Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The exit door. The state of Labour as Jeremy Corbyn departs

SystemSystem Posts: 11,008
edited March 2020 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The exit door. The state of Labour as Jeremy Corbyn departs

What of Labour?  This is a question that almost no one is thinking about as, almost unnoticed, Jeremy Corbyn slips out of the limelight.  Like the Magnificent Ambersons, Labour have got their comeuppance. They’d got it three times filled and running over. But those who had longed for it were not there to see it. And they never knew it, those who were still living had forgotten all about it, and all about them.

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • Options
    Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 26,470
    "Elderly in lockdown and children in school help Sweden pursue herd immunity

    Swedish public health experts argue that the virus can be stopped solely by vaccination or by herd immunity.

    Since a vaccine for widespread use is still at least a year away, they say, the only possible way to stop the epidemic is by isolating vulnerable people while allowing the virus to spread as slowly as possible through the healthy population as they build resistance." (£)

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/world/coronavirus-elderly-in-lockdown-and-children-in-school-help-sweden-pursue-herd-immunity-r705m76dd
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,924
    edited March 2020
    Good morning fellow Pb-ers. Trust everyone has sprung forward.

    In other thoughts, vanilla seemed to be being difficult yesterday, and continues to be so today.

    On topic, Corbyn could well have been the gadfly of the Left of the Party, keeper of the Socialist flame etc, but he was never, ever, Leader material.
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,077
    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    If it's any consolation you are not alone.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,251
    The weather is not helping, with flood warnings down the North Sea Coast.
  • Options
    ArtistArtist Posts: 1,882
    edited March 2020
    Labour members were so quick to press the panic button after 2015, that a proper post-mortem of what went wrong never really happened.

    The two major issues it would have brought up were 1) a progressive coalition of voters (Hodges' 35% strategy) isn't large enough, Labour need to directly attract Tory voters and 2) Britain will always be repulsed by the idea of the Scottish Nationalists having a decisive say on running the country.

    Five years later and Labour have positioned themselves even further away from winning Tory voters and have lost a further 6% vote share in Scotland with the same 1 seat.

    Starmer's first task will simply be to get Labour where they were under mid term Miliband, having poll leads,winning local election seats and not having rock bottom personal leadership ratings. Start with the basics of what the leading opposition party should be doing and going from there.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,924

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    Just think what it would be like without sites like this and, dare I say it, Facebook. As over 70's we are getting supportive and caring messages on all sorts of media. Probably more than we normally get, TBH!
  • Options
    Fysics_TeacherFysics_Teacher Posts: 6,060

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    I think that is why the start was delayed as long as it was.

    I’m looking at June before I can go out again, but I’ve had a lot of practice at being at home on my own while recovering from various treatments.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    Just think what it would be like without sites like this and, dare I say it, Facebook. As over 70's we are getting supportive and caring messages on all sorts of media. Probably more than we normally get, TBH!
    I took a call from a school friend yesterday. He's making a point of phoning 2 or 3 different people a day. People he wouldn't normally speak to.

    Seemed like a cool idea.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,924

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    I think that is why the start was delayed as long as it was.

    I’m looking at June before I can go out again, but I’ve had a lot of practice at being at home on my own while recovering from various treatments.
    There are a lot of plans for parties, meetings, events etc which were being made which we can now write off. And make new, virtual or telephonic, ones!

    Will there be a lot more books written?
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    Just think what it would be like without sites like this and, dare I say it, Facebook. As over 70's we are getting supportive and caring messages on all sorts of media. Probably more than we normally get, TBH!
    I took a call from a school friend yesterday. He's making a point of phoning 2 or 3 different people a day. People he wouldn't normally speak to.

    Seemed like a cool idea.
    I'm planning on calling all the people who work in my company every few days, and also people I know are living alone or vulnerable. It will help them and I will benefit too.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    OT:
    Fantastic article and not to anticipate the second but one thing if this site is in any way representative, I'm not sure that members and diehards really have a clue of just how bad it is. The classic would be Justin124 who seems in massive denial and has convinced himself that hatred of Boris and the arrival of SKS will be sufficient to sweep the Tories from power next time. Many others have a similar view. I am from the NE of England. I am not young. What we saw there in December was extraordinary and similar or worse has happened in many heartlands. Even some of the smaller cities are no longer safe - Coventry, Sunderland, Hull... they are nowhere in Scotland, north Wales moved away in December.. the list goes on.

    Of course it's all reversible but it won't be easy - JC has gone but apparently will stay vocal and wants a shadow cabinet role, while several new MPs who did scrape home are clear head cases. Momentum is embedded in the party machinery. Neil Kinnock performed miracles in the early 90s to pave the way for Tony Blair. That is SKS's task now. Good luck with that.

    I expect inevitably the focus today will swiftly move to mre pressing matters. But it was nice to porget for a few minutes. Thankyou.
  • Options
    squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,331

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    Just think what it would be like without sites like this and, dare I say it, Facebook. As over 70's we are getting supportive and caring messages on all sorts of media. Probably more than we normally get, TBH!
    I took a call from a school friend yesterday. He's making a point of phoning 2 or 3 different people a day. People he wouldn't normally speak to.

