Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » COVID-19: With Boris back some of this afternoon’s development

SystemSystem Posts: 11,017
edited April 2020 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » COVID-19: With Boris back some of this afternoon’s developments

Boris Johnson promises austerity won't be part of coronavirus economic recovery planhttps://t.co/tzHRLqmxpq pic.twitter.com/U6sYyoMlyw

Read the full story here


«1345

Comments

  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,501
    edited April 2020
    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,658
    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,268

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Had some supermarket veggie pizza for lunch today - arrived with the rest of the shopping delivery yesterday :)
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    I have plenty of pineapple, its important to have essentials in. No yeast though sorry.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,501
    edited April 2020

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    I actually have plenty of those. My local petshop sells excellent flour, which they buy by the sack and weigh up in the back.

    But the pizza will be from the freezer.

    The stuff I struggle for at present is limes and lemons. I've just finished the stock from an overdone purchase for a cocktail party 18 months ago, and I can't find any more.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,658
    edited April 2020

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Had some supermarket veggie pizza for lunch today - arrived with the rest of the shopping delivery yesterday :)
    Pah! A man of your talents should be making his own from scratch.

    I spit* on your supermarket pizza!

    (*Not literally obvs - that would get me arrested.)
  • Options

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Flour I'll grant you, but you can get yeast without leaving the house given a couple of days!
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,965

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Aldi has yeast or at least our local one had it yesterday as we bought 5 packets and sent 3 of them in various directions this morning
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,607

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Amazon for the yeast and Morrisons for the flour.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,658

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Flour I'll grant you, but you can get yeast without leaving the house given a couple of days!
    Yes, good point.

    Here's a question: which travels further and faster in the atmosphere, yeast spores or coronavirus?
  • Options
    alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Had some supermarket veggie pizza for lunch today - arrived with the rest of the shopping delivery yesterday :)
    I take from that that you hadn't actually ordered it and I presume it wasn't a Margherita. But then you did clearly say you'd eaten it. Tut tut.
  • Options
    EPGEPG Posts: 6,006
    Something something listen to Dom and felons like Staines not journalists or even man journalists.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,658
    MaxPB said:

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Amazon for the yeast and Morrisons for the flour.
    Thanks but we hae yeast and we hae flour,
    And sae let the Lord be Thankit!

    Pizza night tomorrow in the Pointer household... probably topped with fresh asparagus from the garden *smug face*
  • Options
    So I guess we're all going to be wearing masks for the foreseeable future.

    I bagsy the designer ones.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,263
    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,501
    edited April 2020

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Had some supermarket veggie pizza for lunch today - arrived with the rest of the shopping delivery yesterday :)
    Pah! A man of your talents should be making his own from scratch.

    I spit* on your supermarket pizza!

    (*Not literally obvs - that would get me arrested.)
    The best PAH! is still Jean-Pierre from Not the Nine O Clock News...

    (Why does the time paramenter not work?). Try 2:37.

    https://youtu.be/7vk5K-4PGYQ?t=157
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    IanB2 said:

    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table

    Could just be a function of the increased testing numbers. The percentage of positive tests are falling. How does our percentage of positive tests compare to other comparable nations in past 24h?
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,607
    IanB2 said:

    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table

    It's not as bad as that, it's a small percentage of a huge number of people being tested. We're down from 40% of people turning out positive to ~8%.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,263

    IanB2 said:

    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table

    Could just be a function of the increased testing numbers. The percentage of positive tests are falling. How does our percentage of positive tests compare to other comparable nations in past 24h?
    Doesn’t that depend on why people are being tested? If all countries are only testing symptomatic people then the percentage isn’t reassuring at all
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table

    Could just be a function of the increased testing numbers. The percentage of positive tests are falling. How does our percentage of positive tests compare to other comparable nations in past 24h?
    Doesn’t that depend on why people are being tested? If all countries are only testing symptomatic people then the percentage isn’t reassuring at all
    Given the very high proportion of people who can have symptoms but it turns out they have something else - or be asymptomatic and have the virus - then the quantity of tests and percentage of tests being positive both matter.

    A month ago we weren't finding many cases because we weren't testing. Now we are testing more it is only logical that we are finding more.
  • Options
    EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    edited April 2020
    MaxPB said:

    IanB2 said:

    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table

    It's not as bad as that, it's a small percentage of a huge number of people being tested. We're down from 40% of people turning out positive to ~8%.
    REVEALED: The media's cunning plan to make Johnson look dumb by forcing him to rapidly increase testing and hence positive results.

