Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » And so to the first leaders’ TV debate of GE2019 – without a r

SystemSystem Posts: 11,007
edited November 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » And so to the first leaders’ TV debate of GE2019 – without a remainer

politicalbetting.com is proudly powered by WordPress with "Neat!" theme. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Read the full story here


«13456710

Comments

  • Options
    Sloppy first?
  • Options
    Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    CORBYN will be a remainer if he needs to be, to keep SNP or LD happy
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    edited November 2019
    I’ve got some paint I’m watching dry,

    I’m thinking how much better it would be at running the country than either of these losers.
  • Options
    eristdooferistdoof Posts: 4,887
    FPT
    Andrew said:

    Ashcroft poll asked people what they think the GE outcome will be:

    Con maj 22%, Con largest party but no maj 34%, Lab maj 7%, Lab largest but no maj 8%

    Betting markets think Con maj 64%, Lab maj 2%ish.

    Hold on a mo you are comparing two different things here!

    The betting market does indeed think there is a 64% probability of a Con overall majority. But the poll is saying that '22% of those polled predicted Con overall Majority' The respondents are being asked to pick the most likely winner, not give an estimate of the probability. The two are not the same thing at all.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    Aw yes, live on YouTube!
  • Options
    GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 19,077
    edited November 2019
    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.
  • Options
    kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 3,936
    So long as Corbyn doesn't promise to nationalise Wetherspoons and Boris can keep himself from humping someone's leg, both will be considered to have outperformed expectations.

    In other words, the bar is set very low for this one. Who will disappoint the least?
  • Options
    I expect Boris Johnson to win against a poor opponent (a bit like the Battle of Zama) but display all the humility of Crassus at Carrhae.
  • Options
    Basically, whichever one of them says more of my debate bingo bets wins my vote.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    kyf_100 said:

    So long as Corbyn doesn't promise to nationalise Wetherspoons and Boris can keep himself from humping someone's leg, both will be considered to have outperformed expectations.

    In other words, the bar is set very low for this one. Who will disappoint the least?

    Johnson, it is well known, wishes to screw Corbyn remorselessly.

    But he will hopefully wait until December 12th and do it via the ballot box rather than live on stage.
  • Options
    brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Killing squirrels.
  • Options
    Ave_it said:

    CORBYN will be a remainer if he needs to be, to keep SNP or LD happy

    Must be tense waiting for the big confrontation - Saturday 3pm
  • Options
    MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,286
    FPT: BBC has lost live coverage of final 2 rounds of Augusta Masters golf.
  • Options
    Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411

    Ave_it said:

    CORBYN will be a remainer if he needs to be, to keep SNP or LD happy

    Must be tense waiting for the big confrontation - Saturday 3pm
    We probably won't be playing next season so yes I'm quite nervous!

    The starter to #MegaPollingSaturday3!
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,572

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Tsk! Sloppy Jo!
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Killing squirrels.
    Has that story not tailed off yet?

    It’s very convenient for me. I was teaching about Richard III earlier today and I explained why he was such an idiot to deny having planned to marry his niece. Immediately everyone gossiped about how the king had denied planning an extraordinary act of incest.

    Now I have an up to the minute example as well.
  • Options

    Basically, whichever one of them says more of my debate bingo bets wins my vote.

    If my accumulator comes up, I'm voting Tory*






    *I reserve the right to withdraw these remarks if this unlikely event happens
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    MikeL said:

    FPT: BBC has lost live coverage of final 2 rounds of Augusta Masters golf.

    A blow for that August body.
  • Options
    nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    I’ve decided I’ll be having a drink for each time Bozo says get Brexit done ! Which means I’ll have alcohol poisoning about ten minutes into the debate .

  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826
    The final garden stakes numbers are in

    360 up (8 refusals 5 Corbyn 3 BREXIT) and I am officially knackered despite only being the driver.

    My spell as silver van man is over.

    2017 numbers for comparison 400
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    nico67 said:

    I’ve decided I’ll be having a drink for each time Bozo says get Brexit done ! Which means I’ll have alcohol poisoning about ten minutes into the debate .

    Really? What are you drinking that you’ll last that long? Small beer, I presume?
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,572
    ydoethur said:

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Killing squirrels.
    Has that story not tailed off yet?

    It’s very convenient for me. I was teaching about Richard III earlier today and I explained why he was such an idiot to deny having planned to marry his niece. Immediately everyone gossiped about how the king had denied planning an extraordinary act of incest.

    Now I have an up to the minute example as well.
    I have literally no idea what that post is about :disappointed:
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826
    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109

    ydoethur said:

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Killing squirrels.
    Has that story not tailed off yet?

