Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Unelected PM Boris Johnson maintains his 100% record in Parlia

12467

Comments

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934
    Nigelb said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    tyson said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    MaxPB said:



    After speaking to someone I know, they ventured their opinion on Brexit. They still don't understand why the 2016 vote did not mean we instantly left the EU! I tried explain....does not understand the FTPA and why Boris cannot have an election, so far. People think what they want to think and the sheer level of ignorance on democratic institutions and the processes involved seem to pass many citizens.

    Well all they will hear tonight and tomorrow (and the next few days) is that Boris wanted to have an election and Labour denied the people a say. As you rightly point out, the detail of whatever no deal blocking stuff will get lost in the small print. The headlines are "Labour vote down election". It's going to play very badly IMO.
    It all turns on October 31st. If we leave by then he is a hero. If we don't he is done for.
    Not necessarily, Boris has voted for No Deal and the WA at MV3 and to remove the backstop. the Commons has voted to stay in the EU past October 31st, against No Deal and against the WA.

    This week has been a PR exercise from Boris reassuring Leavers he is on their side against the diehard Remainer traitors in the Commons, he might try and ask the Queen to refuse royal assent but even if the Bill against No Deal passes led by Corbyn Boris can then call a general election backed by Labour with a mandate for Brexit having always voted to Leave on October 31st while Corbyn has always voted to Remain past October 31st and to leave the EU if the Tories win a majority straightaway.

    He can then watch the Labour Leave seats start to topple
    Haha....I don't think yo his entitled, narcissistic bluster day in and out....
    Let’s wait for the first proper polls. I predict all the Boris haters will be rather disappointed. But we shall see

    Night night from SPARTA
    Indeed, I have never, ever in my life wanted to win a general election as much as this one and I expect most real conservatives feel the same. In fact I could not care less if the Tories never win a general election for over a decade after as long as Boris wins this one, delivers Brexit, wipes the smug smile off the diehard Remainers and beats the treacherous Corbyn
    Given the comment, it seems appropriate to ask, how old are you ?
    37
  • surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    They won't, the Tories got 65% in Beaconsfield in 2017, even if that vote split 50-50 between the Tory candidate and Grieve given Labour only got 21% and the LDs got 7% one of them would still win
    How do you know what Labour and Lib Dem voters would do ? Your mind certainly cannot read their minds.
  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Indeed. I would think they have better chances than most independents due to incumbency and the nature of the Tory split and the national situation. Still the point is the Independents might not win but the Tories will have to divert resources they could of used elsewhere.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,925

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Rory Stewart too. He seems well liked on his patch.
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,276
    edited September 2019

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    This must explain all the 'Jezza is frit', 'Jezza is chicken' stuff that Cummings has ordered the eurosceptic press to run with tonight. They think they've failed to secure the pre No deal GE and are now managing the narrative so that this fact reflects badly on Jezza. But it feels thin - it's not as if everyone you speak to was hitherto gagging for a general election to be called.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    https://twitter.com/joepike/status/1169371276135284737

    Round my way, we treat our friends a little better than that.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,044
    Stewart Jackson on Newsnight.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    They won't, the Tories got 65% in Beaconsfield in 2017, even if that vote split 50-50 between the Tory candidate and Grieve given Labour only got 21% and the LDs got 7% one of them would still win
    How do you know what Labour and Lib Dem voters would do ? Your mind certainly cannot read their minds.
    Even if they combined and none vote for Grieve that still makes only 28% for the Labour and LDs combined and 32.5% for Grieve and the same for the Tory candidate and that assumes most of Grieve's vote does not go Tory which is very unlikely, S Bucks narrowly voted Leave and Tory voters even more so
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Hammond is only going to have the Executive canvassing for him - and hardly any of the members, pissed off as they are that his "re-selection" was a stitch-up......
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,482
    Noo said:

    TOPPING said:



    Why would you want to wipe the smug smile off your own face?

    I find your endless sniping at HYUFD close to bullying.

    I don't happen to agree with HYUFD, but he is at least amiable.
    Amiable people don't go around calling people traitors just for having policies they dislike.
    Or declaring civil war...
  • The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Hang on until the 21st November so that he lasts longer than Canning.
  • The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    This must explain all the 'Jezza is frit', 'Jezza is chicken' stuff that Cummings has ordered the eurosceptic press to run with tonight. They think they've failed to secure the pre No deal GE and are now managing the narrative so that this fact now reflects badly on Jezza. But it feels thin - it's not as if everyone you speak to was hitherto gagging for a general election to be called.

    Without action chicken photos and crying grit will get a bit wearing. If there is no election what, in practice, is Johnson going to do?

  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    Noo said:

    https://twitter.com/joepike/status/1169371276135284737

    Round my way, we treat our friends a little better than that.