    Seemed like a cool idea.
    That is what our vicar has set up. People have been asked to call three people not necessarily churchgoers every few days. I am doing it and I know its appreciated.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    Golly. We've had 2 weeks here and at least 2 more of full hard lockdown to go. You are going to have to change your mindset. My sister and her husband are in Sunderland - sheer terror is proving effective enough for them!
  • Options
    squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,331

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    I think that is why the start was delayed as long as it was.

    I’m looking at June before I can go out again, but I’ve had a lot of practice at being at home on my own while recovering from various treatments.
    All those Dads army reruns are keeping my 90 year old father in law happy!!!
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    I think that is why the start was delayed as long as it was.

    I’m looking at June before I can go out again, but I’ve had a lot of practice at being at home on my own while recovering from various treatments.
    All those Dads army reruns are keeping my 90 year old father in law happy!!!
    Catch up and on demand TV are keeping a lot of us sane if not perhaps as physicaly healthy as we should be.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,903
    Have the clocks gone forward or back. It's the most sunday sunday ever right now.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,251
    felix said:

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    I think that is why the start was delayed as long as it was.

    I’m looking at June before I can go out again, but I’ve had a lot of practice at being at home on my own while recovering from various treatments.
    All those Dads army reruns are keeping my 90 year old father in law happy!!!
    Catch up and on demand TV are keeping a lot of us sane if not perhaps as physicaly healthy as we should be.
    I've gone old school -- DVDs. Life on Mars last week; the Gold Robbers (a surprisingly good ITV series from 1969) now.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,544

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    Just think what it would be like without sites like this and, dare I say it, Facebook. As over 70's we are getting supportive and caring messages on all sorts of media. Probably more than we normally get, TBH!
    I took a call from a school friend yesterday. He's making a point of phoning 2 or 3 different people a day. People he wouldn't normally speak to.

    Seemed like a cool idea.
    That is what our vicar has set up. People have been asked to call three people not necessarily churchgoers every few days. I am doing it and I know its appreciated.
    My church is doing the same, with suggested readings to study and contemplate, in place of usual worship, then discussion via WhyPay? Conference calls. Also ringing round more isolated members to make sure their spiritual needs are catered for alongside physical ones.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,917
    It is easy to forget, but before Jeremy Corbyn turned up Ed Miliband was the worst leader Labour had ever had. One undoubted positive about the current leadership election is that Labour members almost certainly haven’t chosen the worst possible candidate. From little acorns ...
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,251
    edited March 2020
    On topic. Boris learned the lessons of ge2017, ditched May/Cameron and embraced the popular parts of Labour's platform. This is a pattern Boris has used before, as arguably did Blair and Cameron to a lesser extent. If Starmer's policy of free sherbert dip dabs for every voter opens up poll leads, Boris will be giving away sherbert fountains within months. Labour drew the wrong lessons and doubled down on its mistakes from the previous two elections.

    Is this a weakening of party loyalties? I'm not sure. Look at Labour and you'd say yes but what of the Tory side? Some Conservatives left the party (and others were slung out) but there has also been a degree of triumphalism: never mind the policies, the blue team won.

    There is also the question of foreign intervention but that report is still under lockdown in the Number 10 safe.

    I'd suggest the big question barely involves Labour at all -- what happens when Conservative MPs realise they are implementing Labour policies?
  • Options
    nunu2nunu2 Posts: 1,453
    This is mad. Trump is helping those states he needs for the Electoral College!
    https://mobile.twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/1244053944554401800
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,251
    nunu2 said:

    This is mad. Trump is helping those states he needs for the Electoral College!
    https://mobile.twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/1244053944554401800

    How shocking.
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    Artist said:

    Labour members were so quick to press the panic button after 2015, that a proper post-mortem of what went wrong never really happened.

    The two major issues it would have brought up were 1) a progressive coalition of voters (Hodges' 35% strategy) isn't large enough, Labour need to directly attract Tory voters and 2) Britain will always be repulsed by the idea of the Scottish Nationalists having a decisive say on running the country.

    Five years later and Labour have positioned themselves even further away from winning Tory voters and have lost a further 6% vote share in Scotland with the same 1 seat.

    Starmer's first task will simply be to get Labour where they were under mid term Miliband, having poll leads,winning local election seats and not having rock bottom personal leadership ratings. Start with the basics of what the leading opposition party should be doing and going from there.

    A poll lead ? First task is to get within 10% points.
    I guess Covid gives him cover to drop the free broadband promise.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,917
    nunu2 said:

    This is mad. Trump is helping those states he needs for the Electoral College!
    https://mobile.twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/1244053944554401800

    It is exactly what you’d expect Trump to do. This is why things in the US are only going to get worse. The world will need a workaround.

  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    edited March 2020

    On topic. Boris learned the lessons of ge2017, ditched May/Cameron and embraced the popular parts of Labour's platform. This is a pattern Boris has used before, as arguably did Blair and Cameron to a lesser extent. If Starmer's policy of free sherbert dip dabs for every voter opens up poll leads, Boris will be giving away sherbert fountains within months. Labour drew the wrong lessons and doubled down on its mistakes from the previous two elections.

    Is this a weakening of party loyalties? I'm not sure. Look at Labour and you'd say yes but what of the Tory side? Some Conservatives left the party (and others were slung out) but there has also been a degree of triumphalism: never mind the policies, the blue team won.

    There is also the question of foreign intervention but that report is still under lockdown in the Number 10 safe.

    I'd suggest the big question barely involves Labour at all -- what happens when Conservative MPs realise they are implementing Labour policies?

