Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Swinson and Farage should now be included in polling “best PM”

SystemSystem Posts: 11,005
edited July 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Swinson and Farage should now be included in polling “best PM” ratings alongside Johnson and Corbyn

Latest surveys are clear  – the binary CON-LAB choice much less applicable

Read the full story here


«134567

Comments

  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247
    First
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247
    Labour's front bench has disappeared
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
    edited July 2019
    Third like Labour (if they're lucky).
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,811
    LOL,
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    Let's wait for Hartlepool's opinion.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247
    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry
  • Options
    noisywinternoisywinter Posts: 249
    Well I have to say I thought Boris was impressive today

    If it wasnt for Brexit and also the profligacy in spending commitments I would be optimistic- he seems really up for it
  • Options
    tpfkartpfkar Posts: 1,546
    Haven't been able to follow closely but Johnson-Corbyn really is the Accrington Stanley vs Forest Green of our times isn't it? Even with the history of the big two parties, surely we now need to look elsewhere for leadership and inspiration when the core offer is so poor.

    So this thread topic's exactly what's needed.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Talking up the LibDems is all well and good but there is a risk they will do a Farage and not show up at a general election. Even more of a risk with Farage's BXP.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,899

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    That was within the scope of the WDA.
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    I do hope that this change is made for the large number of polls that are doubtless in the field now.
  • Options
    surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469
    tlg86 said:
    51 now. Jason Gillispie scored a double hundred and was promptly dropped. Batsmen do not like bowlers encroaching into their territory.
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,079
    Most definitely they should be included. The next election is shaping up in England as a genuine 4 way scrap.
  • Options
    surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    So you are back supporting Boris. All is forgiven. The Airbus factory will close after a No Deal Brexit. It is a matter of time.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,247
    edited July 2019

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    So you are back supporting Boris. All is forgiven. The Airbus factory will close after a No Deal Brexit. It is a matter of time.
    I can advise you Airbus have confirmed it will not close it's 'Welsh' factory irrespective of the outcome of Brexit

    And yes, I have been very surprised by Boris today and his filleting of Corbyn and McDonnell has been long overdue by the conservative party
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    edited July 2019
    Get Jess Phillips in quick.

    1. Joe
    2. Jess






    3.
    4.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    "Boris Johnson has designed this cabinet to win a snap election with the votes of economically disadvantaged white voters with xenophobic tendencies dazzled by buffoonery and audacity." — Paul Mason

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/25/boris-johnson-new-cabinet-prime-minister-ministerial-party-country
  • Options
    kinabalukinabalu Posts: 39,079

    Well I have to say I thought Boris was impressive today

    If it wasnt for Brexit and also the profligacy in spending commitments I would be optimistic- he seems really up for it

    There is no doubt whatsoever that he is really up for it. There never was, in truth.

    The question is what do we think the 'it' is?

    What is he mainly keen to promote?

    (a) The national interest.
    (b) The party interest.
    (c) Boris Johnson.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,811

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    So you are back supporting Boris. All is forgiven. The Airbus factory will close after a No Deal Brexit. It is a matter of time.
    given most of Scottish fishing is owned by foreigners and what's left will be peddled by Boris, only fools or Tories will be cheering in Scotland
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,336
    AndyJS said:

    "Boris Johnson has designed this cabinet to win a snap election with the votes of economically disadvantaged white voters with xenophobic tendencies dazzled by buffoonery and audacity." — Paul Mason

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/25/boris-johnson-new-cabinet-prime-minister-ministerial-party-country

    Setting aside the strong element of caricature, that seems more or less correct.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,811
    kinabalu said:

    Well I have to say I thought Boris was impressive today

    If it wasnt for Brexit and also the profligacy in spending commitments I would be optimistic- he seems really up for it

    There is no doubt whatsoever that he is really up for it. There never was, in truth.

    The qu)estion is what do we think the 'it' is?

    What is he mainly keen to promote?