    Edit: if we're shifting focus from "people who probably have it" to a mixture of "people who probably have it" and "people who probably don't have it but let's check anyway to make sure and also because we have an arbitrary target to hit" then you would also expect the % +ve figure to drop, to some extent.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Flour I'll grant you, but you can get yeast without leaving the house given a couple of days!
    Both plain and self-raising in M&S today...
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,263

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table

    Could just be a function of the increased testing numbers. The percentage of positive tests are falling. How does our percentage of positive tests compare to other comparable nations in past 24h?
    Doesn’t that depend on why people are being tested? If all countries are only testing symptomatic people then the percentage isn’t reassuring at all
    Given the very high proportion of people who can have symptoms but it turns out they have something else - or be asymptomatic and have the virus - then the quantity of tests and percentage of tests being positive both matter.

    A month ago we weren't finding many cases because we weren't testing. Now we are testing more it is only logical that we are finding more.
    Nevertheless we are already near the top of the table and our case numbers are still growing relatively quickly.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,603

    So I guess we're all going to be wearing masks for the foreseeable future.

    I bagsy the designer ones.

    Face coverings, Mr Eagles.

    Get with the programme.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,959
    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    Cant believe the mad cat lady makes the header.

    Forshame.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,187
    edited April 2020
    "Quote" rel="Philip_Thompson"> No! At no point is the debt alone unsustainable! We could sustainably have debt at 3000% of GDP if we were sustainably running a budget surplus and sustainably have 0.2% bond yields. At that point interest would be running at 6% of GDP and could be paid.

    What is unsustainable is the deficit which causes debt to increase compoundedly and interest can't be paid.

    Debt is relevant but insignificant. What is significant is our structural deficit, which is why our bond yields now are so much cheaper than they were a decade ago.


    *

    Which illustrates my point. At some stage on the torrid journey of UK plc from debt of 85% towards debt of 3000% - and almost certainly well before such a level is reached - it will become untenable. Budget surpluses would hardly be relevant unless we are postulating coming down to 3000% from an even higher level. Which is not possible since if 3000% is unsustainable, anything higher would already have been unsustainable and thus never reached.

    Botton line - both debt and deficit are relevant and significant. Pretend it's not me telling you if it helps. Pretend it's Sunak.
  • Options
    alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table

    Could just be a function of the increased testing numbers. The percentage of positive tests are falling. How does our percentage of positive tests compare to other comparable nations in past 24h?
    Doesn’t that depend on why people are being tested? If all countries are only testing symptomatic people then the percentage isn’t reassuring at all
    Isn't the real question, why are we trying to draw comparisons between different data sets?
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,603
    MattW said:

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    I actually have plenty of those. My local petshop sells excellent flour, which they buy by the sack and weigh up in the back.

    But the pizza will be from the freezer.

    The stuff I struggle for at present is limes and lemons. I've just finished the stock from an overdone purchase for a cocktail party 18 months ago, and I can't find any more.
    We've been getting lemons and limes in our fruit box. We had a pineapple a few weeks back. Kiwi fruit this week. It is the surprise element that gets me up in the morning.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,959
    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    You can raise the retirement age, and that helps.

    But it's also unbelievably unpopular. And labour participation rates drop off as people get older even with a rising retirement age.

    You can offer no more defined benefit plans in future, but you can't change the ones that we already owe (and have not saved for).

    I wrote a report a couple of years ago, showing the rising spend on healthcare and pensions in the UK. It's really scary, because you can't make the number go backwards easily.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,603
    More exciting than the weekly fruit lottery, when I went to collect the bin earlier two men in a car stopped to ask directions. It's a nightmare for people making deliveries when houses have names and no numbers.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,917
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Today’s growth in case numbers looks alarming, in percentage terms compared to other countries. We aren’t levelling off nearly as quickly. Only Russia looks worse at the top end of the table

    Could just be a function of the increased testing numbers. The percentage of positive tests are falling. How does our percentage of positive tests compare to other comparable nations in past 24h?
    Doesn’t that depend on why people are being tested? If all countries are only testing symptomatic people then the percentage isn’t reassuring at all
    Given the very high proportion of people who can have symptoms but it turns out they have something else - or be asymptomatic and have the virus - then the quantity of tests and percentage of tests being positive both matter.

