Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » China Crisis

SystemSystem Posts: 11,008
edited April 2020 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » China Crisis

China attempted to cover up the initial COVID-19 outbreak.It’s made no effort to identify who ‘patient zero’ was.It’s daily ‘official’ figures leave more questions than answers. pic.twitter.com/WyMkI2Ky9o

Read the full story here


«134567

Comments

  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,924
    I think I'd agree with most of that. Good article Mr Meeks.

  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943
    When world leaders from Macron to Trump have criticised the Chinese government response it is clear it is not going to be business as usual with Beijing.

    Meanwhile, images of a broken seal on a Wuhan lab refrigerator that kept 1500 virus strains have emerged

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233185/Shock-photos-inside-Wuhan-lab-stores-1-500-virus-strains.html
  • Options
    TomsToms Posts: 2,478
    Good article.
    I'd concur that option two is the way to go, but, for myself, I'm afraid I'd add a biggish touch of universal misanthropy to it. It seems that tribalism may be our Waterloo.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,924
    eadric said:

    Nicely written but oddly piffling. Completely ignores the fact China is actively using the virus to undermine the West. Bizarre.

    By making many in the West believe ridiculous conspiracy theories?
  • Options
    BannedinnParisBannedinnParis Posts: 1,884
    eadric said:

    Nicely written but oddly piffling. Completely ignores the fact China is actively using the virus to undermine the West. Bizarre.

    yeah, the false dilemma at the end jumps out. Very clunkily done.
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141
    edited April 2020
    Good piece, there's a lot that justifies a boycott of China (not least the Uighur genocide) but it's weird to want to do it over something the Chinese already want to fix, and a time when most of western civilization is shutting down its means of production and China is starting theirs back up.

    However there's another angle to this, which is that like alcohol China didn't just produce the problem, it also produced the solution. A few months ago we were looking at footage of the empty streets of Wuhan and talking their lockdown as this epic monstrous alien authoritarian Chinese thing, and yet here we are. The west has been used to being the leader, if not in raw wealth, of the world's governance and social ideas, and I think this is the first time in a long time that the leadership has been going in the opposite direction. It might be worth thinking about what other epic monstrous alien authoritarian Chinese things might go down better with western voters than we used to think.
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,141
    eadric said:


    “There’s a lot that justifies a boycott of Nazi Germany (not least the Jewish genocide) BUT...”

    I don't remember you advocating a boycott of China over the Uighur genocide, but I admit I don't follow all the threads.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.
  • Options
    SockySocky Posts: 404

    Good piece, there's a lot that justifies a boycott of China (not least the Uighur genocide) but it's weird to want to do it over something the Chinese already want to fix

    Have they fixed the wet markets?
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,250
    edited April 2020
    Following a recent pb header, HMG has appointed the former Head of Olympics Deliverance as its PPE tsar, complete with wartime analogy.

    Just as Lord Beaverbrook spearheaded the wartime efforts on aircraft production, the appointment of Lord Deighton will bring renewed drive and focus to coordinate this unprecedented peacetime challenge.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/olympics-chief-brought-in-to-boost-ppe-production

    ETA https://www7.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2020/04/12/the-government-needs-to-sort-out-the-ppe-issues-or-it-will-be-seen-as-wilfully-incompetent-or-worse/
  • Options
    SockySocky Posts: 404
    "it turns out that this is another area where profits are privatised and risks are socialised."

    I think this is the crux of the matter. BTW I am not seeing Sinophobia now any more than I saw much Francophobia in Brexit.

    However one thing we can all (right and left) demand of governments is that they do some long-term strategic thinking, and then put their finger on the scales of the free market where that is justified.
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    China is a very risky place to get stuff made. Lying and cutting corners are part and parcel of business relationships with firms. This used to be offset by cheap labour but those days are gone.

    Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,924
    eadric said:

    Good piece, there's a lot that justifies a boycott of China (not least the Uighur genocide) but

    Can you suggest an alternative construction?
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,250
    TGOHF666 said:

    China is a very risky place to get stuff made. Lying and cutting corners are part and parcel of business relationships with firms. This used to be offset by cheap labour but those days are gone.

    Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing.

    I expect you are half right.
  • Options
    SockySocky Posts: 404

    It might be worth thinking about what other epic monstrous alien authoritarian Chinese things might go down better with western voters than we used to think.

    I think you have already answered that with you Uighur comment. How many in the west secretly admire the Chinese for their tough line on Muslims making trouble?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,903
    Much of 2 involves onshoring critical supply chains and so forth. Our national resilience is piss poor and needs addressing urgently.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095

    Following a recent pb header, HMG has appointed the former Head of Olympics Deliverance as its PPE tsar, complete with wartime analogy.

    Just as Lord Beaverbrook spearheaded the wartime efforts on aircraft production, the appointment of Lord Deighton will bring renewed drive and focus to coordinate this unprecedented peacetime challenge.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/olympics-chief-brought-in-to-boost-ppe-production

    ETA https://www7.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2020/04/12/the-government-needs-to-sort-out-the-ppe-issues-or-it-will-be-seen-as-wilfully-incompetent-or-worse/

    "Head of Olympics Deliverance"

    Cue the duelling banjos.....
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    edited April 2020
    Socky said:

    It might be worth thinking about what other epic monstrous alien authoritarian Chinese things might go down better with western voters than we used to think.