    It’s very convenient for me. I was teaching about Richard III earlier today and I explained why he was such an idiot to deny having planned to marry his niece. Immediately everyone gossiped about how the king had denied planning an extraordinary act of incest.

    Now I have an up to the minute example as well.
    I have literally no idea what that post is about :disappointed:
    The bit about Richard, or the bit about squirrels?
  • Options
    nico67nico67 Posts: 4,502
    ydoethur said:

    nico67 said:

    I’ve decided I’ll be having a drink for each time Bozo says get Brexit done ! Which means I’ll have alcohol poisoning about ten minutes into the debate .

    Really? What are you drinking that you’ll last that long? Small beer, I presume?
    Very funny !
  • Options
    Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826

    Sloppy first?

    Thought you were more of a sloppy 2nds man myself!!
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Tsk! Sloppy Jo!
    Did she lose the appeal today then?
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,572
    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Killing squirrels.
    Has that story not tailed off yet?

    It’s very convenient for me. I was teaching about Richard III earlier today and I explained why he was such an idiot to deny having planned to marry his niece. Immediately everyone gossiped about how the king had denied planning an extraordinary act of incest.

    Now I have an up to the minute example as well.
    I have literally no idea what that post is about :disappointed:
    The bit about Richard, or the bit about squirrels?
    The squirrels
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109

    ydoethur said:

    ydoethur said:

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Killing squirrels.
    Has that story not tailed off yet?

    It’s very convenient for me. I was teaching about Richard III earlier today and I explained why he was such an idiot to deny having planned to marry his niece. Immediately everyone gossiped about how the king had denied planning an extraordinary act of incest.

    Now I have an up to the minute example as well.
    I have literally no idea what that post is about :disappointed:
    The bit about Richard, or the bit about squirrels?
    The squirrels
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jo-swinson-squirrels-shooting-stones-lib-dems-slingshot-fake-news-a9209196.html
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826
    My TV is fooked my Green has gone grey.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793
    Spin will be that Jezza nailed and it and Boris was hoist by his own putard.

    And then the polls will arrive at the weekend and it will have absolutely ni difference whatsoever. :D
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,572
    timmo said:

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Tsk! Sloppy Jo!
    Did she lose the appeal today then?
    Did they have leave to appeal?
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826
    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    Clever boy.
  • Options
    I’m watching The Crown tonight.

    Really.

    I will get nothing from this debate.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Tsk! Sloppy Jo!
    Did she lose the appeal today then?
    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
    It will be adjourned pretty quickly
  • Options
    Ave_it said:

    CORBYN will be a remainer if he needs to be, to keep SNP or LD happy

    But it is an "OR".
    On indyref2, he can't keep both happy.
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,987

    Ave_it said:

    The key to CON is to get some of the seats we lost to LAB in 2010 and 2015 back (probably won't be Hove or ECA) but maybe places like Crewe, Ipswich, Reading W, even Kensington and Canterbury.

    We are not going to be getting all these Northern seats where we haven't won before although maybe a few like Newcastle UL and Wrexham.

    20 to 25 gains from LAB might be enough!

    I can believe Reading West and Crewe and Nantwich. Derby North should be ok too.

    I’m less confident of Kensington and Canterbury.

    Ipswich, Bristol North West and Croydon Central maybe maybe not.

    Hove, ECA, Enfield Southgate, Portsmouth South and Battersea definitely not.
    Here are my model's latest predictions

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yIHH_ZtcH9w9JF5e8WwYD6QuhOhlVwCO_GboafT6kfc/edit?usp=sharing

    Note that I have dropped the Wales part of my model. It didn't reflect the regional swing and was too harsh on the Tories. I am now using a combination of Baxter, Flavible and MRP for Wales.
    I have made the additive and multiplication models 50/50.
    I have updated with the two polls tonight.

    Con/Lab/LD

    England 311/194/27
    Wales 15/20/1
    Scotland 5/1/5
    Total 331/215/33
  • Options
    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
    Justice delayed is justice denied.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    edited November 2019

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
    Justice delayed is justice denied.
    I might have a different opinion if he was standing again.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826

    timmo said:

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Tsk! Sloppy Jo!
    Did she lose the appeal today then?
    Did they have leave to appeal?
    She appeals to nobody

    Apart from Gallowgate and OGH
  • Options
    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
    Justice delayed is justice denied.
    I might have a different opinion if he was standing again.
    It’s just a prelim hearing - but the charges may have been added to - or reduced..
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109
    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
    Justice delayed is justice denied.
    I might have a different opinion if he was standing again.
    I don’t think the wheels of justice can be stopped from turning merely because the accused is a retired politician. Even if he was quite a senior one and there’s an election on.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826
    nichomar said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
    Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?

    Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
    Justice delayed is justice denied.
    I might have a different opinion if he was standing again.
    It’s just a prelim hearing - but the charges may have been added to - or reduced..
    OK, I see less reason for a delay for that. Might be different if the ex-leader was being charged a few days before election day!

    Welcome to PB, btw (assuming this isn't your fourth account after the password debacle!)
  • Options
    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
    Justice delayed is justice denied.
    I might have a different opinion if he was standing again.
    It’s just a prelim hearing - but the charges may have been added to - or reduced..
    OK, I see less reason for a delay for that. Might be different if the ex-leader was being charged a few days before election day!

    Welcome to PB, btw (assuming this isn't your fourth account after the password debacle!)
    The ban hammer never forgets apparently.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:

    RobD said:

    Flashy4 said:
    Erm, surely they could have picked a better time?
    Justice delayed is justice denied.
    I might have a different opinion if he was standing again.
    It’s just a prelim hearing - but the charges may have been added to - or reduced..
    OK, I see less reason for a delay for that. Might be different if the ex-leader was being charged a few days before election day!

    Welcome to PB, btw (assuming this isn't your fourth account after the password debacle!)
    The ban hammer never forgets apparently.
    :o an ex-con? :D
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826

    Ave_it said:

    CORBYN will be a remainer if he needs to be, to keep SNP or LD happy

    But it is an "OR".
    On indyref2, he can't keep both happy.
    He will campaign for neither and implement the 2nd Ref
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    nichomar said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
    Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?

    Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
    Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
  • Options
    alb1onalb1on Posts: 698

    I’ll get my “where the hell is Super Jo?” in early.

    Killing squirrels.
    Probably a lot safer than being female and in the presence of Boris.
  • Options
    alb1onalb1on Posts: 698

    I’m watching The Crown tonight.

    Really.

    I will get nothing from this debate.

    Better The Crown than The Clown?
  • Options
    I don't think the mob outside the ITV studio chanting what sounds like "Tory scum" are going to win over any voters to Labour
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793

    My TV is fooked my Green has gone grey.

    Must be the oddest PEB so far. Caroline Lucas actually looked somewhat scary! :open_mouth:
  • Options
    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    My mum just called her a "junior office girl" :lol:

    Boris = "filthy disgusting b*st*rd"
    Corbyn = "useless idiot"

    :lol:
  • Options
    Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411

    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    My mum just called her a "junior office girl" :lol:

    Boris = "filthy disgusting b*st*rd"
    Corbyn = "useless idiot"

    Maybe your mum should be PM! She would be an improvement on them!
    :lol:
  • Options
    Can we please all save time by stating now who we think has won.

    I think SuperJo won it, by virtue of not appearing.
  • Options
    Banterman said:

    I don't think the mob outside the ITV studio chanting what sounds like "Tory scum" are going to win over any voters to Labour

    I'd dearly love to ram that loudhailer up that scruffy rabbles nose.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    About the time I invented Jo Swansong.....
  • Options

    Can we please all save time by stating now who we think has won.

    I think SuperJo won it, by virtue of not appearing.

    Larry the Cat.

    He has managed to pivot out of the 'retirement' they had planned for him in the new year. Outstanding debating skills.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826
    nichomar said:

    nichomar said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
    Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?

    Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
    Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
    So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.

    Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.

    No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
  • Options
    TudorRoseTudorRose Posts: 1,662

    Can we please all save time by stating now who we think has won.

    I think SuperJo won it, by virtue of not appearing.

    I think the answer will be ITV. If the debate is interesting (however defined) ITV will get the credit, if it's boring no-one will tune into the others.
  • Options
    Can I please say for the record at this point that I think these debates are a complete waste of time, they add nothing to the sum of knowledge about the candidates, they change very few people's minds and they personalise the whole election in a way I think is counter productive. They also propagate the lie that we are voting for a party or a PM rather than an individual representative.

    These are not potential presidents, they are simply individuals seeking election in their constituencies and hoping that they can then persuade enough fellow MPs to make them PM. We should stop Americanising our electoral system in this way.

    Rant over... for now. :)

  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826
    nichomar said:

    nichomar said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
    Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?

    Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
    Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
    Totally due.

    Really.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826

    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    My mum just called her a "junior office girl" :lol:

    Boris = "filthy disgusting b*st*rd"
    Corbyn = "useless idiot"

    :lol:
    Tell her to vote for the useless idiot he is the only way to stop the filthy disgusting bastard.
  • Options
    GIN1138 said:

    My TV is fooked my Green has gone grey.

    Must be the oddest PEB so far. Caroline Lucas actually looked somewhat scary! :open_mouth:
    Different. Black and white. Great performance. Superb.

