Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Ipsos MORI ends a morning of bad news for the Tories with the

2456715

Comments

  • Options
    TravelJunkieTravelJunkie Posts: 431
    If labour is at 40% or close to it, the vote share in Scotland has to increase and that could only be bad for the SNP.

    Any chance of SNP switches to labour?
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    dr_spyn said:
    A lot of "satisfaction with leader" responses are about who is doing well, not whether people like them. It's perfectly obvious that Corbyn is doing well in the campaign and May is not - almost nobody here really disputes it. He's overcome what everyone recognises is a tidal wave of derision and hostility from the media, the Tories and many in his own party and continues to campaign with calm, friendly optimism. At a personal level I think it's terrific and an example of how to deal with adversity.

    The key point, though, is that Corbyn is not the drag on Labour ratings that the Tories expected and based their strategy on. I think that a lot of people feel that politics under May is just a grim slog and voting Labour is voting for a bit of positivity and hope. The Tory message that it's a terrible risk is just not cutting through - it's actually reinforcing the sense that the Tories are all doom and gloom.

    And Ipsos-Mori, like ICM, does weight by past voting, doesn't it?
    Whether the surge is enough is yet to be seen, but you deserve plaudits for seeing it before the rest of us did.

  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    notme said:

    My prediction is 70/80 majority.

    I really doubt Corbyn will have a majority *that* big....
  • Options
    TypoTypo Posts: 195
    Chris said:

    So how did Momentum manage to rig a phone poll? Have they been applying for jobs in call centres, or what?

    I would appreciate if somebody could explain how phone polling works. Do you still have to be on a panel?
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,814
    I have got no idea what the hell is going on with the polls.

    Yes, MORI is famously the most volatile of all, but I'm wondering if we're witnessing the death spasms of public opinion polling for voting intention in the UK.

    Getting a representative sample has become more and more difficult over the last thirty years. The 1987 General Election was the last time that "traditional" sampling and processing worked; the 1992 General Election was the harbinger of doom for the polling companies. They responded in different ways, incorporating political identification and weighting, public/private sector weighting, remembered vote, spirals of silence, re-weighting, and so on and so on.

    Phone responses dropped over the years to nearly negligible levels. Something like 5%-10% of contactees became respondents; the others didn't answer or put the phone down. Those that responded were assumed to be representative.

    2015 showed that they weren't.

    Online polling was pioneered in 2001-2005. Self-selecting panels were viewed with (appropriate) scepticism, but YouGov first, and then others, proved that if you process the responses well enough (and if all your many assumptions are valid), you can get an answer that is close enough to reality.
    2010 and 2015 showed that these assumptions fail more often than we would like.

    Getting a suitable sample is nearly impossible these days.

    Expressed preference and likelihood to vote have a major disclaimer about them. A more wised-up populace know that their responses to polls will be fed back to the politicians who are closely watching them, via the media.

    Processing, weighting, and so forth is based on assumption piled upon assumption piled upon rule of thumb.

    And now the same population polled at the same time in the same way but with different assumptions are giving weird and chaotic outcomes.

    Added to that, I have the suspicion that the seat scores might (only might) end up more decoupled from the opinion poll scores than normal.

    Whatever happens, I have the strong suspicion that the main governing factor in whoever gets the closest score will be pure unadulterated luck. And luck never lasts forever, anyway.
  • Options
    rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 7,907

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Fox jr has already voted, but would love that!
    They should definitely change the interest thing on those post 2012 if they can.
    IMO historical debt should not be written off. I still have the vast majority of it left but I knew what I was getting into.

    Will thw next step be to give me back the repayments I've been making?
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,945
    Brom said:

    AndyJS said:

    One explanation for the Labour share being so high is that in the 1990s the turnout in many safe Labour seats collapsed from an average of about 70% to around 55% and hasn't really ever recovered since. It could be that Corbyn is once again enthusing the voters in those seats and turnout could be back up to 70% again. It would have a significant effect on Labour's vote share but it wouldn't win them many seats. Most of the Merseyside seats are good examples of this.

    It's quite plausible that Jez is soaring in Sefton and sinking in Scunthorpe
    IF the polls are correct (big if), then Jez isn't sinking anywhere. Both parties should see their vote increase everywhere. The questions then are By how much? And equally importantly Where?
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943
    The news of charges against Craiig Mackinlay in South Thanet means UKIP must fancy their chances of their candidate the Reverend Stuart Piper taking the seat to make up for the loss of Thanet South
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    The Conservatives only hope is that Labour activists have somehow managed to get themselves registered with the polling companies in greater numbers than the populace in general.
  • Options
    The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    edited June 2017

    AndyJS said:

    One explanation for the Labour share being so high is that in the 1990s the turnout in many safe Labour seats collapsed from an average of about 70% to around 55% and hasn't really ever recovered since. It could be that Corbyn is once again enthusing the voters in those seats and turnout could be back up to 70% again. It would have a significant effect on Labour's vote share but it wouldn't win them many seats. Most of the Merseyside seats are good examples of this.

    As someone with a 1st in mathematics at a top redbrick university I disagree with you.

    Reading your posts, you seem to be very bullish about conservative prospects and very bearish towards labour. I haven't seen one negative post about conservative polling and you seem to be of the belief that the polls are wrong.

    1) In Tory wards turnout was 85% in 2015. Labour ward turnout was 45-50%. Had Labour turnout been similar, the tories would have lost 28 seats in the midlands/northern england. Tory enthusiasm is down compared to 2015, labour enthusiasm is up.
    2) 3/4 labour voters in the midlands/northern england are ex-labour voters. There is no evidence now that these same UKIP voters are voting heavily for conservative.
    3) There are a lot of seats where the tory vote has a very low ceiling. Plymouth, Southampton, Walsall, Stoke, Weaver Vale, Carlisle and any increase in vote enthusiasm could easily see a labour gain. As mentioned on the conservative home website, the tories are campaigning in labour areas they haven't done so in decades and its ok getting 2-3k votes for council elections but to get to 20k to win a seat is very, very hard. The labour vote is not going to down. There aren't enough seats like Tamworth, Burton that are moving away from Labour.
    You don't need 20K to win some Labour seats though! Stoke central in 2015 off the top of my head had Tristram Hunt win on 12K approximately.
  • Options
    TravelJunkieTravelJunkie Posts: 431
    DanSmith said:

    Great poll, but as a Labour supporter I'm still fully anticipating a 2015-esque gut punch at 10pm next

    DanSmith said:

    DanSmith said:

    Labour lead by 3 in that IpsosMORI before turnout filters are applied.