    Round my way, we show rather more respect those that made us who we are.

    Jesus, they are adults who made a conscious decision to poke the party in the eye. What did they expect?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,877
    AndyJS said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Just saw Nick Watt reporting Boris will call off the fillibuster in HoL if Jezza agrees to an election.

    So Jezza can get NO DEAL off the table on 31st October by agreeing to a GE.

    But of course this isn't really about Brexit and No Deal at all is it? This is purely about Labour MPs being absolutely panic stricken at the prospect of having to face the electorate because they know the Lib-Dems will fillet them on the Remain side while Con/Brexit will fillet them on the Leave side.

    +1
    -1

    The Labour strategy is bang on point.

    Nobody in their right mind would give Boris an election at the time of his own choosing.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934
    Foxy said:

    Noo said:

    TOPPING said:



    Why would you want to wipe the smug smile off your own face?

    I find your endless sniping at HYUFD close to bullying.

    I don't happen to agree with HYUFD, but he is at least amiable.
    Amiable people don't go around calling people traitors just for having policies they dislike.
    Or declaring civil war...
    It is Parliament voting down the Withdrawal Agreement and No Deal and refusing to respect the Leave vote that has led us close to that point
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,482

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Hammond is only going to have the Executive canvassing for him - and hardly any of the members, pissed off as they are that his "re-selection" was a stitch-up......
    Stephen Hammond may do very well. Wimbledon is heartland Remania.

    I would think some of the others will pull off independent victories too.
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195

    Nigelb said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    tyson said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    MaxPB said:



    After speaking to someone I know, they ventured their opinion on Brexit. They still don't understand why the 2016 vote did not mean we instantly left the EU! I tried explain....does not understand the FTPA and why Boris cannot have an election, so far. People think what they want to think and the sheer level of ignorance on democratic institutions and the processes involved seem to pass many citizens.

    Well all they will hear tonight and tomorrow (and the next few days) is that Boris wanted to have an election and Labour denied the people a say. As you rightly point out, the detail of whatever no deal blocking stuff will get lost in the small print. The headlines are "Labour vote down election". It's going to play very badly IMO.
    It all turns on October 31st. If we leave by then he is a hero. If we don't he is done for.
    Not necessarily, Boris has voted for No Deal and the WA at MV3 and to remove the backstop. the Commons has voted to stay in the EU past October 31st, against No Deal and against the WA.

    This week has been a PR exercise from Boris reassuring Leavers he is on their side against the diehard Remainer traitors in the Commons, he might try and ask the Queen to refuse royal assent but even if the Bill against No Deal passes led by Corbyn Boris can then call a general election backed by Labour with a mandate for Brexit having always voted to Leave on October 31st while Corbyn has always voted to Remain past October 31st and to leave the EU if the Tories win a majority straightaway.

    He can then watch the Labour Leave seats start to topple
    Haha....I don't think yo his entitled, narcissistic bluster day in and out....
    Let’s wait for the first proper polls. I predict all the Boris haters will be rather disappointed. But we shall see

    Night night from SPARTA
    Indeed, I have never, ever in my life wanted to win a general election as much as this one and I expect most real conservatives feel the same. In fact I could not care less if the Tories never win a general election for over a decade after as long as Boris wins this one, delivers Brexit, wipes the smug smile off the diehard Remainers and beats the treacherous Corbyn
    Given the comment, it seems appropriate to ask, how old are you ?
    4 years old.
    I don't believe he was asking you.
  • Pulpstar said:

    Motion 2E slightly quicker, only 21 minutes from the last "clear the bar" to this one.

    They need to get through them more than twice as fast. I don't see how they can possibly manage it.
  • surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    You surely know, every possibility has been "war-gamed" thousands of time.
  • GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Great headlines for the Government tonight, Corbyn blocks Brexit and the Government ends austerity and increases spending on the NHS and police etc.

    What a constrast to GE17 when Corbyn promised to back Brexit and could attack May's Government over continued austerity

    It's hard to understand what's changed with Jezza since 2017? I always had him down a campaigner at heart. A politiican that was most at home away from the petty games of Westminster and out on the stump.

    It's very, very disappoitning.

    To think I've been toying with voting for him in recent months. :(
    Seriously? Didn't think a hardcore leaver such as yourself would consider voting for a party which would deliver you BRINO, even before Corbyn caved on offering a 2nd referendum.
    Well at one point I couldn't see how any Brexit would happen any other way except Jezza implementing it.

    And remember I'd have voted for May's deal on MV2 and MV3 and though the ERG etc were dumb not to...
    Well if isam was sincere when he said he'd consider voting Labour again in a post-Brexit world, perhaps Paul Embery's notion that an electoral nirvana awaits Labour by embracing a staunch leave position isn't as bonkers at it seems (though I still suspect not).
  • FloaterFloater Posts: 14,195

    TOPPING said:



    Why would you want to wipe the smug smile off your own face?

