Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Undefined discussion subject.

SystemSystem Posts: 11,002
edited June 2020 in General
«13456

Comments

  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 32,739
    It's just a scratch...
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,225
    edited June 2020
    'Tis not so deep as a well nor so wide as a church-door,
    But 'tis enough, 'twill serve.'
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,225
    Nestacres said:
    Well then, everything's hunky dory.
  • coachcoach Posts: 250
    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    Nestacres said:
    Boris Johnson having declared the war is over, and the country open for business, what did you expect?
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,749
    All part of BJ and Dom's cunning plan. We lesser mortals may never be able to discern its fearful symmetry, but it's there for sure.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    edited June 2020
    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    That might be true, however the focus will be on the berk driving the country.
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 7,981

    'Tis not so deep as a well nor so wide as a church-door,
    But 'tis enough, 'twill serve.'

    "Our sting is oft not noted, but it is death ....." ;)
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,225
    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870
    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Maybe.

    The berk driving to a castle, thereby encouraging everyone else to break lockdown, thereby leading to a second peak... that might not be forgotten so easily.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 50,772
    With the greatest of respect to Mike the YouGov poll seems a complete answer to this thread. During this outrage, fury and incandescence there has been a 2% swing towards the government.

    Next.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,749
    Prof getting a bit huffy. Perhaps he should stick to public pronouncements on oncology.

    https://twitter.com/ProfKarolSikora/status/1267428899673300992?s=20
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    DavidL said:

    With the greatest of respect to Mike the YouGov poll seems a complete answer to this thread. During this outrage, fury and incandescence there has been a 2% swing towards the government.

    Next.

    Hmmm, time will tell.
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,225

    'Tis not so deep as a well nor so wide as a church-door,
    But 'tis enough, 'twill serve.'

    "Our sting is oft not noted, but it is death ....." ;)
    OK, you got me...The Iliad?
  • coachcoach Posts: 250

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    That might be true, however the focus will be on the berk driving the country.
    Correct, I read that some on here think Boris won't be around for long, hard to disagree.

    The next few years are going to be painful, I can't think of anybody that I would like to see in charge - do you have any suggestions?
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 14,912
    What's striking is that views on Cummings split much more in party grounds than on leave/remain. Johnson's appeal was meant to reach beyond traditional Tory voters, especially with the older working class demographic that voted Leave and helped the Tories win seats in the North of England and the Midlands in 2019. But support for Cummings seems to be limited to the Tory bunker. In the long run the Tory's opponents are better off with Cummings still inside the Tory tent, pissing all over its occupants.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 61,575
    Not yet available outside of the US, but this looks very interesting:

    https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1267419153822109696
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,009

    Prof getting a bit huffy. Perhaps he should stick to public pronouncements on oncology.

    https://twitter.com/ProfKarolSikora/status/1267428899673300992?s=20

    It is noticeable how often scientific mavericks are speaking outside their area of expertise. The one pronouncing on immunological "dark matter" is a neurologist who specialises in image analysis.
  • coachcoach Posts: 250

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830
    Meanwhile the Vine show on r2 this lunchtime features a fearless undercover investigation by a beeb reporter into - drum roll - ILLEGAL HAIRDRESSING. It is all getting a bit silly.
  • NorthstarNorthstar Posts: 140
    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    This is the piece that baffles me - there’s a vital debate about how on earth you cope equitably with the economic devastation on the horizon that the left seems mostly uninterested in...
  • BannedinnParisBannedinnParis Posts: 1,884

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    That might be true, however the focus will be on the berk driving the country.
    Corbyn's gone, m8.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    That might be true, however the focus will be on the berk driving the country.
    Corbyn's gone, m8.
    I am not sure I follow you?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 61,575
    edited June 2020

    Prof getting a bit huffy. Perhaps he should stick to public pronouncements on oncology.

    https://twitter.com/ProfKarolSikora/status/1267428899673300992?s=20

    Sikora has Imperial form...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karol_Sikora
    I can confirm that Karol Sikora is not on the staff at Imperial and does not hold the title of honorary professor of oncology. This individual has been warned before by the college for making claims that he is employed by us, or associated with us. His views are very certainly not the views of the college.

