Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The voters’ misconceptions could win this for Leave

1246

Comments

  • Options
    hunchmanhunchman Posts: 2,591
    JohnO said:

    RobD said:

    felix said:

    Scott_P said:

    @KateEMcCann: Mahmood said he was offended by "racist" Leave announcements on Turkey and "disappointed" by Boris comments on Obama https://t.co/bdcE38UEtS

    Oh dear - it's gonna be a rough night on here CCCOOONNSSSPPPIIIRRRAAACCCYYYYYYYY!!
    Remain are going to win this referendum by 80% to Leave's 20%

    Remain are so professional with their campaign and sleeper agents.

    With MI7 on their side, Dave can put his feet up for the next fortnight.
    As a fellow PB Tory, I take it you've seen the arranged vote tallies? Bet accordingly :)
    I have a hunch-man that the votes are all being 'counted' in Finchley Road.
    DYOR before making such stupid comments! You've never looked at companies house or any official documents relating to there have you? I rest my case.
  • Options
    TCPoliticalBettingTCPoliticalBetting Posts: 10,819
    edited June 2016
    RobD said:

    Sandpit said:

    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    @thequentinletts: Heard an intriguing rumour last night about Out/In percentages in early postal-vote returns.

    @thequentinletts: Further rumours reach me of postal vote early returns. They may explain the recent acceleration in activity by Downing St.

    Bordering on illegal there!
    He can get away with it as long as he's not posting actual vote numbers.

    One can well believe that a lot of Leave voters voted early, their minds already made up.
    It has to be bull. As I understand it the votes are just opened and verified at this time. They will not actually be counted until the night and that will be done at more than 300 counts around the country. I see absolutely no way on earth he could have any idea about what the postal votes are showing nationally.
    Isn't it that only the outer envelope is opened before polling day? He may be talking about number of votes rather than which way they have voted?
    Is this two envelope the same system everywhere and do they only open the A envelopes at the count?
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    edited June 2016
    HYUFD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Scott_P said:

    @thequentinletts: Heard an intriguing rumour last night about Out/In percentages in early postal-vote returns.

    @thequentinletts: Further rumours reach me of postal vote early returns. They may explain the recent acceleration in activity by Downing St.

    One would expect postal vote returns to be more "Remain" based on the fact ABs use them the most, however they tend also to be used by older people which may cancel it out.

    "Remain" is f*cked if it is behind on the postal count.
    The elderly get postal votes in the earliest so they should favour Leave for now

    Don't most postal votes get sent back the day they are received so they don't get forgotten?

    Even so some postal votes never get returned - 25% from memory at the last general election.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2016
    Sandpit said:

    kle4 said:

    Unconnected to anything else, anyone know what VPNs are worth using?

    Most of the good ones have stopped working recently, as far as content geoblocking (BBC, Netflix) goes.

    The "content industry" doesn't understand that if you treat your legitimate customers like that then most of them find "other" ways to watch what they want.

    The best VPN is one that's incoming to your house or office in the UK, easy to set up with a half decent router.
    Netflix have apparently got even more aggressive in the past few days, stopping to ipv6 tunnelling services. Obviously their hands are being forced by the content owners, who are total muppets.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,189
    Has Theresa Villiers had a bit of a makeover?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285

    Financial illiteracy from a BBC political reporter. Norman Smith on R4 PM 5 mins ago.
    "Qn: What will the EU do if we LEAVE and end our payments?
    Ans: I dont think it will make much difference as they will be too distracted with all the other issues.."

    A £10 billion black hole in their funding is not much?

    Send him to Wigan pier....
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040
    Leave moving back in quite strongly on Betfair - is this poll related?
  • Options
    weejonnie said:

    Looks like leave coming back in a tad on betfair.

    Rather more than a tad I would say -

    At midday LEAVE were 4.5 to back on the Betfair exchange, right now they are 3.9, that's a huge movement in just a few hours ...... I reckon that either OGH has been back in the market backing them, or there's a mighty favourable poll for them due out any time soon.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Mr. Mark, it's the heroism of Satan in Paradise Lost. Or Constantine Dragases at the fall of Byzantium. Or Leonidas at Thermopylae.

    "They say Remain has so much propaganda it will blot out the sun."

    "Then we shall campaign in the shade."

    :p

    :lol:
  • Options
    rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    kle4 said:

    Unconnected to anything else, anyone know what VPNs are worth using?

    Depends what you want it for. How concerned you are about logging. If you want continued iplayer access. How cost sensitive you are.
    For Iplayer access I use Media Hint which is 39.99 decadent American dollars a month.
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,203

    Just listened to Sarah Wollaston on LBC. My goodness, she waffled for England. I'm not convinced and feel this story will unravel as time goes on.

    I think the bigger story is Major and Blair stirring up the Northern Ireland troubles. What an insult to the Irish people after all they have been through for all those years.

    Is false indignation some sort of catnip to the right?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2016
    rpjs said:

    kle4 said:

    Unconnected to anything else, anyone know what VPNs are worth using?

    Depends what you want it for. How concerned you are about logging. If you want continued iplayer access. How cost sensitive you are.
    For Iplayer access I use Media Hint which is 39.99 decadent American dollars a month.
    That is way too much for a general VPN! You can get good vpns for a 1/10 of the price that iplayer still works with.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,859

    Sandpit said:

    kle4 said:

    Unconnected to anything else, anyone know what VPNs are worth using?

    Most of the good ones have stopped working recently, as far as content geoblocking (BBC, Netflix) goes.