    As a lifelong Tory your last point is very re-assuring for the blues. For us power always wins out over dogma. Some in Labour doggedly ignore the fact that most people hate dogma.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,251

    It is easy to forget, but before Jeremy Corbyn turned up Ed Miliband was the worst leader Labour had ever had. One undoubted positive about the current leadership election is that Labour members almost certainly haven’t chosen the worst possible candidate. From little acorns ...

    Haven't they? We'll see. Starmer is probably the least charismatic of those who stood, is a paid-up member of London's metropolitan elite, and devised the Brexit policy.
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,987
    Pulpstar said:

    Have the clocks gone forward or back. It's the most sunday sunday ever right now.

    Spring forward - fall back.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187

    It is easy to forget, but before Jeremy Corbyn turned up Ed Miliband was the worst leader Labour had ever had. One undoubted positive about the current leadership election is that Labour members almost certainly haven’t chosen the worst possible candidate. From little acorns ...

    Haven't they? We'll see. Starmer is probably the least charismatic of those who stood, is a paid-up member of London's metropolitan elite, and devised the Brexit policy.
    At the risk of pre-empting Alastair's second piece, one could argue that parts of the South East might be happy to vote Labour so long as they aren't led by someone like Jeremy Corbyn. How many seats like Watford, Wycombe and the Milton Keynes seats could Labour flip with a leader who isn't perceived as a threat to their standard of living?

    We've seen a realignment in one part of the country, could the same happen in traditionally safe Tory areas?
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226

    The weather is not helping, with flood warnings down the North Sea Coast.

    Isn't it easier to stay indoors in bad weather?

    Unless you have a dog and are forced out there anyway.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,387
    nunu2 said:

    This is mad. Trump is helping those states he needs for the Electoral College!
    https://mobile.twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/1244053944554401800

    Actually, reading the article, it’s a total clusterfnck, rather than any particular coordinated activity:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/desperate-for-medical-equipment-states-encounter-a-beleaguered-national-stockpile/2020/03/28/1f4f9a0a-6f82-11ea-aa80-c2470c6b2034_story.html

    Though it’s true that Florida seems to have received preferential treatment, that seems more likely because the governor is assiduous in flattering Trump:
    ... Florida has been an exception in its dealings with the stockpile: The state submitted a request on March 11 for 430,000 surgical masks, 180,000 N95 respirators, 82,000 face shields and 238,000 gloves, among other supplies — and received a shipment with everything three days later, according to figures from the state’s Division of Emergency Management. It received an identical shipment on March 23, according to the division, and is awaiting a third.
    “The governor has spoken to the president daily, and the entire congressional delegation has been working as one for the betterment of the state of Florida,” said Jared Moskowitz, the emergency management division’s director. “We are leaving no stone unturned.”
    President Trump repeatedly has warned states not to complain about how much they are receiving, including Friday during a White House briefing, where he advised Vice President Pence not to call governors who are critical of the administration’s response. “I want them to be appreciative,” he said...
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,917

    It is easy to forget, but before Jeremy Corbyn turned up Ed Miliband was the worst leader Labour had ever had. One undoubted positive about the current leadership election is that Labour members almost certainly haven’t chosen the worst possible candidate. From little acorns ...

    Haven't they? We'll see. Starmer is probably the least charismatic of those who stood, is a paid-up member of London's metropolitan elite, and devised the Brexit policy.
    This is not a time for charisma. Substance is what is required. The Tories won a huge majority with a leader who is a fully paid-up member of London’s metropolitan elite.

  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688

    It is easy to forget, but before Jeremy Corbyn turned up Ed Miliband was the worst leader Labour had ever had. One undoubted positive about the current leadership election is that Labour members almost certainly haven’t chosen the worst possible candidate. From little acorns ...

    Haven't they? We'll see. Starmer is probably the least charismatic of those who stood, is a paid-up member of London's metropolitan elite, and devised the Brexit policy.
    Great soundbite. Unfortunately none of those three assertions are true.

    He isn't a 'paid-up member of London's metropolitan elite'. Being successful doesn't automatically qualify you for that opprobrium. He came from a pretty working class family background in Southwark which is hardly metropolitan elite and certainly wasn't then: mother a nurse and father a toolmaker and his mother was ill for much of his childhood. He was state school educated.

    He did not 'devise' Labour's Brexit policy at all. That is utter rubbish. Labour was almost as riven on Europe as the Conservatives. Harold Wilson recognised this and had to deal with the Far Left's ambivalence towards the EEC and at times outright antipathy to Europe: Tony Benn, Eric Heffer being examples. Keir Starmer was attempting to hold together two mutually incompatible forces within Labour: the pro-European metropolitan London elites and the northern (basically racist) working class.

    Is he charismatic? Dunno. He can be very effective at the despatch box: erudite and incisive with a sharp forensic mind.

    So cut the crap and at least take him down for plausible, not spurious, reasons.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,814

    The weather is not helping, with flood warnings down the North Sea Coast.

    Opposite for me, brilliant sunshine in Ayrshire and no problem with lockdown whatsoever. Tidied up garden yesterday , planted my M&S seed packages up, a few beers etc. All very pleasant indeed amid the doom and gloom.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226

    On topic. Boris learned the lessons of ge2017, ditched May/Cameron and embraced the popular parts of Labour's platform. This is a pattern Boris has used before, as arguably did Blair and Cameron to a lesser extent. If Starmer's policy of free sherbert dip dabs for every voter opens up poll leads, Boris will be giving away sherbert fountains within months. Labour drew the wrong lessons and doubled down on its mistakes from the previous two elections.