    I find your endless sniping at HYUFD close to bullying.

    I don't happen to agree with HYUFD, but he is at least amiable.
    There are a couple of obsessives on here.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380

    Noo said:

    https://twitter.com/joepike/status/1169371276135284737

    Round my way, we treat our friends a little better than that.

    Round my way, we show rather more respect those that made us who we are.

    Jesus, they are adults who made a conscious decision to poke the party in the eye. What did they expect?
    Are... are you saying Boris Johnson made Ken Clarke who is is?
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    There'll be an election after 31st. Corbyn though will have his Pyrrhic Victory insofar Johnson will have failed to take us out of the EU by that date.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,925

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    This must explain all the 'Jezza is frit', 'Jezza is chicken' stuff that Cummings has ordered the eurosceptic press to run with tonight. They think they've failed to secure the pre No deal GE and are now managing the narrative so that this fact now reflects badly on Jezza. But it feels thin - it's not as if everyone you speak to was hitherto gagging for a general election to be called.
    " Corbyn blocks Brexit " headlines ain't much use to the LDs. They run the danger of coalescing the Remain vote. The split nature of which has given the Tories big polling leads.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,482
    edited September 2019

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    This must explain all the 'Jezza is frit', 'Jezza is chicken' stuff that Cummings has ordered the eurosceptic press to run with tonight. They think they've failed to secure the pre No deal GE and are now managing the narrative so that this fact now reflects badly on Jezza. But it feels thin - it's not as if everyone you speak to was hitherto gagging for a general election to be called.

    Without action chicken photos and crying grit will get a bit wearing. If there is no election what, in practice, is Johnson going to do?

    From next week Jezza can just shrug. "I would be happy to vote for an election, but Parliament is prorogued at the orders of Johnson." I am happy to have a vote on it when we have reconvened and dealt with emergency matters.

    BoZo is hoist by his own prorogation. His master startegist seems to be the General Burnside of British politics.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,181

    TOPPING said:



    Why would you want to wipe the smug smile off your own face?

    I find your endless sniping at HYUFD close to bullying.

    I don't happen to agree with HYUFD, but he is at least amiable.
    Do you now?

    Traitor, diehard remainer, treacherous. All pretty amiable in your book. Fine by me.
  • The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,238
    dixiedean said:

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Rory Stewart too. He seems well liked on his patch.
    That is a very interesting example.

    Given the huge Conservative vote, it would take a remarkable personal following to win it as an independent candidate (possibly aided by the LDs standing aside for him, as Swinson has hinted at, should the local party agree).
    On the other hand, it’s quite possible he gets the whip restored, given the current unrest in the party.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934
    edited September 2019

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,877

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Hammond is only going to have the Executive canvassing for him - and hardly any of the members, pissed off as they are that his "re-selection" was a stitch-up......
    Which Hammond, Stephen or Phil?
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    HYUFD said:

    Foxy said:

    Noo said:

    TOPPING said:



    Why would you want to wipe the smug smile off your own face?

    I find your endless sniping at HYUFD close to bullying.

    I don't happen to agree with HYUFD, but he is at least amiable.
    Amiable people don't go around calling people traitors just for having policies they dislike.
    Or declaring civil war...
    It is Parliament voting down the Withdrawal Agreement and No Deal and refusing to respect the Leave vote that has led us close to that point
    No it hasn't. That's just an adolescent fantasy.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,181
    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:



    Why would you want to wipe the smug smile off your own face?

    I find your endless sniping at HYUFD close to bullying.

    I don't happen to agree with HYUFD, but he is at least amiable.
    Thankyou though it is more just annoying than bullying
    Absolutely. That is just what the Conservative Party thinks of diehard remainers such as yourself.
  • TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:



    Why would you want to wipe the smug smile off your own face?

    I find your endless sniping at HYUFD close to bullying.

    I don't happen to agree with HYUFD, but he is at least amiable.
    Do you now?

    Traitor, diehard remainer, treacherous. All pretty amiable in your book. Fine by me.
    Terms of endearment.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IfoUM6a4bA
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,077
    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    I’lll save this one for a rainy day.
  • HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    Nigelb said:

    HYUFD said:

    Byronic said:

    tyson said:

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    MaxPB said:



    After speaking to someone I know, they ventured their opinion on Brexit. They still don't understand why the 2016 vote did not mean we instantly left the EU! I tried explain....does not understand the FTPA and why Boris cannot have an election, so far. People think what they want to think and the sheer level of ignorance on democratic institutions and the processes involved seem to pass many citizens.