    The "content industry" doesn't understand that if you treat your legitimate customers like that then most of them find "other" ways to watch what they want.

    The best VPN is one that's incoming to your house or office in the UK, easy to set up with a half decent router.
    Netflix have apparently got even more aggressive in the past few days, stopping to ipv6 tunnelling services. Obviously their hands are being forced by the content owners, who are total muppets.
    Yeah I saw that the other day. Nothing like alienating your paying customers. Did the movie industry not learn anything from the music industry and Napster way back in the '90s?
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    RobD said:

    TGOHF said:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/09/look-out-boris-johnson--downing-streets-assassins-are-out-to-get/

    "It’s quite plausible: the next Prime Minister will be chosen by Tory party members and they’ll probably back Brexit by a margin of two-to-one.

    They’re unlikely to forget being told by George Osborne that they are “economically illiterate” or that they are saboteurs who seek to “place a bomb” under their country.

    It’s hard to see the Chancellor, or anyone else, beating Boris in a leadership election. But if Remain wins, there may be enough time to stop Boris getting to the starting line."

    Will Boris get the votes required to put him to the membership?
    Depends how he does tonight and on 21st.
  • Options
    JamesMJamesM Posts: 221
    Hi all. I am a Leave supporter and thought Sarah Wollaston's comments were tricky for the Leave campaign, albeit I don't agree with her. That said, it hardly got a mention on the 6 o'clock news and we must remember most voters aren't sat on politicalbetting.com reading about the referendum all day.

    My thought about Major and Blair heading to NI is that Major's comments on the news about Scotland is potentially creating a real hostage to fortune for the UK government in the future. The line from the UK government has been there is no case for a second referendum, yet Major said that if there is popular demand for one a government couldn't refuse. I know he means post-Brexit, but the principle is set potentially. Isn't that actually destabilising to the UK too!!
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,859
    Well done Jonny Bairstow, gets his name on the board in the Long Room. A good day's batting from England.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,803
    murali_s said:

    Leave moving back in quite strongly on Betfair - is this poll related?

    Even if there were no shift in the polls, Leave's odds are too long. Remain's probability of winning should be 55-60%.

  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Harry Cole ‏@MrHarryCole

    Agent Corbyn strikes again! Has slammed "utterly exaggerated claims" on both sides for "drowning out" the messages.

    Harry Cole ‏@MrHarryCole
    On "utterly exaggerated" EU claims, Corbyn said: "I don't join in with that." On Monday he said paid holiday would be abolished after Brexit
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
  • Options
    LadyBucket said:I think the bigger story is Major and Blair stirring up the Northern Ireland troubles. What an insult to the Irish people after all they have been through for all those years.

    I hope that this does not create some unfortunate incidents in Northern Ireland as we move into the marching season. English politicians need to be very careful about unforeseen consequences of inflammatory language.
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506

    Financial illiteracy from a BBC political reporter. Norman Smith on R4 PM 5 mins ago.
    "Qn: What will the EU do if we LEAVE and end our payments?
    Ans: I dont think it will make much difference as they will be too distracted with all the other issues.."

    A £10 billion black hole in their funding is not much?

    Perhaps BBC bias rather than financial illiteracy?
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,203

    RobD said:

    Sandpit said:

    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    @thequentinletts: Heard an intriguing rumour last night about Out/In percentages in early postal-vote returns.

    @thequentinletts: Further rumours reach me of postal vote early returns. They may explain the recent acceleration in activity by Downing St.

    Bordering on illegal there!
    He can get away with it as long as he's not posting actual vote numbers.

    One can well believe that a lot of Leave voters voted early, their minds already made up.
    It has to be bull. As I understand it the votes are just opened and verified at this time. They will not actually be counted until the night and that will be done at more than 300 counts around the country. I see absolutely no way on earth he could have any idea about what the postal votes are showing nationally.
    Isn't it that only the outer envelope is opened before polling day? He may be talking about number of votes rather than which way they have voted?
    Is this two envelope the same system everywhere and do they only open the A envelopes at the count?
    It was certainly my understanding that they don't open the vote envelope until the day. In Shropshire you had to fold the vote so they could read your validation code through the window. Every election these days people claim to have inside knowledge of the early postsl voting but afaiu it's bullshit.
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341
    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    RobD said:

    What did he say?

    Women could be at risk of mass sex attacks carried out by gangs of migrant men if Britain stays in the EU, Nigel Farage has warned.
    Unsavoury as it may be, is that true or not, especially given events in Germany?
    No. The attackers are not EU citizens.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    edited June 2016
    Sandpit said:

    Sandpit said:

    kle4 said:

    Unconnected to anything else, anyone know what VPNs are worth using?

    Most of the good ones have stopped working recently, as far as content geoblocking (BBC, Netflix) goes.

    The "content industry" doesn't understand that if you treat your legitimate customers like that then most of them find "other" ways to watch what they want.

    The best VPN is one that's incoming to your house or office in the UK, easy to set up with a half decent router.
    Netflix have apparently got even more aggressive in the past few days, stopping to ipv6 tunnelling services. Obviously their hands are being forced by the content owners, who are total muppets.
    Yeah I saw that the other day. Nothing like alienating your paying customers. Did the movie industry not learn anything from the music industry and Napster way back in the '90s?
    I know it is like that never happened. Also has nobody showed them (insert something I won't mention) which is like Netflix on steroids*. The only.way to beat free is to make it great, make it idiot proof, make it cheap, make it work everywhere.