    Is this a weakening of party loyalties? I'm not sure. Look at Labour and you'd say yes but what of the Tory side? Some Conservatives left the party (and others were slung out) but there has also been a degree of triumphalism: never mind the policies, the blue team won.

    There is also the question of foreign intervention but that report is still under lockdown in the Number 10 safe.

    I'd suggest the big question barely involves Labour at all -- what happens when Conservative MPs realise they are implementing Labour policies?

    The point you are making, put in a different way, is that a political leader devoid of obviously strong political principles is better suited to making the sort of realignments needed to steal opponents' clothes and assemble a majority under FPTnP. Blair, Cameron, Johnson all fall into this category, and arguably Wilson from an earlier era. Thatcher is the exception, but she was lucky in having an equally extreme principal opposition.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Foxy said:

    I’m really starting to struggle with the lockdown. Another 6 weeks or whatever is going to be horrible.

    Just think what it would be like without sites like this and, dare I say it, Facebook. As over 70's we are getting supportive and caring messages on all sorts of media. Probably more than we normally get, TBH!
    I took a call from a school friend yesterday. He's making a point of phoning 2 or 3 different people a day. People he wouldn't normally speak to.

    Seemed like a cool idea.
    That is what our vicar has set up. People have been asked to call three people not necessarily churchgoers every few days. I am doing it and I know its appreciated.
    My church is doing the same, with suggested readings to study and contemplate, in place of usual worship, then discussion via WhyPay? Conference calls. Also ringing round more isolated members to make sure their spiritual needs are catered for alongside physical ones.
    Ah that might explain it. My friend is a churchgoer.

    Still, a really good idea I feel.
  • Options
    FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    For those with personal experience, headache last night, tickly throat overnight and this morning, and slightly warm this morning (though that seems to be subsiding). Too mild to be covid?
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052

    It is easy to forget, but before Jeremy Corbyn turned up Ed Miliband was the worst leader Labour had ever had. One undoubted positive about the current leadership election is that Labour members almost certainly haven’t chosen the worst possible candidate. From little acorns ...

    Haven't they? We'll see. Starmer is probably the least charismatic of those who stood, is a paid-up member of London's metropolitan elite, and devised the Brexit policy.
    This is not a time for charisma. Substance is what is required. The Tories won a huge majority with a leader who is a fully paid-up member of London’s metropolitan elite.

    It is the time for empathy .

    Starmer and Labour continue to look at voters as something to either be patronised or endured.

    He’s a less worse option than RLB though.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,814
    Tory Klaxon surge on a sub sample did not last long ..........

    Sensational Panelbase poll shows SNP have further increased their enormous lead over the Tories -
    Scottish Parliament constituency voting intentions:

    SNP 51% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (n/c)
    Labour 14% (n/c)
    Liberal Democrats 6% (-1)
    Greens 3% (n/c)

    Scottish Parliament regional list voting intentions:

    SNP 48% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (+1)
    Labour 13% (-1)
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    tlg86 said:

    It is easy to forget, but before Jeremy Corbyn turned up Ed Miliband was the worst leader Labour had ever had. One undoubted positive about the current leadership election is that Labour members almost certainly haven’t chosen the worst possible candidate. From little acorns ...

    Haven't they? We'll see. Starmer is probably the least charismatic of those who stood, is a paid-up member of London's metropolitan elite, and devised the Brexit policy.
    At the risk of pre-empting Alastair's second piece, one could argue that parts of the South East might be happy to vote Labour so long as they aren't led by someone like Jeremy Corbyn. How many seats like Watford, Wycombe and the Milton Keynes seats could Labour flip with a leader who isn't perceived as a threat to their standard of living?

    We've seen a realignment in one part of the country, could the same happen in traditionally safe Tory areas?
    All of the seats you quote swung to the Tories except Wycombe where the only real movement went to the LDs. All that happened in the heartlands generally were smaller swings and some intermittent boosts for the LDs. To win the Toy heartlands you will need Blairite type policies. SKS is unlikely to provide them.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,387
    malcolmg said:

    The weather is not helping, with flood warnings down the North Sea Coast.

    Opposite for me, brilliant sunshine in Ayrshire and no problem with lockdown whatsoever. Tidied up garden yesterday , planted my M&S seed packages up, a few beers etc. All very pleasant indeed amid the doom and gloom.
    Everyone copes differently...
    https://twitter.com/StephenMcDonell/status/1244153697887633408
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124

    1. The US is a country in epic decline.
    2. China is a country that cannot be trusted.
    3. Ditto Russia
    4. The EU talks solidarity but does not practise it.
    There is some major shit still ahead of us all.

    Russia is sending supplies to Italy and China to Spain. Germany is giving some help to Italy. The omens are not good.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    IanB2 said:

    On topic. Boris learned the lessons of ge2017, ditched May/Cameron and embraced the popular parts of Labour's platform. This is a pattern Boris has used before, as arguably did Blair and Cameron to a lesser extent. If Starmer's policy of free sherbert dip dabs for every voter opens up poll leads, Boris will be giving away sherbert fountains within months. Labour drew the wrong lessons and doubled down on its mistakes from the previous two elections.

