Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Brecon & Radnor recall petition succeeds and an early by-e

SystemSystem Posts: 11,018
edited June 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Brecon & Radnor recall petition succeeds and an early by-election test for the new CON leader is in prospect

The result for the Chris Davies by election vote is announced. More on @ITVWales later pic.twitter.com/PC24Ex9XqM

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited June 2019
    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870
    edited June 2019
    Second... like the Conservatives. If they're lucky.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567

    1st

    Yes, the LDs likely will be.

  • Options
    booksellerbookseller Posts: 421
    4th like the Tories
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341
    edited June 2019

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    It will fall to 2 if an opposition party wins the by-election (though a Brexit Party MP would quite likely support the government in a VONC)
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    If the Tories lose the seat the opposition parties gain it and that reduces the overall majority by two.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    It will fall to 2 if an opposition party wins the by-election.
    3 surely?

    It was 5 this morning wasn't it? Or not. It's getting so tight it's quite hard to work out!
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    If the Tories lose the seat the opposition parties gain it and that reduces the overall majority by two.
    Indeed. But didn't they start on 5 this morning Mike? Or do you make it 4 before the recall?
  • Options
    TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,708

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,605
    Off topic: Just rescued another brood of mallard ducklings from our back garden. Just two this time. Mother and babies doing well, heading across the field in the general direction of water.
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    It will fall to 2 if an opposition party wins the by-election.
    3 surely?

    It was 5 this morning wasn't it? Or not. It's getting so tight it's quite hard to work out!
    I thought the working majority was 4, though as you say it's constantly changing!
  • Options
    TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,708
    I also assume Mark Field will be under IMMENSE pressure to NOT resign as an MP.

    Where he actually to do so, and the both By-elections lost, the government majority would fall to zero.
  • Options
    PaulMPaulM Posts: 613

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    If the Tories lose the seat the opposition parties gain it and that reduces the overall majority by two.
    Isn't the seat already lost following the success of the recall and Davies now no longer the MP- seat is vacant ?
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Important wicket for england.
    Abba-tastic as Fernando falls :

    Can you hear the wicket fall Fernando?
    I remember long ago another starry match like this
    In the firelight Fernando
    You were humming to yourself and softly stroked the ball
    You couldn't see the distant Rashid
    And the sounds of cat calls were coming from afar
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870

    I also assume Mark Field will be under IMMENSE pressure to NOT resign as an MP.

    Where he actually to do so, and the both By-elections lost, the government majority would fall to zero.

    The banter heuristic suggests that Theresa May will withdraw the whip from him the day before Boris becomes prime minister.
  • Options
    Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,059
    With this and mark field....and the sandbach complaint.

    A good look for the modern tory party.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,814
    edited June 2019
    Could be in for a Lib-Dem "spectacular" - just like in the old days.

    Time to party like its 1993. :D
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,189

    Off topic: Just rescued another brood of mallard ducklings from our back garden. Just two this time. Mother and babies doing well, heading across the field in the general direction of water.

    Hopefully they don't encounter any murderous cats like Palmerston.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,836

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I expect that Labour would go for it, but they would be in danger of losing 60 or so seats at the moment, so that could be a deterrent.

    The independents will only go for it if they want to do something else with their lives than be MP's.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    It's a really awkward seat for the Conservatives to have a by-election in. Their first objective must be to stay ahead of the Brexit party. I wonder if one of the bookies will offer a market on a head to head between them.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Sean_F said:

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I expect that Labour would go for it, but they would be in danger of losing 60 or so seats at the moment, so that could be a deterrent.

    The independents will only go for it if they want to do something else with their lives than be MP's.
    Labour will point to Peterborough. Whether they're right to I don't know but they will.

    The independents, I guess you're right. Sigh.
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    Not sure if that table is up to date. I think the LD seats total should be 11, one down from the GE - didn't the Lib Dem MP for Eastbourne resign the whip?
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341
    Have there been any Westminster voting intention polls for NI? Curious as to whether any of the DUP's 10 seats might be vulnerable - could matter a lot if there is another close result.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    Not sure if that table is up to date. I think the LD seats total should be 11, one down from the GE - didn't the Lib Dem MP for Eastbourne resign the whip?
    They've got Chuka Umunna now.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited June 2019

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    Not sure if that table is up to date. I think the LD seats total should be 11, one down from the GE - didn't the Lib Dem MP for Eastbourne resign the whip?
    Yes but he was re-set by Chuka I think, so 12
  • Options
    TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,708

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    I think Nick Boles ISN'T in the Con total, whilst Mercer is.
    I always work back from the General Election.