    * of course the content creators know about this but just sticking head in the sand.
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341

    VoteLeave must be absolutely incandescent with rage at Nigel Farage. They had a good week last week, with immigration and a "points based" system and one inappropriate comment from Farage has completely changed the debate.

    Utter rubbish. Vote Leave and their utterly sh*t campaign (sorry Plato, but it is) have only themselves to blame. It was utterly stupid to imagine that they could sweep Nigel under the carpet, and that the other kids would play nice with them if they did. Instead, they should have done everything in their power to integrate him into their campaign, so everyone could at least have attempted to sing from the same hymn sheet. They were always going to lump him in with the Leave campaign regardless of official status.
    "Too many campaigners have failed to integrate into Vote Leave and speak the Vote Leave message..."
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,983

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    It's not First Past the Post though. Every vote counts.

    So getting NI and Scotland REMAINs up from 55% to 60% is worthwhile.
    Exactly, if Remain rack up large majorities in London, Scotland and NI they will scrape home even if Leave win the South, the Midlands and the North but do so bú a smaller margin
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,803

    RobD said:

    Sandpit said:

    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    @thequentinletts: Heard an intriguing rumour last night about Out/In percentages in early postal-vote returns.

    @thequentinletts: Further rumours reach me of postal vote early returns. They may explain the recent acceleration in activity by Downing St.

    Bordering on illegal there!
    He can get away with it as long as he's not posting actual vote numbers.

    One can well believe that a lot of Leave voters voted early, their minds already made up.
    It has to be bull. As I understand it the votes are just opened and verified at this time. They will not actually be counted until the night and that will be done at more than 300 counts around the country. I see absolutely no way on earth he could have any idea about what the postal votes are showing nationally.
    Isn't it that only the outer envelope is opened before polling day? He may be talking about number of votes rather than which way they have voted?
    I agree but the intimation was that the early postal returns had either panicked or encouraged No 10. Not sure how he could reach that conclusion based solely on how many had been returned.
    in the past, agents could get a good idea how postal votes were going by watching them being opened. I think these days, only the outer envelope is opened.

    Now, it may be that unusually high levels of postal votes are coming in from areas expected to vote Leave, which may be causing concern in No. 10.

    But, that's only speculation.
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071

    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    RobD said:

    What did he say?

    Women could be at risk of mass sex attacks carried out by gangs of migrant men if Britain stays in the EU, Nigel Farage has warned.
    Unsavoury as it may be, is that true or not, especially given events in Germany?
    No. The attackers are not EU citizens.
    Yet
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,203
    JamesM said:

    Hi all. I am a Leave supporter and thought Sarah Wollaston's comments were tricky for the Leave campaign, albeit I don't agree with her. That said, it hardly got a mention on the 6 o'clock news and we must remember most voters aren't sat on politicalbetting.com reading about the referendum all day.

    My thought about Major and Blair heading to NI is that Major's comments on the news about Scotland is potentially creating a real hostage to fortune for the UK government in the future. The line from the UK government has been there is no case for a second referendum, yet Major said that if there is popular demand for one a government couldn't refuse. I know he means post-Brexit, but the principle is set potentially. Isn't that actually destabilising to the UK too!!

    It's difficult to see that a vote for leave isn't a vote for the break up of the UK. Unless Scotland also votes for leave which seems unlikely. Wee Nicky has every right to hold a referendum and declare UDI as far as I can see.
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506

    RobD said:

    Scott_P said:

    RobD said:

    What did he say?

    Women could be at risk of mass sex attacks carried out by gangs of migrant men if Britain stays in the EU, Nigel Farage has warned.
    Unsavoury as it may be, is that true or not, especially given events in Germany?
    No. The attackers are not EU citizens.
    Not EU citizens yet.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    It's not First Past the Post though. Every vote counts.

    So getting NI and Scotland REMAINs up from 55% to 60% is worthwhile.
    Actually, it's still FPTP it's just there are only two horses in the race.

    The evidence at the moment suggests Remain are trying to motivate their base to vote. That may change but spending money on wall to wall digital advertising at Canary Wharf is money than cannot be spent elsewhere.
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071

    JamesM said:

    Hi all. I am a Leave supporter and thought Sarah Wollaston's comments were tricky for the Leave campaign, albeit I don't agree with her. That said, it hardly got a mention on the 6 o'clock news and we must remember most voters aren't sat on politicalbetting.com reading about the referendum all day.

    My thought about Major and Blair heading to NI is that Major's comments on the news about Scotland is potentially creating a real hostage to fortune for the UK government in the future. The line from the UK government has been there is no case for a second referendum, yet Major said that if there is popular demand for one a government couldn't refuse. I know he means post-Brexit, but the principle is set potentially. Isn't that actually destabilising to the UK too!!

    It's difficult to see that a vote for leave isn't a vote for the break up of the UK. Unless Scotland also votes for leave which seems unlikely. Wee Nicky has every right to hold a referendum and declare UDI as far as I can see.
    Double win!
  • Options
    It would be funny if the UK voted for remain and Scotland for leave.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,975
    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,983
    edited June 2016

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    Mr. Llama, if the rumours are true and Skyrim gets remastered for the PS4, with mod support, I might get it. If so, the Survival mode style mod could be of interest.

    Have you played Fallout 4 on Survival mode yet? I was pissed off with Curie the other day. I expertly infiltrated a well-defended base, then she wandered off and got in a firefight, which led to my death.

    Mr. Evershed, that's a good point.

    Mr. Dancer, Skyrim with a survival mod produces a totally different game, add in more realistic weight carrying and money actually having weight and the game is transformed. Strategies and tactics that used to work just no longer do so; More forward thinking is required and the game slows down a lot.