    Is this a weakening of party loyalties? I'm not sure. Look at Labour and you'd say yes but what of the Tory side? Some Conservatives left the party (and others were slung out) but there has also been a degree of triumphalism: never mind the policies, the blue team won.

    There is also the question of foreign intervention but that report is still under lockdown in the Number 10 safe.

    I'd suggest the big question barely involves Labour at all -- what happens when Conservative MPs realise they are implementing Labour policies?

    The point you are making, put in a different way, is that a political leader devoid of obviously strong political principles is better suited to making the sort of realignments needed to steal opponents' clothes and assemble a majority under FPTnP. Blair, Cameron, Johnson all fall into this category, and arguably Wilson from an earlier era. Thatcher is the exception, but she was lucky in having an equally extreme principal opposition.
    Correct - Labour is wedded to ideology - much of it quite outdated. They can win when they aren't.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    felix said:

    1. The US is a country in epic decline.
    2. China is a country that cannot be trusted.
    3. Ditto Russia
    4. The EU talks solidarity but does not practise it.
    There is some major shit still ahead of us all.

    Russia is sending supplies to Italy and China to Spain. Germany is giving some help to Italy. The omens are not good.
    Spain receives a shipment from nato today
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    malcolmg said:

    Tory Klaxon surge on a sub sample did not last long ..........

    Sensational Panelbase poll shows SNP have further increased their enormous lead over the Tories -
    Scottish Parliament constituency voting intentions:

    SNP 51% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (n/c)
    Labour 14% (n/c)
    Liberal Democrats 6% (-1)
    Greens 3% (n/c)

    Scottish Parliament regional list voting intentions:

    SNP 48% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (+1)
    Labour 13% (-1)

    Yup they're all flat-lining.
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    felix said:

    1. The US is a country in epic decline.
    2. China is a country that cannot be trusted.
    3. Ditto Russia
    4. The EU talks solidarity but does not practise it.
    There is some major shit still ahead of us all.

    Russia is sending supplies to Italy and China to Spain. Germany is giving some help to Italy. The omens are not good.
    Spain got a consingnment of duff tests from China. The Russian PPE sent to Italy didn’t work.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    Nigelb said:
    Cheltenham Festival says "Hold my pint....."
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,387

    Nigelb said:
    Cheltenham Festival says "Hold my pint....."
    Not without disposable gloves.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    For Labour to win, it needs big ideas that Boris can't nick.

    My guess though is they will learn all the wrong lessons from the Covid-10 bail-outs.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,387
    While Cuomo has been proving an extremely effective Governor of NY State, the Mayor of NY, De Blasio, has been almost Trump scale bad:
    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/03/bill-de-blasio-had-his-worst-week-as-new-york-city-mayor.html
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,229
    Nigelb said:

    nunu2 said:

    This is mad. Trump is helping those states he needs for the Electoral College!
    https://mobile.twitter.com/JesseLehrich/status/1244053944554401800

    Actually, reading the article, it’s a total clusterfnck, rather than any particular coordinated activity:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/desperate-for-medical-equipment-states-encounter-a-beleaguered-national-stockpile/2020/03/28/1f4f9a0a-6f82-11ea-aa80-c2470c6b2034_story.html

    Though it’s true that Florida seems to have received preferential treatment, that seems more likely because the governor is assiduous in flattering Trump:
    ... Florida has been an exception in its dealings with the stockpile: The state submitted a request on March 11 for 430,000 surgical masks, 180,000 N95 respirators, 82,000 face shields and 238,000 gloves, among other supplies — and received a shipment with everything three days later, according to figures from the state’s Division of Emergency Management. It received an identical shipment on March 23, according to the division, and is awaiting a third.
    “The governor has spoken to the president daily, and the entire congressional delegation has been working as one for the betterment of the state of Florida,” said Jared Moskowitz, the emergency management division’s director. “We are leaving no stone unturned.”
    President Trump repeatedly has warned states not to complain about how much they are receiving, including Friday during a White House briefing, where he advised Vice President Pence not to call governors who are critical of the administration’s response. “I want them to be appreciative,” he said...
    Trump is a total fucking disgrace in everything he does.
    If I was in california or new York I would be ready to secede and let the "shithole" states sink in their own crap. Trump is worse than a mafia gangster.
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,982
    TGOHF666 said:


    I guess Covid gives him cover to drop the free broadband promise.

    They might as well do it. It's going to be a rounding error on the deficit.
  • Options
    If the cult give up and Starmer wins then a large part of his battle will be internal - fighting the continuity Corbyn loyalists who despite being no longer in power will have influence.
    If the cult don't give up and proclaim RLB the winner then I expect a fairly rapid exodus as moderates flee before they are pushed.

    You have to look at the context. Corbyn won. So say Corbyn supporters who see no problem with the Jeremy prancing around on streets taking his applause for the NHS. Corbyn won because the government are delivering Corbyn policies. Corbyn won because the Corona crisis is the collapse of neoliberalism they've been dreaming of, now more than ever they must Keep Going to lead the scared people of Britain to True Socialism.