    A month ago we weren't finding many cases because we weren't testing. Now we are testing more it is only logical that we are finding more.
    Nevertheless we are already near the top of the table and our case numbers are still growing relatively quickly.
    Our testing was appalling till recently, now it's fine. Seeing as we're looking more we'll find more.
  • Options
    EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
  • Options
    alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100
    rcs1000 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    You can raise the retirement age, and that helps.

    But it's also unbelievably unpopular. And labour participation rates drop off as people get older even with a rising retirement age.

    You can offer no more defined benefit plans in future, but you can't change the ones that we already owe (and have not saved for).

    I wrote a report a couple of years ago, showing the rising spend on healthcare and pensions in the UK. It's really scary, because you can't make the number go backwards easily.
    Might CV19 be helping? Oh dear, have I said something I shouldn't have?
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,917

    More exciting than the weekly fruit lottery, when I went to collect the bin earlier two men in a car stopped to ask directions. It's a nightmare for people making deliveries when houses have names and no numbers.

    Our house doesn't have a number, even on the deeds.
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    rcs1000 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.


    You can offer no more defined benefit plans in future, but you can't change the ones that we already owe (and have not saved for).
    .
    £1 in every £5 of council tax raised goes on council pensions.

    These schemes need frozen ASAP.
  • Options
    alteregoalterego Posts: 1,100
    Pulpstar said:

    More exciting than the weekly fruit lottery, when I went to collect the bin earlier two men in a car stopped to ask directions. It's a nightmare for people making deliveries when houses have names and no numbers.

    Our house doesn't have a number, even on the deeds.
    That's a bit posh ain't it? Like Buck 'Ouse you mean/
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited April 2020
    kinabalu said:

    No! At no point is the debt alone unsustainable! We could sustainably have debt at 3000% of GDP if we were sustainably running a budget surplus and sustainably have 0.2% bond yields. At that point interest would be running at 6% of GDP and could be paid.

    What is unsustainable is the deficit which causes debt to increase compoundedly and interest can't be paid.

    Debt is relevant but insignificant. What is significant is our structural deficit, which is why our bond yields now are so much cheaper than they were a decade ago.

    *

    Which illustrates my point. At some stage on the torrid journey of UK plc from debt of 85% towards debt of 3000% - and almost certainly well before such a level is reached - it will become untenable. Budget surpluses would hardly be relevant unless we are postulating coming down to 3000% from an even higher level. Which is not possible since if 3000% is unsustainable, anything higher would already have been unsustainable and thus never reached.

    Botton line - both debt and deficit are relevant and significant. Pretend it's not me telling you if it helps. Pretend it's Sunak.
    No it perpetually depends upon the circumstances. If we had 3000% borrowing but the Bank of England owned 2995% of the bonds and the 5% of the bonds owned by private investors had a 0.2% yield and we were running a budget surplus then how sustainable or unsustainable would that be?

    If we had borrowing at 10% GDP but had a structural 33% of GDP budget deficit per annum then how sustainable or unsustainable would that be?
  • Options
    GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191
    eek said:

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Aldi has yeast or at least our local one had it yesterday as we bought 5 packets and sent 3 of them in various directions this morning
    You only need one sachet to make the equivalent of a sourdough starter, which you feed for a couple of days. You then use some for a loaf, and keep feeding the rest to keep it going for future loaves.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,959
    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,187
    MaxPB said:

    Taxing a falling asset value will necessitate an increase in the tax rate which will compound the loss in value and create a negative feedback loop. Wealth taxes only make sense to push behaviour change, not to raise money as people shift money into an untaxed asset class (and eventually overseas to tax havens).

    That sounds like bollox to me, I'm afraid.
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,959
    alterego said:

    rcs1000 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    You can raise the retirement age, and that helps.

    But it's also unbelievably unpopular. And labour participation rates drop off as people get older even with a rising retirement age.

    You can offer no more defined benefit plans in future, but you can't change the ones that we already owe (and have not saved for).

    I wrote a report a couple of years ago, showing the rising spend on healthcare and pensions in the UK. It's really scary, because you can't make the number go backwards easily.
    Might CV19 be helping? Oh dear, have I said something I shouldn't have?
    This is why I know CV-19 is not a disease created to wage economic war.

