Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Making Amber Rudd Tory Leader & Prime Minister might be the on

SystemSystem Posts: 11,008
edited December 2017 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Making Amber Rudd Tory Leader & Prime Minister might be the only way to ensure she holds her seat.

if("undefined"==typeof window.datawrapper)window.datawrapper={};window.datawrapper["6bUkU"]={},window.datawrapper["6bUkU"].embedDeltas={"100":668,"200":460,"300":408,"400":382,"500":382,"600":356,"700":356,"800":356,"900":356,"1000":356},window.datawrapper["6bUkU"].iframe=document.getElementById("datawrapper-chart-6bUkU"),window.datawrapper["6bUkU"].iframe.style.height=window.datawrapper["6bUkU"].embedDeltas[Math.min(1e3,Math.max(100*Math.floor(window.datawrapper["6bUkU"].iframe.offsetWidth/100),100))]+"px",window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if("undefined"!=typeof a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var b in a.data["datawrapper-height"])if("6bUkU"==b)window.datawrapper["6bUkU"].iframe.style.height=a.data["datawrapper-height"][b]+"px"});

Read the full story here


Comments

  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    TSE
    The figures shown for Heath at Bexley in 1966 are wrong! His majority in the 1966 election was halved to circa 2300 compared with circa 4500 in 1964. There was a swing to Labour there of over 2%.
  • Options
    RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    justin124 said:

    TSE
    The figures shown for Heath at Bexley in 1966 are wrong! His majority in the 1966 election was halved to circa 2300 compared with circa 4500 in 1964. There was a swing to Labour there of over 2%.

    Wasn't that rather famously due to the Communist candidate standing down?
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,116
    edited December 2017

    justin124 said:

    TSE
    The figures shown for Heath at Bexley in 1966 are wrong! His majority in the 1966 election was halved to circa 2300 compared with circa 4500 in 1964. There was a swing to Labour there of over 2%.

    Wasn't that rather famously due to the Communist candidate standing down?
    There was a fourth candidate in 1964 but he was (a) not a Communist (or at least not officially) and (b) only polled 2.3% of the vote, hardly explaining a five-point rise for Labour in 1966. However, Heath's vote rose as well - it was the Liberal vote that was seriously squeezed.
This discussion has been closed.