  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793
    edited November 2019

    Can I please say for the record at this point that I think these debates are a complete waste of time, they add nothing to the sum of knowledge about the candidates, they change very few people's minds and they personalise the whole election in a way I think is counter productive. They also propagate the lie that we are voting for a party or a PM rather than an individual representative.

    These are not potential presidents, they are simply individuals seeking election in their constituencies and hoping that they can then persuade enough fellow MPs to make them PM. We should stop Americanising our electoral system in this way.

    Rant over... for now. :)

    I did think it was interesting to try them out in 2010 but I think overall you're correct.

    The media love the debates because they get to be the center of attention and make it look like they are calling the shots and making the politicians dance to their tune - look what happened to Theresa when she ducked out of them.

    At times I think the media believe general elections are just about them pushing around politicians... while the public is shut out of the process.

    Voters finally gets their say on 12/12/19 but until then GBP are out in the cold. Which I think is partly why 2015, 2017 and now 2019 general elections have seemed to lackluster.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,644
    So, I just read the Green Party Manifesto, as I assume has every reasonable person in the country.

    First impressions
    92 pages – a bit chunky, but bookmarked to the various sections, which I don’t recall others doing last time, so that’s convenient. No financial tables at the back like last time, which is a shame, but at least they attempt to explain their financing. The title ‘If not now, when?’ seems double edged, since given their likely vote share and seat numbers, are they not implicitly admitting it will be ‘never’ for them and their policies, if it is not now?

    The executive summary of their five major themes (Green New Deal, Remain and Transform, Grow Democracy, The Green Quality of Life Guarantee, and The New Deal for Tax and Spend) is useful and well presented in ensuring it should be easy to remember at least one key detail of each theme even if you don’t get past page 3.

    Inter chapter sections on what elected Greens are delivering is a bit underwhelming, but not a bad idea.

    Overall the theme is being very transformational, although like all parties they are self-righteous. From the forward ‘The Green Party has always been on the right side of history and you can trust us to get the future right too’. Yes, the Green Party are always right.

    Oh, I'm not done.
  • Options
    ChameleonChameleon Posts: 3,886
    I see that #WinForCorbyn is already trending on twitter.

    We live in a post-satire society.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,109

    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    My mum just called her a "junior office girl" :lol:

    Boris = "filthy disgusting b*st*rd"
    Corbyn = "useless idiot"

    :lol:
    Your mother is wrong.

    Johnson is also a useless idiot.

    And Corbyn is also a filthy disgusting bastard.
  • Options
    Barnesian said:

    Ave_it said:

    The key to CON is to get some of the seats we lost to LAB in 2010 and 2015 back (probably won't be Hove or ECA) but maybe places like Crewe, Ipswich, Reading W, even Kensington and Canterbury.

    We are not going to be getting all these Northern seats where we haven't won before although maybe a few like Newcastle UL and Wrexham.

    20 to 25 gains from LAB might be enough!

    I can believe Reading West and Crewe and Nantwich. Derby North should be ok too.

    I’m less confident of Kensington and Canterbury.

    Ipswich, Bristol North West and Croydon Central maybe maybe not.

    Hove, ECA, Enfield Southgate, Portsmouth South and Battersea definitely not.
    Here are my model's latest predictions

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yIHH_ZtcH9w9JF5e8WwYD6QuhOhlVwCO_GboafT6kfc/edit?usp=sharing

    Note that I have dropped the Wales part of my model. It didn't reflect the regional swing and was too harsh on the Tories. I am now using a combination of Baxter, Flavible and MRP for Wales.
    I have made the additive and multiplication models 50/50.
    I have updated with the two polls tonight.

    Con/Lab/LD

    England 311/194/27
    Wales 15/20/1
    Scotland 5/1/5
    Total 331/215/33
    Thanks.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    nichomar said:

    nichomar said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
    Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?

    Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
    Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
    So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.

    Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.

    No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
    You would find any lib dem leader repellent because you see them trying to occupy your entitled space in the ‘any but Tory vote’ spectrum and the bastards get elected to local councils depriving you of your god given right to anoint the next labour candidate. The tories believe the same, the duopoly is all they want to preserve but it will be what it will be. I predict that corbyn will be an even better helper than Michael Foot was to the Tory cause. It’s you’re own fault, nobody else you support him you live with him but at least criticism lib dem policies rather than petty personality slurs.
  • Options

    Banterman said:

    I don't think the mob outside the ITV studio chanting what sounds like "Tory scum" are going to win over any voters to Labour

    I'd dearly love to ram that loudhailer up that scruffy rabbles nose.
    Got a Twitter ban for suggesting something similar to Steve Bray/Dave Allan, now the libdem candidate somewhere in Wales
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,987

    nichomar said:

    nichomar said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
    Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?

    Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
    Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
    So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.

    Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.

    No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
    As has already been explained, the LD vote going down is because of successful tactical voting. It will be going up in LD target seats and dropping rapidly in non-target seats to avoid splitting the remain vote. There are many more non-target seats so the average LD share comes down but hopefully the number of targets seats won by LDs goes up.

    I'm not dismayed by it. It's nothing to do with Jo but a function of successful targeting.
  • Options
    You have to laugh at Richard Burgon. Jezza up there with Attlee
  • Options
    ydoethur said:

    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    My mum just called her a "junior office girl" :lol:

    Boris = "filthy disgusting b*st*rd"
    Corbyn = "useless idiot"

    :lol:
    Your mother is wrong.

    Johnson is also a useless idiot.

    And Corbyn is also a filthy disgusting bastard.
    Swinson isn't a junior office girl? :lol:
  • Options
    eristdooferistdoof Posts: 4,887
    ydoethur said:

    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    My mum just called her a "junior office girl" :lol:

    Boris = "filthy disgusting b*st*rd"
    Corbyn = "useless idiot"

    :lol:
    Your mother is wrong.

    Johnson is also a useless idiot.

    And Corbyn is also a filthy disgusting bastard.
    Then she wasn't wrong, just incomplete.
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    So, I just read the Green Party Manifesto, as I assume has every reasonable person in the country.

    First impressions
    92 pages – a bit chunky, but bookmarked to the various sections, which I don’t recall others doing last time, so that’s convenient. No financial tables at the back like last time, which is a shame, but at least they attempt to explain their financing. The title ‘If not now, when?’ seems double edged, since given their likely vote share and seat numbers, are they not implicitly admitting it will be ‘never’ for them and their policies, if it is not now?

    The executive summary of their five major themes (Green New Deal, Remain and Transform, Grow Democracy, The Green Quality of Life Guarantee, and The New Deal for Tax and Spend) is useful and well presented in ensuring it should be easy to remember at least one key detail of each theme even if you don’t get past page 3.

    Inter chapter sections on what elected Greens are delivering is a bit underwhelming, but not a bad idea.

    Overall the theme is being very transformational, although like all parties they are self-righteous. From the forward ‘The Green Party has always been on the right side of history and you can trust us to get the future right too’. Yes, the Green Party are always right.

    Oh, I'm not done.

    The title is a nod to Primo Levi presumably.
  • Options
    SunnyJimSunnyJim Posts: 1,106
    Banterman said:

    You have to laugh at Richard Burgon. Jezza up there with Attlee

    Comical Ali, just without the grounding in reality.
  • Options

    Can we please all save time by stating now who we think has won.

    I think SuperJo won it, by virtue of not appearing.

    Kate Garraway.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,644
    The Greens make a big play of being the only party we can trust to stand up for remaining part of Europe, for a final say, and tackling reasons why we voted leave. Yet they have a remain alliance, so we can trust some others I guess.

    Green New Deal
    Business will be incentivized to lead the way on the new deal apparently, but not clear how. Power and resources to local government it says, a common ideal, but what if devolved governments and local government do not want to follow the ideals? This section is heavy on promising that there will be huge transformation, and promises 100bn a year for that, but at least in this section its unclear why that amount, and it makes the huge transformation sound very easy. But it’s saying nice things for the most part.

    Good luck with transforming the planning system to make wind and other power generation easier – taking on the NIMBY’s!

    Connect our electricity supply with Europe. I don’t know if we do this to some extent already, or how feasible it is, but it sounds cool.

    Ban fracking and other unconventional forms of fossil fuel extraction, now and forever’. What’s a conventional form of fossil fuel extraction? Mining? Why is that ok because it is conventional?

    All homes to improve insultation. 100,000 new council homes a year (cynic in me says why that number and not a bit more or a bit less? Just that they needed to get to 6 figures to sound good). Secure, lifetime tenancies for the council homes.

    New developments to have safe pedestrian access to shops and schools, or are ‘within 1km of a local rail, tube or tram station, or 500m of a high frequency bus service’. That seems awfully close.

    Going big on ‘a new golden age of train’. But still cautious enough to say railways will be taken into public ownership over a period of 10 years. As predicted stopping the building of new runways and ‘all’ increased road capacity.

    A network of electrical vehicle charging points – that does seem needed.

    Promoting stay at home working - and employers reimbursing working hours heating, electricity and wi fi costs.

    Plenty on farming practices, makes sense given their strength in the SW I’d guess. ‘Legislate for a right to food giving everyone access to healthy, nutritious, locally grown food’ for schools though?