    (a) The national interest.
    (b) The party interest.
    (c) Boris Johnson.
    (c), (b).............long way away (a)
  • Options
    StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    They should certainly be included in the “worst PM” ratings.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,811

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    So you are back supporting Boris. All is forgiven. The Airbus factory will close after a No Deal Brexit. It is a matter of time.
    I can advise you Airbus have confirmed it will not close it's 'Welsh' factory irrespective of the outcome of Brexit

    And yes, I have been very surprised by Boris today and his filleting of Corbyn and McDonnell has been long overdue by the conservative party

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    So you are back supporting Boris. All is forgiven. The Airbus factory will close after a No Deal Brexit. It is a matter of time.
    I can advise you Airbus have confirmed it will not close it's 'Welsh' factory irrespective of the outcome of Brexit

    And yes, I have been very surprised by Boris today and his filleting of Corbyn and McDonnell has been long overdue by the conservative party
    G, if No deal and they are stiffed with tariffs they will be gone tout suite
  • Options
    StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    malcolmg said:

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    So you are back supporting Boris. All is forgiven. The Airbus factory will close after a No Deal Brexit. It is a matter of time.
    given most of Scottish fishing is owned by foreigners and what's left will be peddled by Boris, only fools or Tories will be cheering in Scotland
    Often the same thing.
  • Options
    StuartDicksonStuartDickson Posts: 12,146
    kinabalu said:

    Boris is storming this

    Aw falling in love. Sweet!

    But word of warning. He's a notorious cad. So don't give it up too easily.
    And for god’s sake, wear protection. You really don’t want to know where it’s been.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    Scott_P said:
    A naked leadership bid.....

    He should be composing an apology to Mrs Leon Brittan
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    Just watched Swinson on BBC2 politics. Somebody in the LibDems needs to tell her to get rid of the nervous tic of constantly saying "you know". It is not the speech of somebody with Number 10 in her sight.

    Plus - her teeth are too big for her face! Weirdly distracting....
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 41,811
    tpfkar said:

    Haven't been able to follow closely but Johnson-Corbyn really is the Accrington Stanley vs Forest Green of our times isn't it? Even with the history of the big two parties, surely we now need to look elsewhere for leadership and inspiration when the core offer is so poor.

    So this thread topic's exactly what's needed.

    Unfortunately for us have you seen what is lurking elsewhere, Dumb and Dumber will not cut it any better than existing dummies. Who would be stupid enough to want Farage or Swinson.
  • Options
    kjhkjh Posts: 10,571
    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,336
    As a Lib Dem, Mike ought to be able to find more flattering photos of Swinson.
    The one on the day of her leadership acceptance was even worse - it made her look as though she had jaundice.

    It's shallow, but image matters.
  • Options
    surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469
    Roger said:

    Scott_P said:
    A naked leadership bid.....

    He should be composing an apology to Mrs Leon Brittan
    But,,, I have just signed in.
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    kjh said:

    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.

    On the basis of notional calculations made at the time of the 2010 Boundary changes the seat would have been marginal in 2005.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,578
    It dawned on me that Bozo appointed Rudd and Morgan because he'd run out of swivel-eyed women but still needed a couple more female cabinet ministers to fill some perceived quota.

    Even he regards Andrea Jenkyns as a loon too far.
  • Options
    Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    Nigelb said:

    As a Lib Dem, Mike ought to be able to find more flattering photos of Swinson.
    The one on the day of her leadership acceptance was even worse - it made her look as though she had jaundice.

    It's shallow, but image matters.

    She looks really nice in the Labour attack ad saying you don't wanna vote for her because Tory coalition. Unintentionally I assume
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,937
    edited July 2019
    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    Scott_P said:
    I see Watson has waved goodbye to Northern Ireland with his pride in "Britain", not the UK......
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,274
    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a funeral) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    Death of the Tory party?
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215

    Talking up the LibDems is all well and good but there is a risk they will do a Farage and not show up at a general election. Even more of a risk with Farage's BXP.

    As always, it hangs on whether you believe the polls.

    Picking up the NE Somerset discussion from the previous thread, based on the 2017 result it’s a safe Tory seat with Labour a clear second.

    Yet on the national polls both Tory and Labour have lost about half of their GE vote share and the LibDem vote has doubled or trebled.

    These vote shifts won’t fall evenly, and the odds are that a seat like NE Somerset - which the LibDems “won” in this year’s local elections and polled very well in the Euro elections - is likely to be one where the remainer shift to the LibDems is greater than average.

    On a UNS model the Tories are still clear winner with Lib and Lab fighting for second place. On Flavible’s more sophisticated (not necessarily more accurate) model, the LibDems are running the Tories close for first place.