    Link please.
    https://twitter.com/BobbyIpsosMORI/status/870598290659844096

    Surely that right-hand chart should be labelled 'Labour Lead +3'!

    It could be like 2015. Or it could be like 2016 and the expected swing back to the establishment doesn't happen. Interesting times !
    Whatever the exit poll, add 2 points to the tories because the exit poll doesn't find those shy tory voters. The tories always do better than the exit poll. Even in 97% they did better.
  • Options
    PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited June 2017
    If Corbyn wins a majority - or can form a stable coalition/minority gov - I expect the tories will go full on tea party for the next few years.

    fun fun fun.
  • Options
    StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Early 20s with debts? I know people in their 30s with them.
    I'll be f***** ing pissed as I responsibily paid off mine early (although I would have probably paid it all by now)
    Why would you pay it off early?
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,027

    Got an email from Theresa May this morning. In the subject header:

    "I need you to do this one thing for me"

    Sounds desperate, and a bit creepy!

    TMay is Bridget Jones?
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,274

    What is really bizzare to me is as this corbyasm has ramped up, Tories don't seem to do anything in response. Either they haven't got a clue what to do or they don't believe it.

    You would think that they would have every known popular Tory on the media round the clock with some form of attack. Even the Tory friendly media haven't really been fed attack stories, mail yesterday was how biased the bbc is and today telegraph about to waiting times. The first won't shift a vote and the second is bad for the government.

    And yet how much more can she increase the vote share.

    The reality is the collapse of the left into labour and if they vote then goodness knows what will happen
    It's not about boosting your own vote, it is about damaging corbynism so people vote lib dem or green.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    What is really bizzare to me is as this corbyasm has ramped up, Tories don't seem to do anything in response. Either they haven't got a clue what to do or they don't believe it.

    You would think that they would have every known popular Tory on the media round the clock with some form of attack. Even the Tory friendly media haven't really been fed attack stories, mail yesterday was how biased the bbc is and today telegraph about to waiting times. The first won't shift a vote and the second is bad for the government.

    There doesn't seem to be any grid. What is going on at CCHQ? Tumbleweed?

    They have completely ceded the ground and the spotlight to Labour from day one of this campaign. The Tories are nowhere to be seen. They've no-showed at their own party. It's a miracle the polls have them in the 40s.
    I think many Tories are still assuming May will win (narrowly) and want her to own her hubris and mistakes.

    They have been cut out of the inner circle and maligned so much over the past year (Hammond) that they don't care.

    They'll only come to her rescue if Corbyn as PM looks serious.
  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    Patrick said:

    Maybe I'm just projecting - but if it's 45/40 then we might well see a Tory landslide of wafer thin majorities. And a Labour landslide in 2022.

    Boundary changes will come in very handy for the Tories protecting a majority
  • Options
    ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 4,968
    edited June 2017
    Typo said:

    AndyJS said:

    One thing's for sure, the Labour campaign has been infinitely more clever and cunning than the Tories ever bargained for. And better presented too.

    Even more impressive considering it caught them off-guard.
    The contrast between TMay's complacency and Blair's take nothing for granted, scrupulously self-disciplined 1997 campaign is really striking.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943
    edited June 2017
    Mori poll does not mean much, they have the Tories on 45% which is actually at the higher end of what most pollsters are showing and 8% more than Cameron got in 2015 just they have Corbyn getting 10% more than Miliband got. Mori's final 2015 poll had the Tories on 36% and Labour on 35% so they look like repeating their history of getting the Tory share about right but way overestimating Labour
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Early 20s with debts? I know people in their 30s with them.
    I'll be f***** ing pissed as I responsibily paid off mine early (although I would have probably paid it all by now)
    Why would you pay it off early?
    I didn't think you could pay it off early any more. You just have to keep paying the 'graduate tax' on earnings above a certain amount for 30 years.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,027
    HYUFD said:

    Mori poll does not mean much, they have the Tories on 45% which is actually at the higher end of what most pollsters are showing and 8% more than Cameron got in 2015 just they have Corbyn getting 10% more than Miliband got.

    But if they're underestimating turnout, Labour could be in the lead...
  • Options
    JonCisBackJonCisBack Posts: 911
    Anecdote time

    For literally the first time this campaign the election came up at lunch in the canteen. We have TVs on BBC news channel permanently with subtitles. Election came on, and someone said "surely May has got more than just "I'm not Jeremy Corbyn"". general laughter and "yeah it's a bit crap isn't it", "they seem to think that would be enough". The feeling that the tories have little to offer is getting through.

    Still gobsmacked by how inept the tories have been, and dispirited, almost embarrassed by how crap May herself has been. Astonishingly unimpressive.

    Maybe they want to lose??

  • Options
    YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    Typo said:

    AndyJS said:

    One thing's for sure, the Labour campaign has been infinitely more clever and cunning than the Tories ever bargained for. And better presented too.

    Even more impressive considering it caught them off-guard.
    The contrast between TMay's complaceny and Blair's take nothing for granted, scrupulously self-disciplined 1997 campaign is really striking.
    Truly is New Labour took nothing for granted even on election day were still worried.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Early 20s with debts? I know people in their 30s with them.
    The irony is that we have loans and debts because George Osborne vetoed a graduate tax, but if the Tories tweaked it into a graduate tax now, it would be hugely popular. It pretty much is one in all but name anyway.

    It would eliminate debts at a stroke, and only higher earners would pay it (depending on where it was pitched). It would cost nothing, and not change who pays -- because the low-paid do not have to repay the loans anyway. The difference is that the non-payers would not feel crippled by debt.