    My only question will be who they select as deputy to go with RLB. Needs to be someone loyal to the cause. Rayner seemed to be the initial choice but then she said some terrible things about Israel having the right to exist. Which leaves Burgon. OK so declaring Burgon the winner is literally telling the world they've rigged the thing but given how they have openly rigged various seat selections are they bothered about being caught out?
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    Sky News suggesting big problems brewing in Italy after 15 days of lockdown.
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,703
    "“If the Conservatives can broaden their appeal, they will be circling around seats like Barrow & Furness, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Derbyshire North East and Wrexham."
    They won Wrexham last December.
  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    Dura_Ace said:

    TGOHF666 said:


    I guess Covid gives him cover to drop the free broadband promise.

    They might as well do it. It's going to be a rounding error on the deficit.
    Broadband has proven its worth during this lockdown :-)

    Probably double down on the policy by giving everyone a free computer so they can work from home in any future pandemic.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    "“If the Conservatives can broaden their appeal, they will be circling around seats like Barrow & Furness, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Derbyshire North East and Wrexham."
    They won Wrexham last December.

    They won all of them in December. That was my point.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,387
    This is an illustration of the problem with PPE - if you don’t have significant stockpiles, it’s impossible to meet demand in a worldwide pandemic.
    The world’s largest glove maker, Malaysia’s Top Glove Corporation Bhd, which makes one in every five gloves globally, expects a product shortage as demand from Europe and the United States is exceeding its capacity, Reuters reports.

    The company has extended shipping times to cope with the demand surge, according to executive chairman Lim Wee Chai.

    Lim said orders received in the past few weeks, mainly from Europe and the United States, were almost double the company’s production capacity. Top Glove can produce 200 million natural and synthetic rubber gloves a day.


    And you can’t double production capacity overnight, even if you had the capital to do it, and weren’t worried about what to do with the new production lines when demand goes back to normal....
  • Options
    GideonWiseGideonWise Posts: 1,123
    felix said:

    Sky News suggesting big problems brewing in Italy after 15 days of lockdown.

    Go on..
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,229
    Nigelb said:
    I'm not sure. In early February I was telling people here in Cologne that we should cancel the carnival(=mardi Gras) which is up to 2 million people (just in Cologne) partying for 5 days continuously , but everyone just laughed. It would be almost unthinkable Cologne is all about Carnival.

    But looking back I'm not sure it would have made much difference. Cancelling the big parades would have certainly sent a message, but I don't think many transmissions happened there, people were infected in bars and clubs which would have been impossible to cancel at that point.

    Perhaps New Orleans would be different, being more internationally famous cancelling would have reduced a lot of international travel to the city, so perhaps would make a bigger difference there. But then the argument would be more earlier restrictions on travel generally, which would have been a good idea
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    How much trouble is the QC in ? I mean this is obviously a MI7 honey trap / sting but surely he will be in hot water?
  • Options
    TGOHF666 said:

    How much trouble is the QC in ? I mean this is obviously a MI7 honey trap / sting but surely he will be in hot water?
    He’s utterly screwed because he names two of the complainants.
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052

    TGOHF666 said:

    How much trouble is the QC in ? I mean this is obviously a MI7 honey trap / sting but surely he will be in hot water?
    He’s utterly screwed because he names two of the complainants.
    Slap on the wrist or big fine ?
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,387
    For those bored on a Sunday morning, this is a lengthy and very interesting (though deeply technical) paper on the work done a decade and a half back on SARS vaccines:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2633062/
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,578
    malcolmg said:

    Tory Klaxon surge on a sub sample did not last long ..........

    Sensational Panelbase poll shows SNP have further increased their enormous lead over the Tories -
    Scottish Parliament constituency voting intentions:

    SNP 51% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (n/c)
    Labour 14% (n/c)
    Liberal Democrats 6% (-1)
    Greens 3% (n/c)

    Scottish Parliament regional list voting intentions:

    SNP 48% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (+1)
    Labour 13% (-1)

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/alex-salmond-was-a-bully-and-a-sex-pest-his-own-qc-says-on-train-jfgbkr857
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,814
    felix said:

    malcolmg said:

    Tory Klaxon surge on a sub sample did not last long ..........

    Sensational Panelbase poll shows SNP have further increased their enormous lead over the Tories -
    Scottish Parliament constituency voting intentions:

    SNP 51% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (n/c)
    Labour 14% (n/c)
    Liberal Democrats 6% (-1)
    Greens 3% (n/c)

    Scottish Parliament regional list voting intentions:

    SNP 48% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (+1)
    Labour 13% (-1)

    Yup they're all flat-lining.
    Big SNP majority government and mandate for independence on those numbers
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,650
    Starmer cannot come in soon enough. So far the vast majority of comment from labour figures, and the reaction of its grassroots, indicate they plan to cross their fingers and trust that the public will be sick of the Tories after 14 years. Which might well be so but they have to lose a lot of seats to lose control.

    Once Starmer is in place we can finally see general competence, if he can retain the corbynite masses, and if he can tip toe them toward some more effective positioning.

    And no, Jeremy, the way the government responds during a generationally unique pandemic event does not mean an approach for normal times has been proven right. That's like saying the government doesnt support killing people, but because in a war they kill people clearly they support it at all times.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,249
    Again, @RochdalePioneers nails it.

    Does the Labour party think it won the argument. Because if it does then it was Jeremy's argument and why would anyone want to change it.

    I daresay if events had transpired earlier then he would not have agreed to step down as his moment is surely upon us.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,814
    Crap journalism in that first story, a ventilator does not treat covid-19 it helps a person breath when unable to do so on their own, does nothing whatsoever to treat the virus, what absolute morons we have for supposed journalists in this country.
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,115
    What do people think about Jeremy Hunt at 66-1 for next PM?