    Aside from our political futures, the betting opportunities, and risks, are likely to focus upon calling seats such as this correctly.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    Just watched Swinson on BBC2 politics. Somebody in the LibDems needs to tell her to get rid of the nervous tic of constantly saying "you know". It is not the speech of somebody with Number 10 in her sight.

    Plus - her teeth are too big for her face! Weirdly distracting....

    Tony Blair used to say "you know" all the time.
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Pulpstar said:

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    That was within the scope of the WDA.
    The WDA commits us to signing up for CFP v2. 0
  • Options
    Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,300
    Roger said:
    Even after losing all that weight, I'm not convinced this is something we should countenance.
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,954

    Scott_P said:
    I see Watson has waved goodbye to Northern Ireland with his pride in "Britain", not the UK......
    At last he's found something in common with the Brexitories.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,940
    All this is theatre. We're headed for No Deal is the message from today. Nothing else has any long term significance.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,937

    Just watched Swinson on BBC2 politics. Somebody in the LibDems needs to tell her to get rid of the nervous tic of constantly saying "you know". It is not the speech of somebody with Number 10 in her sight.

    Plus - her teeth are too big for her face! Weirdly distracting....

    Yes, Chuka is the real star I feel, Jo the warm up act
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,919
    Alistair said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    That was within the scope of the WDA.
    The WDA commits us to signing up for CFP v2. 0
    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8396
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
    I think you mean 'if only Boris hadn't bottled it'.
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,691

    FF43 said:

    Under almost any scenario most of the 12 Scottish tories are gone. Ruth Davidson has been very quiet recently. A no deal Brexit is now more unlikely than ever it will be a no deal Exit.

    There has to be a good chance Ruth Davidson will leave politics. Brexit has utterly undermined her political position.

    I don't see the point of setting up a Scottish Conservative Party that is somewhat associated with a Brexit Party Except In Name that is so toxic they need to get away.

    Unless the point is to set up a properly Scottish Conservative Party ahead of independence that Malcolm G etc could sign up to

    Either way I don't see Davidson having any reason to stay around.
    Are you scots?

    My guess is that the tories will now hoover up the unionist vote and increase their representation at the expense of the SNP.
    Yes. There is a market for British, not Scottish, worth maybe 15% of the vote. The Conservatives wouldn't get any Westminster MPs and would be totally clobbered if they led any independence referendum from a unionist side.

    That wasn't the market Ruth Davidson was playing in. Note past tense.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
    And by now we’d be welcoming someone like Mrs May into office as better able to bring the country back together after three years of divisive failure under Bozo.
  • Options
    Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,300

    It dawned on me that Bozo appointed Rudd and Morgan because he'd run out of swivel-eyed women but still needed a couple more female cabinet ministers to fill some perceived quota.

    Even he regards Andrea Jenkyns as a loon too far.

    Morgan: sacked by May (tick); worked with Bojo's buddy Malthouse and others on "getting Brexit done" (tick).

    Rudd: gave Bojo valuable Remainery support in the leadership contest (tick).

    Admittedly, in a reshuffle where people like Mordaunt got fired (and especially given Morgan's previous anti-Boris stance), I'm a little surprised.. but I can see how both have done their bit to be redeemed.
  • Options

    Scott_P said:
    I see Watson has waved goodbye to Northern Ireland with his pride in "Britain", not the UK......
    Northern Irish unionists would generally consider themselves British, which is the word Watson uses.

    The term "British Isles" is less used these days due to Irish sensitivities, and nationalists and those in the Republic of Ireland understandably wouldn't identify themselves as British. But, as a geographical fact, Ireland is one of the British Isles and those there have every bit as much right to call themselves British as those on the Isle of Wight (or not - up to them). Great Britain is simply the largest of the British Isles.

  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    IanB2 said:

    Talking up the LibDems is all well and good but there is a risk they will do a Farage and not show up at a general election. Even more of a risk with Farage's BXP.

    As always, it hangs on whether you believe the polls.

    Picking up the NE Somerset discussion from the previous thread, based on the 2017 result it’s a safe Tory seat with Labour a clear second.

    Yet on the national polls both Tory and Labour have lost about half of their GE vote share and the LibDem vote has doubled or trebled.