  • Options
    GideonWiseGideonWise Posts: 1,123
    Why are so many so bullish on the Tories? I can't see them bettering 2015 now, all the risk is on the downside.

    Do people just not believe the polls anymore?
  • Options
    TravelJunkieTravelJunkie Posts: 431

    AndyJS said:

    One explanation for the Labour share being so high is that in the 1990s the turnout in many safe Labour seats collapsed from an average of about 70% to around 55% and hasn't really ever recovered since. It could be that Corbyn is once again enthusing the voters in those seats and turnout could be back up to 70% again. It would have a significant effect on Labour's vote share but it wouldn't win them many seats. Most of the Merseyside seats are good examples of this.

    As someone with a 1st in mathematics at a top redbrick university I disagree with you.

    Reading your posts, you seem to be very bullish about conservative prospects and very bearish towards labour. I haven't seen one negative post about conservative polling and you seem to be of the belief that the polls are wrong.

    1) In Tory wards turnout was 85% in 2015. Labour ward turnout was 45-50%. Had Labour turnout been similar, the tories would have lost 28 seats in the midlands/northern england. Tory enthusiasm is down compared to 2015, labour enthusiasm is up.
    2) 3/4 labour voters in the midlands/northern england are ex-labour voters. There is no evidence now that these same UKIP voters are voting heavily for conservative.
    3) There are a lot of seats where the tory vote has a very low ceiling. Plymouth, Southampton, Walsall, Stoke, Weaver Vale, Carlisle and any increase in vote enthusiasm could easily see a labour gain. As mentioned on the conservative home website, the tories are campaigning in labour areas they haven't done so in decades and its ok getting 2-3k votes for council elections but to get to 20k to win a seat is very, very hard. The labour vote is not going to down. There aren't enough seats like Tamworth, Burton that are moving away from Labour.
    You don't need 20K to win some Labour seats though! Stoke central in 2015 off the top of my head had Tristram Hunt win on 12,000K approximately.
    Thats why tories won seats in the north, midlands and cities in the south because the labour vote didn't turnup. They had nothing to vote for. This time they really do.

    Some seats the vote between tory and labour havent really moved. Broxtowe has always been a competitive seat and even in landslides the loser has got withing 5-6k votes while other seats were getting 10k plus majorities.

    In london, the tories got over 22k plus in hampstead, ealing, brentford and lost. The tory vote had so much to vote and everyone is making the assumption that the tory vote is as positive as 2015. No chance.

  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,251
    dixiedean said:

    Fpt:

    Just to point out to anyone planing to high-tail it to Canada, that BC just elected an NDP (Labour) / Green coalition into power. Good luck!

    Have just come back from my son and daughter in law's in Vancouver and my daughter in law promotes BC throghout Asia. Just one of the best places in the World but very expensive.

  • Options
    StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092
    Typo said:

    AndyJS said:

    One thing's for sure, the Labour campaign has been infinitely more clever and cunning than the Tories ever bargained for. And better presented too.

    Even more impressive considering it caught them off-guard.
    Has anyone attempted an analysis of why corbyn the campaigner seems so much more competent than corbyn the loto, even in areas that are very similar in both roles (controlling media narrative for example)? I'm almost starting to suspect hussling
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Chris said:

    So how did Momentum manage to rig a phone poll? Have they been applying for jobs in call centres, or what?

    Momentum are fiendish. They have infiltrated the whole country...
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    I thought the LDs would be down to 5% with ICM but actually they're on 7%, only down 0.8 points since GE2015. UKIP and Greens must have been reduced to almost nothing.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943
    Pong said:

    If Corbyn wins a majority - or can form a stable coalition/minority gov - I expect the tories will go full on tea party for the next few years.

    fun fun fun.

    If the Tories are on 45% no chance of there not being a Tory PM
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256

    Can someone sedate SeanT in advance.

    I was planning to quietly swap his wine for RedBull double-caffeinated....
  • Options
    YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    Pong said:

    If Corbyn wins a majority - or can form a stable coalition/minority gov - I expect the tories will go full on tea party for the next few years.

    fun fun fun.

    Possibly they thought it was all-over it is now .
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,098

    HYUFD said:

    Mori poll does not mean much, they have the Tories on 45% which is actually at the higher end of what most pollsters are showing and 8% more than Cameron got in 2015 just they have Corbyn getting 10% more than Miliband got.

    But if they're underestimating turnout, Labour could be in the lead...
    Yes. If there is a significant Corbyn effect that brings out people who are normally non-voters, the polls could quite easily be flattering the Tories.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Fox jr has already voted, but would love that!
    Tell me something: when precisely was it that you became an unhinged and pretentious socialist twat?

    You voted Tory in GE2010, as I understand it, and were a fan of the coalition. Corbyn and McDonnell will be far worse than Brown and Darling ever were.

    You know this (deep down) so there must be something deeply visceral going in inside what passes for your brain.
  • Options
    ProdicusProdicus Posts: 658

    Got an email from Theresa May this morning. In the subject header:

    "I need you to do this one thing for me"

    Sounds desperate, and a bit creepy!

    It's just the planned start of the GOTV period. Normal.
  • Options
    Carolus_RexCarolus_Rex Posts: 1,414
    dixiedean said:

    Got an email from Theresa May this morning. In the subject header:

    "I need you to do this one thing for me"

    Sounds desperate, and a bit creepy!

    Are you a hit man? Take out Corbyn? :)
    I am beginning to wonder if agent Corbyn has gone rogue.
  • Options
    jonny83jonny83 Posts: 1,261
    If the polls are accurate then I assume we will see some increased Conservative campaigning in some of those Tory marginals right? And less in targeting Labour ones?

    Can't believe they are polling 40%, the issues about defense and security alone should be keeping them away from that even if you agree with their economic policy of increased taxation and borrowing.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943
    edited June 2017

    HYUFD said:

    Mori poll does not mean much, they have the Tories on 45% which is actually at the higher end of what most pollsters are showing and 8% more than Cameron got in 2015 just they have Corbyn getting 10% more than Miliband got.