    I think you have already answered that with you Uighur comment. How many in the west secretly admire the Chinese for their tough line on Muslims making trouble?
    I doubt all that many are aware of what's happening there. I find it hard to get too worked up about all the bad things in the world. I remember finding it curious that the F1 world was agonising over Bahrain when they didn't think twice about going to China. I was thoroughly appalled by Arsenal having a go at Mesut Ozil for bringing up the plight of the Uighurs.

    I suspect there are some books on this, but I've always wondered how the world would have reacted to Nazi Germany perpetrating the Holocaust, without invading their neighbours.
  • Options
    SockySocky Posts: 404

    "Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing."

    I expect you are half right.

    Why don't you see a expansion in UK manufacturing?

    Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,924
    eadric said:

    eadric said:

    Good piece, there's a lot that justifies a boycott of China (not least the Uighur genocide) but

    Can you suggest an alternative construction?
    I just wouldn’t put the word ‘but’ after the word ‘genocide’ when attempting an excuse
    Even though there was a comma?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,903
    One thing the govt should make explicitly clear, just in case it isn't ready is that flying abroad is at your own risk for a couple of years.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,924
    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,250
    edited April 2020
    Socky said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    "Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing."

    I expect you are half right.
    Why don't you see a expansion in UK manufacturing?

    Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement.
    For years I've advocated on pb we follow the American example of using national security to protect our industries. Just yesterday I complained we were handing personal data to the USA and Cabinet meetings (via Zoom) to China. So yes, I am all in favour of HMG's thumb on the scales but let's wait and see if anything substantial materialises once this crisis is over.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,924
    Socky said:

    "Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing."

    I expect you are half right.

    Why don't you see a expansion in UK manufacturing?

    Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement.
    Outside Germany, Italy has by far the most manufacturing in Europe. It doesn't seem to have done their population much good.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,966

    eadric said:

    eadric said:


    “There’s a lot that justifies a boycott of Nazi Germany (not least the Jewish genocide) BUT...”

    I don't remember you advocating a boycott of China over the Uighur genocide, but I admit I don't follow all the threads.
    Indeed you did it twice, in succession

    ‘genocide, but’
    Here's one more: There's a particular kind of right-wing bullshitter who affect to be deeply concerned about issues like human rights and genocide, but only when it coincides with one of their unrelated hobby-horses, the rest of the time they care more about trade or nationalist realpolitik.
    Since empty threats on the internet is going to be the extent of *action* against China that the right-wing bullshitters will get, it would be generous to let them rant away to their wee hearts' content. I'd like to think that it would get it out of their system but it's probably going to be a permanent addition to their stable of hobby horses.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    Socky said:

    "Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing."

    I expect you are half right.

    Why don't you see a expansion in UK manufacturing?

    Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement.
    The world's governemnts will quietly, without fuss or announcement, start implementing a policy of "Buy China last". That will leave plenty of opportunities.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,924
    Pulpstar said:

    Much of 2 involves onshoring critical supply chains and so forth. Our national resilience is piss poor and needs addressing urgently.

    The problem is that taking manufacturing "in-house" doesn't make us less dependent on other nations.

    We have few indigenous raw materials, so all we get is a false sense of security. The cars may be made in the UK, but if we produce no iron ore, nickel, copper, etc., then all we've done is moved the point of pain, while increasing the cost of cars to consumers.
  • Options
    kjhkjh Posts: 10,573
    HYUFD said:

    When world leaders from Macron to Trump have criticised the Chinese government response it is clear it is not going to be business as usual with Beijing.

    Meanwhile, images of a broken seal on a Wuhan lab refrigerator that kept 1500 virus strains have emerged

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233185/Shock-photos-inside-Wuhan-lab-stores-1-500-virus-strains.html

    Honestly! This daily mail stuff is ignorant scaremongering. It is a heat insulation seal. It isn't to secure the viruses. A bit of common sense applies after all you break that seal much more spectacularly every time you open the door.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    I didn’t write that Robert, please don’t misrepresent me again.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,924
    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    Well, they are. Aren’t they? Otherwise why have they arrested and kidnapped coronavirus whistleblowers from the start? And why are they still doing so?
    Of course they are.

    They are an evil totalitarian dictatorship with fuck all respect for human rights.

    But they didn't create the CV-19 virus and release it into the West as a weapon.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,966
    tlg86 said:

    Socky said:

    It might be worth thinking about what other epic monstrous alien authoritarian Chinese things might go down better with western voters than we used to think.

    I think you have already answered that with you Uighur comment. How many in the west secretly admire the Chinese for their tough line on Muslims making trouble?
    I doubt all that many are aware of what's happening there. I find it hard to get too worked up about all the bad things in the world. I remember finding it curious that the F1 world was agonising over Bahrain when they didn't think twice about going to China. I was thoroughly appalled by Arsenal having a go at Mesut Ozil for bringing up the plight of the Uighurs.

    I suspect there are some books on this, but I've always wondered how the world would have reacted to Nazi Germany perpetrating the Holocaust, without invading their neighbours.
    I guess 1933-1939 is a pretty fair guide.
    Of course the Holocaust proper was an ideological side effect of Germany invading their near and farther neighbours.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,924
    tlg86 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    I didn’t write that Robert, please don’t misrepresent me again.
    I didn't say you did.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,250
    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    Well, they are. Aren’t they? Otherwise why have they arrested and kidnapped coronavirus whistleblowers from the start? And why are they still doing so?
    Of course they are.

    They are an evil totalitarian dictatorship with fuck all respect for human rights.