    Well all they will hear tonight and tomorrow (and the next few days) is that Boris wanted to have an election and Labour denied the people a say. As you rightly point out, the detail of whatever no deal blocking stuff will get lost in the small print. The headlines are "Labour vote down election". It's going to play very badly IMO.
    It all turns on October 31st. If we leave by then he is a hero. If we don't he is done for.
    Not necessarily, Boris has voted for No Deal and the WA at MV3 and to remove the backstop. the Commons has voted to stay in the EU past October 31st, against No Deal and against the WA.

    This week has been a PR exercise from Boris reassuring Leavers he is on their side against the diehard Remainer traitors in the Commons, he might try and ask the Queen to refuse royal assent but even if the Bill against No Deal passes led by Corbyn Boris can then call a general election backed by Labour with a mandate for Brexit having always voted to Leave on October 31st while Corbyn has always voted to Remain past October 31st and to leave the EU if the Tories win a majority straightaway.

    He can then watch the Labour Leave seats start to topple
    Haha....I don't think yo his entitled, narcissistic bluster day in and out....
    Let’s wait for the first proper polls. I predict all the Boris haters will be rather disappointed. But we shall see

    Night night from SPARTA
    Indeed, I have never, ever in my life wanted to win a general election as much as this one and I expect most real conservatives feel the same. In fact I could not care less if the Tories never win a general election for over a decade after as long as Boris wins this one, delivers Brexit, wipes the smug smile off the diehard Remainers and beats the treacherous Corbyn
    Given the comment, it seems appropriate to ask, how old are you ?
    I suspect Johnson doesn’t exactly share his view.

  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited September 2019

    The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    Does the average voter think that deeply about the political situation? They might just see a party complaining about a "coup" and then refusing to agree to an election.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Ireland copying Trump - putting up a wall.

    https://twitter.com/irishtimesbiz/status/1169289057089835008?s=21
  • isamisam Posts: 40,877

    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Great headlines for the Government tonight, Corbyn blocks Brexit and the Government ends austerity and increases spending on the NHS and police etc.

    What a constrast to GE17 when Corbyn promised to back Brexit and could attack May's Government over continued austerity

    It's hard to understand what's changed with Jezza since 2017? I always had him down a campaigner at heart. A politiican that was most at home away from the petty games of Westminster and out on the stump.

    It's very, very disappoitning.

    To think I've been toying with voting for him in recent months. :(
    Seriously? Didn't think a hardcore leaver such as yourself would consider voting for a party which would deliver you BRINO, even before Corbyn caved on offering a 2nd referendum.
    Well at one point I couldn't see how any Brexit would happen any other way except Jezza implementing it.

    And remember I'd have voted for May's deal on MV2 and MV3 and though the ERG etc were dumb not to...
    Well if isam was sincere when he said he'd consider voting Labour again in a post-Brexit world, perhaps Paul Embery's notion that an electoral nirvana awaits Labour by embracing a staunch leave position isn't as bonkers at it seems (though I still suspect not).
    They’ll have passed a law banning people my age from voting by the time we live in a post Brexit world, if we ever do
  • Norm said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    There'll be an election after 31st. Corbyn though will have his Pyrrhic Victory insofar Johnson will have failed to take us out of the EU by that date.
    Johnson won't have failed. Johnson will be on the side of the people while the smug politicians think they know better than what the public decided and are obstructing Brexit and obstructing an election.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    31 October Do or Die

    Looking mightily like the latter tonight. Who would have thought it.
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251

    The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    Why so? They are just as split as the Tories. If they stand on a soft Brexit ticket having blocked our departure on 31st October they will still leach their remainer votes to the Lib Dems and any self respecting Brexiter who for example doesn't want a Labour Brexit with its customs union etc will still vote Tory/Brexit Party
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,286
    Are Con Peers giving up?

    Amendment moved - took 90 seconds - nobody else spoke - straight to a Division on the amendment (no Closure Motion).
  • Jonathan said:

    31 October Do or Die

    Looking mightily like the latter tonight. Who would have thought it.

    Ahem.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,925
    Nigelb said:

    dixiedean said:

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Rory Stewart too. He seems well liked on his patch.
    That is a very interesting example.

    Given the huge Conservative vote, it would take a remarkable personal following to win it as an independent candidate (possibly aided by the LDs standing aside for him, as Swinson has hinted at, should the local party agree).
    On the other hand, it’s quite possible he gets the whip restored, given the current unrest in the party.
    I use it only cos he is in the neighbouring Constituency to mine, and because it shares some similarities. The Tories in the rural North are an unideological , practical, down-to-earth bunch, rarely wealthy either. Their vote is traditional, but not automatic. It is also a long way from Westminster, indeed, a fair way from anywhere.
    If the LDs stand aside, I reckon he'd be a shoo in.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,077

    Norm said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    There'll be an election after 31st. Corbyn though will have his Pyrrhic Victory insofar Johnson will have failed to take us out of the EU by that date.
    Johnson won't have failed. Johnson will be on the side of the people while the smug politicians think they know better than what the public decided and are obstructing Brexit and obstructing an election.
    How? The public wants a deal. It’s up to BoJo to get one now. Chop chop. Believe in Britain.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,936
    Doesn’t look to me like this Surrender Bill is going to get back to the commons in time.