    It is no surprise that the game boxes such as PS4 are, belatedly, coming to understand and implement this, personalised, aspect of gaming. I have also no doubt that they will try and control and monetize it rather than allow the free for all one gets with PC Gaming. They will, in short, bugger it up for their customers.

    Perhaps this is a metaphor for real life, game box players want safety, and the illusion of freedom (they are remainers). PC gamers are happy to accept the greater risks and greater benefits of a free world (they are leavers).

    Anyway, I have still to touch FallOut4. One of my chums was much into it and I have watched him play, but it has never grabbed me. I think because I just could not see enough differnece between it and FallOut 3 and New Vegas. Certainly not enough to make we want to get out of my Sidney Cam special (aka Hawker Hurricane) and leave the multiplayer aerial battles over Kent anyway.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,803

    JamesM said:

    Hi all. I am a Leave supporter and thought Sarah Wollaston's comments were tricky for the Leave campaign, albeit I don't agree with her. That said, it hardly got a mention on the 6 o'clock news and we must remember most voters aren't sat on politicalbetting.com reading about the referendum all day.

    My thought about Major and Blair heading to NI is that Major's comments on the news about Scotland is potentially creating a real hostage to fortune for the UK government in the future. The line from the UK government has been there is no case for a second referendum, yet Major said that if there is popular demand for one a government couldn't refuse. I know he means post-Brexit, but the principle is set potentially. Isn't that actually destabilising to the UK too!!

    It's difficult to see that a vote for leave isn't a vote for the break up of the UK. Unless Scotland also votes for leave which seems unlikely. Wee Nicky has every right to hold a referendum and declare UDI as far as I can see.
    Polling suggests that the outcome of such a Referendum would be much the same as in 2014,
  • Options
    I see the John and Tony act is leading the BBC etc with something about sarah and nothing about this obscure Laboru MP.

    In the end though I can't see many people being swayed by BBC etc stories like this who are not probably going to vote remain anyway.

    Large amounts of adverts in Canary Wharf ditto. The only thing it might do is get a few people to actually bother to turn up.

    Meanwhile has anyone got any figures on how many people who have registered in recent times are already on the register. I gather 75% of people who registered between Christmas 2014 and election day were already on the register.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    Osborne up to his tricks again..

    Vote Leave Media‏ @Vote_LeaveMedia
    Report from inside No11 bunker: GO to leak HMT preparations for dealing with 'financial panic' in order to spark ... financial panic. Genius
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,859
    Stumps, day 1 at Lords. England 279/6.

    Betfair back prices Eng 1.5, SL 13, Draw 3.9.

    Possibly some showers coming over the weekend so not too much laying the draw if you're that way inclined.
    http://www.metcheck.com/UK/today.asp?zipcode=London City&locationID=57205&lat=51.5&lon=-0.1&findtype=
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,936

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    It's not First Past the Post though. Every vote counts.

    So getting NI and Scotland REMAINs up from 55% to 60% is worthwhile.
    Actually, it's still FPTP it's just there are only two horses in the race.

    The evidence at the moment suggests Remain are trying to motivate their base to vote. That may change but spending money on wall to wall digital advertising at Canary Wharf is money than cannot be spent elsewhere.
    Indeed. So have some faith in the Leave strategy. It is the one rattling, not being rattled.

    :-)
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,910

    weejonnie said:

    Looks like leave coming back in a tad on betfair.

    Rather more than a tad I would say -

    At midday LEAVE were 4.5 to back on the Betfair exchange, right now they are 3.9, that's a huge movement in just a few hours ...... I reckon that either OGH has been back in the market backing them, or there's a mighty favourable poll for them due out any time soon.
    If you could predict and back/lay all these moves you'd be a very rich man - but there is no guarantee the market will move your way at any point in time so you just have to do what you "think" is fair value.

    My sole bet here is "leave" £10 at 4.0, which seems more than fair to me.
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,203

    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.

    Do you seriously think Sindy wouldn't go through at the second iteration? I would expect Scottish Labour and SLD to join SNP in campaigning for Sindy in that circumstance and I could see it going through 60-40.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,975
    Mr. Royale, sounds very Osborne.

    Mr. Llama, I'm a console player and likely Leave voter. Your analogy is wrong.

    I haven't played New Vegas, but Fallout 4 is a lot better than Fallout 3. Up to you, of course, but I rather like it, especially on Survival mode.
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    I wonder how much the Farage line is because Labour's strong lead among ethnic minority voters show little or no sign of standing up for Remain?

    It was mentioned by Lord Hayward yesterday and Cameron was made to look a completely out of touch fool in the TV debate by Harry Boparai.

  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,983

    HYUFD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Scott_P said:

    @thequentinletts: Heard an intriguing rumour last night about Out/In percentages in early postal-vote returns.

    @thequentinletts: Further rumours reach me of postal vote early returns. They may explain the recent acceleration in activity by Downing St.

    One would expect postal vote returns to be more "Remain" based on the fact ABs use them the most, however they tend also to be used by older people which may cancel it out.

    "Remain" is f*cked if it is behind on the postal count.
    The elderly get postal votes in the earliest so they should favour Leave for now

    Don't most postal votes get sent back the day they are received so they don't get forgotten?