    But they didn't create the CV-19 virus and release it into the West as a weapon.
    But the virus quite likely came from that Wuhan lab, the coincidence is too much to bear

    Best guess: a lab worker sold a bat on the black market
    Surely the "coincidence" that the bat virus lab was built close to where bat viruses are found was planned. In any case, whether you blame the lab or the wet markets, everyone is agreed the virus came from Wuhan.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226
    eadric said:

    eadric said:

    Good piece, there's a lot that justifies a boycott of China (not least the Uighur genocide) but

    Can you suggest an alternative construction?
    I just wouldn’t put the word ‘but’ after the word ‘genocide’ when attempting an excuse
    You’ve got up remarkably early for a Sunday morning and have suddenly become the authority on avoiding giving offence on PB?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,903
    2/3rds of Spain live in flats. That's got to have made both the crisis and dealing with the crisis worse than it otherwise would have been.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,229
    kjh said:

    HYUFD said:

    When world leaders from Macron to Trump have criticised the Chinese government response it is clear it is not going to be business as usual with Beijing.

    Meanwhile, images of a broken seal on a Wuhan lab refrigerator that kept 1500 virus strains have emerged

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233185/Shock-photos-inside-Wuhan-lab-stores-1-500-virus-strains.html

    Honestly! This daily mail stuff is ignorant scaremongering. It is a heat insulation seal. It isn't to secure the viruses. A bit of common sense applies after all you break that seal much more spectacularly every time you open the door.
    There's obviously a concerted effort going on now to fix the narrative that it's only China to blame, now that there's a risk of people getting angry with western governments.

    The timing of anonymous reports of secret reports from December, the stories planted in tame newspapers and journalists, it's classic stuff. The sudden concern about human rights, and animal rights, in people who previously showed no concern (in many cases more likely to go on bizarre anti vegan and anti ECHR rants).

    I say screw China!

    But the buck stops at no. 10 (and in the White House for the US).
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187

    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328

    It was talked about on BBC News this morning.

  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    edited April 2020
    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    Well, they are. Aren’t they? Otherwise why have they arrested and kidnapped coronavirus whistleblowers from the start? And why are they still doing so?
    Of course they are.

    They are an evil totalitarian dictatorship with fuck all respect for human rights.

    But they didn't create the CV-19 virus and release it into the West as a weapon.
    But the virus quite likely came from that Wuhan lab, the coincidence is too much to bear

    Best guess: a lab worker sold a bat on the black market
    Or a lab worker had a significant and extended exposure to the virus allowing it the opportunity to infect humans
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    edited April 2020
    kjh said:

    HYUFD said:

    When world leaders from Macron to Trump have criticised the Chinese government response it is clear it is not going to be business as usual with Beijing.

    Meanwhile, images of a broken seal on a Wuhan lab refrigerator that kept 1500 virus strains have emerged

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233185/Shock-photos-inside-Wuhan-lab-stores-1-500-virus-strains.html

    Honestly! This daily mail stuff is ignorant scaremongering. It is a heat insulation seal. It isn't to secure the viruses. A bit of common sense applies after all you break that seal much more spectacularly every time you open the door.
    I've mentioned this several times and will continue to do so. The last smallpox death in the UK occurred from a laboratory leak.

    It's only because we had a vaccine that it didn't become a pandemic.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-45101091
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,982
    Socky said:

    "Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing."

    I expect you are half right.

    Why don't you see a expansion in UK manufacturing?

    Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement.
    No sign yet. They've just awarded the T31 frigate propulsion system to Germany (Renk, MTU, Man) and the HVAC system to Norway (Novenco).
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    tlg86 said:

    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328

    It was talked about on BBC News this morning.

    Thanks for that clarification.

    There's often a disconnect between the BBC News website and the news programmes.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    rcs1000 said:

    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    Well, they are. Aren’t they? Otherwise why have they arrested and kidnapped coronavirus whistleblowers from the start? And why are they still doing so?
    Of course they are.

    They are an evil totalitarian dictatorship with fuck all respect for human rights.

    But they didn't create the CV-19 virus and release it into the West as a weapon.
    The expert analysis suggstes that indeed, the Chinese just discovered Covid-19 rather than created it.

    But in a world where one evil totalitarian dictatorship was happy enough to use nerve agents on UK soil, I wouldn't be quite so certain about deliberate release being ruled out.

    But a bat from the Wuhan facility sold on the black market looks likeliest. Given that the US had a presence in the Wuhan labs until recently, was that known to be a thing though? Did infected stuff just go walkabout?
  • Options
    SockySocky Posts: 404
    rcs1000 said:

    Outside Germany, Italy has by far the most manufacturing in Europe. It doesn't seem to have done their population much good.

    Are you referring to imported Chinese labour making handbags? If so, why would that help the locals much?

  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    tlg86 said:

    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328

    It was talked about on BBC News this morning.

    Any news on newspaper circulation during Covid - surely not many physical copies being sold these days.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,577
    eadric said:

    Pulpstar said:

    One thing the govt should make explicitly clear, just in case it isn't ready is that flying abroad is at your own risk for a couple of years.

    I suspect travel insurers will make that quite plain
    Virtually no travel Insurance is valid if you travel against FCO advice - even when it’s against “all but essential travel.” Anyone travelling abroad now is almost certainly travelling uninsured.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187

    tlg86 said:

    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328

    It was talked about on BBC News this morning.

    Thanks for that clarification.