    318 Con win - Bercow is counted as 'Con', so then goes to Speaker = 317
    Three (Allen, Wollaston and Soubry) to CUK = 314
    Boles walks = 313
    Davies unseated = 312

    Mercer? If you don't count him, then its 311.
    If somehow Field also decides to fall on his sword, its 310.

    The 'government' can survive for a bit longer if it is really 312.
    If it really becomes 310, I think they're heading for toastville.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,836

    Sean_F said:

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I expect that Labour would go for it, but they would be in danger of losing 60 or so seats at the moment, so that could be a deterrent.

    The independents will only go for it if they want to do something else with their lives than be MP's.
    Labour will point to Peterborough. Whether they're right to I don't know but they will.

    The independents, I guess you're right. Sigh.
    Sure, but even if the Peterborough result were repeated nationwide, Labour would go significantly backwards in net terms.
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    Not sure if that table is up to date. I think the LD seats total should be 11, one down from the GE - didn't the Lib Dem MP for Eastbourne resign the whip?
    They've got Chuka Umunna now.
    Ah of course
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341

    I also assume Mark Field will be under IMMENSE pressure to NOT resign as an MP.

    Where he actually to do so, and the both By-elections lost, the government majority would fall to zero.

    What if he is facing charges for assault, as looks quite possible?
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    JackW said:

    Sky News - Brecon & Radnor heads for by-election as recall vote passes.

    LD winning there? They presumably start favorite, Jack?
    Absolutely.

  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    If you believe this, you should bet on the Conservatives:

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1142026414927089664

    I don't believe this.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    It'd be really great actually if someone nerdy wanted to go into this thoroughly and set out the numbers with position viz a viz WA / Brexit and the Conservatives. Maybe even a spreadsheet? It's not a given that all the opposition would support a VONC. But if they did, it's very close to curtains for this Government.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567

    It's a really awkward seat for the Conservatives to have a by-election in. Their first objective must be to stay ahead of the Brexit party. I wonder if one of the bookies will offer a market on a head to head between them.

    ‘Make sure Boris doesn’t betray us’ is going to be quite a persuasive argument for them.

  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,206
    Excellent. A bit of by-election fun for the slow mid summer period.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Excellent. A bit of by-election fun for the slow mid summer period.

    Because there's nothing else happening now?
  • Options
    blueblueblueblue Posts: 875

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    I think Nick Boles ISN'T in the Con total, whilst Mercer is.
    I always work back from the General Election.

    318 Con win - Bercow is counted as 'Con', so then goes to Speaker = 317
    Three (Allen, Wollaston and Soubry) to CUK = 314
    Boles walks = 313
    Davies unseated = 312

    Mercer? If you don't count him, then its 311.
    If somehow Field also decides to fall on his sword, its 310.

    The 'government' can survive for a bit longer if it is really 312.
    If it really becomes 310, I think they're heading for toastville.
    Number of Labour MPs unwilling to make Jeremy Corbyn Prime Minister?
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    I think Nick Boles ISN'T in the Con total, whilst Mercer is.
    I always work back from the General Election.

    318 Con win - Bercow is counted as 'Con', so then goes to Speaker = 317
    Three (Allen, Wollaston and Soubry) to CUK = 314
    Boles walks = 313
    Davies unseated = 312

    Mercer? If you don't count him, then its 311.
    If somehow Field also decides to fall on his sword, its 310.

    The 'government' can survive for a bit longer if it is really 312.
    If it really becomes 310, I think they're heading for toastville.
    Great, that's really helpful. Thank you.

    All eyes on Phillip Lee ... ;)
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Nigelb said:

    It's a really awkward seat for the Conservatives to have a by-election in. Their first objective must be to stay ahead of the Brexit party. I wonder if one of the bookies will offer a market on a head to head between them.

    ‘Make sure Boris doesn’t betray us’ is going to be quite a persuasive argument for them.

    By letting in the Lib Dems? Seems a hard way to ensure Boris does it, by gifting the seat to the Lib Dems.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,284
    I can see why some hope for an election but there are many mps seats under threat including labour ones and all the independents. I cannot see a vonc being an attractive proposition across the HOC excluding the SNP
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567
    edited June 2019

    Nigelb said:

    It's a really awkward seat for the Conservatives to have a by-election in. Their first objective must be to stay ahead of the Brexit party. I wonder if one of the bookies will offer a market on a head to head between them.