    He's been leading the criticism of the government for not testing enough. If, god forbid, the situation in the UK deteriorates beyond expectations, and the government is seen to have failed, might he be the obvious choice to lead a change in policy?

    In a cruel twist of fate for Johnson, Hunt might be the pandemic's Churchill to Johnson's Chamberlain.
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,694
    Good piece on the diplomatic fallout from COVID19.
    https://twitter.com/NAR/status/1241963325019377670
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,116
    Scott_xP said:
    It seems appropriate to raise this article:

    http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2018/03/11/three-reasons-why-jennie-formby-should-not-become-general-secretary-of-the-labour-party/

    And point out that it was completely correct on every point. It even mentioned Karie Murphy’s sex life as an example of nepotism.

    If Starmer does this, he will kneecap McCluskey. Hopefully that will not lead to Starmer being hobbled but McCluskey finally being ousted from his role at UNITE.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,650
    Andy_JS said:

    "Elderly in lockdown and children in school help Sweden pursue herd immunity

    Swedish public health experts argue that the virus can be stopped solely by vaccination or by herd immunity.

    Since a vaccine for widespread use is still at least a year away, they say, the only possible way to stop the epidemic is by isolating vulnerable people while allowing the virus to spread as slowly as possible through the healthy population as they build resistance." (£)

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/world/coronavirus-elderly-in-lockdown-and-children-in-school-help-sweden-pursue-herd-immunity-r705m76dd

    Isnt everyone kind of doing that in various ways? It seems expected that once peaks are over and restrictions relaxed cases will rise again, and there might be waves later in the year. It's about managing our health service pressures more than actually thinking we can stop people getting it until a vaccine arrives
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,814

    TGOHF666 said:

    How much trouble is the QC in ? I mean this is obviously a MI7 honey trap / sting but surely he will be in hot water?
    He’s utterly screwed because he names two of the complainants.
    It is the Torygraph, will be shown to be as big a bollox as the accusations. Unionists absolutely fuming that their stitch up failed.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Perhaps I’m unusual but I’m not hugely interested in international blame-casting at a time of an urgent and fast-moving crisis. I’d rather the politicians concentrated on the task at hand.
  • Options
    squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,331
    malcolmg said:

    The weather is not helping, with flood warnings down the North Sea Coast.

    Opposite for me, brilliant sunshine in Ayrshire and no problem with lockdown whatsoever. Tidied up garden yesterday , planted my M&S seed packages up, a few beers etc. All very pleasant indeed amid the doom and gloom.
    What about your second home in england?
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,814

    malcolmg said:

    Tory Klaxon surge on a sub sample did not last long ..........

    Sensational Panelbase poll shows SNP have further increased their enormous lead over the Tories -
    Scottish Parliament constituency voting intentions:

    SNP 51% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (n/c)
    Labour 14% (n/c)
    Liberal Democrats 6% (-1)
    Greens 3% (n/c)

    Scottish Parliament regional list voting intentions:

    SNP 48% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (+1)
    Labour 13% (-1)

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/alex-salmond-was-a-bully-and-a-sex-pest-his-own-qc-says-on-train-jfgbkr857
    I see you ignore the actual numbers, the fact that unionists said trial would kill the SNP and fact that Salmond is NOT guilty on all charges.
    We will see when the perjury cases come up and the names are published, the conspirators cannot hide forever and unionist attempts to try and continue the charade are doomed.
  • Options
    squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,331

    What do people think about Jeremy Hunt at 66-1 for next PM?

    He's been leading the criticism of the government for not testing enough. If, god forbid, the situation in the UK deteriorates beyond expectations, and the government is seen to have failed, might he be the obvious choice to lead a change in policy?

    In a cruel twist of fate for Johnson, Hunt might be the pandemic's Churchill to Johnson's Chamberlain.

    Probably better than 66-1 now tim.is not here to slag him.off
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,249
    ydoethur said:

    Scott_xP said:
    It seems appropriate to raise this article:

    http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2018/03/11/three-reasons-why-jennie-formby-should-not-become-general-secretary-of-the-labour-party/

    And point out that it was completely correct on every point. It even mentioned Karie Murphy’s sex life as an example of nepotism.

    If Starmer does this, he will kneecap McCluskey. Hopefully that will not lead to Starmer being hobbled but McCluskey finally being ousted from his role at UNITE.
    And his role as the cuddly BBC R4 Broadcasting House face of socialism.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Good article Alastair and good foresight on the 4 seats (and even the North East!) at risk.

    Does raise an interesting prospect that even if Labour replace London's Corbyn with London's Starmer, even facing London's Boris, that Labour might continue to slip backwards in their former North East heartland.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,578
    malcolmg said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    How much trouble is the QC in ? I mean this is obviously a MI7 honey trap / sting but surely he will be in hot water?
    He’s utterly screwed because he names two of the complainants.
    It is the Torygraph, will be shown to be as big a bollox as the accusations. Unionists absolutely fuming that their stitch up failed.
    It's the Times, and if there was, as Salmond appears to believe, a stitch up it was within the SNP.

    Imagine, not being able to blame someone else for their failings......
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141

    Perhaps I’m unusual but I’m not hugely interested in international blame-casting at a time of an urgent and fast-moving crisis. I’d rather the politicians concentrated on the task at hand.