    There's often a disconnect between the BBC News website and the news programmes.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-52341750
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    kamski said:

    kjh said:

    HYUFD said:

    When world leaders from Macron to Trump have criticised the Chinese government response it is clear it is not going to be business as usual with Beijing.

    Meanwhile, images of a broken seal on a Wuhan lab refrigerator that kept 1500 virus strains have emerged

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233185/Shock-photos-inside-Wuhan-lab-stores-1-500-virus-strains.html

    Honestly! This daily mail stuff is ignorant scaremongering. It is a heat insulation seal. It isn't to secure the viruses. A bit of common sense applies after all you break that seal much more spectacularly every time you open the door.
    There's obviously a concerted effort going on now to fix the narrative that it's only China to blame, now that there's a risk of people getting angry with western governments.

    The timing of anonymous reports of secret reports from December, the stories planted in tame newspapers and journalists, it's classic stuff. The sudden concern about human rights, and animal rights, in people who previously showed no concern (in many cases more likely to go on bizarre anti vegan and anti ECHR rants).

    I say screw China!

    But the buck stops at no. 10 (and in the White House for the US).
    The CIA's "WTF is going on in Wuhan?" Report was November....
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,577

    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328

    https://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/1251601198261637120?s=21
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,867

  • Options
    SockySocky Posts: 404
    Dura_Ace said:

    "Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement."

    No sign yet. They've just awarded the T31 frigate propulsion system to Germany (Renk, MTU, Man) and the HVAC system to Norway (Novenco).

    Perhaps strangely, high-value defence work is one area I would be happy to outsource. Relying on guaranteed, profitable orders from the MOD helped make our manufacturing companies lazy and complacent.

    Having half a dozen companies competing for PPE contracts is something different again.
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    tlg86 said:

    tlg86 said:

    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328

    It was talked about on BBC News this morning.

    Thanks for that clarification.

    There's often a disconnect between the BBC News website and the news programmes.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-52341750
    It's the Sky News lead headline and so it should be. Not tucked away in the newspaper review section.
  • Options
    kjhkjh Posts: 10,573

    kjh said:

    HYUFD said:

    When world leaders from Macron to Trump have criticised the Chinese government response it is clear it is not going to be business as usual with Beijing.

    Meanwhile, images of a broken seal on a Wuhan lab refrigerator that kept 1500 virus strains have emerged

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233185/Shock-photos-inside-Wuhan-lab-stores-1-500-virus-strains.html

    Honestly! This daily mail stuff is ignorant scaremongering. It is a heat insulation seal. It isn't to secure the viruses. A bit of common sense applies after all you break that seal much more spectacularly every time you open the door.
    I've mentioned this several times and will continue to do so. The last smallpox death in the UK occurred from a laboratory leak.

    It's only because we had a vaccine that it didn't become a pandemic.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-45101091
    Oh for goodness sake I made no comment on whether it came from a lab or not. What I referred to was a picture used as evidence of poor containment that showed no such thing, which is irrisponsible and ignorant scaremongering.
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,982
    edited April 2020
    I wonder who the first political casualty of Wuflu will be? I think we'll shortly have Hancock's testicle shaped head on a platter which will be a laugh.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187

    tlg86 said:

    tlg86 said:

    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328

    It was talked about on BBC News this morning.

    Thanks for that clarification.

    There's often a disconnect between the BBC News website and the news programmes.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-52341750
    It's the Sky News lead headline and so it should be. Not tucked away in the newspaper review section.
    The BBC has a policy of investigating stories themselves before publishing them as their own work. It’s why you quite often see a story on many media outlets and then the BBC report the same thing three days later once they’re satisfied that it is true.

    Sky News on the other hand are happy to report news as news.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,250
    edited April 2020

    rcs1000 said:

    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    Well, they are. Aren’t they? Otherwise why have they arrested and kidnapped coronavirus whistleblowers from the start? And why are they still doing so?
    Of course they are.

    They are an evil totalitarian dictatorship with fuck all respect for human rights.

    But they didn't create the CV-19 virus and release it into the West as a weapon.
    The expert analysis suggstes that indeed, the Chinese just discovered Covid-19 rather than created it.

    But in a world where one evil totalitarian dictatorship was happy enough to use nerve agents on UK soil, I wouldn't be quite so certain about deliberate release being ruled out.

    But a bat from the Wuhan facility sold on the black market looks likeliest. Given that the US had a presence in the Wuhan labs until recently, was that known to be a thing though? Did infected stuff just go walkabout?
    All this tin foil deliberate release from the lab stuff is plainly nonsense. Worse, it misses (and distracts from) the point that next time, one of these viruses might well be used as a weapon if and when a totalitarian regime takes a like to British cathedrals.
  • Options
    BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    Dura_Ace said:

    I wonder who the first political casualty of Wuflu will be? I think we'll shortly have Hancock's testicle shaped head on a platter which will be a laugh.

    Looks like Hancock is 100% safe then! :lol:
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    edited April 2020
    This article is mostly a predictable hash of apologism for the actions and behaviour of the Chinese state and whataboutism, together with some self-hatred of Britain.

    That said there is scope for agreement on one point: China putting its own house in order.

    The concern is that it will (as most authoritarian states do) be more interested in smoke and mirrors and blaming others than actually making any meaningful changes.

    The virus is a wake-up call that China needs to move to an open and transparent government accountable to its people and thus acting more responsibly on the world stage. That means - if we want this to not happen again - that Western policy should shift from being focussed on acquiescence and soft collaboration with the CCP to a goal of encouraging democratic reform.