    Because CV-19 - if left unchecked to wipe out the oldies - would be a massive economic boon, reducing pension payments, freeing up housing, and improving the dependency ratio.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    kinabalu said:

    MaxPB said:

    Taxing a falling asset value will necessitate an increase in the tax rate which will compound the loss in value and create a negative feedback loop. Wealth taxes only make sense to push behaviour change, not to raise money as people shift money into an untaxed asset class (and eventually overseas to tax havens).

    That sounds like bollox to me, I'm afraid.
    There's decades of evidence of that.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,962
    IanB2 said:
    I assume they are too embarrassed to report on the US nowadays?
  • Options

    So I guess we're all going to be wearing masks for the foreseeable future.

    I bagsy the designer ones.

    Careful out there.


    Like I'm not in enough trouble already without wearing that.
  • Options
    AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900


    Could just be a function of the increased testing numbers. The percentage of positive tests are falling. How does our percentage of positive tests compare to other comparable nations in past 24h?

    About triple Italy's. Germany is a bit trickier because the daily case count bounces about a bit, but let's say 5x. Spain we look kinda similar, but guessing a bit at their daily testing numbers, they don't announce them regularly.

    We're possibly seeing some effects of a backlog in testing demand though? Other high-testing countries may be predominately testing unlikelies by now, having had spare capacity for a while.




  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,917
    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    Why not just borrow the hypothecated pot to get over the short term hump in moving to DC ? You're paying out or less than DB anyway. Unfunded schemes are funny money anyway.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,959
    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    I agree: defined benefit pension schemes are a ticking time bomb.

    In the US, there are a large number of municipalities that are on the verge of bankruptcy due to pension obligations. There it's worse, because you have a negative feedback loop. Pension costs cause local income taxes to rise. Workers leave because other places have lower taxes. Proportion of municipality's spending on pensions rises. They cut the education, police and parks budget. More workers leave. It's a really horrible negative feedback loop that we need to avoid.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,413
    Fpt

    eristdoof said:

    We should not have used a split infinitive.
    It's ok to consciously use one according to Fowler.
    Does Fowler then claim to inadvertently split an infinitive is not OK?
    IIRC no.

    I donated my well-thumbed Fowler to some grad when I retired but I seem to remember he divided the populace into four: those happy souls who neither know nor care know about split infinitives, those who care but don't really understand them, those who know but don't really care, and finally the poor sods who feel they have to always (yes, I know) point out their superior knowledge by picking up any sign of a dreaded SI.
    I don't feel that at all. If I did, PB would give me a full time occupation. I do think it is an inelegant and unnecessary fumble in a formal letter.
  • Options
    AndreaParma_82AndreaParma_82 Posts: 4,714
    Candidates so far for vacant Select Committe Chairs (after appointments to Shadow Cabinet)

    Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee: Stella Creasy, Angela Eagle, Darren Jones
    Committee of Standards: Chris Bryant

    Nominations close on Monday
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,603
    Pulpstar said:

    More exciting than the weekly fruit lottery, when I went to collect the bin earlier two men in a car stopped to ask directions. It's a nightmare for people making deliveries when houses have names and no numbers.

    Our house doesn't have a number, even on the deeds.
    Our address is based on the developer's favourite football team.
  • Options
    NorthofStokeNorthofStoke Posts: 1,758
    As far as I can see there is no useful statistical information to be gleaned from the test results. In England and Wales the population being sampled is changing daily as testing is increased and all countries have different criteria so cannot be compared.Testing may well be useful for managing individual cases and deployment of staff but that is a different matter.
  • Options
    mattmatt Posts: 3,789
    rcs1000 said:

    alterego said:

    rcs1000 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    You can raise the retirement age, and that helps.

    But it's also unbelievably unpopular. And labour participation rates drop off as people get older even with a rising retirement age.

    You can offer no more defined benefit plans in future, but you can't change the ones that we already owe (and have not saved for).

    I wrote a report a couple of years ago, showing the rising spend on healthcare and pensions in the UK. It's really scary, because you can't make the number go backwards easily.
    Might CV19 be helping? Oh dear, have I said something I shouldn't have?
    This is why I know CV-19 is not a disease created to wage economic war.

    Because CV-19 - if left unchecked to wipe out the oldies - would be a massive economic boon, reducing pension payments, freeing up housing, and improving the dependency ratio.
    The economic war on the young to give the boomers the future they feel that everyone else should pay for will be with us for some time though.
  • Options
    EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    And results in massive brain drain from the public sector. Regardless of your views as to the competence of civil servants, removal of the gold-plated pension arrangements (the one obvious draw to a career there) is unlikely to make things better.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,959
    IanB2 said:
    I would suggest that countries/cities/states fall into one of three categories:

    (1) Totally fucked it up. Overloaded healthcare system. High death rates. Lockdown too late. Lombardy and New York City are the key standouts here.