    This is what Cummings meant when he said there wasn’t any way to block no deal...
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited September 2019
    "Professor Sir John Curtice

    Polling expert

    "I think the truth is the argument about no-deal is just a re-hash of the debate about whether we want to remain or leave in the first place."

    "With Brexit there is no point in talking about the electorate as a whole.

    "We have two different electorates: we have a remain electorate and we have a leave electorate.

    "Seventy five per cent of remain voters think that leaving without a deal is a bad idea and they oppose it. And around 75% of leave voters think that it is a good idea and they favour it."

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-49557734
  • HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Link?

    Wikipedia says otherwise, so I'd be interested to see the contrary.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934
    edited September 2019

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
  • MangoMango Posts: 1,013
    Suffice to say that any country where Dominic Cummings and Seumas Milne have any influence on events is utterly utterly fucked.
  • The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    Exactly. Arguably this is the first front rank strategic call Corbyn has got right since he was elected Labour leader. Which suggests it wasn't his call. But the fact he didn't obstruct it is very interesting and being woefully under analyised.
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251

    Norm said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    There'll be an election after 31st. Corbyn though will have his Pyrrhic Victory insofar Johnson will have failed to take us out of the EU by that date.
    Johnson won't have failed. Johnson will be on the side of the people while the smug politicians think they know better than what the public decided and are obstructing Brexit and obstructing an election.
    Yes that's why I called it a Pyrrhic victory!
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    Mango said:

    Suffice to say that any country where Dominic Cummings and Seumas Milne have any influence on events is utterly utterly fucked.

    Late entry for best comment of the day.
    And thanks for the reminder about Milne. I'm over my earlier dalliance with considering voting Labour.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    Jonathan said:

    31 October Do or Die

    Looking mightily like the latter tonight. Who would have thought it.

    Ahem.
    Possibly do and die still sadly.
  • The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    I suspect Cummings's plan is to warp the shared psyche so that 'Delay Election' becomes in many people's minds completely synonymous with 'Cancel Brexit'. Indeed, Brendan was trying something similar earlier today.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/09/04/why-remoaners-are-so-terrified-of-a-general-election/
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,077
    edited September 2019
    Noo said:

    Mango said:

    Suffice to say that any country where Dominic Cummings and Seumas Milne have any influence on events is utterly utterly fucked.

    Late entry for best comment of the day.
    And thanks for the reminder about Milne. I'm over my earlier dalliance with considering voting Labour.
    The Blairites will still be very powerful in any Corbyn administration. They make up 80% of the Parliamentary Labour Party.
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    Prorogation != Dissolution.
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    AndyJS said:

    "Professor Sir John Curtice

    Polling expert

    "I think the truth is the argument about no-deal is just a re-hash of the debate about whether we want to remain or leave in the first place."

    "With Brexit there is no point in talking about the electorate as a whole.

    "We have two different electorates: we have a remain electorate and we have a leave electorate.

    "Seventy five per cent of remain voters think that leaving without a deal is a bad idea and they oppose it. And around 75% of leave voters think that it is a good idea and they favour it."

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-49557734

    25% of remain voters don’t think it’s a bad idea? Because it’s the quickest route to rejoining?

  • StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092
    GIN1138 said:

    Just saw Nick Watt reporting Boris will call off the fillibuster in HoL if Jezza agrees to an election.

    So Jezza can get NO DEAL off the table on 31st October by agreeing to a GE.

    But of course this isn't really about Brexit and No Deal at all is it? This is purely about Labour MPs being absolutely panic stricken at the prospect of having to face the electorate because they know the Lib-Dems will fillet them on the Remain side while Con/Brexit will fillet them on the Leave side.

    It's super weird that you're going so heavy on a talking point that's most likely going to be disproven within a few weeks
  • Norm said:

    The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    Why so? They are just as split as the Tories. If they stand on a soft Brexit ticket having blocked our departure on 31st October they will still leach their remainer votes to the Lib Dems and any self respecting Brexiter who for example doesn't want a Labour Brexit with its customs union etc will still vote Tory/Brexit Party
    No, they'd have a get-out in that scenario. Of course their position is and will still be a logical nonsense, but their voters and potential voters are either dead against a no-deal crash-out, or at least sympathetic to the line that Labour could get a better deal. So saying 'we averted no-deal, now vote for us for a more sensible approach to the negotiations', with a nod to a referendum, would go a long way to winning back support from people who would like to vote Labour but were put off by Corbyn's shilly-shallying; Labour would have something concrete to show such voters, and would also have humiliated Boris and helped push his nutjob support back towards Farage.