    And the big one – Universal Basic income. Paid to everyone, regardless of employment status. In my experience its people who work on lower incomes who hate this idea, but whatever.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,095
    Barnesian said:

    Ave_it said:

    The key to CON is to get some of the seats we lost to LAB in 2010 and 2015 back (probably won't be Hove or ECA) but maybe places like Crewe, Ipswich, Reading W, even Kensington and Canterbury.

    We are not going to be getting all these Northern seats where we haven't won before although maybe a few like Newcastle UL and Wrexham.

    20 to 25 gains from LAB might be enough!

    I can believe Reading West and Crewe and Nantwich. Derby North should be ok too.

    I’m less confident of Kensington and Canterbury.

    Ipswich, Bristol North West and Croydon Central maybe maybe not.

    Hove, ECA, Enfield Southgate, Portsmouth South and Battersea definitely not.
    Here are my model's latest predictions

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yIHH_ZtcH9w9JF5e8WwYD6QuhOhlVwCO_GboafT6kfc/edit?usp=sharing

    Note that I have dropped the Wales part of my model. It didn't reflect the regional swing and was too harsh on the Tories. I am now using a combination of Baxter, Flavible and MRP for Wales.
    I have made the additive and multiplication models 50/50.
    I have updated with the two polls tonight.

    Con/Lab/LD

    England 311/194/27
    Wales 15/20/1
    Scotland 5/1/5
    Total 331/215/33
    Is that the first time you have predicted a workable Tory majority?
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    Ave_it said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    I invented 'SuperJo' the week before last!
    My mum just called her a "junior office girl" :lol:

    Boris = "filthy disgusting b*st*rd"
    Corbyn = "useless idiot"

    :lol:
    Tell her to vote for the useless idiot he is the only way to stop the filthy disgusting bastard.
    She should vote for the office junior that is neither and shows more potential than the two put together.
  • Options
    If Corbyn does well, this will be the start.

    If he does badly, it might well be the end.

    Although I think Johnson running away from one of the debates isn't a great idea.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    edited November 2019

    If Corbyn does well, this will be the start.

    If he does badly, it might well be the end.

    Although I think Johnson running away from one of the debates isn't a great idea.

    Given how many were planned, I doubt people will miss him in one.
  • Options
    alb1onalb1on Posts: 698

    GIN1138 said:

    My TV is fooked my Green has gone grey.

    Must be the oddest PEB so far. Caroline Lucas actually looked somewhat scary! :open_mouth:
    Different. Black and white. Great performance. Superb.

    Agreed. It is difficult to think what more she could have done to drive voters to either Lab or LDs.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,294
    edited November 2019
    Paging @Scrapheap_as_was

    Poch sacked.

    https://twitter.com/SpursOfficial/status/1196874518951796736

    Inevitable given he's less successful than George Graham and Juande Ramos
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,644
    Remain and Transform
    Yawn – ‘the social contract is broken and the power game is rigged’. Student Common room stuff.

    I get what they are saying about Leave not fixing people’s issues, but it seems very convenient that the Greens say they recognize why people voted for Brexit, and not one of them is that some people wanted to leave. The Greens channeling Daenerys Targaryen – people don’t know their own minds, but the Greens do.

    Live streaming of meetings of the European Central Bank – now that’ll be a thrill ride! But a lot of these EU wide plans (there's loads to reform the EU) are not in the Greens’ power. But they do agree with not doing the Strasbourg move.

    Reducing migration in the long term’. Never expected to see that. Needs EU wide minimum income guarantee, EU wide minimum wages, just for starters. The latter sounds impossible to me.

    FPTP to go, of course, but for local councils they want all councils to vote every 2 years to elect 50% of its members. I think voting by thirds is dumb, and this is a bit better I guess, but forcing those that elect every 4 years to change seems at odds with their words on devolving things to localities, to trust them. Also to force them to move from Cabinet systems to Committee systems. Again, not a problem wanting more Committee systems back, but ‘requiring’ it?

    Referendum on a Cornish assembly

    Chancellor of the Exchequer to be supplanted from No. 11 by a Carbon Chancellor

    Scrap the Home Office. Rename the Ministry of Defence to the Ministry for Security and Peace.

    Overhaul of parliamentary language to make it self explanatory – this is just waffle. You can make things easier, I am sure, but its passing legislation, it’s going to get a bit legalistic at times.

    Green Quality of life Guarantee
    I’m starting to flag now, but its basically money money money for everyone. No one to be paid more than 10x that of the lowest paid worker, and no bonus more than the annual salary of the lowest paid worker.

    Replacing Ofsted.

    Not abolishing private schools, which surprises me.

    Windrush day – a new bank holiday to celebrate migration.

    New press regime to allow women to make complaints about media coverage encouraging misogyny.