    (2) Locked down a little later than they should have done, but broadly did "OK". These countries - like France and the UK and much of the US - are mostly looking now to how they ease restrictions.

    (3) Did really well, and have contained the virus. Which is a very small number of countries, like South Korea and some of China.

    The UK is comfortably in the second group. We've done OK. We could have done better. But we've done OK.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Paris St-Germain have been awarded the Ligue 1 title after it was announced the season would not resume because of the coronavirus pandemic.

    Liverpool fans will now calling for EPL to not resume matches.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,413
    kinabalu said:

    MaxPB said:

    Taxing a falling asset value will necessitate an increase in the tax rate which will compound the loss in value and create a negative feedback loop. Wealth taxes only make sense to push behaviour change, not to raise money as people shift money into an untaxed asset class (and eventually overseas to tax havens).

    That sounds like bollox to me, I'm afraid.
    It sounds like it's fatal to your argument in other words.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,959
    matt said:

    rcs1000 said:

    alterego said:

    rcs1000 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    You can raise the retirement age, and that helps.

    But it's also unbelievably unpopular. And labour participation rates drop off as people get older even with a rising retirement age.

    You can offer no more defined benefit plans in future, but you can't change the ones that we already owe (and have not saved for).

    I wrote a report a couple of years ago, showing the rising spend on healthcare and pensions in the UK. It's really scary, because you can't make the number go backwards easily.
    Might CV19 be helping? Oh dear, have I said something I shouldn't have?
    This is why I know CV-19 is not a disease created to wage economic war.

    Because CV-19 - if left unchecked to wipe out the oldies - would be a massive economic boon, reducing pension payments, freeing up housing, and improving the dependency ratio.
    The economic war on the young to give the boomers the future they feel that everyone else should pay for will be with us for some time though.
    Yeah, but the young understand TikTok, so it all balances out.
  • Options
    BannedinnParisBannedinnParis Posts: 1,884
    rcs1000 said:

    IanB2 said:
    I would suggest that countries/cities/states fall into one of three categories:

    (1) Totally fucked it up. Overloaded healthcare system. High death rates. Lockdown too late. Lombardy and New York City are the key standouts here.

    (2) Locked down a little later than they should have done, but broadly did "OK". These countries - like France and the UK and much of the US - are mostly looking now to how they ease restrictions.

    (3) Did really well, and have contained the virus. Which is a very small number of countries, like South Korea and some of China.

    The UK is comfortably in the second group. We've done OK. We could have done better. But we've done OK.
    with the caveat that all analysis needs a caveat 'so far'.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Paris St-Germain have been awarded the Ligue 1 title after it was announced the season would not resume because of the coronavirus pandemic.

    Liverpool fans will now calling for EPL to not resume matches.

    You kidding?

    We know Liverpool deserve the League but they also deserve to smash past 100 points.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Everybody got their pots, pans, drums, fireworks, space-x sized rockets ready...remember you arent doing it properly unless you are within a few cm of everybody else....thats how they do it in London.
  • Options
    EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976

    Paris St-Germain have been awarded the Ligue 1 title after it was announced the season would not resume because of the coronavirus pandemic.

    Liverpool fans will now calling for EPL to not resume matches.

    Liverpool mayor: "our fans are too dangerously thick to allow matches to be resumed*"
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52484530

    *paraphrased
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    And results in massive brain drain from the public sector. Regardless of your views as to the competence of civil servants, removal of the gold-plated pension arrangements (the one obvious draw to a career there) is unlikely to make things better.
    Better to pay staff the money they deserve at the time of employment rather than for 40 years after they have retired to Tuscany aged 55.




  • Options
    RobCRobC Posts: 398
    rcs1000 said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    You can raise the retirement age, and that helps.

    But it's also unbelievably unpopular. And labour participation rates drop off as people get older even with a rising retirement age.

    You can offer no more defined benefit plans in future, but you can't change the ones that we already owe (and have not saved for).