    ‘Make sure Boris doesn’t betray us’ is going to be quite a persuasive argument for them.

    By letting in the Lib Dems? Seems a hard way to ensure Boris does it, by gifting the seat to the Lib Dems.
    A remarkably defeatist line for the Brexit party to adopt.

  • Options
    PaulMPaulM Posts: 613

    Have there been any Westminster voting intention polls for NI? Curious as to whether any of the DUP's 10 seats might be vulnerable - could matter a lot if there is another close result.

    Would imagine that South Belfast would be very vulnerable, esp given Brexit.
  • Options
    TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,708
    edited June 2019

    Sean_F said:

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I expect that Labour would go for it, but they would be in danger of losing 60 or so seats at the moment, so that could be a deterrent.

    The independents will only go for it if they want to do something else with their lives than be MP's.
    Labour will point to Peterborough. Whether they're right to I don't know but they will.

    The independents, I guess you're right. Sigh.
    Of course, but this is the problem with the FTPA.
    Government proposes legislation (any legislation - doesn't matter - it could be the 'don't pick your nose at a bus stop Act) = defeated as only get 312 votes FOR. The DUP agreement is only C&S.

    Labour table No Confidence vote, and it fails because DUP suddenly switch to support and a lot of independents find themselves washing their hair that night.

    Rinse and repeat (no pun intended).
    How long can a Government REALLY go on, not able to get ANYTHING passed but surviving any VoNC thrown their way? Three years of zombie government. I can't see it.

    This is the problem with the FTPA. Confidence motions are not coupled with legislation, so people like Sammy Wilson can vote against the government on everything all day long, but then support them on the VoNC later that night.

  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    If you believe this, you should bet on the Conservatives:

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1142026414927089664

    I don't believe this.

    Isn't that 30.9% at a General Election?

    This is a by-election. So must be much lower surely?
  • Options
    stodgestodge Posts: 12,850
    Afternoon all :)

    I'd caution against LD over-confidence in this by-election. Against the apparently national euphoria that will greet Boris Johnson becoming Prime Minister (and I imagine he'll pay a couple of visits to the constituency in the campaign), the LDs will need to be at the top of their game.

    It will be a real test for the Party's new leader and it's always good to get that by-election win whatever the circumstances.

    Meanwhile, in other areas:

    https://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2019/06/nao-rubbishes-government-over-data-usage-and-storage?utm_source=Adestra&utm_medium=email&utm_term=

    How can Governments and indeed Councils take the right decisions if they don't have the right information? My experience of local Government information systems is they are clogged with information but none of it is much use for (and very often the authority doesn't have the tools to carry out) proper data analysis and forecasting.

    One or two examples of good practice exist but I suspect local and central Government is drowning in a porridge of useless information.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,836

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    I think Nick Boles ISN'T in the Con total, whilst Mercer is.
    I always work back from the General Election.

    318 Con win - Bercow is counted as 'Con', so then goes to Speaker = 317
    Three (Allen, Wollaston and Soubry) to CUK = 314
    Boles walks = 313
    Davies unseated = 312

    Mercer? If you don't count him, then its 311.
    If somehow Field also decides to fall on his sword, its 310.

    The 'government' can survive for a bit longer if it is really 312.
    If it really becomes 310, I think they're heading for toastville.
    IMHO, the government will survive a Vote of Confidence if the Conservatives have 307 or more MPs.

    307 plus DUP plus Woodcock, Lewis, Hermon, minus one Deputy Speaker is 319

    That leaves 321 who could vote against, but I expect Austin and some of CHUK would abstain.

  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    It's a really awkward seat for the Conservatives to have a by-election in. Their first objective must be to stay ahead of the Brexit party. I wonder if one of the bookies will offer a market on a head to head between them.

    ‘Make sure Boris doesn’t betray us’ is going to be quite a persuasive argument for them.

    By letting in the Lib Dems? Seems a hard way to ensure Boris does it, by gifting the seat to the Lib Dems.
    A remarkably defeatist line for the Brexit party to adopt.