    Economic and political pressure is part of the toolkit.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095

    rcs1000 said:

    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    Well, they are. Aren’t they? Otherwise why have they arrested and kidnapped coronavirus whistleblowers from the start? And why are they still doing so?
    Of course they are.

    They are an evil totalitarian dictatorship with fuck all respect for human rights.

    But they didn't create the CV-19 virus and release it into the West as a weapon.
    The expert analysis suggstes that indeed, the Chinese just discovered Covid-19 rather than created it.

    But in a world where one evil totalitarian dictatorship was happy enough to use nerve agents on UK soil, I wouldn't be quite so certain about deliberate release being ruled out.

    But a bat from the Wuhan facility sold on the black market looks likeliest. Given that the US had a presence in the Wuhan labs until recently, was that known to be a thing though? Did infected stuff just go walkabout?
    All this tin foil deliberate release from the lab stuff is plainly nonsense. Worse, it misses (and distracts from) the point that next time, one of these viruses might well be used as a weapon if and when a totalitarian regime takes a like to British cathedrals.
    So, they have never done it - but we must be on our guard for when they do it.

    Thanks for that contribution.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095

    Crikey. The Sunday Times have really raised the stakes. Sky News are leading with it. The BBC, predictably, don't even give it a mention.

    This is absolutely damning.

    https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-missed-a-series-of-opportunities-to-lessen-impact-of-covid-19-11975328

    https://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/1251601198261637120?s=21
    People looking for things that are absolutely damning finding things that are, er, absolutely damning. I'm shocked.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    eadric said:

    This is a load of wank. Sorry. I keep waiting for the bit where Brexit gets the blame, as the heroic Beijing Remainers strive to solve the British bug

    Underneath that's exactly what he's thinking.

    Because he's obsessed by Brexit and that's how he thinks.
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,229

    kamski said:

    kjh said:

    HYUFD said:

    When world leaders from Macron to Trump have criticised the Chinese government response it is clear it is not going to be business as usual with Beijing.

    Meanwhile, images of a broken seal on a Wuhan lab refrigerator that kept 1500 virus strains have emerged

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233185/Shock-photos-inside-Wuhan-lab-stores-1-500-virus-strains.html

    Honestly! This daily mail stuff is ignorant scaremongering. It is a heat insulation seal. It isn't to secure the viruses. A bit of common sense applies after all you break that seal much more spectacularly every time you open the door.
    There's obviously a concerted effort going on now to fix the narrative that it's only China to blame, now that there's a risk of people getting angry with western governments.

    The timing of anonymous reports of secret reports from December, the stories planted in tame newspapers and journalists, it's classic stuff. The sudden concern about human rights, and animal rights, in people who previously showed no concern (in many cases more likely to go on bizarre anti vegan and anti ECHR rants).

    I say screw China!

    But the buck stops at no. 10 (and in the White House for the US).
    The CIA's "WTF is going on in Wuhan?" Report was November....
    Exactly my point. Let's say for the sake of argument these reports actually exist:

    Why have anonymous sources release this info when it is too late to be useful to the world, but when it is most politically useful to the gangster in the white House?

    The significance may not have been clear in November or December, but must have been obvious in January.

    The world should also treat the US as a pariah state for not telling what they knew, if we believe the reports.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    eadric said:

    eadric said:


    “There’s a lot that justifies a boycott of Nazi Germany (not least the Jewish genocide) BUT...”

    I don't remember you advocating a boycott of China over the Uighur genocide, but I admit I don't follow all the threads.
    Indeed you did it twice, in succession

    ‘genocide, but’
    Here's one more: There's a particular kind of right-wing bullshitter who affect to be deeply concerned about issues like human rights and genocide, but only when it coincides with one of their unrelated hobby-horses, the rest of the time they care more about trade or nationalist realpolitik.
    There we have it: opinions over China are really just being used as another vector to fight domestic political battles and culture wars back here in the UK, and elsewhere in the West.

    Meanwhile President Xi laughs. He laughs his socks off.
  • Options
    SockySocky Posts: 404


    So, they have never done it - but we must be on our guard for when they do it.

    Nice rhetorical flourish, but his point is a fair one.

    The Tim Harford article I plugged yesterday is worth a read (Google tim harford disaster).
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,703

    eadric said:

    This is a load of wank. Sorry. I keep waiting for the bit where Brexit gets the blame, as the heroic Beijing Remainers strive to solve the British bug

    Underneath that's exactly what he's thinking.

    Because he's obsessed by Brexit and that's how he thinks.
    ... and yet you're the ones mentioning it.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,916
    An excellent article. The Chinese regime is deeply unpleasant. It is oppressive, murderous, deceitful, inefficient and interested only in its own survival - just like dozens of other regimes we happily do business with each and every day. The Saudi Arabian government - which murders journalists, treats women as second class citizens, funds terrorist groups and is in the process of developing a nuclear bomb that will further destabilise an already highly unstable region - is about to buy Newcastle United FC.

    We clearly need to be much more circumspect in our dealings with China. It’s not a country to be trusted. But it is not a country we can shun either. Like Saydi Arabia, we need what it offers.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    eadric said:

    This is a load of wank. Sorry. I keep waiting for the bit where Brexit gets the blame, as the heroic Beijing Remainers strive to solve the British bug

    Underneath that's exactly what he's thinking.

    Because he's obsessed by Brexit and that's how he thinks.
    ... and yet you're the ones mentioning it.
    We're pointing out what lies underneath it all.

