progress-of-devastating-disease

    Easy to lose sight of this stuff - but this is real news.

    Study not powered to look at symptomatic outcomes - do t get too excited.

    I'm a great fan of Ionis technology though (one of my companies has licenses for IBD)
  • Options
    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Mildly amused the EU repeatedly says nothing's agree until everything's agreed, and when Davis makes a similar comment suddenly people are wetting themselves.
  • Options

    NEW THREAD

  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    M

    Elliot said:

    Scott_P said:
    That discrete audit found the CAP worked for the UK, which is obviously bonkers. It discredited the whole exercise. It made clear the whole thing was done by pro-EU civil servants seeking the conclusions they wanted to. Reminds me of the Yes, Minister line about independent inquiries being trains following the tracks you set before them.
    “Obviously bonkers” was your conclusion of your professional audit? Or just from perusing Daily Telegraph headlines?
    CAP is "obviously bonkers" in that it makes payments to landowners simply for owning land (designed for French smallholders) rather than encouraging productivity
This discussion has been closed.