    — Prof Sir Roy Anderson, Rector of the Imperial College London
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,387
    I would be more concerned if the public did back Cummings, as that might mean they would copy his lax adherence to the guidelines (if not the law).
  • Beibheirli_CBeibheirli_C Posts: 7,981

    'Tis not so deep as a well nor so wide as a church-door,
    But 'tis enough, 'twill serve.'

    "Our sting is oft not noted, but it is death ....." ;)
    OK, you got me...The Iliad?
    I cannot remember to be honest. It is just there in the junk pile of facts and quotes that fill my head. "Dune" possibly? Bene Gesserit? Sadly I cannot go through my library at present so it is what it is ;)
  • coachcoach Posts: 250
    Northstar said:

    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    This is the piece that baffles me - there’s a vital debate about how on earth you cope equitably with the economic devastation on the horizon that the left seems mostly uninterested in...
    It really is incredible, they seem so intent on point scoring that they either can't or won't see the wood for the trees.

    I'm very interested to see how Starmer reacts, I see nothing in his history to suggest he has the foggiest idea. But when the furlough ends and millions finally realise they don't have jobs it is going to be carnage.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    coach said:

    Northstar said:

    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    This is the piece that baffles me - there’s a vital debate about how on earth you cope equitably with the economic devastation on the horizon that the left seems mostly uninterested in...
    It really is incredible, they seem so intent on point scoring that they either can't or won't see the wood for the trees.

    I'm very interested to see how Starmer reacts, I see nothing in his history to suggest he has the foggiest idea. But when the furlough ends and millions finally realise they don't have jobs it is going to be carnage.
    This is why incumbency is not an assett at the next election, unless of course miracles can be worked between now and then.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,669
    IshmaelZ said:

    Meanwhile the Vine show on r2 this lunchtime features a fearless undercover investigation by a beeb reporter into - drum roll - ILLEGAL HAIRDRESSING. It is all getting a bit silly.

    Raab's hair was surprisingly neat.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,009
    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    Take comfort from the deaths of all those dispensable old people, and think how much money the state will save when it doesn't have to pay them, care for them and give them medical care.

    Maybe that's why the stock markets are surging.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,165
    FPT:
    Pulpstar said:

    I'm not saying Antifa should or shouldn't be designated a terrorist org but that they shouldn't simply because of their name falls at the first hurdle, as the USA has designated the "party of God"* a terrorist organisation, so on that logic the USA is 'pro fascist' because Antifa are designated terrorists, Trump must also be 'against God'.

    * A literal translation

    Antifa, in my opinion, falls into the same bracket as Democratic People's Republic. Not very democratic, and not a lot of good for people.
  • coachcoach Posts: 250

    coach said:

    Northstar said:

    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    This is the piece that baffles me - there’s a vital debate about how on earth you cope equitably with the economic devastation on the horizon that the left seems mostly uninterested in...
    It really is incredible, they seem so intent on point scoring that they either can't or won't see the wood for the trees.

    I'm very interested to see how Starmer reacts, I see nothing in his history to suggest he has the foggiest idea. But when the furlough ends and millions finally realise they don't have jobs it is going to be carnage.
    This is why incumbency is not an assett at the next election, unless of course miracles can be worked between now and then.
    Oh Boris will be blamed, no doubt about that.

    But will Starmer offer a credible alternative?

    And there are no miracles to be worked btw, unless you can suggest what might trigger them.
  • NorthstarNorthstar Posts: 140
    coach said:

    Northstar said:

    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    This is the piece that baffles me - there’s a vital debate about how on earth you cope equitably with the economic devastation on the horizon that the left seems mostly uninterested in...
    It really is incredible, they seem so intent on point scoring that they either can't or won't see the wood for the trees.