    These vote shifts won’t fall evenly, and the odds are that a seat like NE Somerset - which the LibDems “won” in this year’s local elections and polled very well in the Euro elections - is likely to be one where the remainer shift to the LibDems is greater than average.

    On a UNS model the Tories are still clear winner with Lib and Lab fighting for second place. On Flavible’s more sophisticated (not necessarily more accurate) model, the LibDems are running the Tories close for first place.

    Aside from our political futures, the betting opportunities, and risks, are likely to focus upon calling seats such as this correctly.
    But Labour was the clear second there - within 5,000 votes of JRM - in 2010 despite any Libdem boost from Cleggmania etc.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,899
    37 in Cambridge now
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 39,954
    FF43 said:

    FF43 said:

    Under almost any scenario most of the 12 Scottish tories are gone. Ruth Davidson has been very quiet recently. A no deal Brexit is now more unlikely than ever it will be a no deal Exit.

    There has to be a good chance Ruth Davidson will leave politics. Brexit has utterly undermined her political position.

    I don't see the point of setting up a Scottish Conservative Party that is somewhat associated with a Brexit Party Except In Name that is so toxic they need to get away.

    Unless the point is to set up a properly Scottish Conservative Party ahead of independence that Malcolm G etc could sign up to

    Either way I don't see Davidson having any reason to stay around.
    Are you scots?

    My guess is that the tories will now hoover up the unionist vote and increase their representation at the expense of the SNP.
    Yes. There is a market for British, not Scottish, worth maybe 15% of the vote. The Conservatives wouldn't get any Westminster MPs and would be totally clobbered if they led any independence referendum from a unionist side.

    That wasn't the market Ruth Davidson was playing in. Note past tense.
    'My guess is that the tories will now hoover up the unionist vote and increase their representation at the expense of the SNP.'

    That's a keeper.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,200

    Just watched Swinson on BBC2 politics. Somebody in the LibDems needs to tell her to get rid of the nervous tic of constantly saying "you know". It is not the speech of somebody with Number 10 in her sight.

    Vicky Pollard :)
  • Options
    TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,387
    Alistair said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Boris commitment to ditching the CFP and becoming a coastal trading nation will be music to the ears of the Scottish Fishing Industry

    That was within the scope of the WDA.
    The WDA commits us to signing up for CFP v2. 0
    I'm pretty certain the FP included control of our waters?
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215
    kjh said:

    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.

    It isn’t a seat that Labour can win. Which isn’t to say Labour can’t come second - and they have.

    But the probability of being able to win a seat and the probability of being in second place aren’t as closely correlated as you might think.

    It is a seat the LibDems could win - as demonstrated by the balance of votes in both this year’s local and Euro elections. But it will depend on Labour voters seeing where the new land lies.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,937

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
    Yes, love him or loathe him Boris has brought new energy, charisma and passion to No 10
  • Options
    kjhkjh Posts: 10,571
    edited July 2019
    justin124 said:

    kjh said:

    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.

    On the basis of notional calculations made at the time of the 2010 Boundary changes the seat would have been marginal in 2005.
    You are definitely doing an HYFD. You are ignoring the fact that I accepted originally they could win in a landslide situation (it was in my analysis) and are using really dubious data (notional calculations on such boundary changes are not that accurate) and even then it only becomes marginal (if it had existed) during a period of big wins by Labour.

    I was simply arguing that LDs can get the tactical vote (particularly currently) but Labour can not (enough to unseat JRM).

    The LDs probably won't and things may change to make this scenario redundant (LDs drop in the polls).

    Everything has changed since the last election. Looking at results from 2017 and saying the LDs are nowhere and Lab are 2nd and assuming that is guide is nonsense. The LDs got massacred in 2017 so you have to look further back and see if it really is a straight Lab/Con seat.

    There biggest problem for the LDs could be the targeting of easier pickings near by.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,336
    Scott_P said:
    The language is a trifle coarse, but essentially correct.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215
    justin124 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Talking up the LibDems is all well and good but there is a risk they will do a Farage and not show up at a general election. Even more of a risk with Farage's BXP.

    As always, it hangs on whether you believe the polls.

    Picking up the NE Somerset discussion from the previous thread, based on the 2017 result it’s a safe Tory seat with Labour a clear second.

    Yet on the national polls both Tory and Labour have lost about half of their GE vote share and the LibDem vote has doubled or trebled.