    Even so some postal votes never get returned - 25% from memory at the last general election.
    Yes but the elderly use them most
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,936
    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    They are - or rather, the local teams are. But sending two ex Prime Ministers to NI to scrape around for votes, and the unpopular chancellor to Scotland strikes me as desperation...
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    John_M said:

    TGOHF said:

    Scott_P said:

    He has been offered a job by No 10

    @KateEMcCann: NEW: Khalid Mahmood, Brexit backing Labour MP, defecting to remain amid concerns abt tone on "immigration and race" https://t.co/bdcE38UEtS

    Oh, wait...

    This guy ? He's a real asset.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1186818/Labour-MP-spent-2-575-staying-riot-gold-marble-silk-hotel-girlfriend.html

    "Labour MP spent £2,575 staying in 'riot of gold, marble and silk' hotel with girlfriend


    Hahahaha - what did I say this morning?

    Hell, what did I say at the very beginning of this campaign? I predicted the racism smears then. Same as UKIP in the GE. My only surprise is it's taken them this long.

    I thought we were xenophobes, not racists. Is it one of those or both? I suppose xenophobic racists has a certain cachet, though I'm sure racist xenophobes will have its adherents.

    Remain. So ugly. One day they might start selling the EU to us, though I shan't hold my breath.

    Edit: Oops, I forgot, 'parochial racist xenophobes'. How silly of me.
    So much potential for anagrams with that range of letters...
  • Options
    @Vote_LeaveMedia

    MPs reporting that Whips are ringing round asking them to defect - No.10 must be really worried #VoteLeave

    The remainer gloating on here seems to have quietened down here during the last hour. Although to be fair the whole thing was probably about as influential as a pub argument about the first round FA Cup Derby between Crystal Palace and Tooting and Mitcham United in 1975/
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,975
    edited June 2016
    Mr. Monksfield, that's a decision for Scots to make. I hope it wouldn't, but the idea we should submit to an unaccountable, undemocratic, bureaucratic power-grabbing monstrosity for fear of something that might happen is to be frit.

    Edited extra bit: also, Quebec had two votes and didn't leave Canada.
  • Options
    MP_SEMP_SE Posts: 3,642

    Osborne up to his tricks again..

    Vote Leave Media‏ @Vote_LeaveMedia
    Report from inside No11 bunker: GO to leak HMT preparations for dealing with 'financial panic' in order to spark ... financial panic. Genius

    The act of a desperate man.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.

    Do you seriously think Sindy wouldn't go through at the second iteration? I would expect Scottish Labour and SLD to join SNP in campaigning for Sindy in that circumstance and I could see it going through 60-40.
    If YES couldn't win with the possibility of the £ and $100 a barrel , do you really think they could win at $50 a barrel and having to join the € ?

    Not a chance.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,803

    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.

    Do you seriously think Sindy wouldn't go through at the second iteration? I would expect Scottish Labour and SLD to join SNP in campaigning for Sindy in that circumstance and I could see it going through 60-40.
    That would be cutting off one's nose to spite one's face. RUK is a far bigger trading partner for Scotland than REU is.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,983

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    It's not First Past the Post though. Every vote counts.

    So getting NI and Scotland REMAINs up from 55% to 60% is worthwhile.
    Actually, it's still FPTP it's just there are only two horses in the race.

    The evidence at the moment suggests Remain are trying to motivate their base to vote. That may change but spending money on wall to wall digital advertising at Canary Wharf is money than cannot be spent elsewhere.
    Yes but one constituency so small rural areas are slightly less represented and big cities slightly more represented in the result
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,717

    Mr. Royale, sounds very Osborne.

    Mr. Llama, I'm a console player and likely Leave voter. Your analogy is wrong.

    I haven't played New Vegas, but Fallout 4 is a lot better than Fallout 3. Up to you, of course, but I rather like it, especially on Survival mode.

    New Vegas is awesome with some very fun, colourful DLC which no doubt is super cheap now. I've put 90 hours into Fallout4 on one playthrough, and I'll play it again, but I think I prefer New Vegas.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,983

    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.

    Do you seriously think Sindy wouldn't go through at the second iteration? I would expect Scottish Labour and SLD to join SNP in campaigning for Sindy in that circumstance and I could see it going through 60-40.
    Recent polls show Scotland backing the Union even if BREXIT although that could change again though if England votes Leave it will effectively be saying Scotland can sod off anyway! If England votes Leave and the UK Remain that sentiment would be even more likely
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    Yes, but as in any election there are swing areas that could go either way.

    If Remain were confident, I'd expect to see much more activity in the Home Counties.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    Fool me once etc! Hard to take them seriously when they have such a woeful track record on these sort of things.
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    Crude oil prices have doubled since February. Just in time for summer driving season. 'Twas ever thus. sigh
  • Options

    HYUFD said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Scott_P said:

    @thequentinletts: Heard an intriguing rumour last night about Out/In percentages in early postal-vote returns.

    @thequentinletts: Further rumours reach me of postal vote early returns. They may explain the recent acceleration in activity by Downing St.

    One would expect postal vote returns to be more "Remain" based on the fact ABs use them the most, however they tend also to be used by older people which may cancel it out.

    "Remain" is f*cked if it is behind on the postal count.
    The elderly get postal votes in the earliest so they should favour Leave for now

    Don't most postal votes get sent back the day they are received so they don't get forgotten?

    Even so some postal votes never get returned - 25% from memory at the last general election.
    From HoC Report "86.0% of people who were sent a postal ballot pack voted, compared with 63.5% of those who were entitled to vote at a polling station."
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited June 2016

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    This is the organisation that predicted a moderate slowdown in 2008.

    Next.

    (oh, and twenty years to recover to 2007 standards in 2009)
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,936

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    I think that is just the economists shouting because no-one is listening, no?