    But if they're underestimating turnout, Labour could be in the lead...
    They are not, they are probably overestimating youth turnout again and like yougov have clearly learnt next to nothing from 2015. ICM and Comres have learnt however and their turnout model replicates that of 2015, hence they both have Tory leads of 10%+
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,870

    I think that a lot of people feel that politics under May is just a grim slog and voting Labour is voting for a bit of positivity and hope. The Tory message that it's a terrible risk is just not cutting through - it's actually reinforcing the sense that the Tories are all doom and gloom.

    This is absolutely spot on.

    What surprises me is that May hasn't seen this coming. She was the one who publicly called out the Tories for becoming the "nasty party". She was the one who told Osborne to "learn some emotional intelligence". Her name has been made on two things: quiet competence and understanding "ordinary people". And yet this election is showing she can do neither.

    Still, 6 days to go, so maybe Crosby has some as yet unpublicised super-effective doom and gloom to win people round.
  • Options
    ChrisChris Posts: 11,098
    AndyJS said:

    I thought the LDs would be down to 5% with ICM but actually they're on 7%, only down 0.8 points since GE2015. UKIP and Greens must have been reduced to almost nothing.

    But with the two main parties up so much, this would still be disastrous for the LDs in terms of seats.
  • Options
    GideonWiseGideonWise Posts: 1,123

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Early 20s with debts? I know people in their 30s with them.
    The irony is that we have loans and debts because George Osborne vetoed a graduate tax, but if the Tories tweaked it into a graduate tax now, it would be hugely popular. It pretty much is one in all but name anyway.

    It would eliminate debts at a stroke, and only higher earners would pay it (depending on where it was pitched). It would cost nothing, and not change who pays -- because the low-paid do not have to repay the loans anyway. The difference is that the non-payers would not feel crippled by debt.



    The reason why it hasn't been turned into a graduate tax is because a graduate tax is a seriously bad policy versus the loan-system.

    I accept the current loan system is a much harder political sell however.
  • Options
    PongPong Posts: 4,693
    edited June 2017

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Early 20s with debts? I know people in their 30s with them.
    The irony is that we have loans and debts because George Osborne vetoed a graduate tax, but if the Tories tweaked it into a graduate tax now, it would be hugely popular. It pretty much is one in all but name anyway.

    It would eliminate debts at a stroke, and only higher earners would pay it (depending on where it was pitched). It would cost nothing, and not change who pays -- because the low-paid do not have to repay the loans anyway. The difference is that the non-payers would not feel crippled by debt.



    I thought the problem with a graduate tax is it incentivizes emigration (especially for high earners) in a way semi-commercial student loans don't.

    I like the idea of a simple graduate tax, but not sure it can really work in a globalised world/economy. Paying for H/E out of general taxation is IMO, the best and least unfair solution.
  • Options
    spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,302

    HYUFD said:

    Mori poll does not mean much, they have the Tories on 45% which is actually at the higher end of what most pollsters are showing and 8% more than Cameron got in 2015 just they have Corbyn getting 10% more than Miliband got.

    But if they're underestimating turnout, Labour could be in the lead...
    It depends on what groups are turning out. If it's the 18-34 age group then that's true. But if it's the over 65s then not.

    The young have consistently not turned out. I don't see happening in sufficient numbers to happen.
  • Options
    ParistondaParistonda Posts: 1,819
    I still think May will win handsomely on the day, 50-80 majority, not a landslide but decent enough.

    For all that PB talks about toxic Corbyn (and I also thought he would be toxic) it seems that the IRA stuff really isn't cutting through with the floating voters.

    Plus he seems to have inspired a Bernie like momentum with youths. Now, the classic assumption is that youths don't turn up, and that's probably correct. But the EU ref assumptions were based on non voters not turning up, all forecasts of a leave victory assumed a low turnout not a high one. I think we may actually see big youth turnout for once. Bernie only lost to Hillary because of his weakness with minority voters, which doesn't really apply to more white Britain.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,274
    edited June 2017
    dixiedean said:

    Fpt:

    Just to point out to anyone planing to high-tail it to Canada, that BC just elected an NDP (Labour) / Green coalition into power. Good luck!

    They are centre left not corbynism...Also are they going to remove all the tax incentives for startups in BC? Force all the software, games, vfx companies out? If they do they will crash the place and I am sure calgary will have them instead.

    Labour aren't proposing sensible centre left policies (which don't overly bother me), it is having a marxist chancellor that scares the shit out of me.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820

    Election Expenses.
    I know someone who gave £10,000 to an mps campaign in 2015 (not in south thanet) to a tory mp to stop ukip getting in. When I heard this, I was certain, but said nothing, that this broke election law.

    Can a constituent living in a seat give £10,000 to an mp?

    Yes, why not? It has to be declared, and the donor has to be on the electoral roll (but not necessariy in the same constituency).
    It wasn't declared.
    If that's true, then it was illegal. I would doubt very much that it wasn't declared, though; why would the MP not declare it? BTW The donor doesn't have to declare anything, it's the party receiving the donation which should check that the donor is on the electoral roll and declare the donation in its returns to the Electoral Commission.
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,692

    Can someone sedate SeanT in advance.

    I was planning to quietly swap his wine for RedBull double-caffeinated....
    Surely you are not the 20 something Corbynsta he lovingly tells us about?
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,161

    Can someone sedate SeanT in advance.

    I was planning to quietly swap his wine for RedBull double-caffeinated....
    The 'f' key on his laptop will need replacing by the end of this evening.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943
    Patrick said:

    Maybe I'm just projecting - but if it's 45/40 then we might well see a Tory landslide of wafer thin majorities. And a Labour landslide in 2022.

    On what grounds? More like 1992 than 1997
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,799

    45/40 could produce anything from a hung Parliament to a large Conservative majority. It's back to the 1960's.
  • Options
    Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 4,814

    DanSmith said:

    Great poll, but as a Labour supporter I'm still fully anticipating a 2015-esque gut punch at 10pm next

    DanSmith said:

    DanSmith said:

    Labour lead by 3 in that IpsosMORI before turnout filters are applied.