    Of course Corbyn might screw it up, since he's not very bright.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Hammond is only going to have the Executive canvassing for him - and hardly any of the members, pissed off as they are that his "re-selection" was a stitch-up......
    Which Hammond, Stephen or Phil?
    Sorry, Phil.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,482
    alex. said:

    AndyJS said:

    "Professor Sir John Curtice

    Polling expert

    "I think the truth is the argument about no-deal is just a re-hash of the debate about whether we want to remain or leave in the first place."

    "With Brexit there is no point in talking about the electorate as a whole.

    "We have two different electorates: we have a remain electorate and we have a leave electorate.

    "Seventy five per cent of remain voters think that leaving without a deal is a bad idea and they oppose it. And around 75% of leave voters think that it is a good idea and they favour it."

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-49557734

    25% of remain voters don’t think it’s a bad idea? Because it’s the quickest route to rejoining?

    Some of the 25% may feel that No Deal Brexit is a bad idea, but do not oppose it, or even support it. There are some like that on this board.
  • DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
    MikeL said:

    Are Con Peers giving up?

    Amendment moved - took 90 seconds - nobody else spoke - straight to a Division on the amendment (no Closure Motion).

    It's a long cold night.
  • Jonathan said:

    31 October Do or Die

    Looking mightily like the latter tonight. Who would have thought it.

    Ahem.
    I’ll join this coughing chorus.
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    That's prorogation not dissolution. You are completely wrong about this.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,482

    The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    Exactly. Arguably this is the first front rank strategic call Corbyn has got right since he was elected Labour leader. Which suggests it wasn't his call. But the fact he didn't obstruct it is very interesting and being woefully under analyised.
    To be fair on Jezza, left wing activists revel in the rule book, obscure protocols, plotting and organising. Bozo is fighting on Jezzas home turf.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,925
    AndyJS said:

    "Professor Sir John Curtice

    Polling expert

    "I think the truth is the argument about no-deal is just a re-hash of the debate about whether we want to remain or leave in the first place."

    "With Brexit there is no point in talking about the electorate as a whole.

    "We have two different electorates: we have a remain electorate and we have a leave electorate.

    "Seventy five per cent of remain voters think that leaving without a deal is a bad idea and they oppose it. And around 75% of leave voters think that it is a good idea and they favour it."

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-49557734

    Which is why Labour will be rejoicing at any news implying Corbyn blocks Brexit. That is a fertile electorate to mine.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934
    edited September 2019
    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
  • Noo said:

    Mango said:

    Suffice to say that any country where Dominic Cummings and Seumas Milne have any influence on events is utterly utterly fucked.

    Late entry for best comment of the day.
    And thanks for the reminder about Milne. I'm over my earlier dalliance with considering voting Labour.
    Two political cranks run Britain. Incredible.
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,925

    Norm said:

    The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    Why so? They are just as split as the Tories. If they stand on a soft Brexit ticket having blocked our departure on 31st October they will still leach their remainer votes to the Lib Dems and any self respecting Brexiter who for example doesn't want a Labour Brexit with its customs union etc will still vote Tory/Brexit Party
    No, they'd have a get-out in that scenario. Of course their position is and will still be a logical nonsense, but their voters and potential voters are either dead against a no-deal crash-out, or at least sympathetic to the line that Labour could get a better deal. So saying 'we averted no-deal, now vote for us for a more sensible approach to the negotiations', with a nod to a referendum, would go a long way to winning back support from people who would like to vote Labour but were put off by Corbyn's shilly-shallying; Labour would have something concrete to show such voters, and would also have humiliated Boris and helped push his nutjob support back towards Farage.

    Of course Corbyn might screw it up, since he's not very bright.
    The lesson of the past two days is maybe better to be not very bright than too clever by half?
  • I wonder if Cummings is wargaming or drinking again right now? I know where my money is
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,286
    Lord True has returned - he's getting into his stride again and things are getting heated.

    He had previously left the House and someone else moved his previous amendment for him.
  • Norm said:

    The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    Why so? They are just as split as the Tories. If they stand on a soft Brexit ticket having blocked our departure on 31st October they will still leach their remainer votes to the Lib Dems and any self respecting Brexiter who for example doesn't want a Labour Brexit with its customs union etc will still vote Tory/Brexit Party
    No, they'd have a get-out in that scenario. Of course their position is and will still be a logical nonsense, but their voters and potential voters are either dead against a no-deal crash-out, or at least sympathetic to the line that Labour could get a better deal. So saying 'we averted no-deal, now vote for us for a more sensible approach to the negotiations', with a nod to a referendum, would go a long way to winning back support from people who would like to vote Labour but were put off by Corbyn's shilly-shallying; Labour would have something concrete to show such voters, and would also have humiliated Boris and helped push his nutjob support back towards Farage.