    Support employers to explire the benefits of offering menstruation and menopausal leave to workers – surprised this is not going to be a requirement.

    Pardon small scale drug dealers. Cannabis legal, of course.

    New deal for tax and spend

    Council tax and business rates abolished – Land Value Tax . charge landowner a proportion of capital value of the land each year (est at 1.4% of current values)

    Trident, new roads, airports, HS2 axed

    Says extra operational expenditure of 141.5bn a year. Not sure that adds up given the 100bn a year on Green new deal.

    Done.
  • Options
    Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411

    Barnesian said:

    Ave_it said:

    The key to CON is to get some of the seats we lost to LAB in 2010 and 2015 back (probably won't be Hove or ECA) but maybe places like Crewe, Ipswich, Reading W, even Kensington and Canterbury.

    We are not going to be getting all these Northern seats where we haven't won before although maybe a few like Newcastle UL and Wrexham.

    20 to 25 gains from LAB might be enough!

    I can believe Reading West and Crewe and Nantwich. Derby North should be ok too.

    I’m less confident of Kensington and Canterbury.

    Ipswich, Bristol North West and Croydon Central maybe maybe not.

    Hove, ECA, Enfield Southgate, Portsmouth South and Battersea definitely not.
    Here are my model's latest predictions

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yIHH_ZtcH9w9JF5e8WwYD6QuhOhlVwCO_GboafT6kfc/edit?usp=sharing

    Note that I have dropped the Wales part of my model. It didn't reflect the regional swing and was too harsh on the Tories. I am now using a combination of Baxter, Flavible and MRP for Wales.
    I have made the additive and multiplication models 50/50.
    I have updated with the two polls tonight.

    Con/Lab/LD

    England 311/194/27
    Wales 15/20/1
    Scotland 5/1/5
    Total 331/215/33
    Is that the first time you have predicted a workable Tory majority?
    Could be CON maj 150 at 9pm!
  • Options
    BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 7,987

    Barnesian said:

    Ave_it said:

    The key to CON is to get some of the seats we lost to LAB in 2010 and 2015 back (probably won't be Hove or ECA) but maybe places like Crewe, Ipswich, Reading W, even Kensington and Canterbury.

    We are not going to be getting all these Northern seats where we haven't won before although maybe a few like Newcastle UL and Wrexham.

    20 to 25 gains from LAB might be enough!

    I can believe Reading West and Crewe and Nantwich. Derby North should be ok too.

    I’m less confident of Kensington and Canterbury.

    Ipswich, Bristol North West and Croydon Central maybe maybe not.

    Hove, ECA, Enfield Southgate, Portsmouth South and Battersea definitely not.
    Here are my model's latest predictions

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yIHH_ZtcH9w9JF5e8WwYD6QuhOhlVwCO_GboafT6kfc/edit?usp=sharing

    Note that I have dropped the Wales part of my model. It didn't reflect the regional swing and was too harsh on the Tories. I am now using a combination of Baxter, Flavible and MRP for Wales.
    I have made the additive and multiplication models 50/50.
    I have updated with the two polls tonight.

    Con/Lab/LD

    England 311/194/27
    Wales 15/20/1
    Scotland 5/1/5
    Total 331/215/33
    Is that the first time you have predicted a workable Tory majority?
    Yes. It's because of the Welsh effect rather than polling movement.
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    The Greens make a big play of being the only party we can trust to stand up for remaining part of Europe, for a final say, and tackling reasons why we voted leave. Yet they have a remain alliance, so we can trust some others I guess.

    Green New Deal
    Business will be incentivized to lead the way on the new deal apparently, but not clear how. Power and resources to local government it says, a common ideal, but what if devolved governments and local government do not want to follow the ideals? This section is heavy on promising that there will be huge transformation, and promises 100bn a year for that, but at least in this section its unclear why that amount, and it makes the huge transformation sound very easy. But it’s saying nice things for the most part.

    Good luck with transforming the planning system to make wind and other power generation easier – taking on the NIMBY’s!

    Connect our electricity supply with Europe. I don’t know if we do this to some extent already, or how feasible it is, but it sounds cool.

    Ban fracking and other unconventional forms of fossil fuel extraction, now and forever’. What’s a conventional form of fossil fuel extraction? Mining? Why is that ok because it is conventional?

    All homes to improve insultation. 100,000 new council homes a year (cynic in me says why that number and not a bit more or a bit less? Just that they needed to get to 6 figures to sound good). Secure, lifetime tenancies for the council homes.

    New developments to have safe pedestrian access to shops and schools, or are ‘within 1km of a local rail, tube or tram station, or 500m of a high frequency bus service’. That seems awfully close.