    I wrote a report a couple of years ago, showing the rising spend on healthcare and pensions in the UK. It's really scary, because you can't make the number go backwards easily.
    It is difficult to gain support for increasing the state pension to 70 when many people still fail to reach that age simply because we haven't made any real progress against inherently deadly killers such as pancreatic cancer and continue to fail to diagnose other cancers at an early enough stage to be able to cure them.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,268

    More exciting than the weekly fruit lottery, when I went to collect the bin earlier two men in a car stopped to ask directions. It's a nightmare for people making deliveries when houses have names and no numbers.

    Hope they were more than 2 metres away!
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,263
    rcs1000 said:

    IanB2 said:
    I would suggest that countries/cities/states fall into one of three categories:

    (1) Totally fucked it up. Overloaded healthcare system. High death rates. Lockdown too late. Lombardy and New York City are the key standouts here.

    (2) Locked down a little later than they should have done, but broadly did "OK". These countries - like France and the UK and much of the US - are mostly looking now to how they ease restrictions.

    (3) Did really well, and have contained the virus. Which is a very small number of countries, like South Korea and some of China.

    The UK is comfortably in the second group. We've done OK. We could have done better. But we've done OK.
    Our comparators are the other major european countries.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,268

    Everybody got their pots, pans, drums, fireworks, space-x sized rockets ready...remember you arent doing it properly unless you are within a few cm of everybody else....thats how they do it in London.

    All that cheering and yelling, sure-fire way to spread the virus.
  • Options
    squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,341

    MattW said:

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    I actually have plenty of those. My local petshop sells excellent flour, which they buy by the sack and weigh up in the back.

    But the pizza will be from the freezer.

    The stuff I struggle for at present is limes and lemons. I've just finished the stock from an overdone purchase for a cocktail party 18 months ago, and I can't find any more.
    We've been getting lemons and limes in our fruit box. We had a pineapple a few weeks back. Kiwi fruit this week. It is the surprise element that gets me up in the morning.
    Why di you need a surprise? We order locally and they send us what we want...qed.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,959
    edited April 2020
    TGOHF666 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    And results in massive brain drain from the public sector. Regardless of your views as to the competence of civil servants, removal of the gold-plated pension arrangements (the one obvious draw to a career there) is unlikely to make things better.
    Better to pay staff the money they deserve at the time of employment rather than for 40 years after they have retired to Tuscany aged 55.




    If they all head to Tuscany, then the Coronavirus will get 'em, reducing our future pension obligations.
  • Options
    AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900
    edited April 2020

    Everybody got their pots, pans, drums, fireworks, space-x sized rockets ready...remember you arent doing it properly unless you are within a few cm of everybody else....thats how they do it in London.

    Here we have a guy playing the bagpipes at 8pm ........ which is fine, at a reasonable distance, when they're good. This guy isn't.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    And results in massive brain drain from the public sector. Regardless of your views as to the competence of civil servants, removal of the gold-plated pension arrangements (the one obvious draw to a career there) is unlikely to make things better.
    Having the best and brightest drain from the public sector sounds like things being better to me.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,268
    edited April 2020
    alterego said:

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    Had some supermarket veggie pizza for lunch today - arrived with the rest of the shopping delivery yesterday :)
    I take from that that you hadn't actually ordered it and I presume it wasn't a Margherita. But then you did clearly say you'd eaten it. Tut tut.
    Oh I did order it - two in fact!

    But they missed out a couple of things - substituting a second bacg of frozen beans for frozen broccoli. And not packing any carrots even though I ordered two bags. On the other hand when I checked our order online prior to delivery, they said we were going to be without pasta, but the delivery DID include pasta!
  • Options
    Endillion said:

    Paris St-Germain have been awarded the Ligue 1 title after it was announced the season would not resume because of the coronavirus pandemic.

    Liverpool fans will now calling for EPL to not resume matches.

    Liverpool mayor: "our fans are too dangerously thick to allow matches to be resumed*"
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52484530

    *paraphrased
    Chippy Tits Anderson is an Everton fan.

    He really is special.

    For ten years he complained about Tory austerity screwing over Liverpool council but in 2018 he managed to find £280 million to loan to Everton for their new stadium.
  • Options
    FoxyFoxy Posts: 44,594

    More exciting than the weekly fruit lottery, when I went to collect the bin earlier two men in a car stopped to ask directions. It's a nightmare for people making deliveries when houses have names and no numbers.

    They should use what3words. It is what it was invented for.

    https://what3words.com
  • Options
    EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    TGOHF666 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    And results in massive brain drain from the public sector. Regardless of your views as to the competence of civil servants, removal of the gold-plated pension arrangements (the one obvious draw to a career there) is unlikely to make things better.
    Better to pay staff the money they deserve at the time of employment rather than for 40 years after they have retired to Tuscany aged 55.