    Of course Corbyn might screw it up, since he's not very bright.
    Exactly. Labour's all-things-to-all-people Brexit coalition didn't collapse via Leavers it collapsed just before the Euros via Remainers. Seeing off No Deal and Boris' arrogance before agreeing to the inevitable GE is the least worst way of reclaiming lost votes from the Greens/Lib Dems once the logic of FPTP kicks in during the campaign.
  • The idea that anyone will care whether Labour votes for an election today or in a few days' or weeks' time is for the birds. It's actually a very strong position for them: they have an incontrovertible argument that no election can take place until the imminent threat of a No Deal catastrophe has been averted, they have a superb political point that Boris can't be trusted, and they'll be in good shape if they can campaign on having saved the country from an ideological chlorinated-chicken Tory No Deal Brexit.

    Exactly. Arguably this is the first front rank strategic call Corbyn has got right since he was elected Labour leader. Which suggests it wasn't his call. But the fact he didn't obstruct it is very interesting and being woefully under analyised.

    Labour MPs are currently immensely powerful. Corbyn has little to no leverage over them. That is absolutely key in how this plays out.

  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    If this was earlier, I missed it:
    Michael Fallon is stepping down as an MP at the next election.

    All of a sudden it feels like quite a lot of incumbents won't be up for re-election. I wonder whether anyone has any stats for how many incumbents stood per election?
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,286
    Surely Boris would have to call off filibuster before Corbyn voted for GE.

    So how could Boris be sure Corbyn would not renege?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 19,877
    Foxy said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    This must explain all the 'Jezza is frit', 'Jezza is chicken' stuff that Cummings has ordered the eurosceptic press to run with tonight. They think they've failed to secure the pre No deal GE and are now managing the narrative so that this fact now reflects badly on Jezza. But it feels thin - it's not as if everyone you speak to was hitherto gagging for a general election to be called.

    Without action chicken photos and crying grit will get a bit wearing. If there is no election what, in practice, is Johnson going to do?

    From next week Jezza can just shrug. "I would be happy to vote for an election, but Parliament is prorogued at the orders of Johnson." I am happy to have a vote on it when we have reconvened and dealt with emergency matters.

    BoZo is hoist by his own prorogation. His master startegist seems to be the General Burnside of British politics.
    Indeed. He needs only to resist an election until Monday evening (I think?), after which he can safely say “bring it on”, safe in the knowledge there cannot be an election until November.
  • Jonathan said:

    31 October Do or Die

    Looking mightily like the latter tonight. Who would have thought it.

    Ahem.
    I’ll join this coughing chorus.
    Do you know you are quoted as a source on the FTPA's Wikipedia page ?
  • surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469
    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    You are losing it.
  • HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    No she can't.
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    So just to be clear - parliament will be prorogued immediately after a Queens Speech? It’s a view I suppose. Johnson can’t try the prorogation card because he’s already played it.

  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,482
    MikeL said:

    Are Con Peers giving up?

    Amendment moved - took 90 seconds - nobody else spoke - straight to a Division on the amendment (no Closure Motion).

    Well lets see how it goes, but surely not speaking defeats the purpose of a filibuster?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934
    alex. said:

    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    So just to be clear - parliament will be prorogued immediately after a Queens Speech? It’s a view I suppose. Johnson can’t try the prorogation card because he’s already played it.

    No, that is on the cards trust me
  • NooNoo Posts: 2,380
    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    The queen cannot call a general election. The PM cannot call a general election. Sorry, but I think you have this wrong.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,785

    I wonder if Cummings is wargaming or drinking again right now? I know where my money is

    Maybe he's wargaming AND drinking? Some people can multitask. :D
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934

    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    No she can't.
    Yes she can, all within the royal prerogative powers the executive branch can use
  • Norm said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    There'll be an election after 31st. Corbyn though will have his Pyrrhic Victory insofar Johnson will have failed to take us out of the EU by that date.
    Johnson won't have failed. Johnson will be on the side of the people while the smug politicians think they know better than what the public decided and are obstructing Brexit and obstructing an election.
    How? The public wants a deal. It’s up to BoJo to get one now. Chop chop. Believe in Britain.
    Parliament is sabotaging Britain's ability to get a deal though, didn't you hear?
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,286
    They're in full stride again - now talking about what a filibuster is.
  • alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    GIN1138 said:

    I wonder if Cummings is wargaming or drinking again right now? I know where my money is

    Maybe he's wargaming AND drinking? Some people can multitask. :D
    Drinking at the same table as HYUFD by the sounds of it.
  • HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    No she can't.
    She could refuse to a royal assent. But boy would the heavens open then
  • Foxy said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    This must explain all the 'Jezza is frit', 'Jezza is chicken' stuff that Cummings has ordered the eurosceptic press to run with tonight. They think they've failed to secure the pre No deal GE and are now managing the narrative so that this fact now reflects badly on Jezza. But it feels thin - it's not as if everyone you speak to was hitherto gagging for a general election to be called.