    It's as obvious as hell, and that's been further reinforced by some podium-star Remainers coming on this thread this morning to shout "right-wing bullshitters" in unison.
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,229

    eadric said:

    This is a load of wank. Sorry. I keep waiting for the bit where Brexit gets the blame, as the heroic Beijing Remainers strive to solve the British bug

    Underneath that's exactly what he's thinking.

    Because he's obsessed by Brexit and that's how he thinks.
    ... and yet you're the ones mentioning it.
    +1000
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,916
    On the Sunday Times piece, none of it is surprising. Johnson will never change. He’s self-centred, bone idle and doesn’t do detail or scrutiny. Voters know this. Right now they don’t care. They like him. That’s why this story will make no difference to anything. Relentless, forensic opposition is the only option.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,250
    edited April 2020
    Dura_Ace said:

    I wonder who the first political casualty of Wuflu will be? I think we'll shortly have Hancock's testicle shaped head on a platter which will be a laugh.

    Hancock's fall from grace clearly demonstrates that Dominic Cummings needs to run the Health SpAds just like he runs the Treasury team. Whether Hancock resigns or swallows this effective demotion depends whether he has the balls of the Saj or Rishi's ambition.

    Rishi Sunak is the only minister who is a threat to the prime minister, not because he plans a coup but because his popularity means any other plotters don't need Boris to save their seats. It is hard to move the Chancellor now however, even though Boris's entire recent political career is founded on the Stalinist airbrushing of former Chancellors. He has ousted three already.

    It would have been Jenrick but he is safe now because to sack him over 3rd-home-gate would put the spotlight on Boris's own household(s).

    I can't get worked up about Pritti Patel stumbling over reading a number which was, I suspect, badly formatted in her script.

    Some of the scientifically-trained Cabinet ministers might have been expected to be able to read a graph or a table and know what exponential means, so I'd wonder if any ill-advised told-you-so's might arouse Boris's wrath.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    On one thing I'm now very clear: there is no authoritarian regime or country however vile or nasty that political opponents here in the UK would ever unite against.

    They'd far rather use it to pursue domestic political squabbles. Just as the native Celtic tribes of Britannia did in the face of the Roman Invasion.

    Anyone know how that turned out for them?
  • Options
    kamskikamski Posts: 4,229

    eadric said:

    This is a load of wank. Sorry. I keep waiting for the bit where Brexit gets the blame, as the heroic Beijing Remainers strive to solve the British bug

    Underneath that's exactly what he's thinking.

    Because he's obsessed by Brexit and that's how he thinks.
    ... and yet you're the ones mentioning it.
    We're pointing out what lies underneath it all.

    It's as obvious as hell, and that's been further reinforced by some podium-star Remainers coming on this thread this morning to shout "right-wing bullshitters" in unison.
    You would be more convincing if you weren't talking about brexit in response to an article that doesn't contain even the slightest whiff of brexit.

    Maybe you would stop going on about it if everything Alastair Meeks posts on any subject whatsoever has a disclaimer : "Warning: the author is against Brexit"
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    An excellent article. The Chinese regime is deeply unpleasant. It is oppressive, murderous, deceitful, inefficient and interested only in its own survival - just like dozens of other regimes we happily do business with each and every day. The Saudi Arabian government - which murders journalists, treats women as second class citizens, funds terrorist groups and is in the process of developing a nuclear bomb that will further destabilise an already highly unstable region - is about to buy Newcastle United FC.

    We clearly need to be much more circumspect in our dealings with China. It’s not a country to be trusted. But it is not a country we can shun either. Like Saydi Arabia, we need what it offers.

    Apart from your first, last and second last sentence - I agree with all of that.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226

    On one thing I'm now very clear: there is no authoritarian regime or country however vile or nasty that political opponents here in the UK would ever unite against.

    They'd far rather use it to pursue domestic political squabbles. Just as the native Celtic tribes of Britannia did in the face of the Roman Invasion.

    Anyone know how that turned out for them?

    They got better roads, sanitation, etc. ?
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,351
    Certain things are probably true. Porton Down will be working on flu, as will installations in China, Russia, America and others. For defensive measures, if nothing else. China will tell you what it wants you to know. Cock-up is far more likely than conspiracy.

    If Mr Evil were around, he'd make damn sure they had a vaccine first - so we can assume he isn't. Eating bats and pangolins could have been inadvisable. But rye and peanuts (ergot and aflatoxin) don't have an unblemished record either.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,916
    Pulpstar said:

    2/3rds of Spain live in flats. That's got to have made both the crisis and dealing with the crisis worse than it otherwise would have been.

    Socky said:

    "Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing."

    I expect you are half right.

    Why don't you see a expansion in UK manufacturing?

    Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement.
    The problem with manufacturing is that getting it started and then sustaining it comes with big upfront costs. If the only market is one of 65 million people its tough to recoup those. If we want to get round that we are going to need state subsidies or ownership.

  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901
    If MPs who were elected in 2017 on a mandate to implement Brexit has done so, the PM wouldn’t be Boris, and wouldn’t have spent the early part of the pandemic trying to get the deal done.
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,703
    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    eadric said:

    rcs1000 said:

    tlg86 said:

    There is no evidence that Covid-19 is an intentional attempt by the Chinese to bring the world to a standstill. Indeed, if it were, starting by rocking your own society to its foundations would be a pretty peculiar way of doing so.

    Actually, if a country wanted to do something like this, I'd have thought starting it off in its own country would be the perfect way to do it. In fact, the lack of an outbreak in the rest of China is suspicious. If a country wanted to murder millions around the world, why would they be worried about losing a few of their own?