    I'm very interested to see how Starmer reacts, I see nothing in his history to suggest he has the foggiest idea. But when the furlough ends and millions finally realise they don't have jobs it is going to be carnage.
    Yes, well worth watching Starmer on the economic response.

    There’s a massive space opening up off the back of both Brexit and Covid for a bigger state and massive economic intervention. It’s opening up quickly so a skilful opposition could influence how it develops as any good or popular idea pitched by Labour would be quickly implemented by the govt.

    This, and the implications stemming from it for taxes, public finance, and employment, are likely to be the terrain of the next election. So far Starmer has had nothing remotely interesting to say on it but perhaps he and Annalise Dodds are hard at work planning away...
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    In pure anecdote news was talking to my parents yesterday and they mentioned that the first people to get Coronavirus in their sleepy town of three thousand or so was two people who had shortly returned from Cheltenham Festival.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,712
    edited June 2020
    On voting intention though just a 1% swing from the Tories to Labour since GE19

    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1267414279147474944?s=20
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,712
    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    Chris said:

    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    Take comfort from the deaths of all those dispensable old people, and think how much money the state will save when it doesn't have to pay them, care for them and give them medical care.

    Maybe that's why the stock markets are surging.
    The roll call of 60,000 excess deaths in the UK is drowned out by the hoopla that the Conservatives remain 10 points ahead in the polls.

    Interesting prioritising.
  • brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    This year's GE is gonna be tight.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
    Well that is OK then.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,072
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
    You never fail to state the obvious. We can all read you know?
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,232
    Nigelb said:

    Prof getting a bit huffy. Perhaps he should stick to public pronouncements on oncology.

    https://twitter.com/ProfKarolSikora/status/1267428899673300992?s=20

    Sikora has Imperial form...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karol_Sikora
    I can confirm that Karol Sikora is not on the staff at Imperial and does not hold the title of honorary professor of oncology. This individual has been warned before by the college for making claims that he is employed by us, or associated with us. His views are very certainly not the views of the college.

    — Prof Sir Roy Anderson, Rector of the Imperial College London
    Wow. This guy always struck as the ultimate Panglossian and his tweets garnered significant publicity because of it. Is he actually for real or some kind of crank?
  • coachcoach Posts: 250
    So it seems that all the old folk that voted to Leave and for Boris have died of Covid. I'm off to Betfair to get a price on Labour winning in 2024 and us rejoining the EU by 2025.

  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    Nigelb said:

    Prof getting a bit huffy. Perhaps he should stick to public pronouncements on oncology.

    https://twitter.com/ProfKarolSikora/status/1267428899673300992?s=20

    Sikora has Imperial form...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karol_Sikora
    I can confirm that Karol Sikora is not on the staff at Imperial and does not hold the title of honorary professor of oncology. This individual has been warned before by the college for making claims that he is employed by us, or associated with us. His views are very certainly not the views of the college.

    — Prof Sir Roy Anderson, Rector of the Imperial College London
    Prof Sikora getting it in the neck for straying from the strict lockdown orthodoxy?

    welcome to my world.
  • novanova Posts: 525
    DavidL said:

    With the greatest of respect to Mike the YouGov poll seems a complete answer to this thread. During this outrage, fury and incandescence there has been a 2% swing towards the government.

    Next.

    Hmmm.

    Compared to polls before the Cummings saga started, the swing is 2% to Labour - and that's if the YouGov poll is correct and all the other polls follow.

    Ultimately it's pointless to even think about minor changes so far from an election. What will worry the Tories is that they had leads in the mid 20s before Starmer took over, and now we've seen that drop to approx 5% in a few polls. Even 10% is a big drop.

    People might have forgotten Cummings in 4 years, but given that we're facing an economic disaster as things unwind, and we're sailing closer to the wind in terms of a second peak than most of our neighbours, Boris would clearly prefer to still have that large buffer.

    There will be many ups and downs between now and 2024, but the "honeymoon Tories" have already lost faith, and it's going to take a lot to gain that back.