    Strange. Almost all the rest of your posts paint you as a hard-nosed pragmatist. Where's this fluffy idealism coming from?

    Update on London "clapping for carers": we have progressed to honking car horns, alongside the banging of saucepans. If it wasn't summer, we probably would have broken out the fireworks by now.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,942
    Almost no-one outside tonight. Has the novelty worn off?
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,603

    More exciting than the weekly fruit lottery, when I went to collect the bin earlier two men in a car stopped to ask directions. It's a nightmare for people making deliveries when houses have names and no numbers.

    Hope they were more than 2 metres away!
    You can be sure of that!
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489
    for those flowing US Presidential elections, basically everybody on here. US Congressman Justin Amash, who left the Republican party last year has joined the Libertarian Party, and will try to be its candidate for POTUS.

    Will he win, almost certainly not, but in these uncertain times, maybe, just maybe.

    I will be chearing him on and wish him all the best, for what little that is worth.

    Will it change the dynamics of the election, probably not a lot, but perhaps more than last time, after a legal battle, its more likely that he will be in at least one of the TV Debates.

    any thoughts?
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,603

    MattW said:

    MattW said:

    First.

    Yet again.

    Now where's my pizza and my tin of pineapple.

    You need to find some flour and yeast first. Good luck with those!
    I actually have plenty of those. My local petshop sells excellent flour, which they buy by the sack and weigh up in the back.

    But the pizza will be from the freezer.

    The stuff I struggle for at present is limes and lemons. I've just finished the stock from an overdone purchase for a cocktail party 18 months ago, and I can't find any more.
    We've been getting lemons and limes in our fruit box. We had a pineapple a few weeks back. Kiwi fruit this week. It is the surprise element that gets me up in the morning.
    Why di you need a surprise? We order locally and they send us what we want...qed.
    Our three suppliers have rationalised to standard boxes due to high demand. Ad-hoc options are slowly coming back, so we were able to add carrots and cucumbers for tomorrow.

    We have found another supplier with an a la carte menu for fresh produce, but with a 3 week delay between order and delivery.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,189
    Mortimer said:

    Almost no-one outside tonight. Has the novelty worn off?

    Seemed quieter round here tonight.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105
    Mortimer said:

    Almost no-one outside tonight. Has the novelty worn off?

    Big fireworks blasting out across rural Devon for the NHS. Lots of dogs barking for the NHS as a consequence. And a cracking rainbow for the NHS.
  • Options
    TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    And results in massive brain drain from the public sector. Regardless of your views as to the competence of civil servants, removal of the gold-plated pension arrangements (the one obvious draw to a career there) is unlikely to make things better.
    Better to pay staff the money they deserve at the time of employment rather than for 40 years after they have retired to Tuscany aged 55.

    Strange. Almost all the rest of your posts paint you as a hard-nosed pragmatist. Where's this fluffy idealism coming from?

    It is pragmatic - if certain public sector workers deserve more money then pay em - but now not a padded pension. But don't bloat the system

    Collective bargaining prevents the best public sector workers getting paid more.
  • Options
    solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,623
    Mortimer said:

    Almost no-one outside tonight. Has the novelty worn off?

    Have the government not added a slide to the deck showing the number of people clapping on a Thursday night over time barchart yet?
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Just saw the time and realised we forgot to do the clap today but didn't hear any of our neighbours do it either. I think it raining probably pump a dampener on people's enthusiasm.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,105
    rcs1000 said:

    IanB2 said:
    I would suggest that countries/cities/states fall into one of three categories:

    (1) Totally fucked it up. Overloaded healthcare system. High death rates. Lockdown too late. Lombardy and New York City are the key standouts here.

    (2) Locked down a little later than they should have done, but broadly did "OK". These countries - like France and the UK and much of the US - are mostly looking now to how they ease restrictions.

    (3) Did really well, and have contained the virus. Which is a very small number of countries, like South Korea and some of China.

    The UK is comfortably in the second group. We've done OK. We could have done better. But we've done OK.
    China, subject to an independent audit. That we will never get.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    TGOHF666 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    And results in massive brain drain from the public sector. Regardless of your views as to the competence of civil servants, removal of the gold-plated pension arrangements (the one obvious draw to a career there) is unlikely to make things better.
    Better to pay staff the money they deserve at the time of employment rather than for 40 years after they have retired to Tuscany aged 55.