    Link please.
    https://twitter.com/BobbyIpsosMORI/status/870598290659844096

    Surely that right-hand chart should be labelled 'Labour Lead +3'!

    It could be like 2015. Or it could be like 2016 and the expected swing back to the establishment doesn't happen. Interesting times !
    Whatever the exit poll, add 2 points to the tories because the exit poll doesn't find those shy tory voters. The tories always do better than the exit poll. Even in 97% they did better.
    The exit poll doesn't do a vote share, but seat share.
    It's from samples taken in a hundred+ chosen constituencies and extrapolated.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Anecdote time

    For literally the first time this campaign the election came up at lunch in the canteen. We have TVs on BBC news channel permanently with subtitles. Election came on, and someone said "surely May has got more than just "I'm not Jeremy Corbyn"". general laughter and "yeah it's a bit crap isn't it", "they seem to think that would be enough". The feeling that the tories have little to offer is getting through.

    Still gobsmacked by how inept the tories have been, and dispirited, almost embarrassed by how crap May herself has been. Astonishingly unimpressive.

    Maybe they want to lose??

    I do wonder if May is producing "Springtime for Hitler", but that was a surprise hit so not an apt analogy.

    Our clinic coordinators were talking positively over Corbyn yesterday. They see him as some hope for the future, though one of the patients (older male WWC) went off on a bit of a rant about terrorism. The other patients edged away a bit.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,799
    DanSmith said:

    I think pollsters should work with the data rather than giving personal opinions about what the data should say.
    Martin Boon has seen the most recent ICM poll, according to his twitter account, so I expect it's giving rather different figures.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    DanSmith said:

    DanSmith said:

    Labour lead by 3 in that IpsosMORI before turnout filters are applied.

    Link please.
    https://twitter.com/BobbyIpsosMORI/status/870598290659844096
    SNP + Plaid on 4%

    I thought the working assumption for them was 5/6%?
  • Options
    camelcamel Posts: 815

    dr_spyn said:
    A lot of "satisfaction with leader" responses are about who is doing well, not whether people like them. It's perfectly obvious that Corbyn is doing well in the campaign and May is not - almost nobody here really disputes it. He's overcome what everyone recognises is a tidal wave of derision and hostility from the media, the Tories and many in his own party and continues to campaign with calm, friendly optimism. At a personal level I think it's terrific and an example of how to deal with adversity.

    The key point, though, is that Corbyn is not the drag on Labour ratings that the Tories expected and based their strategy on. I think that a lot of people feel that politics under May is just a grim slog and voting Labour is voting for a bit of positivity and hope. The Tory message that it's a terrible risk is just not cutting through - it's actually reinforcing the sense that the Tories are all doom and gloom.

    And Ipsos-Mori, like ICM, does weight by past voting, doesn't it?
    I think you can add a second, converse key point. Teresa May is not the pull on conservative ratings that the Tories expected. Their strategy is built around Strong and Stable Teresa May the brand, and people can see she is socially awkward, slow on her feet and vacillating. You don't build your brand around your product's most obviously discoverable flaw.

  • Options
    surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    HYUFD said:

    The news of charges against Craiig Mackinlay in South Thanet means UKIP must fancy their chances of their candidate the Reverend Stuart Piper taking the seat to make up for the loss of Thanet South

    It missed the weekly newspaper though.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    I have got no idea what the hell is going on with the polls.

    Yes, MORI is famously the most volatile of all, but I'm wondering if we're witnessing the death spasms of public opinion polling for voting intention in the UK.

    Getting a representative sample has become more and more difficult over the last thirty years. The 1987 General Election was the last time that "traditional" sampling and processing worked; the 1992 General Election was the harbinger of doom for the polling companies. They responded in different ways, incorporating political identification and weighting, public/private sector weighting, remembered vote, spirals of silence, re-weighting, and so on and so on.

    Phone responses dropped over the years to nearly negligible levels. Something like 5%-10% of contactees became respondents; the others didn't answer or put the phone down. Those that responded were assumed to be representative.

    2015 showed that they weren't.

    Online polling was pioneered in 2001-2005. Self-selecting panels were viewed with (appropriate) scepticism, but YouGov first, and then others, proved that if you process the responses well enough (and if all your many assumptions are valid), you can get an answer that is close enough to reality.
    2010 and 2015 showed that these assumptions fail more often than we would like.

    Getting a suitable sample is nearly impossible these days.

    Expressed preference and likelihood to vote have a major disclaimer about them. A more wised-up populace know that their responses to polls will be fed back to the politicians who are closely watching them, via the media.

    Processing, weighting, and so forth is based on assumption piled upon assumption piled upon rule of thumb.

    And now the same population polled at the same time in the same way but with different assumptions are giving weird and chaotic outcomes.

    Added to that, I have the suspicion that the seat scores might (only might) end up more decoupled from the opinion poll scores than normal.

    Whatever happens, I have the strong suspicion that the main governing factor in whoever gets the closest score will be pure unadulterated luck. And luck never lasts forever, anyway.

    Excellent post.

    My working assumption is that the polls end up subliminally weighting up enthusiastic, keyed-up voting intentions (Corbyn) far more than sullenly reluctant votes (May). Social media has amplified both the behaviours and the manner in which they operate in this manner too.

    I hope. Boy oh boy do I really really HOPE.
  • Options
    The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    Yorkcity said:

    Typo said:

    AndyJS said:

    One thing's for sure, the Labour campaign has been infinitely more clever and cunning than the Tories ever bargained for. And better presented too.

    Even more impressive considering it caught them off-guard.
    The contrast between TMay's complaceny and Blair's take nothing for granted, scrupulously self-disciplined 1997 campaign is really striking.
    Truly is New Labour took nothing for granted even on election day were still worried.
    Labour had wobbles in 1997 during the national campaign, it was not flawless. Labour were lucky in that Europe had torn the Tories apart for years.