    Without action chicken photos and crying grit will get a bit wearing. If there is no election what, in practice, is Johnson going to do?

    From next week Jezza can just shrug. "I would be happy to vote for an election, but Parliament is prorogued at the orders of Johnson." I am happy to have a vote on it when we have reconvened and dealt with emergency matters.

    BoZo is hoist by his own prorogation. His master startegist seems to be the General Burnside of British politics.
    Indeed. He needs only to resist an election until Monday evening (I think?), after which he can safely say “bring it on”, safe in the knowledge there cannot be an election until November.
    Can Boris get HM to unprorogue? (I've rather forgotten why Boris prorogued in the first place.)
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,934
    edited September 2019
    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    The queen cannot call a general election. The PM cannot call a general election. Sorry, but I think you have this wrong.
    The Queen can prorogue Parliament and not recall it until a general election is approved
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,238
    dixiedean said:

    Nigelb said:

    dixiedean said:

    Scott_P said:
    Which probably means that CCHQ will have to divert resources from other seats, which, the Tories could have used to target Labour seats or defence against LD/SNP. A campaign has finite resources and you can only spend a pound once or have an individual in one place at a time. Independents turning safe seats into marginals is a really clever move by Boris and co! I wonder if they wargamed that as well?
    I think the likes of Grieve and the two Hammonds would stand decent chances. I recall all are in Remain seats - presumably the official Tory candidates will be hardcore Leaver europhobes, to comply with Boris’ purge parameters?
    Rory Stewart too. He seems well liked on his patch.
    That is a very interesting example.

    Given the huge Conservative vote, it would take a remarkable personal following to win it as an independent candidate (possibly aided by the LDs standing aside for him, as Swinson has hinted at, should the local party agree).
    On the other hand, it’s quite possible he gets the whip restored, given the current unrest in the party.
    I use it only cos he is in the neighbouring Constituency to mine, and because it shares some similarities. The Tories in the rural North are an unideological , practical, down-to-earth bunch, rarely wealthy either. Their vote is traditional, but not automatic. It is also a long way from Westminster, indeed, a fair way from anywhere.
    If the LDs stand aside, I reckon he'd be a shoo in.
    I didn’t say he can’t win, or even that it would be highly unlikely - just that it would be fairly remarkable if he did.
  • HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    No she can't.
    Yes she can, all within the royal prerogative powers the executive branch can use
    No she can't. She has no prerogative power to require a general election and dissolution.
  • HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    No she can't.
    She could refuse to a royal assent. But boy would the heavens open then
    That she can and perhaps should do.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,238
    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    Noo said:

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    The previous tweet was a typo apparently...

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1169365639103991809?s=21

    If true, 2019 looks unlikely. Once you get past 31 October, no one is going to thank you for a Christmas election. And no one seems to have noticed that with prorogation November is almost impossible to hit.
    Which does rather beg the question - will be be facing exactly the same situation in January?
    And January 2021, and...

    Johnson’s entire strategy has been based on getting an election before 31st October. What’s he going to do if he doesn’t get one?

    Ask the Queen to refuse royal assent to the anti No Deal Bill and dissolve Parliament using the royal prerogative for a general election mid October to let the voters decide on Brexit before October 31st.

    The FTPA explicitly allows the Queen still to dissolve Parliament and call a general election at her whim under its Supplementary Provisions
    Citation? News to me.
    '6
    Supplementary provisions
    (1)
    This Act does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament.'

    '(7)
    If a parliamentary general election is to take place as provided for by subsection (1) or (3), the polling day for the election is to be the day appointed by Her Majesty by proclamation on the recommendation of the Prime Minister'

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/enacted
    prorogue =/= dissolve
    The Queen can refuse to assent to the extension Bill and prorogue Parliament past October 31st at the PM's request while requiring a general election and dissolution before she summons Parliament again
    The queen cannot call a general election. The PM cannot call a general election. Sorry, but I think you have this wrong.
    The Queen can prorogue Parliament and not recall it until a general election has been held
    She could, in theory, but she won’t.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    I wonder if Cummings is wargaming or drinking again right now? I know where my money is

    Actually he’s tweeting...

    https://twitter.com/odysseanproject/status/1169382274774777857?s=21
This discussion has been closed.