    Gotta pick your battles I guess. Lib Dems got mauled in Peterborough, I dont think Brecon is very fertile for the BXP.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Have to say that from an objective POV as opposed to someone caring about the state of the nation, the next best thing to a General Election is a true minority Government. I remember Jim Callaghan's final months and the problems John Major had even starting out with a 21 seat majority.

    But this is something else. At a critical juncture in this nation's history, with the governing party about to elect someone massively divisive, the Government is almost bereft of its working majority.

    It's a fantastic spectacle.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    FPT
    tlg86 said:

    tlg86 said:

    Is Davies going to be the Tory candidate?

    That would be brave given the size of the recall. The Conservatives must be staring down the barrel of a gun on this one.
    Two thirds of the size of the Peterborough recall. Do you think that's due to the rural nature of the seat or does it suggest the constituents aren't quite as pissed off about it as they were with Onasanya?
    It could be either of those. But note that both the Conservatives and Labour were working for a recall in Peterborough, while only the Lib Dems were in Brecon & Radnor. That might be part of it.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567

    I also assume Mark Field will be under IMMENSE pressure to NOT resign as an MP.

    Where he actually to do so, and the both By-elections lost, the government majority would fall to zero.

    What if he is facing charges for assault, as looks quite possible?
    He’d still probably not resign - and I think charges are very unlikely.
    A civil case is a possibility, I suppose.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567
    Brom said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    It's a really awkward seat for the Conservatives to have a by-election in. Their first objective must be to stay ahead of the Brexit party. I wonder if one of the bookies will offer a market on a head to head between them.

    ‘Make sure Boris doesn’t betray us’ is going to be quite a persuasive argument for them.

    By letting in the Lib Dems? Seems a hard way to ensure Boris does it, by gifting the seat to the Lib Dems.
    A remarkably defeatist line for the Brexit party to adopt.

    Gotta pick your battles I guess. Lib Dems got mauled in Peterborough, I dont think Brecon is very fertile for the BXP.
    Can’t see them not seriously contesting it, though.

  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Sean_F said:

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    I make it three? 312 CON MPs. 10 DUP = 322.
    1 vacant. 7 not attending. 1 Speaker.
    Opposed 319 [1] [2]

    [1] I always get confused with Deputy Speakers - are they allowed to vote or not?
    [2] I realise Nick Boles and Lady Herman may be counted upon to support the government, but not technically?
    Actually that looks right: https://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/current-state-of-the-parties/

    322 v 319

    So if the tories lose the by election it will be 322 v 320

    This really is starting to enter endgame territory for this parliament. Surely?

    Mind you, a successful VONC does depend on the independents & even Labour MPs falling into line and that's by no means a given. Where are Nick Boles and Johnny Mercer in these figures? They surely won't support a VONC?
    I think Nick Boles ISN'T in the Con total, whilst Mercer is.
    I always work back from the General Election.

    318 Con win - Bercow is counted as 'Con', so then goes to Speaker = 317
    Three (Allen, Wollaston and Soubry) to CUK = 314
    Boles walks = 313
    Davies unseated = 312

    Mercer? If you don't count him, then its 311.
    If somehow Field also decides to fall on his sword, its 310.

    The 'government' can survive for a bit longer if it is really 312.
    If it really becomes 310, I think they're heading for toastville.
    IMHO, the government will survive a Vote of Confidence if the Conservatives have 307 or more MPs.

    307 plus DUP plus Woodcock, Lewis, Hermon, minus one Deputy Speaker is 319

    That leaves 321 who could vote against, but I expect Austin and some of CHUK would abstain.

    Whoever gets to be next Conservative leader is going to have to think very carefully about what they say in hustings if they want to be next Prime Minister too.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,206
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Blimey. LibDems have opened as 1/5 red hot favourites. Their Welsh leader is candidate.

    https://twitter.com/LadPolitics/status/1142022855753916416
  • Options
    AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    Thought I'd drive by and inflict this on everyone. Not even sorry.
    https://twitter.com/bexin2d/status/1142026447290347521
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Losing an MP here and an MP there makes a huge difference in a hung parliament with a divisive PM.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Jonathan said:

    Losing an MP here and an MP there makes a huge difference in a hung parliament with a divisive PM.

    Indeed

    I can think of a handful of Cons MPs who might not support him even in a VONC. I mean, in one way why on earth would Dominic Grieve have any incentive to do so?
  • Options
    PaulMPaulM Posts: 613

    If you believe this, you should bet on the Conservatives:

    https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1142026414927089664

    I don't believe this.