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,712
    coach said:

    So it seems that all the old folk that voted to Leave and for Boris have died of Covid. I'm off to Betfair to get a price on Labour winning in 2024 and us rejoining the EU by 2025.

    Hardly, the Tories voteshare up 1% on GE19 to 45%
    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1267414279147474944?s=20
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.
  • FishingFishing Posts: 4,555
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
    I think I might try and run a regression between these numbers and the number of CV deaths per million population or something. See if there's any relationship.
  • Fysics_TeacherFysics_Teacher Posts: 6,060
    Nigelb said:
    Worse than the civil war? I don’t think so.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 50,772

    DavidL said:

    With the greatest of respect to Mike the YouGov poll seems a complete answer to this thread. During this outrage, fury and incandescence there has been a 2% swing towards the government.

    Next.

    Hmmm, time will tell.
    I suspect not. We are already post Cummings and any effect is going to fade away. Let's face it there is plenty in the government's performance in recent weeks to get cross about without him.
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    Chris said:

    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    Take comfort from the deaths of all those dispensable old people, and think how much money the state will save when it doesn't have to pay them, care for them and give them medical care.

    Maybe that's why the stock markets are surging.</blockquote

    We can all tug at the emotional heartstrings.

    I mean look at you, denying millions of disadvantaged and not in danger children their human right of an education
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    HYUFD said:

    coach said:

    So it seems that all the old folk that voted to Leave and for Boris have died of Covid. I'm off to Betfair to get a price on Labour winning in 2024 and us rejoining the EU by 2025.

    Hardly, the Tories voteshare up 1% on GE19 to 45%
    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1267414279147474944?s=20
    Irony? It's a bit like Coppery or Aluminiumy right?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,712
    Fishing said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
    I think I might try and run a regression between these numbers and the number of CV deaths per million population or something. See if there's any relationship.
    Spain has more deaths per million than the UK, the US more deaths overall
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 43,625
    edited June 2020
    NHS England numbers out - 108

    Lowest first day, Monday or not, in quite a while - 13

    image
    imageimage
    image
    image
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    With the greatest of respect to Mike the YouGov poll seems a complete answer to this thread. During this outrage, fury and incandescence there has been a 2% swing towards the government.

    Next.

    Hmmm, time will tell.
    I suspect not. We are already post Cummings and any effect is going to fade away. Let's face it there is plenty in the government's performance in recent weeks to get cross about without him.
    I still stand by the notion that time will tell. The government has to manage a whole heap of trouble coming down the track. If it shakes down in their favour, happy days. If it does not, Cummings, PPE, testing and a whole raft of other potential negatives will bite them hard.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,749
    HYUFD said:

    coach said:

    So it seems that all the old folk that voted to Leave and for Boris have died of Covid. I'm off to Betfair to get a price on Labour winning in 2024 and us rejoining the EU by 2025.

    Hardly, the Tories voteshare up 1% on GE19 to 45%
    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1267414279147474944?s=20
    How's the 2021 Unionist majority going?
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,704
    HYUFD said:
    You should watch the Epstein documentary series on Netflix. very shocking.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 23,929
    Dominic Cummings is still here so those bets have been settled.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.
    Were such an election to occur, I doubt that the Tories would end up more than 5% ahead - a Hung Parliament pretty likely.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,387

    Nigelb said:
    Worse than the civil war? I don’t think so.
    Presumably that isn't "modern"!!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,712

    HYUFD said:

    coach said:

    So it seems that all the old folk that voted to Leave and for Boris have died of Covid. I'm off to Betfair to get a price on Labour winning in 2024 and us rejoining the EU by 2025.

    Hardly, the Tories voteshare up 1% on GE19 to 45%
    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1267414279147474944?s=20
    How's the 2021 Unionist majority going?
    Better than the chances of a Labour victory at the moment
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,749

    HYUFD said:
    You should watch the Epstein documentary series on Netflix. very shocking.
    Well I knew he had a major crush on John Lennon but..
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 14,772
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
    "At least we're not as bad as the US."