    The thing that has always annoyed me about economics is that it is just history and sociology with a bit of (mostly basic) maths thrown in - it has no special insight on the unpredictable future above educated guessing and predictions.
  • Options
    weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    Note the 'could' - in other words bunkum.
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    chestnut said:

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    This is the organisation that predicted a moderate slowdown in 2008.

    Next.
    Unfair. It's actually a good article and more balanced than you might think:

    " Being in the EU means that we have no control at all over immigration from the rest of the EU. Even if we avoided it, it still means being part of a club that has made mistakes as costly as introducing the euro. It means sharing some sovereignty. It means being part of the absurdly wasteful Common Agricultural Policy.

    It is simply childish to suggest that there is no trade-off, that one side has all the answers. It is just untrue to say that we can control overall immigration if we stay in. It is equally untrue to say that we would have more funds to spend on the NHS if we came out — we would have less.

    We are a rich country. The UK is either the fifth or ninth biggest economy in the world (depending on how you measure it). We could cope outside the EU. We can choose to accept a fall in our living standards to regain some sovereignty."

    That doesn't strike me as being overly partisan, even if the headline is a tad clickbaity - let's face it, what isn't these days?
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    In your heartlands you should have a strong local presence to get your vote out. That frees you to send your 'Big Beasts' to areas that presence is lacking.

    Sending your generals to do the work of the infantry means you are simply trying to stop your front collapsing.

    Example from the other side: Im campaigning for Leave in Hull / E Yorks we dont need Boris or anyone here - we the infantry are doing all the work, are advancing pretty much unopposed while mopping up pockets of Remain. We have no need for reinforcements.
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Of course, the Major/Blair thing is not necessarily aimed JUST at Northern Ireland. It could add to general British voters' unease about the "chaos" that might happen if we leave.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,717
    weejonnie said:

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    Note the 'could' - in other words bunkum.
    I don't believe it will be as bad as they say, but the use of 'could' hardly means it must automatically be bunkum. Unless you can be 100% certain, which no one can, could is the only word you could use, surely?
  • Options
    MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    EU funded hack sings for his supper. Sad.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,983

    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    Yes, but as in any election there are swing areas that could go either way.

    If Remain were confident, I'd expect to see much more activity in the Home Counties.
    The Home Counties will vote Leave, yougov this week had Leave ahead in the South but Remain 1% ahead overall, if there is a swing area it is the North West and maybe Wales not the Home Counties
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.

    The slavishly obedient are here as well.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,938

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    It's not First Past the Post though. Every vote counts.

    So getting NI and Scotland REMAINs up from 55% to 60% is worthwhile.
    Actually, it's still FPTP it's just there are only two horses in the race.

    The evidence at the moment suggests Remain are trying to motivate their base to vote. That may change but spending money on wall to wall digital advertising at Canary Wharf is money than cannot be spent elsewhere.
    I suspect it's a sign they have more money than people.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    Fantastic reason to Vote Leave. Giles Merritt, head of the Friends of Europe think tank in Brussels, says we have a chance to strike a blow for democracy and refound the whole EU on behalf of the peoples of Europe:

    “The EU policy elites are in panic. If the British vote to leave the shock will be so ghastly that they will finally wake up and realize that they can no longer ignore demands for democratic reform,” he said.

    “They may have to dissolve the EU as it is and try to reinvent it, both in order to bring the Brits back and because they fear that the whole political order will be swept away unless they do,” he said.

    Mr Merritt said it is an error to suppose that the EU would carry on as a monolithic bloc able to dictate terms after a Brexit vote. “The British would have pricked the bubble. The Germans are deeply alarmed at how suddenly the mood is shifting everywhere,” he said.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/06/07/france-shuns-europe-as-brexit-revolt-spreads/

    We simply MUST vote Leave. We have a chance to lead Europe and achieve the democratic reform we've always dreamed of.

    Europe is relying on us.
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,203
    Sean_F said:

    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.

    Do you seriously think Sindy wouldn't go through at the second iteration? I would expect Scottish Labour and SLD to join SNP in campaigning for Sindy in that circumstance and I could see it going through 60-40.
    That would be cutting off one's nose to spite one's face. RUK is a far bigger trading partner for Scotland than REU is.
    I'm sure they will be sble to set up free trade arrangements, all to their advantage of course, and with no downsides ;)
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,938

    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    Yes, but as in any election there are swing areas that could go either way.

    If Remain were confident, I'd expect to see much more activity in the Home Counties.
    Very few people are going to be converted this referendum. Concentrating on getting your vote out seems a sadly sensible strategy.
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.

    Do you seriously think Sindy wouldn't go through at the second iteration? I would expect Scottish Labour and SLD to join SNP in campaigning for Sindy in that circumstance and I could see it going through 60-40.
    Mr. Monksfield, I we vote leave then we would not only get the EU off our backs but also lose the Cameron Clique and Scotland as well? Sounds like a win-win-win to me,

    The only thing that could be better is if NI decided they would vote to join the Republic (assuming the RoI would have them, which I doubt), but I am not that optimistic. The NI political class and public servants know where their wages are paid from.

    So what you see as a threat is to some of us a, "Yeah? Bring it on". I doubt that it would happen though even if Wales, NI and Scotland vote remain and England votes out.
  • Options
    MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,203
    TGOHF said:

    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.

    Do you seriously think Sindy wouldn't go through at the second iteration? I would expect Scottish Labour and SLD to join SNP in campaigning for Sindy in that circumstance and I could see it going through 60-40.
    If YES couldn't win with the possibility of the £ and $100 a barrel , do you really think they could win at $50 a barrel and having to join the € ?