    But I don't think the Chinese government is that way inclined. I suspect the real number of deaths in China is well over 100,000.

    Brilliant: either the Chinese are lying about the incidence of CV-19 in the rest of the country, or they started it.

    Either way, they're lying bastards.
    Well, they are. Aren’t they? Otherwise why have they arrested and kidnapped coronavirus whistleblowers from the start? And why are they still doing so?
    Of course they are.

    They are an evil totalitarian dictatorship with fuck all respect for human rights.

    But they didn't create the CV-19 virus and release it into the West as a weapon.
    But the virus quite likely came from that Wuhan lab, the coincidence is too much to bear

    Best guess: a lab worker sold a bat on the black market
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8004067/Killer-coronavirus-NOT-genetically-engineered-Scientist-debunks-conspiracy-claims.html
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226
    edited April 2020

    An excellent article. The Chinese regime is deeply unpleasant. It is oppressive, murderous, deceitful, inefficient and interested only in its own survival - just like dozens of other regimes we happily do business with each and every day. The Saudi Arabian government - which murders journalists, treats women as second class citizens, funds terrorist groups and is in the process of developing a nuclear bomb that will further destabilise an already highly unstable region - is about to buy Newcastle United FC.

    We clearly need to be much more circumspect in our dealings with China. It’s not a country to be trusted. But it is not a country we can shun either. Like Saydi Arabia, we need what it offers.

    Ebola came from West Africa. MERS from the Middle East. Bird Flu from Hong Kong. HIV from Congo. 'Spanish' Flu, as best we can determine, from the USA.

    Whatever the lessons are will be for global application. Seeking to 'blame' the place of origin is just displacement activity for politicians with questionable records themselves, starting with Trump.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901
    edited April 2020

    On the Sunday Times piece, none of it is surprising. Johnson will never change. He’s self-centred, bone idle and doesn’t do detail or scrutiny. Voters know this. Right now they don’t care. They like him. That’s why this story will make no difference to anything. Relentless, forensic opposition is the only option.

    I guess being PM is more important, but he did have a newly pregnant fiancée at the time I think.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226
    edited April 2020
    Pulpstar said:

    2/3rds of Spain live in flats. That's got to have made both the crisis and dealing with the crisis worse than it otherwise would have been.

    I'd hazard a guess that the UK has fewer of its population living in blocks of flats than most European nations, and the US fewer still. In the US the real crisis so far is in New York which is almost all high rise. You'd think stemming the spread would be easier for us than almost anywhere?
  • Options
    MysticroseMysticrose Posts: 4,688
    kamski said:

    eadric said:

    This is a load of wank. Sorry. I keep waiting for the bit where Brexit gets the blame, as the heroic Beijing Remainers strive to solve the British bug

    Underneath that's exactly what he's thinking.

    Because he's obsessed by Brexit and that's how he thinks.
    ... and yet you're the ones mentioning it.
    We're pointing out what lies underneath it all.

    It's as obvious as hell, and that's been further reinforced by some podium-star Remainers coming on this thread this morning to shout "right-wing bullshitters" in unison.
    You would be more convincing if you weren't talking about brexit in response to an article that doesn't contain even the slightest whiff of brexit.
    Indeed. The kind of myopia that does this site discredit.

    I really like Boris right now but anyone who defends this Government's handling of this crisis puts themselves in the same nefarious pit as the Chinese Government.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,916

    An excellent article. The Chinese regime is deeply unpleasant. It is oppressive, murderous, deceitful, inefficient and interested only in its own survival - just like dozens of othsts, treats women as second class citizens, funds terrorist groups and is in the process of developing a nuclear bomb that will further destabilise an already highly unstable region - is about to buy Newcastle United FC.

    We clearly need to be much more circumspect in our dealings with China. It’s not a country to be trusted. But it is not a country we can shun either. Like Saydi Arabia, we need what it offers.

    Apart from your first, last and second last sentence - I agree with all of that.
    I really don’t see what you object to in the article. China is too important to shun. The one thing Alastair misses, IMO, is that it is also a huge market to sell into. At this time especially that is not something anyone is just going to walk away from. Being less China-dependent is clearly important, but it is a process and will depend on other markets emerging. However, they will also rely to a large extent on strong relationships with the Chinese - just look at places like Brazil, India, Vietnam and the rest of SE Asia.

  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    isam said:

    On the Sunday Times piece, none of it is surprising. Johnson will never change. He’s self-centred, bone idle and doesn’t do detail or scrutiny. Voters know this. Right now they don’t care. They like him. That’s why this story will make no difference to anything. Relentless, forensic opposition is the only option.

    I guess being PM is more important, but he did have a newly pregnant fiancée at the time I think.
    Newly announced. She’s due in June/July.

  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400

    Pulpstar said:

    2/3rds of Spain live in flats. That's got to have made both the crisis and dealing with the crisis worse than it otherwise would have been.

    Socky said:

    "Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing."

    I expect you are half right.

    Why don't you see a expansion in UK manufacturing?

    Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement.
    The problem with manufacturing is that getting it started and then sustaining it comes with big upfront costs. If the only market is one of 65 million people its tough to recoup those. If we want to get round that we are going to need state subsidies or ownership.

    "Yet what Johnson rediscovered was a great British liberal tradition of making a lot of noise about science in order to cover up deliberate inaction, in the face of demands for a national and imperial strategy for agriculture and industry.....