    Can any one single phrase sum up the times we live in as well as that? Both the poverty of ambition in defending a position that is remarkably poor, and the degree to which the US has fallen from a position of leadership to one of derision and contempt.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,712
    justin124 said:

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.
    Were such an election to occur, I doubt that the Tories would end up more than 5% ahead - a Hung Parliament pretty likely.
    Unless 41 Tory MPs died this year and the opposition won every by election, there is zero chance of an election this year with an 80 seat Tory majority
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
    You never fail to state the obvious. We can all read you know?
    Oddly enough the Spanish media don’t agree. They reckon the figures are 58.04 UK and 57.95 Spain. Not sure where they get their numbers from but it’s all a bit silly having a pissing competition over this.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,072
    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.
    Were such an election to occur, I doubt that the Tories would end up more than 5% ahead - a Hung Parliament pretty likely.
    Unless 41 Tory MPs died this year and the opposition won every by election, there is zero chance of an election this year with an 80 seat Tory majority
    Nothing is ever a “zero chance”.
  • Fysics_TeacherFysics_Teacher Posts: 6,060
    edited June 2020

    Nigelb said:
    Worse than the civil war? I don’t think so.
    Presumably that isn't "modern"!!
    All American history (as in history of the USA) is modern.

    Edit: “in” not “is”
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    justin124 said:

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.
    Were such an election to occur, I doubt that the Tories would end up more than 5% ahead - a Hung Parliament pretty likely.
    If such an election were to occur, the Tory party would have imploded was my point.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 24,587
    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.
    Were such an election to occur, I doubt that the Tories would end up more than 5% ahead - a Hung Parliament pretty likely.
    Unless 41 Tory MPs died this year and the opposition won every by election, there is zero chance of an election this year with an 80 seat Tory majority
    If Boris has opened too early and a second wave sweeps out of control, who knows? Let's hope not nonetheless.
  • BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    HYUFD said:

    coach said:

    So it seems that all the old folk that voted to Leave and for Boris have died of Covid. I'm off to Betfair to get a price on Labour winning in 2024 and us rejoining the EU by 2025.

    Hardly, the Tories voteshare up 1% on GE19 to 45%
    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1267414279147474944?s=20
    That poll is already suggesting Boris made the right decision. Some critics misjudged how much folk cared about Cummings and how it would affect future voting. Sure it was the only story in the news but people were getting ludicrously carried away. Less than a week ago Stark Dawning claimed it was the biggest news story of the last 100 years!!!
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 50,772

    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    With the greatest of respect to Mike the YouGov poll seems a complete answer to this thread. During this outrage, fury and incandescence there has been a 2% swing towards the government.

    Next.

    Hmmm, time will tell.
    I suspect not. We are already post Cummings and any effect is going to fade away. Let's face it there is plenty in the government's performance in recent weeks to get cross about without him.
    I still stand by the notion that time will tell. The government has to manage a whole heap of trouble coming down the track. If it shakes down in their favour, happy days. If it does not, Cummings, PPE, testing and a whole raft of other potential negatives will bite them hard.
    No, the success or failure of the Tories will be determined by how they address those challenges which are immense and might overwhelm any government. Indeed, I would say the probability of being overwhelmed is high, certainly above evens.

    All this episode has shown, once again, is how wide the gap is between the media, especially social media, and the country at large.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,328
    Andrew said:
    Is this really new, or is it just the same one that has been going for about a year now and which can't be stamped out in the usual way (Congo is pretty darned good at this stuff) because there is a civil war going on and they are killing the health workers
  • Fysics_TeacherFysics_Teacher Posts: 6,060

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.
    Were such an election to occur, I doubt that the Tories would end up more than 5% ahead - a Hung Parliament pretty likely.
    Unless 41 Tory MPs died this year and the opposition won every by election, there is zero chance of an election this year with an 80 seat Tory majority
    Nothing is ever a “zero chance”.
    If you throw a dart at a dart board your chances of hitting any individual point is zero.