    Not a chance.
    I for one as a Scot by birth would have voted no first time round but would vote for independence from a post Brexit England.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,285
    Sandpit said:

    Stumps, day 1 at Lords. England 279/6.

    Betfair back prices Eng 1.5, SL 13, Draw 3.9.

    Possibly some showers coming over the weekend so not too much laying the draw if you're that way inclined.
    http://www.metcheck.com/UK/today.asp?zipcode=London City&locationID=57205&lat=51.5&lon=-0.1&findtype=

    England shouldn't need the bat again ;-)
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,983

    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    In your heartlands you should have a strong local presence to get your vote out. That frees you to send your 'Big Beasts' to areas that presence is lacking.

    Sending your generals to do the work of the infantry means you are simply trying to stop your front collapsing.

    Example from the other side: Im campaigning for Leave in Hull / E Yorks we dont need Boris or anyone here - we the infantry are doing all the work, are advancing pretty much unopposed while mopping up pockets of Remain. We have no need for reinforcements.
    Well I have not seen Boris in Islington or Scotland as yet but he has been in the West Country a lot, Kipper heartland, so am not sure that follows
  • Options
    LadyBucketLadyBucket Posts: 590
    Nigel Dodds, DUP, has just been on LBC and he was absolutely furious with Blair and Major. Said their rhetoric was highly dangerous and should never have been allowed to happen.

    What a state British politics is in at the moment. You've got Corbyn and McDonald destroying their party, to remake it in their own image and you've got the PM and Osborne trying to destroy the Conservative party to remake it into a modern pro-European party. I wonder who will still be standing at the end?
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506

    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.

    What are they not listening to?
  • Options
    YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    edited June 2016
    Sean_F said:

    JamesM said:

    Hi all. I am a Leave supporter and thought Sarah Wollaston's comments were tricky for the Leave campaign, albeit I don't agree with her. That said, it hardly got a mention on the 6 o'clock news and we must remember most voters aren't sat on politicalbetting.com reading about the referendum all day.

    My thought about Major and Blair heading to NI is that Major's comments on the news about Scotland is potentially creating a real hostage to fortune for the UK government in the future. The line from the UK government has been there is no case for a second referendum, yet Major said that if there is popular demand for one a government couldn't refuse. I know he means post-Brexit, but the principle is set potentially. Isn't that actually destabilising to the UK too!!

    It's difficult to see that a vote for leave isn't a vote for the break up of the UK. Unless Scotland also votes for leave which seems unlikely. Wee Nicky has every right to hold a referendum and declare UDI as far as I can see.
    Polling suggests that the outcome of such a Referendum would be much the same as in 2014,
    I think it is just as likely that a vote for Remain is a vote for the break-up of the UK.

    Why should Scotland or Wales stay in a small federation (the UK) if we can all belong to a large federation (EU) ?

    The Czech and Slovak Republics are happy to be in the EU together, but they were not happy to be in Czechoslovakia.

    The EU has increased the pressure to dismantle larger nations, like Spain or the UK, because there becomes little point to them.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    rcs1000 said:

    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    Yes, but as in any election there are swing areas that could go either way.

    If Remain were confident, I'd expect to see much more activity in the Home Counties.
    Very few people are going to be converted this referendum. Concentrating on getting your vote out seems a sadly sensible strategy.
    I'm not so sure: look at the polling trend since February.

    Remain had solid 20-30% leads last year.
  • Options
    saddenedsaddened Posts: 2,245

    TGOHF said:

    Mr. Monksfield, disagree entirely. There's no democratic mandate for Scotland to separate because the First Minister unilaterally decides it.

    A Leave success (if Scotland votes Remain) could lead to a second referendum. It would not lead to automatically breaking up the UK.

    Do you seriously think Sindy wouldn't go through at the second iteration? I would expect Scottish Labour and SLD to join SNP in campaigning for Sindy in that circumstance and I could see it going through 60-40.
    If YES couldn't win with the possibility of the £ and $100 a barrel , do you really think they could win at $50 a barrel and having to join the € ?

    Not a chance.
    I for one as a Scot by birth would have voted no first time round but would vote for independence from a post Brexit England.
    If Scotland genuinely wanted independence they would allow a vote for the English. The Scottish really do seem to labour under the misapprehension that the English are desperate to hang on to them.
  • Options

    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.

    What are they not listening to?
    Mr Meeks.
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited June 2016

    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.

    I'm listening, dear old thing.

    I'd have liked the author of the article you shared to be a bit more specific about the "seismic" part - quibbling over 'could' is silly.

    I think it almost certain that BRExit would precipitate a recession that's already overdue. What I don't know is how deep a recession it might be.

    If it's based around historical norms, that would mean a contraction of between 1.6% to 4.6%. I'm assuming that we're not going to equate it with 2008, which was a whopping 7.2% contraction.

    The typical recovery period is between 10 and 13 quarters, let's call it 3 years.

    Unless we've collectively gone cuckoo and believe in 'no more boom or bust', then it seems to me that this isn't an excessive price to pay. Admittedly, in the worst case it puts our economy back to the terrible, famine-haunted days of 2011, but I think we might just manage.
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    Re Economists

    If an economist saw a ten pound note on the pavement he would not bother to pick it up - because if it was real someone would already have picked it up.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302

    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    Yes, but as in any election there are swing areas that could go either way.