    Then, I remember, Neil Hamilton digging in and tarnishing the Tory brand. The Tories had lost the plot politically and had just gone beyond their sell by date. Added to that John Major's refusal to make immigration a key part of his election campaign - We know what happened to Immigration post 1997, it went absolutely crazy.

    It does ask the question though in presentational terms why Corbyn has not been shredded for his duplicity on so many fronts by the Tories, the tory press have been giving him a good going over. But I have done my stint in being a helper in an election so I just sit back and watch and laugh at it. Life will go on whoever wins....
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    Down 10 points? So it was at 55% before?
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,161
    So, if this continues, then the Tory party will have allowed us to leave the EU and then handed the keys to No.10 to a gang of incompetent Marxists.

    Nice work chaps...
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,378

    What is really bizzare to me is as this corbyasm has ramped up, Tories don't seem to do anything in response. Either they haven't got a clue what to do or they don't believe it.

    You would think that they would have every known popular Tory on the media round the clock with some form of attack. Even the Tory friendly media haven't really been fed attack stories, mail yesterday was how biased the bbc is and today telegraph about to waiting times. The first won't shift a vote and the second is bad for the government.

    There doesn't seem to be any grid. What is going on at CCHQ? Tumbleweed?

    They have completely ceded the ground and the spotlight to Labour from day one of this campaign. The Tories are nowhere to be seen. They've no-showed at their own party. It's a miracle the polls have them in the 40s.
    I guess that's what happens when you plan and election and write a manifesto with only four people, and the only other person you tell is Jeremy Hunt ?
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Early 20s with debts? I know people in their 30s with them.
    The irony is that we have loans and debts because George Osborne vetoed a graduate tax, but if the Tories tweaked it into a graduate tax now, it would be hugely popular. It pretty much is one in all but name anyway.

    It would eliminate debts at a stroke, and only higher earners would pay it (depending on where it was pitched). It would cost nothing, and not change who pays -- because the low-paid do not have to repay the loans anyway. The difference is that the non-payers would not feel crippled by debt.



    The reason why it hasn't been turned into a graduate tax is because a graduate tax is a seriously bad policy versus the loan-system.

    I accept the current loan system is a much harder political sell however.
    We still cannot even be sure the loans system is cheaper than the old grants system. It depends on what numbers you want to pluck out of the air for repayment and interest rates.

    I do think income-contingent loans might be a good idea in other areas, but not here.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited June 2017

    If labour is at 40% or close to it, the vote share in Scotland has to increase and that could only be bad for the SNP.

    Any chance of SNP switches to labour?

    East Lothian is apparently on a knife-edge between SNP and Lab (according to various rumours, nothing concrete).
  • Options
    StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092
    spudgfsh said:

    HYUFD said:

    Mori poll does not mean much, they have the Tories on 45% which is actually at the higher end of what most pollsters are showing and 8% more than Cameron got in 2015 just they have Corbyn getting 10% more than Miliband got.

    But if they're underestimating turnout, Labour could be in the lead...
    It depends on what groups are turning out. If it's the 18-34 age group then that's true. But if it's the over 65s then not.

    The young have consistently not turned out. I don't see happening in sufficient numbers to happen.
    The point is that many pollsters price that in. So the risk is all on one side
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040
    You ok hun?

    (Only applies to the numerous PB Tories).
  • Options
    VerulamiusVerulamius Posts: 1,435
    http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2017/06/called-snap-election-cant-bothered-turning-final-round-focus-groups/

    The Lord's latest focus group from South Wales:

    Theresa May as a drink: Strong builder’s tea that you forgot to drink and it’s gone cold.”

    And as a biscuit: “A cookie. They’re tough, and they crumble.” “One of them hard ones at the bottom of the tin that have been there six months. It looks quite nice but you bite it and break all your teeth.”
  • Options
    YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    I know they say no election is good to lose.However 1992 subsequently was a very good election not to win for Labour.The ERM debacle might be noting compared to Brexit.
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,982
    jonny83 said:



    Can't believe they are polling 40%, the issues about defense and security alone should be keeping them away from that even if you agree with their economic policy of increased taxation and borrowing.

    How long are PBTs going to cling to this notion? NOBODY. CARES. ABOUT. IT. They just want the goverment that will give them large amounts of other people's money.

    I expect there will still be people on here banging on about the IRA and Hamas as JC is being driven up the Mall to see HM the Q.

  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,419
    Before Mike writes it, let me ask the question:

    Would we be where we are had Boris withdrawn not prematurely 11 months ago?

    I don't think anyone thought that May would be such a poor campaigner. Had she been exposed to the party membership (against a heavyweight opponent i.e. not Leadsom), this might have become clear before it mattered.

    That said, *would* it have become clear? She didn't have a reputation as a poor interviewee before the election and her serious demeanour might still have proven enough against a Boris who still had (and has) several question marks against him.

    All water under the bridge - perhaps (Boris is 8/1 with PP and 25/1 to be PM on 1 July with Ladbrokes) - but worth pondering all the same.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    edited June 2017
    Oh, and a 2-party share of 85%? OK, then. Whatever.

    Good old Bouncy MORI.
  • Options
    kjohnwkjohnw Posts: 1,456
    this is beginning to feel like brexit, when the longtime ignored are offered a chance of change and sticking two fingers up at the establishment. Corbyn could pull this off something I cant even believe i am thinking. I am terrified for this country now
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,274
    edited June 2017

    I still think May will win handsomely on the day, 50-80 majority, not a landslide but decent enough.

    For all that PB talks about toxic Corbyn (and I also thought he would be toxic) it seems that the IRA stuff really isn't cutting through with the floating voters.

    Plus he seems to have inspired a Bernie like momentum with youths. Now, the classic assumption is that youths don't turn up, and that's probably correct. But the EU ref assumptions were based on non voters not turning up, all forecasts of a leave victory assumed a low turnout not a high one. I think we may actually see big youth turnout for once. Bernie only lost to Hillary because of his weakness with minority voters, which doesn't really apply to more white Britain.