    Isn't that 30.9% at a General Election?

    This is a by-election. So must be much lower surely?
    True, but normally by-elections are seen as a harmless way to send a message to the government without changing anything. If this byelection could bring down the government it is a different state of affairs
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,923
    Yep that lot looks about right, BRP and the outsiders Lab, Plaid, Green probably all too short.
  • Options
    TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,708
    Sean_F said:



    IMHO, the government will survive a Vote of Confidence if the Conservatives have 307 or more MPs.

    307 plus DUP plus Woodcock, Lewis, Hermon, minus one Deputy Speaker is 319

    That leaves 321 who could vote against, but I expect Austin and some of CHUK would abstain.

    And here is the funny bit. You're probably right about 307MPs.
    We here are talking about making a minority government work with just 307 Conservative MPs.

    David Cameron, and no one on this site, believed they could with 307 in May 2010.
    It comes to something when you are basically relying on the ill-discipline of opposition MPs and the goodwill of former Conservative MPs.

    It's why I can't see them managing to 2022. We're in deadsville territory. A government surviving only because the opposition can't be bothered opposing!
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,295
    Adrian Chiles on R5 doing a good job right now on the Field thing.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    Sean_F said:



    IMHO, the government will survive a Vote of Confidence if the Conservatives have 307 or more MPs.

    307 plus DUP plus Woodcock, Lewis, Hermon, minus one Deputy Speaker is 319

    That leaves 321 who could vote against, but I expect Austin and some of CHUK would abstain.



    It's why I can't see them managing to 2022. We're in deadsville territory. A government surviving only because the opposition can't be bothered opposing!
    And a parliament even more paralysed than under Theresa May.

    Can anyone really see Boris Johnson putting up with this? I think he will pre-empt and go to the country.
  • Options
    kjhkjh Posts: 10,626
    In answer to @Nigel_Foreman FPT:

    Are you telling me Calais isn't ours any more?
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,836

    Jonathan said:

    Losing an MP here and an MP there makes a huge difference in a hung parliament with a divisive PM.

    Indeed

    I can think of a handful of Cons MPs who might not support him even in a VONC. I mean, in one way why on earth would Dominic Grieve have any incentive to do so?
    That's certainly another factor. Grieve and Lee have broken with their party, emotionally. OTOH, voting against your own side in a vote of confidence ends friendships forever.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567
    TOPPING said:

    Adrian Chiles on R5 doing a good job right now on the Field thing.

    Putting everyone to sleep ?

  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    If a General Election is called then the by-election is cancelled even if the writ has been moved already right?
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,295
    Nigelb said:

    TOPPING said:

    Adrian Chiles on R5 doing a good job right now on the Field thing.

    Putting everyone to sleep ?

    I loathed him some years ago (like everyone did) but now I like him and think he is a very good broadcaster.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,836
    Pulpstar said:

    Yep that lot looks about right, BRP and the outsiders Lab, Plaid, Green probably all too short.
    I'd make the Lib Dems favourites, certainly, but I wouldn't but their chances at 85%.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567
    TOPPING said:

    Nigelb said:

    TOPPING said:

    Adrian Chiles on R5 doing a good job right now on the Field thing.

    Putting everyone to sleep ?

    I loathed him some years ago (like everyone did) but now I like him and think he is a very good broadcaster.
    I want to like him, but he’s still pure insomnia cure for me.

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    If a General Election is called then the by-election is cancelled even if the writ has been moved already right?

    That's what happened with Gorton in 2017
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited June 2019
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-19/johnson-s-backers-eye-early-u-k-election-despite-brexit-crisis

    I think this is the way it will go. It's Boris' best chance of success, especially if he does a tie-in with Farage.