    One cannot magic an industry out of thin air, whether high end ventilators or batteries, but by referencing innovation one can pretend, for a while. And that is where the politics of Covid-19, and Brexit, are stuck, in cynical fantasies about innovation."

    https://www.davidedgerton.org/blog/2020/4/18/the-governments-response-to-covid-19-and-brexit-are-intimately-connectednbsp
  • Options
    Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,867
    isam said:

    I guess being PM is more important, but he did have a newly pregnant fiancée at the time I think.

    https://twitter.com/carolecadwalla/status/1251630747078836224
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    I don’t think many people are blaming China for being successful in manufacturing. But they are blaming those who let us become dependent on stretched supply chains. The last 5 years in my sector have seen increased onshoring - mainly driven by QC - but also by security of supply and IP.

    For tender based good cost has been everything. Going forward governments are going to gave to pay more for these goods if they want security of supply. I think that is a good use of tax payers money.

    More importantly the reason why it *should not* be business as usual is that China lied. The issue isn’t where the the virus came from (IMV either natural or an accidental escape, it doesn’t really matter). It isn’t that they failed to control. But they lied to the WHO and they lied to other countries. If they had told the truth then, just possibly, lives would have been saved.

    The big change in U.K. policy, for example, was when the Chinese assumptions in the model were based with Italian data. If China had been upfront then appropriate decisions would have been made earlier.

    If there are no consequences of lying then there is no incentive to change behaviour
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,916
    In the long term, the Labour leader engaging with readers of the Mail on Subday may well be of greater political significance than the Sunday Times piece telling us all what we already knew about the PM.
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8233435/When-vulnerable-dignity-deserve-says-SIR-KEIR-STARMER.html
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,250
    edited April 2020
    Deleted
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    JonathanD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    2/3rds of Spain live in flats. That's got to have made both the crisis and dealing with the crisis worse than it otherwise would have been.

    Socky said:

    "Tough times ahead for the Chinese population.

    Good times ahead for British manufacturing."

    I expect you are half right.

    Why don't you see a expansion in UK manufacturing?

    Particularly now, post Brexit, post covid, I can see a lot of future government orders coming with a make-it-here requirement.
    The problem with manufacturing is that getting it started and then sustaining it comes with big upfront costs. If the only market is one of 65 million people its tough to recoup those. If we want to get round that we are going to need state subsidies or ownership.

    "Yet what Johnson rediscovered was a great British liberal tradition of making a lot of noise about science in order to cover up deliberate inaction, in the face of demands for a national and imperial strategy for agriculture and industry.....

    One cannot magic an industry out of thin air, whether high end ventilators or batteries, but by referencing innovation one can pretend, for a while. And that is where the politics of Covid-19, and Brexit, are stuck, in cynical fantasies about innovation."

    https://www.davidedgerton.org/blog/2020/4/18/the-governments-response-to-covid-19-and-brexit-are-intimately-connectednbsp
    "Covid-19, and Brexit, are stuck"

    At least honest enough not to hide it.....
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    isam said:

    If MPs who were elected in 2017 on a mandate to implement Brexit has done so, the PM wouldn’t be Boris, and wouldn’t have spent the early part of the pandemic trying to get the deal done.

    So what you are saying is that it is Boris fault. He should have voted for May. 🤷‍♂️
  • Options
    StereodogStereodog Posts: 400
    On a non political note whipping up Sinophobia will have some nasty social effects. My husband is ethnically Chinese (born in Hong Kong) and he got some pretty unpleasant treatment during the China only stage of Corona virus.

    Sadly a lot of people aren't knowledgeable enough to know the nuances of being ethnically Chinese and the number of times that my husband has been harangued at social events to justify Chinese government policy despite never having set foot on the mainland is incredible.

    Criticising the Chinese government's response to the pandemic is perfectly legitimate as is looking at whether we might want to think the extent to which we've outsourced our production. However talking about leaked viruses without evidence and using terms like Wuflu has real world consequences for innocent people.
  • Options
    DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 24,250
    edited April 2020
    Deleted again while I try to sort out blockquotes.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,916
    isam said:

    On the Sunday Times piece, none of it is surprising. Johnson will never change. He’s self-centred, bone idle and doesn’t do detail or scrutiny. Voters know this. Right now they don’t care. They like him. That’s why this story will make no difference to anything. Relentless, forensic opposition is the only option.

    I guess being PM is more important, but he did have a newly pregnant fiancée at the time I think.
    Johnson being Johnson is not a gotcha. Voters knew what he was in December. They didn’t care. I doubt they care now. They like him. The only way to change things is through careful, thought-through, well-argued opposition. The onus is on Labour to provide that.

  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    rcs1000 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Much of 2 involves onshoring critical supply chains and so forth. Our national resilience is piss poor and needs addressing urgently.

    The problem is that taking manufacturing "in-house" doesn't make us less dependent on other nations.

    We have few indigenous raw materials, so all we get is a false sense of security. The cars may be made in the UK, but if we produce no iron ore, nickel, copper, etc., then all we've done is moved the point of pain, while increasing the cost of cars to consumers.
    But you have a diversified supply chain with freely traded commodity markets
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040
    Scott_xP said:

    isam said:

    I guess being PM is more important, but he did have a newly pregnant fiancée at the time I think.

    https://twitter.com/carolecadwalla/status/1251630747078836224
    At a time where this country needs a great leader, we have Boris Johnson. Sad but true...
This discussion has been closed.