    Bernie lost because of their weird super delegate system, which some people say is rigged (we can say at the very least the RNC big whigs didnt want him and did everything possible to stop him).

    The thing is the comparison sort of stops there...Sanders isn't a terrorist sympathizer, he hadn't taken money from states that kills gays, doesn't surround himself with Marxists and antisemites...
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943

    I still think May will win handsomely on the day, 50-80 majority, not a landslide but decent enough.

    For all that PB talks about toxic Corbyn (and I also thought he would be toxic) it seems that the IRA stuff really isn't cutting through with the floating voters.

    Plus he seems to have inspired a Bernie like momentum with youths. Now, the classic assumption is that youths don't turn up, and that's probably correct. But the EU ref assumptions were based on non voters not turning up, all forecasts of a leave victory assumed a low turnout not a high one. I think we may actually see big youth turnout for once. Bernie only lost to Hillary because of his weakness with minority voters, which doesn't really apply to more white Britain.

    Bernie lost in a Democratic primary not a national election and May has more of the white working class than Hillary did
  • Options
    ProdicusProdicus Posts: 658
    AndyJS said:

    One thing's for sure, the Labour campaign has been infinitely more clever and cunning than the Tories ever bargained for. And better presented too.

    It's always a mistake to believe that your enemy is invincibly stupid. He is not.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    I don't think I can bear to watch May on BBC QT tonight.

    It could be a bloodbath.

    I hope I'm wrong.
  • Options
    JonWCJonWC Posts: 285
    jonny83 said:

    Perhaps I should start learning the 'The Red Flag' lyrics, in preparation for when I will have to sing it every day.

    I presume England will be singing it at the Scotland match on Saturday..
  • Options

    dixiedean said:

    Got an email from Theresa May this morning. In the subject header:

    "I need you to do this one thing for me"

    Sounds desperate, and a bit creepy!

    Are you a hit man? Take out Corbyn? :)
    I am beginning to wonder if agent Corbyn has gone rogue.
    I'm beginning to wonder if Agent Corbyn has been outfoxed by the genius of Agent May, Agent Farron, and Agent Nuttall.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,943
    45% for the Tories would be their highest voteshare since 1970 but 40% for Labour only their highest voteshare since 2001 before Corbynistas get too excited
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,161

    I think that a lot of people feel that politics under May is just a grim slog and voting Labour is voting for a bit of positivity and hope. The Tory message that it's a terrible risk is just not cutting through - it's actually reinforcing the sense that the Tories are all doom and gloom.

    This is absolutely spot on.

    What surprises me is that May hasn't seen this coming. She was the one who publicly called out the Tories for becoming the "nasty party". She was the one who told Osborne to "learn some emotional intelligence". Her name has been made on two things: quiet competence and understanding "ordinary people". And yet this election is showing she can do neither.

    Still, 6 days to go, so maybe Crosby has some as yet unpublicised super-effective doom and gloom to win people round.
    Or maybe he's fighting his last election.
  • Options
    AHMatlockAHMatlock Posts: 15
    I have not been moved to comment on this blog for several years now, but the current circumstances are simply too exceptional to ignore. As a lifelong Conservative, the events of the past fortnight have been painful to watch. Nick Timothy and the brain trust behind the Social Care policy are going to have a lot of explaining to do in 7 days time, no matter the result as it seems clear that, barring another massive polling failure, we are not going to get the historic landslide that seemed to be within our reach when the election was called. I think the best we can hope for now is a respectable working majority.

    I have a lot of respect for Theresa May, I like her temperament and her style, but she has seemingly fallen into the same trap as other top level politicians in allowing herself to become beholden to a tight and closed circle of advisors who really aren't as well connected to the Great British public as they think. As TSE has already said, her reputation is likely to emerge from this shemozzle with significant damage, and it is just possible she may lose! I certainly hope not but, by God, how the mighty have fallen!
  • Options
    jonny83jonny83 Posts: 1,261
    Prodicus said:

    AndyJS said:

    One thing's for sure, the Labour campaign has been infinitely more clever and cunning than the Tories ever bargained for. And better presented too.

    It's always a mistake to believe that your enemy is invincibly stupid. He is not.
    He hold dangerous views that will put the country at greater risk, but he's not stupid.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    I think some of the comments are spot on. Yesterday I was relatively sure Brexit, economy, immigration ad nausea would see the Tories home easily. But that appears to be wrong. They aren't offering anything positive. It's so fucking bleak. Corbyn does sound like he wants to transform Britain, regardless of the practicality and the possibility economic implications.
    I'm in what would be described as typical Corbynite target grouping as a very low income renter, but I've always leant tory followed by social liberal or green as protest. I've never voted Labour, but personally a Corbyn win would harm me less than the middle classes and might benefit me greatly.
    Put it this way, I'm really gonna enjoy the election night coverage cos it's gonna be shits and giggles!
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Nigelb said:

    What is really bizzare to me is as this corbyasm has ramped up, Tories don't seem to do anything in response. Either they haven't got a clue what to do or they don't believe it.

    You would think that they would have every known popular Tory on the media round the clock with some form of attack. Even the Tory friendly media haven't really been fed attack stories, mail yesterday was how biased the bbc is and today telegraph about to waiting times. The first won't shift a vote and the second is bad for the government.

    There doesn't seem to be any grid. What is going on at CCHQ? Tumbleweed?

    They have completely ceded the ground and the spotlight to Labour from day one of this campaign. The Tories are nowhere to be seen. They've no-showed at their own party. It's a miracle the polls have them in the 40s.
    I guess that's what happens when you plan and election and write a manifesto with only four people, and the only other person you tell is Jeremy Hunt ?
    I dont think that an election was planned. No evidence of Tory planning certainly!
  • Options
    PeterMannionPeterMannion Posts: 712
    jonny83 said:

    If the polls are accurate then I assume we will see some increased Conservative campaigning in some of those Tory marginals right? And less in targeting Labour ones?

    Can't believe they are polling 40%, the issues about defense and security alone should be keeping them away from that even if you agree with their economic policy of increased taxation and borrowing.