    It will be an incredible General Election. I expect something sensational from the LibDems. But there might well be a Cons-BXP majority because Corbyn is so toxic.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    JackW said:

    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310

    With an untested controversial opposition leader waiting in the wings ready to take the country in a different direction.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,814
    Will Mark Reckless stand for the Brexit Party just make TSE's dreams come true? :D
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    JackW said:

    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310

    Remember it so well. It was live on Radio 4. At the last minute Jim appealed in his speech to successive members opposite. A lot of commentators thought he'd swung it back. But as you say, sensationally, he lost by 1 vote and the rest, as they say, is history.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,814
    JackW said:

    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310

    Boris will seize the day before he's VONC and call a general election IMO.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567
    Field’s prompt statement has probably averted any chance of a assault charge:

    “In the confusion many guests understandably felt threatened and when one protester rushed past me towards the top table I instinctively reacted.
    "There was no security present and I was for a split second genuinely worried she might have been armed.
    "As a result I grasped the intruder firmly in order to remove her from the room as swiftly as possible."
    He added: "I deeply regret this episode and unreservedly apologise to the lady concerned for grabbing her but in the current climate I felt the need to act decisively to close down the threat to the safety of those present."

    He has at the very least established reasonable doubt.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    GIN1138 said:

    JackW said:

    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310

    Boris will seize the day before he's VONC and call a general election IMO.
    That's my view.

    Question I have, is that going to be prior to Oct 31st? Surely yes?

    Well, TSE wanted the excitement of Boris v Gove but the build up to a General Election would be even more so.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    edited June 2019
    Got our polling cards through the door today for the annoying Northumbria Police and Crime Commissioner by-election. I can imagine turnout will be total dog poo.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,605
    Nigelb said:

    Field’s prompt statement has probably averted any chance of a assault charge:

    “In the confusion many guests understandably felt threatened and when one protester rushed past me towards the top table I instinctively reacted.
    "There was no security present and I was for a split second genuinely worried she might have been armed.
    "As a result I grasped the intruder firmly in order to remove her from the room as swiftly as possible."
    He added: "I deeply regret this episode and unreservedly apologise to the lady concerned for grabbing her but in the current climate I felt the need to act decisively to close down the threat to the safety of those present."

    He has at the very least established reasonable doubt.

    Was it The Fast Show that had a sketch of a Tory MP speaking to the press with his wife at his side to explain away some misdeed or other with a cock-and-bull story, and then saying that he hopes it is the end of the matter?
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,814

    GIN1138 said:

    JackW said:

    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310

    Boris will seize the day before he's VONC and call a general election IMO.
    That's my view.

    Question I have, is that going to be prior to Oct 31st? Surely yes?

    Well, TSE wanted the excitement of Boris v Gove but the build up to a General Election would be even more so.
    I think he'll announce it on 5th September (first day back after summer recess) and hold it on 17th October.

    This will also be enough to get the EU to push back our "departure" date to 31st December I'd have thought...
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,187
    8/1 the Cons is a great price. I'm having that.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,605

    Got our polling cards through the door today for the annoying Northumbria Police and Crime Commissioner by-election. I can imagine turnout will be total dog poo.

    That is a definite cock & balls voting opportunity!

    I have a 100% record of spoiling my ballot in PCC elections (but with nothing quite so graphic!).
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,079
    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    JackW said:

    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310

    Boris will seize the day before he's VONC and call a general election IMO.
    That's my view.

    Question I have, is that going to be prior to Oct 31st? Surely yes?

    Well, TSE wanted the excitement of Boris v Gove but the build up to a General Election would be even more so.
    I think he'll announce it on 5th September (first day back after summer recess) and hold it on 17th October.

    This will also be enough to get the EU to push back our "departure" date to 31st December I'd have thought...
    Don't tell @HYUFD that!!
  • Options
    StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092
    kinabalu said:

    8/1 the Cons is a great price. I'm having that.

    Looks like it's already come in to 4/1 sadly.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,836

    Nigelb said:

    Field’s prompt statement has probably averted any chance of a assault charge:

    “In the confusion many guests understandably felt threatened and when one protester rushed past me towards the top table I instinctively reacted.
    "There was no security present and I was for a split second genuinely worried she might have been armed.
    "As a result I grasped the intruder firmly in order to remove her from the room as swiftly as possible."
    He added: "I deeply regret this episode and unreservedly apologise to the lady concerned for grabbing her but in the current climate I felt the need to act decisively to close down the threat to the safety of those present."

    He has at the very least established reasonable doubt.

    Was it The Fast Show that had a sketch of a Tory MP speaking to the press with his wife at his side to explain away some misdeed or other with a cock-and-bull story, and then saying that he hopes it is the end of the matter?
    Little Britain, IIRC, where he was explaining away his encounter with a rent boy.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567
    Looks like Rashid just sealed the game.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Thanks for that Gin. 5th Sept for a 17th Oct election sounds like a plan
  • Options
    _Anazina__Anazina_ Posts: 1,810
    Last night, I witnessed the unedifying spectacle of the PB Tory arch-sycophants Mortimer and Carlotta defending the response of Mark Field MP.