    If Remain were confident, I'd expect to see much more activity in the Home Counties.
    The Home Counties will vote Leave, yougov this week had Leave ahead in the South but Remain 1% ahead overall, if there is a swing area it is the North West and maybe Wales not the Home Counties
    That's my point. If Remain were on course for a solid win the stockbroker belt would be getting attention as well as the core cities.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302

    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.

    What are they not listening to?
    Alastair.
  • Options
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    In your heartlands you should have a strong local presence to get your vote out. That frees you to send your 'Big Beasts' to areas that presence is lacking.

    Sending your generals to do the work of the infantry means you are simply trying to stop your front collapsing.

    Example from the other side: Im campaigning for Leave in Hull / E Yorks we dont need Boris or anyone here - we the infantry are doing all the work, are advancing pretty much unopposed while mopping up pockets of Remain. We have no need for reinforcements.
    Well I have not seen Boris in Islington or Scotland as yet but he has been in the West Country a lot, Kipper heartland, so am not sure that follows
    Eastern England is Kipper heartland. West Country used to be Lib Dem heartland swung to the Tories and seems the perfect place for Boris to pick up votes for Leave.
  • Options
    I must congratulate remain on allowing.the Blair creature to lead tonights news telling us to vote in favour of staying iin.

    That they have let him loose in such a prominent way shows that they are desperate, never mind where he went to pontificate
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,975
    I'm off. Hope the debate goes well for Leave, not sure if I'll watch, though.
  • Options
    LucyJonesLucyJones Posts: 651

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    It's not First Past the Post though. Every vote counts.

    So getting NI and Scotland REMAINs up from 55% to 60% is worthwhile.
    Actually, it's still FPTP it's just there are only two horses in the race.

    The evidence at the moment suggests Remain are trying to motivate their base to vote. That may change but spending money on wall to wall digital advertising at Canary Wharf is money than cannot be spent elsewhere.
    My daughter got another email from StrongerIn today, asking for a donation. They claim that Vote Leave have £3million more to spend than they do.
    (Incidentally, she is unsure where they got her email address from, as she has not signed up to support any campaign given that she is not yet old enough to vote).
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961

    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.

    I think my criticism of economists was fair :p
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    @David_Evershed The near-unanimous warnings of the professionals with the most expertise that "There is a palpable fear that something really quite grim for the British economy could follow a Brexit."

    You can point to past prediction failures of economists but to airily wave away such unanimity about such a dangerous risk is quite something.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,803

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    The article is actually rather more nuanced about the pros and cons than the heading implies.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,936
    Wow. I know it takes some doing, but I have never thought anything I have read in the Telegraph or the Guardian worse than I think this Mcternan piece: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/09/if-jeremy-corbyn-had-stopped-tony-blair-invading-iraq-dictators/
  • Options

    I see the "la la la I'm not listening" brigade is out in force tonight.

    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    'if you want to know who's winning look at where they are campaigning.'

    Remains efforts today in N Ireland and Scotland would be like a Tory focus in Surrey or Labour in Liverpool during a GE. Remain think they are losing. Thats todays big story.

    Precisely.

    NI, Canary Wharf, Scotland.

    Look where Remain are campaigning and what they are doing, not what they are saying.
    I would expect Leave to be campaigning in English and Welsh rural areas and market towns now above all too, this is not a FPTP election won by a few suburban marginals in the Midlands and Essex, it is a referendum decided by the winner of the popular vote so maximising turnout in your heartlands is key
    Yes, but as in any election there are swing areas that could go either way.

    If Remain were confident, I'd expect to see much more activity in the Home Counties.
    The Home Counties will vote Leave, yougov this week had Leave ahead in the South but Remain 1% ahead overall, if there is a swing area it is the North West and maybe Wales not the Home Counties
    That's my point. If Remain were on course for a solid win the stockbroker belt would be getting attention as well as the core cities.
    Yes because if remain were doing well they would target these areas to try and get a big enough victory to close the issue down for a generation
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    John_M said:

    chestnut said:

    The economists strike back:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/paul-johnson-leavers-may-not-like-economists-but-we-are-right-about-brexit-a3267601.html

    The heading and sub-header sum it up:

    "Paul Johnson: Leavers may not like economists but we are right about Brexit

    While few can predict how Britain would fare long-term, if we go it alone the immediate impact could be seismic"

    This is the organisation that predicted a moderate slowdown in 2008.

    Next.
    Unfair. It's actually a good article and more balanced than you might think:

    " Being in the EU means that we have no control at all over immigration from the rest of the EU. Even if we avoided it, it still means being part of a club that has made mistakes as costly as introducing the euro. It means sharing some sovereignty. It means being part of the absurdly wasteful Common Agricultural Policy.

    It is simply childish to suggest that there is no trade-off, that one side has all the answers. It is just untrue to say that we can control overall immigration if we stay in. It is equally untrue to say that we would have more funds to spend on the NHS if we came out — we would have less.

    We are a rich country. The UK is either the fifth or ninth biggest economy in the world (depending on how you measure it). We could cope outside the EU. We can choose to accept a fall in our living standards to regain some sovereignty."

    That doesn't strike me as being overly partisan, even if the headline is a tad clickbaity - let's face it, what isn't these days?
    Strikes me as overly partisan. Even the very biased Treasury forecasts show the UK living standards going up (but slower) in the event of Brexit. Not falling.

    When you compare UK GDP/capita to other non EU western English speaking nations (eg Australia, Canada, New Zealand and USA) there is zero evidence the EU has overly inflated our GDP per capita.
This discussion has been closed.