    That's OK as long as the people who make mistakes are recognizing them and learning from them. If they are then it's good to leave them the leeway to u-turn. But if they're not then leaving them politely unmentioned can be really bad. Dunno whether the British are or not.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,249

    Good article Alastair and good foresight on the 4 seats (and even the North East!) at risk.

    Does raise an interesting prospect that even if Labour replace London's Corbyn with London's Starmer, even facing London's Boris, that Labour might continue to slip backwards in their former North East heartland.

    Expect SKS to develop a North-East twang.
  • Options
    LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 15,115

    Perhaps I’m unusual but I’m not hugely interested in international blame-casting at a time of an urgent and fast-moving crisis. I’d rather the politicians concentrated on the task at hand.

    That is laudably rational of you, but that approach didn't work out too well for Brown and Labour with the last crisis. Osborne framed the narrative, the blame was cast, and the argument won.

    It's the same this time. The political arguments for the next decade are there to be won or lost, now, while the crisis is dealt with. They won't be decided calmly in the aftermath.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,578
    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    Tory Klaxon surge on a sub sample did not last long ..........

    Sensational Panelbase poll shows SNP have further increased their enormous lead over the Tories -
    Scottish Parliament constituency voting intentions:

    SNP 51% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (n/c)
    Labour 14% (n/c)
    Liberal Democrats 6% (-1)
    Greens 3% (n/c)

    Scottish Parliament regional list voting intentions:

    SNP 48% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (+1)
    Labour 13% (-1)

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/alex-salmond-was-a-bully-and-a-sex-pest-his-own-qc-says-on-train-jfgbkr857
    I see you ignore the actual numbers
    I'm not the one presenting an MOE change or no change as "further increased".
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    malcolmg said:

    malcolmg said:

    Tory Klaxon surge on a sub sample did not last long ..........

    Sensational Panelbase poll shows SNP have further increased their enormous lead over the Tories -
    Scottish Parliament constituency voting intentions:

    SNP 51% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (n/c)
    Labour 14% (n/c)
    Liberal Democrats 6% (-1)
    Greens 3% (n/c)

    Scottish Parliament regional list voting intentions:

    SNP 48% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (+1)
    Labour 13% (-1)

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/alex-salmond-was-a-bully-and-a-sex-pest-his-own-qc-says-on-train-jfgbkr857
    I see you ignore the actual numbers, the fact that unionists said trial would kill the SNP and fact that Salmond is NOT guilty on all charges.
    We will see when the perjury cases come up and the names are published, the conspirators cannot hide forever and unionist attempts to try and continue the charade are doomed.
    Salmond's defence was that he was a real nasty bastard who was not safe round women, but his conduct fell just short of criminal.

    Nice guy.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,966
    malcolmg said:

    Tory Klaxon surge on a sub sample did not last long ..........

    Sensational Panelbase poll shows SNP have further increased their enormous lead over the Tories -
    Scottish Parliament constituency voting intentions:

    SNP 51% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (n/c)
    Labour 14% (n/c)
    Liberal Democrats 6% (-1)
    Greens 3% (n/c)

    Scottish Parliament regional list voting intentions:

    SNP 48% (+1)
    Conservatives 26% (+1)
    Labour 13% (-1)

    Malc, I think in these uncertain times we should be grateful that those PBers who month in, month out have predicted the end of the SNP honeymoon, and that every twist & turn of national, European & international politics will be bad for indy, have proved entirely consistent in their predictive powers.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,650
    tlg86 said:

    It is easy to forget, but before Jeremy Corbyn turned up Ed Miliband was the worst leader Labour had ever had. One undoubted positive about the current leadership election is that Labour members almost certainly haven’t chosen the worst possible candidate. From little acorns ...

    Haven't they? We'll see. Starmer is probably the least charismatic of those who stood, is a paid-up member of London's metropolitan elite, and devised the Brexit policy.
    At the risk of pre-empting Alastair's second piece, one could argue that parts of the South East might be happy to vote Labour so long as they aren't led by someone like Jeremy Corbyn. How many seats like Watford, Wycombe and the Milton Keynes seats could Labour flip with a leader who isn't perceived as a threat to their standard of living?

    We've seen a realignment in one part of the country, could the same happen in traditionally safe Tory areas?
    Yes, but I dont think it will en masse next time. Many red wall seats had been trending toward Con for some time, since Cameron or earlier, before Brexit and Corbyn ramped things up under May and particularly Boris. A lot of those southern seats might be right for a non threatening labour figure but require huge swings.

    The worry for labour is how permanent the switches are. Some people are just generally the switching kind. Others find it very hard, they resist it for ages, but once it happens theres relief as though a chord is severed, and they become committed to another side.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,814
    felix said:

    Sky News suggesting big problems brewing in Italy after 15 days of lockdown.

    Given the numbers there you would need to be pretty stupid to be wanting to go out.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,249

    Perhaps I’m unusual but I’m not hugely interested in international blame-casting at a time of an urgent and fast-moving crisis. I’d rather the politicians concentrated on the task at hand.

    That's OK as long as the people who make mistakes are recognizing them and learning from them. If they are then it's good to leave them the leeway to u-turn. But if they're not then leaving them politely unmentioned can be really bad. Dunno whether the British are or not.
    They will only realise they are mistakes in the official histories.
This discussion has been closed.