    Strange. Almost all the rest of your posts paint you as a hard-nosed pragmatist. Where's this fluffy idealism coming from?

    It is pragmatic - if certain public sector workers deserve more money then pay em - but now not a padded pension. But don't bloat the system

    Collective bargaining prevents the best public sector workers getting paid more.
    Padded pensions is just betraying the future and masking our current expenditure.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,263
    Nothing here tonight, first time it has been so quiet.
  • Options
    BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,489
    Foloing on form the discussion of Austerity V Debt V tax rises. and the long term problems with pensions.

    Has anybody seen the rises in Bitcoin price? up about 18% in 48 hours or so.

    Gland I heald on for the long hall.
  • Options
    rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 7,908
    rcs1000 said:



    I agree: defined benefit pension schemes are a ticking time bomb.

    Quiz question: does the govt think the proportion of GDP spent on 'unfunded' public sector pensions will be more or less in 20 years time?

  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Funny how many of us have commented on nothing.

    Is the weather miserable where you are too?
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,603

    Just saw the time and realised we forgot to do the clap today but didn't hear any of our neighbours do it either. I think it raining probably pump a dampener on people's enthusiasm.

    I lost track of time and missed it too.

    To make up for it I'll do a Google image search for nurses...
  • Options
    EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976
    TGOHF666 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Endillion said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    rcs1000 said:

    The rising proportion of oldies means spending on pensions and healthcare rises, even while the number of workers providing tax income falls.

    That is the inevitable consequence of a TFR below 2, and rising life expectancies.

    There is nothing any government can do about it, well nothing much, and it therefore means that either spending on other services is cut, or taxpayers need to reach into their pockets and pay more in taxes.

    That is - however you cut it - austerity.

    Raise the pension age.

    Scrap remaining defined benefit pensions paid by the public purse.

    The first has a bunch of negative consequences (mainly screwing up the labour market, at a time when we really need it to remain unscrewed).

    The second: unless you plan to effectively steal from millions of current public sector workers and retirees, it will have precisely zero effect for several decades, since most of the schemes that matter are unfunded.
    In the near term, it makes things worse because you need to start actually paying into a pot on behalf of public sector employees.
    In the long term it saves you a lot of money. Hence start yesterday.

    And results in massive brain drain from the public sector. Regardless of your views as to the competence of civil servants, removal of the gold-plated pension arrangements (the one obvious draw to a career there) is unlikely to make things better.
    Better to pay staff the money they deserve at the time of employment rather than for 40 years after they have retired to Tuscany aged 55.

    Strange. Almost all the rest of your posts paint you as a hard-nosed pragmatist. Where's this fluffy idealism coming from?

    It is pragmatic - if certain public sector workers deserve more money then pay em - but now not a padded pension. But don't bloat the system

    Collective bargaining prevents the best public sector workers getting paid more.
    Truth is I'm being disingenuous. I can see no reason for civil servants to retain access to a benefit that no-one under the age of 40 now has in the private sector. It should have been done years ago.

    The problem is that it won't make any difference until at least 2065. The private sector defined benefit industry has been effectively dead for years already, but it'll keep running around like the proverbial headless chicken for decades to come.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    BigRich said:

    Foloing on form the discussion of Austerity V Debt V tax rises. and the long term problems with pensions.

    Has anybody seen the rises in Bitcoin price? up about 18% in 48 hours or so.

    Gland I heald on for the long hall.

    No I don't pay attention to pyramid frauds.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 24,965

    rcs1000 said:

    IanB2 said:
    I would suggest that countries/cities/states fall into one of three categories:

    (1) Totally fucked it up. Overloaded healthcare system. High death rates. Lockdown too late. Lombardy and New York City are the key standouts here.

    (2) Locked down a little later than they should have done, but broadly did "OK". These countries - like France and the UK and much of the US - are mostly looking now to how they ease restrictions.

    (3) Did really well, and have contained the virus. Which is a very small number of countries, like South Korea and some of China.

    The UK is comfortably in the second group. We've done OK. We could have done better. But we've done OK.
    China, subject to an independent audit. That we will never get.
    Equally I'm not sure 3 is a good group to be in. 3 weeks to a month ago Japan was definitely in group 3, it definitely isn't in that group any more.
This discussion has been closed.