    If their bottle goes, yes. Then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy of a tighter election.

    If they keep their nerve, they can still get a large majority of 50+
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,903
    SeanT said:

    BETTING ADVICE

    Given the polls, and the trend, the chances of a Hung Parliament are about 2/1, or 5/2 which means the 7/2 on offer is VALUE?

    Not in my opinion, but I've got this election wrong so far - so don't listen to me.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,161
    SeanT said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Can someone sedate SeanT in advance.

    Ms. Momentum can shove a couple of benzos up before she pegs him. That should do it.
    I am sanguine, again. I got my panicking in, early. Perhaps other Tories should have realised I was on to something....
    Come on SeanT. Think of Jezza's forthcoming Wealth Tax on publishing royalties!
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    HYUFD said:

    45% for the Tories would be their highest voteshare since 1970 but 40% for Labour only their highest voteshare since 2001 before Corbynistas get too excited

    Pretty unarguable now that the "true" polling position for the Tories is 44ish%. That's a comfortable majority in any reasonable circumstances.

    Even this Bouncy MORI poll gives a majority of 20 on Baxter (assuming UKIP 2% and Grn 1%).
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    Maybe Sion Simon - at heart - finds all of this darkly amusing.
  • Options
    The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    I thought there wasn't going to be any polls today....are there anymore coming?

    That a phone poll has shown is this is interesting - I wonder whether other phone polls will show the same.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    SeanT said:

    BETTING ADVICE

    Given the polls, and the trend, the chances of a Hung Parliament are about 2/1, or 5/2 which means the 7/2 on offer is VALUE?

    If the Tories get 44%+ it won't be a hung parliament.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited June 2017
    If Corbyn was 20 years younger it might have been much easier for the Tories to attack him politically speaking, but with him looking like Father Christmas it becomes a lot more difficult to combat his policies because it looks slightly unfair and unseemly. Strange but true.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    I don't think I can bear to watch May on BBC QT tonight.

    It could be a bloodbath.

    I hope I'm wrong.

    Double popcorn for me.
  • Options
    AlsoIndigoAlsoIndigo Posts: 1,852
    edited June 2017

    AndyJS said:

    One explanation for the Labour share being so high is that in the 1990s the turnout in many safe Labour seats collapsed from an average of about 70% to around 55% and hasn't really ever recovered since. It could be that Corbyn is once again enthusing the voters in those seats and turnout could be back up to 70% again. It would have a significant effect on Labour's vote share but it wouldn't win them many seats. Most of the Merseyside seats are good examples of this.

    As someone with a 1st in mathematics at a top redbrick university I disagree with you.

    Reading your posts, you seem to be very bullish about conservative prospects and very bearish towards labour. I haven't seen one negative post about conservative polling and you seem to be of the belief that the polls are wrong.

    1) In Tory wards turnout was 85% in 2015. Labour ward turnout was 45-50%. Had Labour turnout been similar, the tories would have lost 28 seats in the midlands/northern england. Tory enthusiasm is down compared to 2015, labour enthusiasm is up.
    2) 3/4 labour voters in the midlands/northern england are ex-labour voters. There is no evidence now that these same UKIP voters are voting heavily for conservative.
    3) There are a lot of seats where the tory vote has a very low ceiling. Plymouth, Southampton, Walsall, Stoke, Weaver Vale, Carlisle and any increase in vote enthusiasm could easily see a labour gain. As mentioned on the conservative home website, the tories are campaigning in labour areas they haven't done so in decades and its ok getting 2-3k votes for council elections but to get to 20k to win a seat is very, very hard. The labour vote is not going to down. There aren't enough seats like Tamworth, Burton that are moving away from Labour.
    One to savor when the Tories get a nice fat majority.

    To paraphrase Thatcher

    "Having a 1st in Maths from a redbrick is like being a lady... if you have to tell people you are, you aren't."
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    May knows how hard brexit is going to be, so has purposefully engineered a shit campaign so that Labour can win and take the blame when it all goes tits up. Obviously. Then the tories will win again with a 100+ seat landslide majority and rule for a lifetime. Genius. Utter genius.
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256
    FF43 said:

    Can someone sedate SeanT in advance.

    I was planning to quietly swap his wine for RedBull double-caffeinated....
    Surely you are not the 20 something Corbynsta he lovingly tells us about?
    :D:D:D:D

    Definitely not!!!!!! I was planning a sort of "reverse Milk Tray advert" where a mysterious lady swoops into Sean's place and swaps the goods, leaves a puzzling card and then silently departs before the fireworks begin

    https://youtu.be/P_LWzvWPmlI
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,903
    Wake up. This is Trump, Brexit all over again.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Pong said:

    Sharon Hodgson @SharonHodgsonMP

    Jeremy Corbyn: Labour could write off historic student debts| All those in early 20's with student debt #VoteLabour

    I know May might be crap, but f*** me Labour are dangerous.

    Early 20s with debts? I know people in their 30s with them.
    The irony is that we have loans and debts because George Osborne vetoed a graduate tax, but if the Tories tweaked it into a graduate tax now, it would be hugely popular. It pretty much is one in all but name anyway.

    It would eliminate debts at a stroke, and only higher earners would pay it (depending on where it was pitched). It would cost nothing, and not change who pays -- because the low-paid do not have to repay the loans anyway. The difference is that the non-payers would not feel crippled by debt.



    I thought the problem with a graduate tax is it incentivizes emigration (especially for high earners) in a way semi-commercial student loans don't.

    I like the idea of a simple graduate tax, but not sure it can really work in a globalised world/economy. Paying for H/E out of general taxation is IMO, the best and least unfair solution.
    Wasn't it Ken Clarke who said he didn't get married for the income tax allowance? I doubt it would have more than a marginal impact on anyone's decision to emigrate.

    You can make a case for general taxation, as we used to do. My point is the current loans system practically is a graduate tax but with the added disadvantage of saddling with debt people who will never be called upon to repay it anyway.
This discussion has been closed.