    Going big on ‘a new golden age of train’. But still cautious enough to say railways will be taken into public ownership over a period of 10 years. As predicted stopping the building of new runways and ‘all’ increased road capacity.

    A network of electrical vehicle charging points – that does seem needed.

    Promoting stay at home working - and employers reimbursing working hours heating, electricity and wi fi costs.

    Plenty on farming practices, makes sense given their strength in the SW I’d guess. ‘Legislate for a right to food giving everyone access to healthy, nutritious, locally grown food’ for schools though?

    And the big one – Universal Basic income. Paid to everyone, regardless of employment status. In my experience its people who work on lower incomes who hate this idea, but whatever.

    On energy and europe connections:

    https://selectra.co.uk/energy/news/policy/brexit-energy
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,826
    I see Jester was posing as south paw earlier.

    We all know he is North Poor

    South Rich
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,644

    kle4 said:

    So, I just read the Green Party Manifesto, as I assume has every reasonable person in the country.

    First impressions
    92 pages – a bit chunky, but bookmarked to the various sections, which I don’t recall others doing last time, so that’s convenient. No financial tables at the back like last time, which is a shame, but at least they attempt to explain their financing. The title ‘If not now, when?’ seems double edged, since given their likely vote share and seat numbers, are they not implicitly admitting it will be ‘never’ for them and their policies, if it is not now?

    The executive summary of their five major themes (Green New Deal, Remain and Transform, Grow Democracy, The Green Quality of Life Guarantee, and The New Deal for Tax and Spend) is useful and well presented in ensuring it should be easy to remember at least one key detail of each theme even if you don’t get past page 3.

    Inter chapter sections on what elected Greens are delivering is a bit underwhelming, but not a bad idea.

    Overall the theme is being very transformational, although like all parties they are self-righteous. From the forward ‘The Green Party has always been on the right side of history and you can trust us to get the future right too’. Yes, the Green Party are always right.

    Oh, I'm not done.

    The title is a nod to Primo Levi presumably.
    If you say so. I assumed it to be a quote, or allusion, but it still makes me think about the answer, given despite their pretensions they are not the voice of the people when they get such limited votes.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793

    If Corbyn does well, this will be the start.

    If he does badly, it might well be the end.

    Although I think Johnson running away from one of the debates isn't a great idea.

    Corbyn will do well (be seen widely to have "won") and it will make absolutely no difference whatsoever.
  • Options
    Why s it clashing with Wales match???
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Barnesian said:

    nichomar said:

    nichomar said:

    Hence forth Tory Swinson is renamed super Jo as she has managed to halve LD VI in a couple of months.

    Long may she reign.

    Well at least she doesn't help the tories as much as corbyn whch i is the single reason Johnson is heading for a majority.
    Why are LDs down from 22 to 12?

    Nothing to do with Super Jo or Jezza?
    Totally due to the sheer horror that many people feel about corbyn getting into power, you should really question why you want to lose elections and fail the people you pretend to want to help because losing with a true socialist platform is more important than actually changing people’s lives. Labour sub 200 big Tory majority all because of corbyn and his clique.
    So since October LD down from 22 to 12 and its all Corbyns fault. At least your consistent.

    Your leader is a voter repellent hypocritical lightweight you should get rid and get Layla in.

    No way LD vote would be nose diving faster than a Beoing 737 Max without Super Jo.
    As has already been explained, the LD vote going down is because of successful tactical voting. It will be going up in LD target seats and dropping rapidly in non-target seats to avoid splitting the remain vote. There are many more non-target seats so the average LD share comes down but hopefully the number of targets seats won by LDs goes up.

    I'm not dismayed by it. It's nothing to do with Jo but a function of successful targeting.
    Let them believe what they want, the continued vitriol hatred from both left and right has sustained me for 36 years, we get in their way it destroys their key messages and it disrupts their ability to award minions with council seats in return for campaigning effort and funding.
  • Options

    Can I please say for the record at this point that I think these debates are a complete waste of time, they add nothing to the sum of knowledge about the candidates, they change very few people's minds and they personalise the whole election in a way I think is counter productive. They also propagate the lie that we are voting for a party or a PM rather than an individual representative.

    These are not potential presidents, they are simply individuals seeking election in their constituencies and hoping that they can then persuade enough fellow MPs to make them PM. We should stop Americanising our electoral system in this way.

    Rant over... for now. :)

    Another thing to blame on Brown. He opened Pandora’s box in agreeing to do the debates in 2010, hoping that something would turn up that would save him. Before then PMs had maintained they would never debate, generally citing the reasons you give above.
  • Options

    Why s it clashing with Wales match???

    Nobody cares.
This discussion has been closed.