    Zero chances do happen, in fact they happen all the time.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,072
    edited June 2020
    Off topic: does anyone know where I would buy gravel like the following pic? I’ve been to 4 garden centres today and nobody has a clue. Probably caught COVID in the process.


  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    The fact that after 10 days of the biggest smear job and witch-hunt in British history the Tories still lead by 10 points with YouGov tells you all need to know - the public are not stupid!
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 14,912

    Nigelb said:
    Worse than the civil war? I don’t think so.
    Presumably that isn't "modern"!!
    Also, at least the right side won the Civil War. No idea where the current nightmare is going to end up.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,328
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse

    Do these numbers mean anything in isolation? What is the baseline for approval of government actions in general?

    I think what this shows more than anything is which societies trust their governments in general.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,084
    HYUFD said:

    Fishing said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
    I think I might try and run a regression between these numbers and the number of CV deaths per million population or something. See if there's any relationship.
    Spain has more deaths per million than the UK, the US more deaths overall
    Why do you cling uselessly to stats such as that? Anyone who can project trends just a few days forward can see that soon the UK will be worse than even Spain.
  • TimTTimT Posts: 6,328

    Off topic: does anyone know where I would buy gravel like the following pic? I’ve been to 4 garden centres today and nobody has a clue. Probably caught COVID in the process.


    I know exactly where I'd go, but it is just outside of Washington DC. Probably not too helpful for you.
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 13,225
    edited June 2020
    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    Well I suppose it might be relevant to the number of people that die of C19 and the health and safety of the public generally but compared to who wins the next election, maybe not so important.
    Really? The majority of people that have died are pretty old, a bloke driving north did very little to contribute to that and by 2024 he'll be long gone.

    I'm genuinely surprised that so many people are oblivious to what we're about to encounter economy wise
    Oi, wotchit! I'm 71 myself and a bit touchy about such casual indifference to the 'pretty old'.

    As for that 'bloke driving north', he singlehandedly undermined the Government's long, hard and quite successful campaign. We can never be certain how many casualties he personally may be responsible for, but he sure didn't help.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,084
    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    That might be true, however the focus will be on the berk driving the country.
    Correct, I read that some on here think Boris won't be around for long, hard to disagree.

    The next few years are going to be painful, I can't think of anybody that I would like to see in charge - do you have any suggestions?
    It is to the Tory party’s shame that Hunt was always the better choice.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,274
    edited June 2020
    Doctors in Italy claim the coronavirus has weakened and become a shadow of the disease that rapidly spread around the world.

    Italian medics say the infection - which has killed 370,000 worldwide - is much less lethal than it was and 'no longer clinically exists'.

    Patients are showing much smaller amounts of the virus in their system, compared to samples taken during the peak of the crisis in March and April, they said.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8376105/Is-Covid-19-really-potent.html

    Or could it be the better weather, more UV light?
  • ClippPClippP Posts: 1,667
    DavidL said:

    With the greatest of respect to Mike the YouGov poll seems a complete answer to this thread. During this outrage, fury and incandescence there has been a 2% swing towards the government.
    Next.

    Of course. This particular piece of bad news was craftily buried beneath prime ministerial assurances that the pandemic was over, lockdown was finished with, and we can all do whatever we like.

    Perhaps David L would like to come back when the death rate goes up again and the mood changes once more.

    Any credibility the Conservatives once had is now irretrievably lost to them.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,047

    Off topic: does anyone know where I would buy gravel like the following pic? I’ve been to 4 garden centres today and nobody has a clue. Probably caught COVID in the process.


    As you've only got 3 bits, could you just chuck it and get a non matching style?
  • novanova Posts: 525

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.

    This year's GE is gonna be tight.

    If there is a GE this year, something so catastrophic will have happened, that I don't think it will be tight at all.
    Were such an election to occur, I doubt that the Tories would end up more than 5% ahead - a Hung Parliament pretty likely.
    Unless 41 Tory MPs died this year and the opposition won every by election, there is zero chance of an election this year with an 80 seat Tory majority
    Nothing is ever a “zero chance”.
    Sure - but come on!?