    These vote shifts won’t fall evenly, and the odds are that a seat like NE Somerset - which the LibDems “won” in this year’s local elections and polled very well in the Euro elections - is likely to be one where the remainer shift to the LibDems is greater than average.

    On a UNS model the Tories are still clear winner with Lib and Lab fighting for second place. On Flavible’s more sophisticated (not necessarily more accurate) model, the LibDems are running the Tories close for first place.

    Aside from our political futures, the betting opportunities, and risks, are likely to focus upon calling seats such as this correctly.
    But Labour was the clear second there - within 5,000 votes of JRM - in 2010 despite any Libdem boost from Cleggmania etc.
    Being second doesn’t mean Labour has a chance of winning.

    And our politics today is nothing like 2010.
  • Options
    AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    edited July 2019
    FF43 said:

    FF43 said:

    Under almost any scenario most of the 12 Scottish tories are gone. Ruth Davidson has been very quiet recently. A no deal Brexit is now more unlikely than ever it will be a no deal Exit.

    There has to be a good chance Ruth Davidson will leave politics. Brexit has utterly undermined her political position.

    I don't see the point of setting up a Scottish Conservative Party that is somewhat associated with a Brexit Party Except In Name that is so toxic they need to get away.

    Unless the point is to set up a properly Scottish Conservative Party ahead of independence that Malcolm G etc could sign up to

    Either way I don't see Davidson having any reason to stay around.
    Are you scots?

    My guess is that the tories will now hoover up the unionist vote and increase their representation at the expense of the SNP.
    Yes. There is a market for British, not Scottish, worth maybe 15% of the vote. The Conservatives wouldn't get any Westminster MPs and would be totally clobbered if they led any independence referendum from a unionist side.

    That wasn't the market Ruth Davidson was playing in. Note past tense.
    To add to this The SCon surge was based on mass LD switching in the northeast. They are not going to stay switched at the next election.
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    IanB2 said:

    kjh said:

    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.

    It isn’t a seat that Labour can win. Which isn’t to say Labour can’t come second - and they have.

    But the probability of being able to win a seat and the probability of being in second place aren’t as closely correlated as you might think.

    It is a seat the LibDems could win - as demonstrated by the balance of votes in both this year’s local and Euro elections. But it will depend on Labour voters seeing where the new land lies.
    With respect , given that Labour was within 5,000 votes of JRM in 2010 - despite the Libdem Cleggmania boost - there is a strong likelihood that Labour would have won there in 2005.
  • Options
    HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 116,937

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a funeral) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    Death of the Tory party?
    No, my father's stepmother.

    If the Tories did not have a leader committed to deliver Brexit though it may have been
  • Options
    OnboardG1OnboardG1 Posts: 1,277

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a funeral) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    Death of the Tory party?
    A murder would defintely stop a show.
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    IanB2 said:

    justin124 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Talking up the LibDems is all well and good but there is a risk they will do a Farage and not show up at a general election. Even more of a risk with Farage's BXP.

    As always, it hangs on whether you believe the polls.

    Picking up the NE Somerset discussion from the previous thread, based on the 2017 result it’s a safe Tory seat with Labour a clear second.

    Yet on the national polls both Tory and Labour have lost about half of their GE vote share and the LibDem vote has doubled or trebled.

    These vote shifts won’t fall evenly, and the odds are that a seat like NE Somerset - which the LibDems “won” in this year’s local elections and polled very well in the Euro elections - is likely to be one where the remainer shift to the LibDems is greater than average.

    On a UNS model the Tories are still clear winner with Lib and Lab fighting for second place. On Flavible’s more sophisticated (not necessarily more accurate) model, the LibDems are running the Tories close for first place.

    Aside from our political futures, the betting opportunities, and risks, are likely to focus upon calling seats such as this correctly.
    But Labour was the clear second there - within 5,000 votes of JRM - in 2010 despite any Libdem boost from Cleggmania etc.
    Being second doesn’t mean Labour has a chance of winning.

    And our politics today is nothing like 2010.
    Indeed - even at present poll levels the LibDem vote is well below levels recorded in that campaign. Some polls only have them on 15%/16% with Labour on 28%/29%.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    IanB2 said:

    Talking up the LibDems is all well and good but there is a risk they will do a Farage and not show up at a general election. Even more of a risk with Farage's BXP.