    I hope they have now come to whatever sense they have left.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,567
    Someone should ask Johnson if this is a waste of police resources:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-48705621
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,639
    Sean_F said:

    Nigelb said:

    Field’s prompt statement has probably averted any chance of a assault charge:

    “In the confusion many guests understandably felt threatened and when one protester rushed past me towards the top table I instinctively reacted.
    "There was no security present and I was for a split second genuinely worried she might have been armed.
    "As a result I grasped the intruder firmly in order to remove her from the room as swiftly as possible."
    He added: "I deeply regret this episode and unreservedly apologise to the lady concerned for grabbing her but in the current climate I felt the need to act decisively to close down the threat to the safety of those present."

    He has at the very least established reasonable doubt.

    Was it The Fast Show that had a sketch of a Tory MP speaking to the press with his wife at his side to explain away some misdeed or other with a cock-and-bull story, and then saying that he hopes it is the end of the matter?
    Little Britain, IIRC, where he was explaining away his encounter with a rent boy.
    https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6mi4f8
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    If a General Election is called then the by-election is cancelled even if the writ has been moved already right?

    That's what happened with Gorton in 2017
    Does the writ for the by election get moved immediately? Or can it be delayed a while until the leadership contest is over and potentially a General Election is called?

    I seem to recall a by-election writ in late 2009 or early 2010 not being moved for about 6 months until it became moot.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited June 2019
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvLI_S7vN_8

    There you go. Edit: this is it. Bad quality though.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,973
    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    JackW said:

    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310

    Boris will seize the day before he's VONC and call a general election IMO.
    That's my view.

    Question I have, is that going to be prior to Oct 31st? Surely yes?

    Well, TSE wanted the excitement of Boris v Gove but the build up to a General Election would be even more so.
    I think he'll announce it on 5th September (first day back after summer recess) and hold it on 17th October.

    This will also be enough to get the EU to push back our "departure" date to 31st December I'd have thought...
    So Boris is going to run in an election where the Brexit advert will be Boris confirming we leave on October 31st Deal or No Deal with us now leaving in December.

    That just doesn't work for the Tories...
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    1st unlike the Tories in the Brecon & Radnor by election :)

    So that's another Cons out.

    I make the current Cons-DUP working majority 4. Can anyone disabuse me of that?

    Will probably fall to 3 with the by-election. It'll only take two tories to vote against the Gov't ...

    Is there any reason why the Opposition shouldn't table a vote of No Confidence now to test the arithmetic?

    Further Tory defections in the wake of Boris being elected could effectively provide the coup de grace to this Government. I also doubt that Lady Hermon would be inclined to support a Boris-led Government in a VNOC.
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    If a General Election is called then the by-election is cancelled even if the writ has been moved already right?

    That's what happened with Gorton in 2017
    Does the writ for the by election get moved immediately? Or can it be delayed a while until the leadership contest is over and potentially a General Election is called?

    I seem to recall a by-election writ in late 2009 or early 2010 not being moved for about 6 months until it became moot.
    I think that the writ is automatically triggered by the Speaker when is he is formally informed of the petition outcome.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    eek said:

    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    JackW said:

    The HoC numbers looks more and more like the fag end of the last months of the Callaghan government. Lost by-election, and the government majority melting away as the Lib-Lab pact confidence and supply and unofficial Unionist and SNP support ceased. The opposition tabled a VONC and won by 311-310

    Boris will seize the day before he's VONC and call a general election IMO.
    That's my view.

    Question I have, is that going to be prior to Oct 31st? Surely yes?

    Well, TSE wanted the excitement of Boris v Gove but the build up to a General Election would be even more so.
    I think he'll announce it on 5th September (first day back after summer recess) and hold it on 17th October.

    This will also be enough to get the EU to push back our "departure" date to 31st December I'd have thought...
    So Boris is going to run in an election where the Brexit advert will be Boris confirming we leave on October 31st Deal or No Deal with us now leaving in December.

    That just doesn't work for the Tories...
    Surely if he goes to the country on the basis that the only way to deliver Brexit is to give him a Commons majority that will work?

    Well, if they really believe the country wants Brexit.

    Which I don't.
This discussion has been closed.