    I mean, perhaps if there was some crazy virus around, and they were all forced to sit squashed up in one room together...
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,047

    Nigelb said:
    Worse than the civil war? I don’t think so.
    Presumably that isn't "modern"!!
    Also, at least the right side won the Civil War. No idea where the current nightmare is going to end up.
    Cromwell fan eh?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Ask a silly question, get a silly answer.

    The public don't care about this anymore. It's a joke now.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,749
    edited June 2020

    The fact that after 10 days of the biggest smear job and witch-hunt in British history the Tories still lead by 10 points with YouGov tells you all need to know - the public are not stupid!

    I know it's not the same as hacks saying mildly disagreeable things about you, but I imagine that the several hundred folk burned or drowned or hanged after being accused of being witches might disagree on the biggest smear job and witch-hunt in British history thing.
    #hyperbolistsrus
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 48,922
    Is Officer Chauvin "Radical Right"?
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    IanB2 said:

    coach said:

    coach said:

    Is this relevant to anything? Cummings is clearly unpopular (no surprise) but I can't see it has any bearing whatsoever on the next general election.

    That will be fought almost exclusively on what's left of the economy and a berk driving to a castle will be forgotten by 99% of voters

    That might be true, however the focus will be on the berk driving the country.
    Correct, I read that some on here think Boris won't be around for long, hard to disagree.

    The next few years are going to be painful, I can't think of anybody that I would like to see in charge - do you have any suggestions?
    It is to the Tory party’s shame that Hunt was always the better choice.
    Not in the circumstances. Hunt was a far worse choice.

    You really think Hunt would have got a better (from our perspective) deal like Boris got?

    You really think Hunt would have got an 80 seat majority.

    Hunt isn't bad, certainly better than May but the time was not right for Hunt. And if Hunt had been elected then you'd have been saying how bad he is.
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,232
    Brom said:

    HYUFD said:

    coach said:

    So it seems that all the old folk that voted to Leave and for Boris have died of Covid. I'm off to Betfair to get a price on Labour winning in 2024 and us rejoining the EU by 2025.

    Hardly, the Tories voteshare up 1% on GE19 to 45%
    https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1267414279147474944?s=20
    That poll is already suggesting Boris made the right decision. Some critics misjudged how much folk cared about Cummings and how it would affect future voting. Sure it was the only story in the news but people were getting ludicrously carried away. Less than a week ago Stark Dawning claimed it was the biggest news story of the last 100 years!!!
    I think I said it was the biggest political story of the last hundred years. Literally everyone in the country has been impacted by Covid-19 to a highly significant degree. Cummings's antics are relevant to everyone in a way that the behaviour of politicians never are.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,084

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    The US, Spanish, Mexican and French governments though still rated worse
    "At least we're not as bad as the US."

    Can any one single phrase sum up the times we live in as well as that? Both the poverty of ambition in defending a position that is remarkably poor, and the degree to which the US has fallen from a position of leadership to one of derision and contempt.
    https://unherd.com/2020/06/covid-has-exposed-america-as-a-failed-state/?tl_inbound=1&amp;tl_groups[0]=18743&amp;tl_period_type=3
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 50,772
    ClippP said:

    DavidL said:

    With the greatest of respect to Mike the YouGov poll seems a complete answer to this thread. During this outrage, fury and incandescence there has been a 2% swing towards the government.
    Next.

    Of course. This particular piece of bad news was craftily buried beneath prime ministerial assurances that the pandemic was over, lockdown was finished with, and we can all do whatever we like.

    Perhaps David L would like to come back when the death rate goes up again and the mood changes once more.

    Any credibility the Conservatives once had is now irretrievably lost to them.
    I have been extremely critical of the government's approach to the relaxation of the lockdown and the chances we are now taking. But the irrational frothing about Cummings had very little to do with that.
This discussion has been closed.