    As always, it hangs on whether you believe the polls.

    Picking up the NE Somerset discussion from the previous thread, based on the 2017 result it’s a safe Tory seat with Labour a clear second.

    Yet on the national polls both Tory and Labour have lost about half of their GE vote share and the LibDem vote has doubled or trebled.

    These vote shifts won’t fall evenly, and the odds are that a seat like NE Somerset - which the LibDems “won” in this year’s local elections and polled very well in the Euro elections - is likely to be one where the remainer shift to the LibDems is greater than average.

    On a UNS model the Tories are still clear winner with Lib and Lab fighting for second place. On Flavible’s more sophisticated (not necessarily more accurate) model, the LibDems are running the Tories close for first place.

    Aside from our political futures, the betting opportunities, and risks, are likely to focus upon calling seats such as this correctly.
    It is not just the polls, or the polls and the seat/swing modelling, but also the question of whether the election will be decided on the issue of Brexit. We have seen before, especially with Ukip, that one cannot just read across from one class of election to the next.

    So the polls might have an entirely correct answer to quite the wrong question.
  • Options
    surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,336
    edited July 2019
    Ishmael_Z said:

    Nigelb said:

    As a Lib Dem, Mike ought to be able to find more flattering photos of Swinson.
    The one on the day of her leadership acceptance was even worse - it made her look as though she had jaundice.

    It's shallow, but image matters.

    She looks really nice in the Labour attack ad saying you don't wanna vote for her because Tory coalition. Unintentionally I assume
    Probably.
    That's the point, though. She looks absolutely fine, but somehow contrives regularly to be photographed or filmed by incompetent amateurs.

    In contrast Boris deliberately looks like a mess, but is a well shot mess.

    The leadership acceptance speech was especially egregious, as they had complete control of lighting and cameras.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215
    edited July 2019
    kjh said:

    justin124 said:

    kjh said:

    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.

    On the basis of notional calculations made at the time of the 2010 Boundary changes the seat would have been marginal in 2005.
    You are definitely doing an HYFD. You are ignoring the fact that I accepted originally they could win in a landslide situation (it was in my analysis) and are using really dubious data (notional calculations on such boundary changes are not that accurate) and even then it only becomes marginal (if it had existed) during a period of big wins by Labour.

    I was simply arguing that LDs can get the tactical vote (particularly currently) but Labour can not (enough to unseat JRM).

    The LDs probably won't and things may change to make this scenario redundant (LDs drop in the polls).

    Everything has changed since the last election. Looking at results from 2017 and saying the LDs are nowhere and Lab are 2nd and assuming that is guide is nonsense. The LDs got massacred in 2017 so you have to look further back and see if it really is a straight Lab/Con seat.

    There biggest problem for the LDs could be the targeting of easier pickings near by.
    Yes.

    And if polls stay as they are (noting of course that there is a perfectly reasonable counter-argument that a GE might drive a return to two-party politics) the collapse in the Labour vote and the surge in LibDem support has to appear somewhere. And a seat like NE Somerset is very likely to be well above average in terms of Lab-LibD swing, based on actual votes cast there this year.

    Our success as punters is going to rest heavily on our ability to read the new political landscape and not get overly distracted by looking back at past results with UNS fixed in our minds.
  • Options
    surbiton19surbiton19 Posts: 1,469
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
    Yes, love him or loathe him Boris has brought new energy, charisma and passion to No 10
    In my case, utterly loathe him.
  • Options
    OnboardG1OnboardG1 Posts: 1,277
    edited July 2019
    And if you think Boris is storming it, well I have a Garden Bridge to sell you. He has evaded almost every question in a way that would seem very familiar to any Mayite. The more I see him the more I think he wants to piss the quality of remaining 50 odd years I have left here away to fuel his ambition. Prick.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Yes, no, maybe. Trouble is that even after a snap election, the same old questions will remain about Brexit and our future relations with the EU.
  • Options
    RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
    Yes, love him or loathe him Boris has brought new energy, charisma and passion to No 10
    That's true. Unfortunately that isn't what we need right now.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,187
  • Options
    kjhkjh Posts: 10,571
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
    Yes, love him or loathe him Boris has brought new energy, charisma and passion to No 10
    Can't disagree with that. The comparisons to Trump are very unfair. Boris has a brain, he is witty, and he can present.

    I don't agree with his politics and he has other faults, but lack of energy, charisma and passion are not amongst them.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    The Lib Dems need defections. Don't be fooled by Johnson's Mussolini tomfoolery. He is more unpleasantly right wing than Farage. I've no doubt that the country will quickly grow to despise him but without a credible Labour leader it's all down to the Lib Dems
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793
    Boris did quite well then? :D
  • Options
    DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,111

    Scott_P said:
    I see Watson has waved goodbye to Northern Ireland with his pride in "Britain", not the UK......
    Northern Irish unionists would generally consider themselves British, which is the word Watson uses.

    The term "British Isles" is less used these days due to Irish sensitivities, and nationalists and those in the Republic of Ireland understandably wouldn't identify themselves as British. But, as a geographical fact, Ireland is one of the British Isles and those there have every bit as much right to call themselves British as those on the Isle of Wight (or not - up to them). Great Britain is simply the largest of the British Isles.

    It’s not geographical “fact” that the archipelago is the “British Isles”, that’s just a name, a nomenclature that was, as you say, commonly used until the second half of the late C20. You can argue that it is a fact that we are all part of the same archipelago (I would agree) but so are Corsica and Sardinia and I don’t know of a collective name for them.

    The name, as with all names, is up for grabs and can always be changed. I don’t like the rather worthy “These Islands”, Dairmud Maculloch’s “Atlantic Islands” doesn’t work because it could equally include the Canaries, and I can’t think of a suitable alternative. I once suggested the “Anglo-Celtic Islands” to someone but they thought I was taking the piss.
  • Options
    Blue_rogBlue_rog Posts: 2,019
    I really enjoyed Boris's performance today. It was a breath of fresh air in what has been a stolid mess. I even thought Bercow was slightly better behaved!
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,789
    Roger said:

    Scott_P said:
    A naked leadership bid.....

    He should be composing an apology to Mrs Leon Brittan
    Yes, a period of silence on his part would be welcome.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    Scott_P said:
    What on earth is 'cuntitude'? Using language like that is just plain naff.
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    IanB2 said:

    kjh said:

    justin124 said:

    kjh said:

    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.

    On the basis of notional calculations made at the time of the 2010 Boundary changes the seat would have been marginal in 2005.
    You are definitely doing an HYFD. You are ignoring the fact that I accepted originally they could win in a landslide situation (it was in my analysis) and are using really dubious data (notional calculations on such boundary changes are not that accurate) and even then it only becomes marginal (if it had existed) during a period of big wins by Labour.

    I was simply arguing that LDs can get the tactical vote (particularly currently) but Labour can not (enough to unseat JRM).

    The LDs probably won't and things may change to make this scenario redundant (LDs drop in the polls).

    Everything has changed since the last election. Looking at results from 2017 and saying the LDs are nowhere and Lab are 2nd and assuming that is guide is nonsense. The LDs got massacred in 2017 so you have to look further back and see if it really is a straight Lab/Con seat.

    There biggest problem for the LDs could be the targeting of easier pickings near by.
    Yes.

    And if polls stay as they are (noting of course that there is a perfectly reasonable counter-argument that a GE might drive a return to two-party politics) the collapse in the Labour vote and the surge in LibDem support has to appear somewhere. And a seat like NE Somerset is very likely to be well above average in terms of Lab-LibD swing, based on actual votes cast there this year.

    Our success as punters is going to rest heavily on our ability to read the new political landscape and not get overly distracted by looking back at past results with UNS fixed in our minds.
    But in 2010 there were polls putting the LibDems clearly ahead of Labour right up to Polling Day . Despite that , Labour was within 10% of winning here - and might well have done so in 2005 - never mind 1997 and 2001.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    The lefty remainer frothing is hilarious.

    A positive message is right wing ? That’s a new one..

  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215
    justin124 said:

    IanB2 said:

    kjh said:

    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.

    It isn’t a seat that Labour can win. Which isn’t to say Labour can’t come second - and they have.

    But the probability of being able to win a seat and the probability of being in second place aren’t as closely correlated as you might think.

    It is a seat the LibDems could win - as demonstrated by the balance of votes in both this year’s local and Euro elections. But it will depend on Labour voters seeing where the new land lies.
    With respect , given that Labour was within 5,000 votes of JRM in 2010 - despite the Libdem Cleggmania boost - there is a strong likelihood that Labour would have won there in 2005.
    That is a worthless statement given where we are now.

    You have to make the assumption that the vote share is now split four ways - and I fully recognise that other arguments and scenarios are available, as a I said below.

    But once you pass this assumption, it is a nonsense to apply the thinking and models developed in a world of small percentage swings between two large parties to the current environment where both Tory and Labour are seeing half of their vote share disappear and minor parties are surging from single digit percentages up to 20+% of the vote.
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,703
    Not surprising when Cummings is involved.
  • Options
    DougSealDougSeal Posts: 11,111
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
    Yes, love him or loathe him Boris has brought new energy, charisma and passion to No 10
    He’s been there less than 24 hours FFS. People were eulogising May in similar ways three years ago. The public, who had no say in his appointment either, see right through the charade. Gove tried to save us but he only managed to postpone the arrival of the man who dooms the U.K.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,215
    justin124 said:

    IanB2 said:

    kjh said:

    justin124 said:

    kjh said:

    Justin, FPT on JRM's seat:

    You said Lab would have won in 1997 and 2001:

    a) What part of my 'can only win if on course for a landslide anyway' did you not get?
    b) You are doing an HYFD here 'Would have won'? You just don't know that.

    On the basis of notional calculations made at the time of the 2010 Boundary changes the seat would have been marginal in 2005.
    You are definitely doing an HYFD. You are ignoring the fact that I accepted originally they could win in a landslide situation (it was in my analysis) and are using really dubious data (notional calculations on such boundary changes are not that accurate) and even then it only becomes marginal (if it had existed) during a period of big wins by Labour.

    I was simply arguing that LDs can get the tactical vote (particularly currently) but Labour can not (enough to unseat JRM).

    The LDs probably won't and things may change to make this scenario redundant (LDs drop in the polls).

    Everything has changed since the last election. Looking at results from 2017 and saying the LDs are nowhere and Lab are 2nd and assuming that is guide is nonsense. The LDs got massacred in 2017 so you have to look further back and see if it really is a straight Lab/Con seat.

    There biggest problem for the LDs could be the targeting of easier pickings near by.
    Yes.

    And if polls stay as they are (noting of course that there is a perfectly reasonable counter-argument that a GE might drive a return to two-party politics) the collapse in the Labour vote and the surge in LibDem support has to appear somewhere. And a seat like NE Somerset is very likely to be well above average in terms of Lab-LibD swing, based on actual votes cast there this year.

    Our success as punters is going to rest heavily on our ability to read the new political landscape and not get overly distracted by looking back at past results with UNS fixed in our minds.
    But in 2010 there were polls putting the LibDems clearly ahead of Labour right up to Polling Day . Despite that , Labour was within 10% of winning here - and might well have done so in 2005 - never mind 1997 and 2001.
    Of course there is an argument that the polls might be wrong. Or that things might change as a GE approaches, or during the campaign.

    However if the polls aren’t wrong, and don’t change, then NE Somerset is a clear LibDem target and a Labour vote is a Wasted Vote.
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,200
    Boris gets so many things wrong! He made some really stupid predictions, the most juicy being these:

    "I have as much chance of becoming Prime Minister as of being decapitated by a frisbee or of finding Elvis." - 2003.

    "My chances of being PM are about as good as the chances of finding Elvis on Mars, or my being reincarnated as an olive." - 2004.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Looks like Boris is doing an unofficial PMQs in the HoC at the moment.
  • Options
    OnboardG1OnboardG1 Posts: 1,277
    TGOHF said:

    The lefty remainer frothing is hilarious.

    A positive message is right wing ? That’s a new one..

    Claiming you can cure cancer with reiki is a positive message, it's still delusional.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,839
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Missed BoJo's First Commons performance (was at a Service of Thanksgiving) but it seems to have been a showstopper anway

    It's where we would have been three years ago if only Mr (Mrs?) Gove hadn't stuck their ambitious oar in.....
    Yes, love him or loathe him Boris has brought new energy, charisma and passion to No 10
    To give him his due, your man did well in the Commons. Very refreshing to see some unabated optimism on display.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    edited July 2019
    Scott_P said:
    Just spare a thought for the poor staffers who had to try to keep track of how many promises of cabinet positions Boris had made.
This discussion has been closed.